“Minor” stroke: not a minor, still open question

Navigating the waters of acute minor stroke therapies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although acute minor stroke often presents with mild symptoms, such as unilateral limb weakness, mild aphasia, dizziness, or mild cognitive impairment, untreated outcomes could be poor, and optimal treatment methods are still debated.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to identify the optimum treatment for minor strokes with a network meta-analysis.

METHODS

Studies from Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane Library were considered. Randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies on ischemic stroke with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score no more than 5, explicit intravenous thrombolysis, or antiplatelet therapy were included. Efficacy outcome was measured by 3-month modified Rankin scale (mRS), with primary outcome defined as mRS score of 0 to 1 and secondary outcome defined as mRS score of 0 to 2. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality at 3 months.

RESULTS

Nine studies encompassing 10 665 patients were meta-analyzed. Aspirin plus clopidogrel (n = 4283) was more strongly associated with primary outcome than aspirin (n = 2128; odds ratio [OR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.04∼1.54) and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA; n = 1840; OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.00∼1.50). Aspirin plus clopidogrel (n = 3933) also had a lower sICH risk than rt-PA (n = 2538; OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.04∼0.30) and tenecteplase (n = 194; OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03∼0.68), as well as a lower mortality than aspirin alone (n = 830; OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10∼0.71). Patients treated with aspirin (n = 815) also had a lower sICH risk than rt-PA (n = 2538; OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.04∼0.95).

CONCLUSION

Dual antiplatelet therapy based on aspirin and clopidogrel offers balanced efficacy and safety, positioning it as a potentially optimal treatment for minor stroke. rt-PA showed comparable efficacy, while its associated risks were more pronounced.

Cognitive impairment after intravenous thrombolysis in mild stroke: assessment of cerebral blood flow covariance network

Background

Mild stroke may lead to cognitive impairment, and it remains unclear whether intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) can mitigate cognitive deficits. This study investigates whether IVT can help alleviate cognitive function impairment in patients and further explores changes in the topological properties of cerebral blood flow (CBF) networks.

Methods

This observational study prospectively enrolled 94 patients with acute mild ischemic stroke (44 IVT vs. 50 non-IVT) from two hospitals. A battery of neuropsychological tests and arterial spin labeling were performed to evaluate their cognitive functioning and CBF in 116 brain regions. Voxel-wise CBF was compared between patients and health controls. The CBF covariance network of patients was constructed by calculating across-subject CBF covariance among 116 brain regions. Network properties were calculated and compared between IVT and no-IVT groups.

Results

The mild stroke group demonstrated significantly lower Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores compared to healthy controls (p < 0.001). Patients receiving IVT showed superior performance on the Trail Making Test-B (p = 0.043), Clock Drawing Test (p = 0.001), and Verbal Fluency Test (p = 0.033). Multivariate regression analysis adjusted for covariates demonstrated significant associations between IVT and cognitive outcomes: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (β = 2.85; 95% CI, 0.64-5.13), Trail Making Test-A (β = -16.90; 95% CI, -32.89--0.90), Trail Making Test-B (β = -43.27; 95% CI, -78.78--7.76), Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised total recall (β = 3.57; 95% CI, 1.36-5.78), HVLT-R delayed recall (β = 1.53; 95% CI, 0.43-2.63), Clock Drawing Test (β = 7.09; 95% CI, 2.40-11.79), and Verbal Fluency Test (β = 3.00; 95% CI, 1.33-4.68). IVT patients exhibited higher small-worldness, clustering coefficient, and global efficiency of the network compared to non-IVT patients.

Conclusion

Intravenous thrombolysis demonstrated early cognitive benefits across multiple domains in patients with mild stroke. Improvement in the brain CBF covariance network properties may be the underlying mechanism.

Safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 93,057 minor stroke patients

BACKGROUND

The definition of minor ischemic stroke (MIS) is a topic of debate, however, the most accepted definition is a stroke with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≤ 5. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is a crucial treatment option for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) including: alteplase, recombinant human tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-tPA), and the recently approved tenecteplase. However, there is a debate regarding its safety and efficacy. Therefore, our objective was to determine the safety and efficacy of IVT in treating minor stroke patients (NIHSS ≤ 5).

METHODS

Using the search strategy assigned which was based on three keywords: "mild" or "minor", "stroke", and "intravenous thrombolysis", we searched for eligible articles on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus from inception till 10th January 2024. We conducted this meta-analysis using the random effect model to account for the heterogeneity among the studies. For the dichotomous variables, we calculated the odds ratio (OR) from the event and total of these variables. While for the continuous variables, we calculated the mean difference (MD) of these variables. Pooling of OR for the occurrence of events was also conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 21 articles with 93,057 patients with MIS were included. The mean age of the participants ranged from 62.3 to 79.6. Most of the included patients had comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, previous stroke, smoking, atrial fibrillation, and hyperlipidemia. Of these, 10,850 received IVT while 82,207 did not. The use of IVT was statistically significant associated with 90-day modified Rankin score (mRs) 0-1 when compared with control with OR of 1.67 (95%CI: 1.46, 1.91, p < 0.00001) and was statistically significantly associated with improvement of NIHSS on discharge with OR of 2.19 (95%CI: 1.56, 3.08, p < 0.00001). In terms of safety outcomes, IVT has proven a safe profile, as there was no significant difference in intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and mortality rates between the IVT and control groups with OR of 1.75 (95CI: 0.95, 3.23, p = 0.07) and 0.93 (95%CI: 0.77, 1.11, p = 0.41), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although some studies have not found any benefits of IVT in MIS patients, a substantial body of literature strongly endorses IVT as an effective and safe treatment for MIS. IVT has been shown to improve the mRs and NIHSS scores at the 90-day mark without an increased risk of ICH or mortality.

Intravenous Alteplase Versus Best Medical Therapy for Patients With Minor Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of thrombolysis (IVT) in minor stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 0-5) remains inconclusive. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of IVT with best medical therapy (BMT) by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to obtain articles related to IVT in minor stroke from inception until August 10, 2023. The primary outcome was an excellent functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1 at 90 days. The associations were calculated for the overall and preformulated subgroups by using the odds ratios (ORs). This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023445856).

RESULTS

A total of 20 high-quality studies, comprised of 13 397 patients with acute minor ischemic stroke, were included. There were no significant differences observed in the modified Rankin Scale scores of 0 to 1 (OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.89-1.37]) and 0 to 2 (OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.95-1.43]), mortality rates (OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.39-1.15]), recurrent stroke (OR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.57-1.38]), and recurrent ischemic stroke (OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.68-1.73]) between the IVT and BMT group. There were differences between the IVT group and the BMT group in terms of early neurological deterioration (OR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.17-2.80]), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 7.48 [95% CI, 3.55-15.76]), and hemorrhagic transformation (OR, 4.73 [95% CI, 2.40-9.34]). Comparison of modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1 remained unchanged in subgroup patients with nondisabling deficits or compared with those using antiplatelets.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that IVT does not yield significant improvement in the functional prognosis of patients with acute minor ischemic stroke. Additionally, it is associated with an increased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage when compared with the BMT. Moreover, IVT may not have superiority over BMT in patients with nondisabling deficits or those using antiplatelets.

Developing a Nomogram to Predict the Probability of Subsequent Vascular Events at 6-Month in Chinese Patients with Minor Ischemic Stroke

Purpose

To develop a nomogram to predict the risk of subsequent vascular events (SVE) at 6-month in Chinese patients with minor ischemic stroke (MIS).

Patients and Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of 260 MIS patients, which were randomly divided into a derivation set (193 cases) and a verification set (67 cases) at a ratio of 3:1. Multi-factor logistic regression was used to construct a predictive model of SVE from the derivation set and verify it in the verification set.

Results

Finally, there were 51 cases (19.6%) of SVE in 260 MIS cases. Age, fasting blood glucose, metabolic syndrome, number of lesions found on MRI, and the infarct size were used to construct the prediction model and nomogram. The AUC in the derivation set was 0.901, with a sensitivity of 0.795, a specificity of 0.877, a positive likelihood ratio of 6.443, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.234. The AUC in the verification set was 0.897, which was not significantly different from the derivation set (P = 0.937). The predictive model based on clinical parameters has good diagnostic efficiency and robustness.

Conclusion

The nomogram can provide personalized predictions for the 6-month SVE risk in Chinese MIS patients.

Relationship between fasting blood glucose and subsequent vascular events in Chinese patients with mild ischaemic stroke: a cohort study

Objective

To characterise the relationship between fasting blood glucose (FBG) and the incidence of subsequent vascular events (SVE) during the 6 months following a mild ischaemic stroke (MIS) in Chinese patients.

Methods

Data from patients with MIS were retrospectively analysed. The primary endpoint was an SVE during the 6-month follow-up period. The participants were allocated to three groups (tertiles), according to their FBG concentration.

Results

Of the 260 participants, 51 (19.6%) reported an SVE during the follow-up period. The incidence of SVE significantly differed among the tertiles of FBG. The odds ratio (OR) was 2.361 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.551–3.594) for FBG as a continuous variable and that for FBG categorised according to tertile was 13.30 (95% CI: 3.519–50.322) in the fully adjusted model. Curve fitting showed that the incidence of SVE gradually increased with increasing FBG, with the highest tertile showing the highest mean incidence (46.7%; 95% CI: 16.2%–79.9%). In addition, participants with or without diabetes mellitus, hypertension, headache, dizziness, mild cognitive impairment or anterior circulation artery lesion showed similar associations between FBG and the incidence of SVE.

Conclusion

FBG is an independent predictor of 6-month SVE risk in Chinese patients with MIS.

Effect of rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis on the prognosis of patients with minor ischemic stroke

AIMS

The evidence of rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis in patients with minor ischemic stroke (MIS) is still controversial. This study aims to investigate the effect of rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis on the prognosis of patients with MIS.

METHODS

We continuously enrolled and analyzed patients with MIS admitted into our hospital within 24 h after symptom onset between January 2016 and December 2018, including 96 patients received intravenous thrombolysis within 4.5 h after symptom onset and 84 patients not received intravenous thrombolysis. A favorable long-term outcome was a 90-day mRS score of 0-1. Good short-term outcome was a 7-day NIHSS score of 0 or less than NIHSS onset.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences between two groups of patients' age, gender, history of hypertension, coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, smoking, drinking, and baseline NIHSS score. Patients with history of stroke (22.62% vs. 10.42%, p < 0.05) and diabetes (46.43% vs. 22.92%, p = 0.01) were higher in group of non-thrombolysis. The difference of NIHSS score after 7 days was statistically different between the two groups (p < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in 90-day mRS score. Logistic regression analysis indicated that the prognosis of patients was correlated with neutrophil ratio and CRP at admission.

CONCLUSION

Patients with MIS received intravenous thrombolysis may be associated with earlier neurological improvement, but might has no significant effect on long-term prognosis. The level of neutrophil ratio and CRP at admission are risk factors determining the prognosis, which requires further research.