The rate of substitution from η6-arene ruthenium(II) complexes

Disruption of the Microtubule Network and Inhibition of VEGFR2 Phosphorylation by Cytotoxic N,O-Coordinated Pt(II) and Ru(II) Complexes of Trimethoxy Aniline-Based Schiff Bases

Platinum-based complexes are one of the most successful chemotherapeutic agents having a significant ground in cancer chemotherapy despite their side effects. During the past few decades, Ru(II) complexes have been emerging as efficient alternatives owing to their promising activities against platinum-resistant cancer. The pathway of action, lipophilicity, and cytotoxicity of a Pt or Ru complex may be tuned by varying the attached ligands, the coordination mode, and the leaving group. In this work, we report a family of Pt(II) and Ru(II) complexes (1-5) of three N,O and N,N donor-based trimethoxyanilines containing Schiff bases with the general formula [Pt^II(L)(DMSO)Cl], [Ru^II(L)(p-cymene)Cl], [Ru^II(L)(p-cymene)Cl]⁺, and [Pt^II(L)Cl₂]. All of the complexes are characterized by different analytical techniques. ¹H NMR and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) data suggest that the N,O-coordinated Pt(II) complexes undergo slower aquation compared to the Ru(II) analogues. The change of the coordination mode to N,N causes the Ru complexes to be more inert to aquation. The N,O-coordinating complexes show superiority over N,N-coordinating complexes by displaying excellent in vitro antiproliferative activity against different aggressive cancer cells, viz., triple-negative human metastatic breast adenocarcinoma MDA-MB-231, human pancreatic carcinoma MIA PaCa-2, and hepatocellular carcinoma Hep G2. In vitro cytotoxicity studies suggest that Pt(II) complexes are more effective than their corresponding Ru(II) analogues, and the most cytotoxic complex 3 is 10-15 times more toxic than the clinical drugs cisplatin and oxaliplatin against MDA-MB-231 cells. Cellular studies show that all of the N,O-coordinated complexes (1-3) initiate disruption of the microtubule network in MDA-MB-231 cells in a dose-dependent manner within 6 h of incubation and finally lead to the arrest of the cell cycle in the G2/M phase and render apoptotic cell death. The disruption of the microtubule network affects the agility of the cytoskeleton rendering inhibition of tyrosine phosphorylation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), a key step in angiogenesis. Complexes 1 and 2 inhibit VEGFR2 phosphorylation in a dose-dependent fashion. Among the Pt(II) and Ru(II) complexes, the former displays higher cytotoxicity, a stronger effect on the cytoskeleton, better VEGFR2 inhibition, and strong interaction with the model nucleobase 9-ethylguanine (9-EtG).

Cationic carboxylate and thioacetate ruthenium(ii) complexes: synthesis and cytotoxic activity against anaplastic thyroid cancer cells

The cationic acetate ruthenium complex [Ru(η1-OAc)(CO)(dppb)(phen)]OAc (1) is easily prepared in 83% yield from [Ru(η1-OAc)(η2-OAc)(CO)(dppb)] (dppb = 1,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)butane) and 1,10-phenanthroline (phen) in MeOH. The derivative 1 undergoes easy substitution of the coordinated acetate by reaction with NaOPiv, KSAc, and KSCN in MeOH, affording the corresponding complexes [RuX(CO)(dppb)(phen)]X (X = OPiv, 2; SAc, 3; and NCS, 4), whereas its reaction with NaCl and NH4PF6 affords [RuCl(CO)(dppb)(phen)]PF6 (5). Carboxylate complexes 1 and 2 show high solubility in water, enabling easy exchange of the coordinated carboxylate by water and other ligands (CH3CN, glutathione). Cationic complexes 1-5, compared to Cisplatin, display a strong cell viability decrease in two human anaplastic thyroid cancer cell lines (SW1736 and 8505C), ranging from 3.10 μM to 0.09 μM EC50 values. The most active compounds 1-3 show a marked increment of apoptosis and decrease of cancer cell aggressiveness, making them promising candidates for further evaluation studies.

Differences in Stability, Cytotoxicity, and Mechanism of Action of Ru(II) and Pt(II) Complexes of a Bidentate N,O Donor Ligand

We report [Ru^II(L)(η⁶-p-cym)Cl] (1 and 2) and [Pt^II(L)(DMSO)Cl] (3 and 4) complexes, where L is a chelate imine ligand derived from chloroethylamine and salicylaldehyde (HL1) or o-vanillin (HL2). The complexes were characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction and other analytical techniques. The ¹H nuclear magnetic resonance data show that both the Ru(II) and Pt(II) complexes start forming the aquated complex within an hour. The aquated complexes are stable at least up to 24 h. The complexes bind to the N⁷ of the model nucleobase 9-ethylguanine (9-EtG). Interaction with calf thymus (CT) DNA shows moderate binding interactions with binding constants, K_b (3.7 ± 1.2) × 10³ M^-1 and (4.3 ± 1.9) × 10³ M^-1 for 1 and 3, respectively. The complexes exhibit significant antiproliferative activity against human pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma (Mia PaCa-2), triple negative metastatic breast adenocarcinoma (MDA-MB-231), hepatocellular carcinoma (Hep G2), and colorectal adenocarcinoma (HT-29) cell lines. The studies show that with the same ligand the Pt(II) complexes are more potent than the Ru(II) complexes. The in vitro potencies of all the complexes toward pancreatic cancer cell line MIA PaCa-2 are more than cisplatin (CDDP). The Pt(II) and Ru(II) complexes show similar binding constants with CT-DNA, but the reactivity of the Pt(II) complex 3 with 9-EtG is faster and their overall cell killing pathways are different. This is evident from the arrest of the cell cycle by the Ru(II) complex 1 in the G2/M phase in contrast to the SubG1 phase arrest by the Pt(II) complex 3. The immunoblot study shows that 3 increases cyclin D and Bcl-2 expression in MDA-MB-231 due to the SubG1 phase arrest where these proteins express in greater quantities. However, both 1 and 3 kill in the apoptotic pathway via dose-dependent activation of caspase 3. Complex 3 depolarizes the mitochondria more efficiently than 1, suggesting its higher preference for the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis. Our work reveals that the same bidentate ligand with a change of the metal center, viz, Pt(II) or Ru(II), imparts significant variation in cytotoxic dosage and pathway of action due to specific intrinsic properties of a metal center (viz, coordination geometry, solution stability) manifested in a complex.