Perioperative bleeding and thrombotic risks in patients with Von Willebrand disease

Perioperative hemostasis management in patients with von Willebrand disease: an institutional experience

OBJECTIVES

Patients with von Willebrand disease (vWD) undergoing surgery are routinely treated with von Willebrand factor (vWF)/factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate to control bleeding risk, but consensus is lacking on optimal dosing. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tailored doses of vWF/FVIII concentrate according to intervention-associated bleeding risk in vWD patients undergoing surgery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of vWD patients who underwent surgical procedures at a haemophilia centre. Patients received vWF/FVIII concentrate with dosage and duration of treatment dependent on intervention type (dental, gynaecological, abdominal or orthopaedic/traumatic) and bleeding risk (moderate/high).

RESULTS

Eighty-three surgical procedures (42 patients) were included. Median preoperative loading doses of vWF/FVIII concentrate were 29.9 IU/kg and 35.7 IU/kg for interventions with moderate ( n  = 16) or high ( n  = 67) bleeding risk, respectively. The median perioperative dose was highest in orthopaedic or trauma-related surgery (140 IU/kg) and lowest in dental or gynaecological interventions (76.4 IU/kg and 80.0 IU/kg, respectively). During follow-up, no bleeding or other complications were observed in 95% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Individually tailored doses of vWF/FVIII concentrate according to intervention-associated bleeding risk were effective in preventing postoperative bleeding, with few complications observed. These doses may be used as guidance in routine clinical care.

Management of severe peri-operative bleeding: Guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care: Second update 2022

BACKGROUND

Management of peri-operative bleeding is complex and involves multiple assessment tools and strategies to ensure optimal patient care with the goal of reducing morbidity and mortality. These updated guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) aim to provide an evidence-based set of recommendations for healthcare professionals to help ensure improved clinical management.

DESIGN

A systematic literature search from 2015 to 2021 of several electronic databases was performed without language restrictions. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies and to formulate recommendations. A Delphi methodology was used to prepare a clinical practice guideline.

RESULTS

These searches identified 137 999 articles. All articles were assessed, and the existing 2017 guidelines were revised to incorporate new evidence. Sixteen recommendations derived from the systematic literature search, and four clinical guidances retained from previous ESAIC guidelines were formulated. Using the Delphi process on 253 sentences of guidance, strong consensus (>90% agreement) was achieved in 97% and consensus (75 to 90% agreement) in 3%.

DISCUSSION

Peri-operative bleeding management encompasses the patient's journey from the pre-operative state through the postoperative period. Along this journey, many features of the patient's pre-operative coagulation status, underlying comorbidities, general health and the procedures that they are undergoing need to be taken into account. Due to the many important aspects in peri-operative nontrauma bleeding management, guidance as to how best approach and treat each individual patient are key. Understanding which therapeutic approaches are most valuable at each timepoint can only enhance patient care, ensuring the best outcomes by reducing blood loss and, therefore, overall morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSION

All healthcare professionals involved in the management of patients at risk for surgical bleeding should be aware of the current therapeutic options and approaches that are available to them. These guidelines aim to provide specific guidance for bleeding management in a variety of clinical situations.

Economic Burden Associated with Major Surgery in Patients with von Willebrand Disease: A United States Retrospective Administrative Database Analysis

Purpose

To estimate the incremental economic burden of major surgeries in patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD).

Patients and Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of the IBM Health MarketScan^® database (2008–2018). Patients with at least two healthcare visits for VWD in the database who had undergone at least one major surgery unrelated to VWD (identified via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revisions procedure codes) were included. Patients without VWD with major surgeries were selected from a 1% random database sample. All patients had ≥12 months of continuous healthcare plan enrollment before and following their first major surgery. Patients with VWD were matched (1:1) with patients without VWD using propensity score matching. Regression models compared healthcare resource utilization and costs between the matched cohorts over a 12-month period after patients’ index major surgery.

Results

After propensity score matching, 2972 pairs were selected. Musculoskeletal and digestive surgeries were the two most common major surgeries (patients with VWD, 39.6% and 25.0%; without VWD, 37.1% and 23.4%, respectively). Patients with VWD were significantly more likely (p<0.0001) to have an inpatient admission (odds ratio = 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52–1.92) or emergency room visit (odds ratio = 1.41; 95% CI 1.25–1.59) than patients without VWD. The numbers of inpatient admissions (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.47; 95% CI 1.35–1.60), emergency room visits (IRR = 1.44; 95% CI 1.31–1.59), and outpatient visits (IRR = 1.16; 95% CI 1.11–1.21) per patient were also significantly greater for patients with VWD than for those without VWD (p<0.0001). Patients with VWD incurred significantly higher (p<0.0001) total healthcare costs (medical and pharmacy) per patient than patients without VWD ($50,733.89 versus $30,154.84, respectively).

Conclusion

Healthcare resource utilization and associated costs among patients undergoing major surgeries were significantly higher for those with VWD than for patients without VWD.

Perioperative Management of Orthopaedic Patients with Hematologic Disorders: A Critical Analysis Review

Perioperative management of orthopaedic patients with a hematologic disorder is a complex endeavor that requires a multidisciplinary team-based approach. A team composed of an experienced orthopaedic surgeon, an anesthesiologist, and a hematologist is necessary to achieve optimal outcomes. Patients with hemophilia and other complex hematologic disorders should be managed at, or in consultation with a hematologist at, a comprehensive hemophilia center. Bleeding disorders and inherited thrombophilia present unique challenges for the perioperative management of orthopaedic surgery. Comprehensive preoperative planning and familiarity with treatment guidelines can help to minimize these risks. Knowledge of the disease processes outlined in this article will provide orthopaedic surgeons with the requisite background knowledge that is needed to initiate safe and effective treatment strategies involving this high-risk patient population.

Rare Co-occurrence of Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Type 2B von Willebrand Disease: Implications for Endoscopic Surveillance and Esophageal Dilation

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and type 2B von Willebrand disease (vWD) are both rare diseases, and the co-occurrence is unlikely. Patients with EoE often need recurrent endoscopic dilations and esophageal biopsies, and the safety of these procedures in the setting of bleeding disorders is not well described in the literature. We describe successful management strategies in a patient with co-existing EoE and type 2B vWD who required multiple dilations and biopsies. This approach might be used for patients with other esophageal disorders and type 2B vWD as well.