1
|
Lu S, Wang Y, Zhou Z, Zhang Y, Yang L, Yang X. The relationship between preoperative serum cystatin C levels and postoperative oncologic outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1641 patients. Updates Surg 2025:10.1007/s13304-025-02208-y. [PMID: 40325333 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-025-02208-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2025] [Indexed: 05/07/2025]
Abstract
An increasing number of studies have indicated that cystatin C (CysC) may serve as an effective indicator for predicting the prognosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, there was currently a lack of meta-analysis examining the influence of serum CysC on the prognosis of RCC. From April 2016 to June 2024, we ultimately selected five retrospective studies including 1641 participants to evaluate the effect of serum CysC on patients with RCC. All data were analyzed using Review Manager version 5.3. The research findings primarily focused on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Both univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to evaluate the results. Five studies involving a total of 1641 patients were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria. Univariate analysis revealed that serum CysC levels were significantly correlated with OS (P < 0.00001) and DFS (P = 0.02) in postoperative patients with RCC. Elevated serum CysC levels were considered a reliable predictor of poor prognosis in patients with RCC. Multivariate analysis indicated that high serum CysC levels were an independent risk factor for OS (P < 0.00001) and DFS (P = 0.006) in postoperative patients with RCC, remaining unaffected by other factors. Our research results indicated that elevated serum CysC levels were associated with reduced OS and DFS in patients with RCC. However, caution must be exercised before making recommendations as this interpretation was based on very few clinical studies and small samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuai Lu
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Yulin Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing TianTan Hospital, Capital Medical University, , No.119 South 4 th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China
| | - Zhongbao Zhou
- Department of Urology, Beijing TianTan Hospital, Capital Medical University, , No.119 South 4 th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China
| | - Yong Zhang
- Department of Urology, Beijing TianTan Hospital, Capital Medical University, , No.119 South 4 th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
| | - Liqing Yang
- Department of Neurology, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai City, Shandong Province, China.
| | - Xudong Yang
- Department of Urology, Beijing TianTan Hospital, Capital Medical University, , No.119 South 4 th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Di Bello F, Rodriguez Penaranda N, Marmiroli A, Longoni M, Falkenbach F, Le QC, Tian Z, Goyal JA, Collà Ruvolo C, Califano G, Creta M, Saad F, Shariat SF, Puliatti S, De Cobelli O, Briganti A, Graefen M, Chun FHK, Longo N, Karakiewicz PI. Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes at Robot-Assisted Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2025:10.1245/s10434-025-17398-3. [PMID: 40314906 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-025-17398-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2025] [Accepted: 04/13/2025] [Indexed: 05/03/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this work is to quantify the magnitude of improvement in in-hospital outcomes between historical and contemporary robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) versus historical and contemporary open PN (OPN). METHODS Within the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2010-2019), we identified patients who underwent RPN and OPN. Multivariable logistic regression models were fit. RESULTS Historical (2010-2014) versus contemporary (2015-2019) proportions were 39% (n = 5,897) versus 61% (n = 9168) for RPN and 59% (n = 7289) versus 41% (n = 5,120) for OPN. Relative to historical, contemporary RPN patients exhibited significantly better in-hospital outcomes in 6 of 12 categories that ranged from-76% for intraoperative complications to-24% for length of stay (LOS) ≥ 75th percentile. Relative to historical, contemporary OPN patients also exhibited significantly better in-hospital outcomes in 7 of 12 categories that ranged from-76% for intraoperative complications to-23% for LOS ≥ 75th percentile. When historical RPN was compared with historical OPN, RPN in-hospital outcomes were better in 10 of 12 comparisons that ranged from-75% for LOS ≥ 75th percentile to-28% for perioperative bleeding. Similarly, when contemporary RPN was compared with contemporary OPN, RPN outcomes were better in 8 of 12 comparisons that ranged from-75% for LOS ≥ 75th percentile to-27% for postoperative complications. CONCLUSION The magnitude of improvement in in-hospital outcomes was more pronounced for contemporary versus historical OPN (seven improved categories) than for contemporary versus historical RPN (six improved categories). However, contemporary RPN outperformed contemporary OPN patients in eight in-hospital outcome categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
| | - Natali Rodriguez Penaranda
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Andrea Marmiroli
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Longoni
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabian Falkenbach
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Quynh Chi Le
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Creta
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Felix H K Chun
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wenzel M, Hoeh B, Cano Garcia C, Bernatz S, Köllermann J, Kluth LA, Chun FKH, Becker A, Mandel P. Patient and tumor characteristics of histological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma and its risk of upstaging to ≥pT3. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:487.e7-487.e13. [PMID: 37758628 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore how histological subtypes impact upstaging to nonorgan confined renal cell carcinoma (≥pT3 RCC) in patients treated with partial/radical nephrectomy for cT1-2 RCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to identify RCC patients treated with partial/radical nephrectomy between January 2002 and December 2021. Patients were stratified according to histological subtype of RCC. Upstaging was defined as any cT1-2 tumor classified as ≥pT3 at final pathology. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to predict upstaging. RESULTS Of overall 1,020 surgically treated RCC patients, 743 harbored clear-cell (72.8%) vs. 193 (18.9%) papillary vs. 49 (4.8%) chromophobe vs. each 4 (0.4%) collecting duct and sarcomatoid vs. 27 (2.6%) other/mixed pathology of RCC. Median tumor size ranged from 3.0 cm (mixed RCC) to 7.7 cm (sarcomatoid RCC). In total, upstaging rate to ≥pT3 was 22% and ranged from 6.1% (chromophobe RCC) to 75% (collecting duct RCC). In univariable logistic regression models, chromophobe and papillary histological subtypes were significantly associated with lower upstaging of all cT1-2 RCC tumors. After controlling for patient and tumor characteristics in multivariable logistic regression models, papillary RCC independently lowers the risk of upstaging, even in sensitivity analyses for cT1 RCC only. CONCLUSION Important differences between histological subtypes of RCC exist regarding characteristics such as stage and tumor size at presentation, as well as upstaging to ≥pT3 at final pathology. Specifically, papillary RCC is significantly associated with lower chance of upstaging even after controlling for confounding parameters. The study is limited by missing central pathological/radiographic review and lack of survival analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Benedikt Hoeh
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Cristina Cano Garcia
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Simon Bernatz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jens Köllermann
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Andreas Becker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hoeh B, Wenzel M, Eckart O, Fleisgarten F, Garcia CC, Köllermann J, Würnschimmel C, Larcher A, Karakiewicz P, Kluth LA, Chun FKH, Mandel P, Becker A. Comparison of peri- and intraoperative outcomes of open vs robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a propensity-matched analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2023; 21:189. [PMID: 37349748 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03061-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the gold standard surgical treatment for resectable renal cell carcinoma (RCC) tumors. However, the decision whether a robotic (RAPN) or open PN (OPN) approach is chosen is often based on the surgeon's individual experience and preference. To overcome the inherent selection bias when comparing peri- and postoperative outcomes of RAPN vs. OPN, a strict statistical methodology is needed. MATERIALS AND METHODS We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to identify RCC patients treated with RAPN and OPN between January 2003 and January 2021. Study endpoints were estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications, and trifecta. In the first step of analyses, descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models (MVA) were applied. In the second step of analyses, to validate initial findings, MVA were applied after 2:1 propensity-score matching (PSM). RESULTS Of 615 RCC patients, 481 (78%) underwent OPN vs 134 (22%) RAPN. RAPN patients were younger and presented with a smaller tumor diameter and lower RENAL-Score sum, respectively. Median EBL was comparable, whereas LOS was shorter in RAPN vs. OPN. Both intraoperative (27 vs 6%) and Clavien-Dindo > 2 complications (11 vs 3%) were higher in OPN (both < 0.05), whereas achievement of trifecta was higher in RAPN (65 vs 54%; p = 0.028). In MVA, RAPN was a significant predictor for shorter LOS, lower rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications as well as higher trifecta rates. After 2:1 PSM with subsequent MVA, RAPN remained a statistical and clinical predictor for lower rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications and higher rates of trifecta achievement but not LOS. CONCLUSIONS Differences in baseline and outcome characteristics exist between RAPN vs. OPN, probably due to selection bias. However, after applying two sets of statistical analyses, RAPN seems to be associated with more favorable outcomes regarding complications and trifecta rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Hoeh
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
| | - Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
- Young Academics in Urology (YAU) Working Group Robotic Surgery, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Olivia Eckart
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Felicia Fleisgarten
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Cristina Cano Garcia
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jens Köllermann
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt Am. Main, Germany
| | - Christoph Würnschimmel
- Young Academics in Urology (YAU) Working Group Robotic Surgery, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Young Academics in Urology (YAU) Working Group Robotic Surgery, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Andreas Becker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt Am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Orozco Scott P, Deshpande P, Abramson M. Genitourinary Cancer: Updates on Treatments and Their Impact on the Kidney. Semin Nephrol 2023; 42:151344. [PMID: 37172546 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2023.151344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
Genitourinary cancers are diverse in their presentation, prevalence, and mortality risk. Although there have been significant advancements in medical (eg, immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors) and surgical treatments of genitourinary cancers, patients are still at risk for chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and electrolyte derangements in the short and long term. In addition, pre-existing kidney disease may increase the risk of developing some genitourinary cancers. This review focuses on the kidney-related effects of treatments for renal cell carcinoma and bladder and prostate cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paloma Orozco Scott
- Department of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Medical School, New York, NY.
| | - Priya Deshpande
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Matthew Abramson
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ghasemi A, Ghaffari K, Gohari A, Eghbali A, Yousefichaijan P, Falahati V. Kidney Failure in Children with Wilms Tumor: A Study Based on Urine Analysis and Ultrasound. Adv Biomed Res 2022; 11:89. [PMID: 36518858 PMCID: PMC9744077 DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_367_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Revised: 12/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Renal insufficiency is one of the inevitable complications in patients with Wilms tumor (WT). The purpose of this study was to assess the renal function in children with WT at baseline and every 3 months to 2 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS In a descriptive-analytical study from 2018 to 2020, 48 children with WT were included in the study. Urine creatinine (UCr), serum calcium (SCr), blood pressure (BP), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and urinary protein (UPro) were evaluated at baseline and every 3 months during the study. Spot UCa/UCr and spot UPro/UCr ratio were calculated. Kidney ultrasonography was used in all patients. Independent Sample t-test and Chi-square tests were utilized to compare age and sex, respectively. RESULTS The mean age of patients at follow-up was 7.3 years. There was no significant difference in mean UCr, SCr, eGFR, 24-h UPro, UCa/UCr ratio, and spot UPro/UCr ratio at baseline and end of study (P baseline> 0.05, P end of study> 0.05). Analysis of kidney size showed a statistical association with tumor stage (P < 0.05). Comparison of the kidney size in patients showed that there is a statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001) at baseline and end of the study. CONCLUSION This study showed that as WT progressed, the size of the kidneys increases without any renal insufficiency. Therefore, it seems that urinalysis of patients with WT along with sonography is necessary to determine renal insufficiency and the use of ultrasound alone to determine kidney insufficiency is not recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Ghasemi
- Department of Biochemistry and Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
| | - Kazem Ghaffari
- Department of Basic and Laboratory Sciences, Khomein University of Medical Sciences, Khomein, Iran
| | - Alireza Gohari
- Clinical Research Development Center of Amir Kabir Hospital, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
| | - Aziz Eghbali
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
| | - Parsa Yousefichaijan
- Clinical Research Development Center of Aliasghar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Vahid Falahati
- Clinical Research Development Center of Amir Kabir Hospital, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran,Address for correspondence: Dr. Vahid Falahati, Clinical Research Development Center of Amir Kabir Hospital, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wenzel M, Hoeh B, Rührup J, Gambetta H, Nocera L, Würnschimmel C, Tian Z, Karakiewicz PI, Briganti A, Chun FK, Roos FC, Becker A, Krimphove MJ. An external validation of the nocera nomogram: Predicting non-organ confined stage of ≥pT3 in cT1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1019057. [PMID: 36300101 PMCID: PMC9589884 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1019057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Only one previously published study by Nocera et al. addressed the risk of upstaging to ≥pT3 in cT1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) by using characteristics of the R.E.N.A.L and PADUA score (age, tumor size, rim location, exophytic rate, polar involvement) developing an accurate nomogram. However, this nomogram has never been externally validated yet. Material and methods The study cohort consisted of 288 patients with cT1a-b ccRCC, diagnosed between 2008-2021 at the University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany. Analyses addressed clinical, tumor and radiographic characteristics. The external validation of the nomogram relied on accuracy calculations derived from the area under the curve of the receiver operator characteristic analysis. Results Overall, 11.8% (n=34) patients harbored ≥pT3 ccRCC. Median radiographic tumor size (3.6 vs. 5.3cm), R.E.N.A.L. (8 vs. 9 points) and PADUA score (9 vs. 11 points), as well as proportions of renal sinus involvement (82.4% vs. 51.6%), renal hilus involvement (44.1 vs. 13.0%), and medial rim location significantly differed between the pT1-2 and ≥pT3 group (all p ≤ 0.01). In subgroup analyses of small renal mass ccRCC patients (<4cm, cT1a), only 3.8% (n=6) patients had ≥pT3 pathology. Upstaged patients were significantly older and more frequently had endophytic tumor than pT1-2 counterparts (p<0.05). The external validation of the Nocera nomogram showed a good accuracy of 76.6%. Using the suggested cut-off of 21%, 26.5% of patients exhibited ≥pT3 ccRCC. Conversely, within patients below cut-off, 5.9% patients exhibited ≥pT3 ccRCC. Conclusion We reported the first external validation of the nomogram addressing the risk of ≥pT3 in cT1 ccRCC patients, demonstrating a good accuracy, with a low false-negative rate. Therefore, the nomogram can accurately be used for patients’ counselling and treatment decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
- *Correspondence: Mike Wenzel,
| | - Benedikt Hoeh
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jessica Rührup
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Hanna Gambetta
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Luigi Nocera
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Christoph Würnschimmel
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
- Department of Health Science and Medicine, Univerity of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K.H. Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Frederik C. Roos
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Andreas Becker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Marieke J. Krimphove
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lu S, Li S. Association between preoperative serum Cystatin-C levels and postsurgical oncological prognosis in patients with PRCC: A retrospective cohort study. Cancer Med 2022; 11:4112-4121. [PMID: 35384340 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cystatin-C (Cys-C) is a predictor of several malignancies. However, whether Cys-C levels predict prognosis in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between Cys-C and clinical outcomes in patients with PRCC. METHODS The medical records of 137 patients with PRCC who underwent surgery at our institution from January 2008 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Data were divided into two subgroups based on cutoff values and the relationship between the Cys-C group and their clinical outcomes was assessed. RESULTS By the last follow-up, 62 patients had died of various causes, 53 of whom died from PRCC. Sixty patients suffered recurrence or metastasis during follow-up. Based on the cutoff value, the patients were divided into two groups: low Cys-C group (Cys-C < 1.25 mg/L, n = 92) and high Cys-C group (Cys-C ≥ 1.25 mg/L, n = 45). Pathological classification and serum Cys-C levels were shown to be independent prognostic factors affecting clinical outcomes, according to multivariate Cox regression analysis (p < 0.05). After adjusting the Cox proportional hazards model, the risk of death was elevated in the high Cys-C group. The results of the area under the curve for time-dependent receiver operating characteristics analysis indicated that Cys-C is a stable and reliable prognostic biomarker for predicting survival in patients with PRCC. Forest plots, constructed to better reflect the comparison of hazard ratios between the two groups, confirmed that Cys-C levels were significantly associated with worsening overall survival. CONCLUSION This study is the first to examine the relationship between preoperative serum Cys-C levels and prognostic overall survival in patients with PRCC. Cys-C may be a useful biomarker for preoperative screening of high-risk patients who may require adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiyang Lu
- Department of Urology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, PR China
| | - Shijie Li
- Department of Urology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ding L, Liu Z, Wang J. Role of cystatin C in urogenital malignancy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:1082871. [PMID: 36589819 PMCID: PMC9794607 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1082871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Urogenital malignancy accounts for one of the major causes of cancer-related deaths globally. Numerous studies have investigated novel molecular markers in the blood circulation, tumor tissue, or urine in order to assist in the clinical identification of tumors at early stages, predict the response of therapeutic strategies, and give accurate prognosis assessment. As an endogenous inhibitor of lysosomal cysteine proteinases, cystatin C plays an integral role in diverse processes. A substantial number of studies have indicated that it may be such a potential promising biomarker. Therefore, this review was intended to provide a detailed overview of the role of cystatin C in urogenital malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Ding
- Department of Urology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Zijie Liu
- Department of Urology, Wuxi No.2 People’s Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
| | - Junqi Wang
- Department of Urology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
- *Correspondence: Junqi Wang,
| |
Collapse
|