Venous thromboembolism and bleeding after hepatectomy: role and impact of risk adjusted prophylaxis

Risk factors associated with venous thromboembolism after hepatectomy in oncology patients

BACKGROUND

Liver resection increases venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk due to malignancy-related hyper-coagulopathy and surgical inflammation. Current guidelines recommend early post-operative and extended pharmacologic prophylaxis for all patients but lack stratification by patient or surgical factors. Despite these guidelines, surgeon preferences influence prophylaxis practices. This study aimed to identify clinical factors associated with VTE following liver resection.

METHODS

Using data from the Hemorrhage During Liver Resection (HeLiX) trial, a randomized clinical trial of patients undergoing liver resection for cancer, univariate comparisons and logistic regression were performed.

RESULTS

Study cohort VTE incidence was 4.1 %. Multivariable analysis identified major liver resection (odds ratio (OR) 2.59, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.38-5.03) and higher estimated blood loss (EBL) (OR 1.14 per 500 mL increase, 95 % CI 1.03-1.26) as associated with increased risk. Surgical duration (OR 1.14 per hour increase, 95 % CI 0.95-1.34) and use of tranexamic acid (OR 1.77, 95 % CI 0.98-3.27) did not reach statistical significance. VTE rate was highly dependent on extent of resection (1-2 segments, 1.7 %; 3-4 segments, 5.4 %; >4 segments, 6.7 %).

CONCLUSION

Major resection and increased EBL are associated with higher risk of VTE. These patients may warrant more intensive prophylax compared to those having minor resections with minimal blood loss.

Caprini guideline indicated venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis among inpatient surgical patients: are there racial/ethnic differences in practice patterns and outcomes?

BACKGROUND

While racial disparity in surgical mortality due to venous thromboembolism (VTE) has improved, a gap persists. Our study aim was to determine differences in VTE prevention practices and their impact on outcomes among racial surgical cohorts.

METHODS

Elective surgeries performed between 1.1.2016 and 5.31.2021 were included. Racial/ethnic cohorts were propensity-matched 1:1 to non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients, and outcomes were compared using unadjusted logistic regression. Match cohort balance was assessed using absolute standardized mean differences and linear model analysis of variance (ANOVA). Pearson's Chi-square tests evaluated bi-variate associations. Conditional logistic regression to compare outcomes between matched groups. Odds ratios, 95 ​% confidence intervals, and p-values are reported. Analyses were performed using R version 4.1.2 and the R package Matchit.

RESULTS

Non-Hispanic other race (NHOR) (vs. NHW) patients were less likely to receive inpatient prophylaxis (OR 0.86, CI:0.76-0.98). Appropriate prophylaxis resulted in similar VTE for NHB (p ​= ​0.71) and Hispanic (p ​= ​0.06), compared to NHW patients. Inpatient bleeding was higher in Hispanic patients with a higher likelihood of receiving appropriate prophylaxis (OR 1.94, CI:1.16-3.32) and NHOR patients with a lower likelihood (OR 1.90, CI:1.10-3.36) CONCLUSION: Postoperative VTE was similar for minority patients receiving appropriate prophylaxis, compared to NHW patients. Inpatient bleeding was more likely in Hispanic and NHOR patients but may not be related to receiving appropriate prophylaxis. NHOR patients were less likely to receive inpatient thromboprophylaxis.

Randomized, controlled, multi-center phase II study of postoperative enoxaparin treatment for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing surgery for hepatobiliary-pancreatic malignancies

Purpose

Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk is pronounced after abdominal cancer surgery. Enoxaparin shows promise in preventing VTE in gastrointestinal, gynecological, and urological cancers, but its application after surgery for hepatobiliary-pancreatic malignancy has been under-evaluated due to bleeding concerns. We confirmed the safety of enoxaparin administration in patients undergoing curative hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery for malignancies in a prospective, multi-center, phase I study.

Methods

The study was conducted from April 2015 to May 2021 across eight specialized centers. Patients (n = 262) were randomized to enoxaparin prophylaxis given postoperatively for 8 days (n = 131) or control (n = 131). The primary endpoint was the efficacy in reducing VTE. Secondary endpoints examined safety.

Results

The full analysis set included 259 patients (131 control, 129 enoxaparin). The per-protocol population included 233 patients (117 control, 116 enoxaparin). Most cases were hepatic malignancies (111 control, 111 enoxaparin). The median administration duration of enoxaparin was 7 days, with 92% receiving 4000 units/day. Despite a reduction in the relative risk (RR) of VTE due to postoperative enoxaparin administration, the results were not significant (control: four cases, 3.4% vs. treatment: two cases, 1.7%; RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.09-2.70; p = 0.6834). No significant difference was found in the incidence of bleeding events (control: five cases, 4.3% vs. treatment: five cases, 4.3%, RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.53-1.89; p = 1.0000).

Conclusions

The perioperative administration of enoxaparin in hepatobiliary-pancreatic malignancies is feasible and safe. However, further case accumulation and investigation are necessary to assess its potential in reducing the occurrence of VTE.

Analysis of Related Influencing Factors of Portal Vein Thrombosis After Hepatectomy

Purpose: To analyze the related factors of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after hepatectomy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was made on 1029 patients who underwent partial hepatectomy in the first affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from March 2018 to March 2023, including PVT group (n = 24) and non-PVT group (n = 1005). The general and clinical data of the two groups were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the clinical information of the two groups. Result: The proportion of preoperative hepatitis B, liver cirrhosis, ascites, intraoperative blood transfusion, postoperative hemostatic drugs, preoperative prothrombin time, intraoperative portal occlusion time, operation time, international standardized ratio of prothrombin time on the first day after operation, D-dimer on the first day after operation, fibrin degradation products on the first day after operation and postoperative hospital stay in the PVT group were all higher than those in the control group (P < .05). The preoperative platelet and albumin in the PVT group were lower than those in the control group. Intraoperative blood transfusion, liver cirrhosis, ascites, international standardized ratio of postoperative prothrombin time, postoperative fibrin degradation products, hilar occlusion time and albumin were independent risk factors for PVT. Conclusion: There are many influencing factors of PVT after hepatectomy. Clinical intervention should be taken to reduce PVT. Clinical Registration Number: K2023-348.