Diffusion-weighted imaging of the head and neck with HASTE: influence of imaging parameters on image quality

Image Quality and ADC Assessment in Turbo Spin-Echo and Echo-Planar Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging of Tumors of the Head and Neck

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the distortion ratio (DR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between turbo spin-echo (TSE)-diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and echo-planar imaging (EPI)-DWI of the orofacial region and prove the usefulness of TSE-DWI for the differential diagnosis of orofacial lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The DR, SNR, and CNR of both sequences were compared in 42 cases. Then, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of various orofacial lesions obtained by TSE-DWI was investigated in 143 lesions.

RESULTS

In the first study, 38 of 42 cases were analyzed. TSE-DWI showed a significantly lower DR (p < 0.05) and higher SNR and CNR than EPI-DWI (p < 0.05), indicating the superiority of TSE-DWI. In the second study, 114 cases (79.3%) were successfully analyzed. When lesions were divided into cysts, benign tumors, squamous cell carcinoma, malignant lymphoma, and other malignant tumors (OT), significant differences were observed in all pairs of lesions (p < 0.05) except squamous cell carcinoma and OT (p = 0.877). The area under the curve for distinguishing benign from malignant tumors was 0.80 with a cutoff ADC of 1.29 × 10^-3 mm²/s.

CONCLUSION

TSE-DWI produced better quality images than EPI-DWI. TSE-DWI yields the high possibility of obtaining ADC in the orofacial region, and this value was considered useful for the differential diagnosis of orofacial lesions.

Artifact-robust diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background suppression at 3 T using improved turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging

OBJECTIVE:

To compare single-shot turbo spin-echo (TSE) diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background suppression (DWIBS) and echo-planar imaging (EPI) DWIBS to determine the feasibility of direct-coronal TSE-DWIBS.

METHODS:

All measurements were performed using a 3.0 T MRI scanner. In the phantom study, we compared the contrast ratios (CRs) of tumor-mimicking phantom (tumor) to muscle-mimicking phantom (muscle) and water to muscle and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) between TSE-DWIBS and EPI-DWIBS. In the volunteer study, 10 healthy volunteers were whole-body scanned with direct-coronal TSE-DWIBS, direct-coronal EPI-DWIBS (corEPI-DWIBS), and transverse EPI-DWIBS (traEPI-DWIBS). Two radiologists assessed the image distortion, uniformity of fat suppression, overall artifacts, and overall image quality in maximum intensity projection (MIP) images from each DWIBS image using a 5-point scale.

RESULTS:

In the phantom study, the CR of tumor to muscle was found to be lower for TSE-DWIBS (10.57 ± 0.45) than for EPI-DWIBS (15.38 ± 0.27), and the CR of water to muscle was higher for TSE-DWIBS (9.61 ± 0.66) than for EPI-DWIBS (2.52 ± 0.60). The volunteer study revealed good inter observer agreement between TSE-DWIBS and EPI-DWIBS with respect to image distortion, uniformity of fat suppression, overall artifacts, and overall image quality, with weighted Cohen's κ coefficients of 0.91, 0.74, 0.87, and 0.72, respectively. Qualitative analysis scores for image distortion, uniformity of fat suppression, overall artifacts, and overall image quality were significantly higher for TSE-DWIBS than for corEPI-DWIBS or traEPI-DWIBS (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Direct-coronal TSE-DWIBS is robust against magnetic field inhomogeneity. High-quality images without distortion or fat suppression inhomogeneity were obtained.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:

Many studies on DWIBS have been previously reported; however, these studies used EPI read-out. To the best of our knowledge, no studies using TSE read-out have been reported. In this study, we examined the feasibility of TSE-DWIBS with lesser artifacts than EPI-DWIBS.

Image quality assessment of single-shot turbo spin echo diffusion-weighted imaging with parallel imaging technique: a phantom study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of single-shot turbo spin echo (TSE) diffusion-weighted (DW) images obtained using a parallel imaging (PI) technique.

METHODS

All measurements were performed on a 3.0-T whole-body MRI system and 32-channel phased-array coil. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and ADC values were measured with a DW imaging (DWI) phantom comprising granulated sugar and agar. The SNRs were calculated using a subtraction method and compared among TSE-DW images at acceleration factors (AFs) of 1-4. Image blur was visually assessed on TSE-DW images of a pin phantom at AFs of 1-4. The ADC values were calculated using DW images with b = 0 and 1000 s mm(-2). The ADC values of TSE-DW images and echo-planar imaging EPI-DW images were compared.

RESULTS

The SNRs decreased as AFs increased, despite selecting the shortest echo time. A lower AF caused increased image blur in the phase-encoding direction. The ADC values of TSE-DWI tended to be lower than those of EPI-DWI, and AFs of 3 and 4 yielded variable ADC values on TSE-DW images.

CONCLUSION

TSE-DWI with an AF of 3 or 4 yielded reduced SNRs; in addition, the image noise and artefacts associated with PI technique may have affected ADC measurements, despite improving image blur in the phase-encoding direction.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Optimizing the imaging parameters of TSE-DWI is useful for providing good image quality and accurate ADC measurements.