Anteroposterior dissection three-lobe technique: an effective surgical method for inexperienced surgeons performing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate

Enhancing continence post holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: assessment of novel technique through randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Transient urinary incontinence (UI) is distressing event following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). Novel technique namely, veil sparing HoLEP (VS-HoLEP), was proposed to improve early continence outcome. In this trial (NCT03494049), VS-HoLEP was compared to standard HoLEP (St-HoLEP).

METHODS

VS-HoLEP entails early apical separation with sparing of ventral apical mucosal veil proximal to the verumontanum. Eligible symptomatic BPH patients were randomly allocated to St-HoLEP (91) and VS-HoLEP (89). The primary outcome was UI as depicted by one-hour pad test at one month postoperatively. Other outcome measures include all perioperative parameters, complications, and urinary outcome measures at different follow-up points.

RESULTS

Median preoperative prostate size was 138 (50:282) and 128 (50:228) mL in St-HoLEP and VS-HoLEP groups respectively. At one month the number of patients with positive one-hour pad test was 21 (23.1%) and 10 (11.4%) in St-HoLEP and VS-HoLEP groups respectively (P 0.047). The difference was significantly in favor of VS-HoLEP considering the number of patients reporting UI, the number of patients with positive one-hour pad test as well as the grade of UI reported at one and 4 months. The difference was not statistically significant at 12 months. The median time to patients' reported continence was 8 (1-52) and 1.5 (1-52) weeks in St-HoLEP and VS-HoLEP groups respectively (P≤0.005). The technique independently predicted positive one-hour pad test at one and four months respectively. At twelve months presence of DM (diabetes mellitus) and more percent PSA reduction independently predicted positive one-hour pad test.

CONCLUSIONS

Veil sparing HoLEP enhances significantly early postoperative urine continence both subjectively and objectively. Optimization of the surgical technique could cut short the number of leaking patients and reduce the degree as well as the duration of transient postoperative urine leak.

Comparison of the efficacy of HoLEP and TURP in the treatment of elderly benign prostatic hyperplasia patients: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To prove that holmium laser prostatectomy (HoLEP) is safe and effective in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and is superior to transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) for elderly patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 565 HoLEP patients and 76 TURP elderly patients. HoLEP patients were first divided into three groups according to their age(Under 65 years old group, 65-79 years old group and over 80 years old group), and their preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative characteristics were then compared. Secondly, the same characteristics of HoLEP and TURP patients over 80 years were compared. Chi-square test, one-way ANOVA and Fisher's exact test were used in this study.

RESULTS

Firstly, we compared HoLEP patients in different age groups and found that there was statistically significant difference in diabetes, CCVD and bladder stones, among the three groups (P<0.05).Secondlye, we compared HoLEP and TURP treatments in elderly patients (≥80 years old). The patients with HoLEP had a higher share of diabetes, CCVD and anticoagulation (P<0.05). Moreover, compared with TURP patients, HoLEP patients had shorter enucleation duration, more enucleate prostate weight, fewer hemoglobin diminutions, shorter bladder irrigation time, shorter catheter-indwelling period, and shorter hospital period (P<0.05). Although there was no difference in IPSS, Qmax and QOL between the two groups before operation (P>0.05), the difference was statistically significant, 6 months after the operation (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

HoLEP is safe and effective for BPH patients, and is superior to transurethral TURP for elderly patients.

Anterior fibromuscular stroma-preserved endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a precision anatomical approach

BACKGROUND

Benign prostate obstruction (BOO) is becoming increasingly important in this aging society. Some urge/stress urinary incontinence (UUI/SUI) still occurs after endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP). It remains unclear how post-EEP incontinence can be avoided. Currently, early apical release to ameliorate the traction of the external sphincter is the best technique for incontinence prevention.

OBJECTIVE

To describe our surgical technique of anterior fibromuscular stroma (AFS)-preserved EEP for BOO.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The medical records of 60 consecutive patients who underwent AFS-preserved EEP for BOO in our center from September 2019 to December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed.

SURGICAL PROCEDURE

AFS-preserved EEP starts at the 12 o'clock position of the urethra, and the junction between the AFS and transitional zone (T-zone) was identified. The AFS and T-zone were separated first to protect the AFS in the initial operative procedure. Then, following the usual enucleation procedure, AFS-preserved EEP could be achieved.

MEASUREMENTS

Postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), testosterone, urethral stricture, and voiding status, such as incontinence, uroflow, and postvoiding residual urine were assessed.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The data show that AFS-preserved EEP could achieve similar surgical outcomes as other early apical release approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

The preserved AFS provides a nice landmark at the 12 o'clock position during EEP.

Efficacy and safety of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for elderly patients: surgical outcomes and King's Health Questionnaire

Background

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has been a widely utilized minimally invasive surgical procedure for benign prostate hyperplasia. The current study aimed to compare surgical outcomes and King’s Health Questionnaire (KHQ) assessment scores following HoLEP between younger men and those aged ≥75 years.

Methods

This prospective single-center study compared perioperative complications, postoperative urinary conditions, and KHQ scores (nine categories) between men aged ≥75 years (group A) and men aged <75 years (group B) before and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery.

Results

A total of 100 patients were included for analysis (group A, n=38 and group B, n=62). No differences in patient backgrounds, perioperative complications, such as perioperative decrease in hemoglobin, postoperative fever, postoperative indwelling catheterization duration, or postoperative hospitalization duration, and KHQ were observed between both groups. Both groups showed significantly better International Prostate Symptom Scores, quality of life, maximum urinary flow rate, and postvoid residual volume 1, 3, and 6 months after HoLEP compared to their respective preoperative levels (P<0.01). Regarding KHQ categories, both groups showed significantly better general health perceptions, impact on life, emotions, and sleep/energy 1 month after HoLEP; role limitations, physical limitations, and social limitations 3 months after HoLEP; and personal relationships and incontinence severity measures 6 months after HoLEP compared to their respective preoperative levels (P<0.05).

Conclusions

HoLEP could be safe and effective even for men aged ≥75 years, comparing complications, urinary condition, and KHQ scores.