Cerebral infarction and in-hospital mortality for patients admitted to hospital with intracardiac thrombus: insights from the National Inpatient Sample

Comparison of embolic risk in left ventricular thrombus between nonischemic and ischemic cardiomyopathy: A nationwide database analysis

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular (LV) thrombus is not common but poses significant risks of embolic stroke or systemic embolism. However, the distinction in embolic risk between nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) remains unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In total, 2738 LV thrombus patients from the JROAD-DPC (Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Diseases Diagnosis Procedure Combination) database were included. Among these patients, 1037 patients were analyzed, with 826 (79.7%) having ICM and 211 with NICM (20.3%). Within the NICM group, the distribution was as follows: dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM; 41.2%), takotsubo cardiomyopathy (27.0%), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (18.0%), and other causes (13.8%). The primary outcome was a composite of embolic stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) during hospitalization. The ICM and NICM groups showed no significant difference in the primary outcome (5.8% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.34). Among NICM, SSE occurred in 12.6% of patients with DCM, 7.0% with takotsubo cardiomyopathy, and 2.6% with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for SSE revealed an odds ratio of 1.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-2.7, p = 0.37) for NICM compared to ICM. However, DCM exhibited a higher adjusted odds ratio for SSE compared to ICM (2.6, 95% CI 1.2-6.0, p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide shows comparable rates of embolic events between ICM and NICM in LV thrombus patients, with DCM posing a greater risk of SSE than ICM. The findings emphasize the importance of assessing the specific cause of heart disease in NICM, within LV thrombus management strategies.

Structural Complications Following ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample 2016 to 2020

ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a life-threatening emergency that can result in cardiac structural complications without timely revascularization. A retrospective study from the National Inpatient Sample included all patients with a diagnosis of STEMI between 2016 and 2020. Primary outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LoS), and healthcare costs for patients with and without structural complications. There were 994,300 hospital admissions included in the analysis (median age 64 years and 32.2% female). Structural complications occurred in 0.78% of patients. There was a three-fold increase in patients with cardiogenic shock (41.6% vs. 13.6%) and in-hospital mortality (30.6% vs. 10.7%) in the group with structural complications. The median LoS was longer (5 days vs. 3 days), and the median cost was significantly greater (USD 32,436 vs. USD 20,241) for patients with structural complications. After adjustments, in-hospital mortality was significantly greater for patients with structural complications (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.73-2.30), and both LoS and costs were greater. There was a significant increase in mortality with ruptured cardiac wall (OR 9.16, 95% CI 5.91-14.20), hemopericardium (OR 3.20, 95% CI 1.91-5.35), and ventricular septal rupture (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.98-3.35) compared with those with no complication. In conclusion, structural complications in STEMI patients are rare but potentially catastrophic events.