Efficacy of atomoxetine plus oxybutynin in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with moderate pharyngeal collapsibility

Cholinergic modulation of upper airway control: maturational changes and mechanisms at cellular and synaptic levels

Respiration is governed by a central rhythm and pattern generator, which has the pre-Bötzinger complex as the inspiratory oscillator initiating the coordinated activity of several respiratory muscles, including the diaphragm, intercostals, and upper airway muscles. The diaphragm is the main inspiratory pump muscle driving inflow, whereas dilator upper airway muscles, such as tongue muscles, reduce airway resistance during inspiration. Breathing exhibits a marked state-dependent pattern attributed to changes in neuromodulatory tone in respiratory-related brain regions, including decreases in noradrenaline and serotonin and increases in acetylcholine levels during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Here, we discuss respiratory modulation by acetylcholine acting on its metabotropic muscarinic receptors, focusing on the regulation of upper airway muscle activity during sleep and wakefulness and its changing effects with postnatal maturation. We focus on experimental data examining muscarinic receptor distribution patterns, the ion channels they modulate, and how these distribution patterns change with postnatal maturation. We also consider experimental data highlighting cholinergic cellular and synaptic effects on hypoglossal motoneurons and pre-Bötzinger complex neurons and how they might explain changes in the effects of cholinergic modulation with development. Overall, this discussion is critical to comprehending the postnatal maturation in the cholinergic modulation of the respiratory control system leading to opposing effects of muscarinic receptors on upper airway muscle activity in neonate (excitatory) and adult (inhibitory) preparations. The changes in cholinergic pathways associated with dysfunctional upper airway patency control are also discussed in the context of pathologies such as sleep-disordered breathing.

Are noradrenergics combined with antimuscarinics the future pharmacologic treatment for obstructive sleep apnea? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

Noradrenergics and antimuscarinics have been proposed as future pharmacotherapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, the available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed heterogeneous results regarding the safety and efficacy of the combined regimen in OSA. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis from the published RCTs to clarify this conflicting evidence.

METHODS

A systematic search of four electronic databases was done till December 2023.

RESULTS

Thirteen RCTs (n = 345) were systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed. The combined regimen significantly reduced apnea-hypopnea index (AHI): AHI 3% [events/h; Mean difference (MD): - 6.30; 95% Confidence interval (CI) (- 9.74, - 2.87); P = 0.0003], AHI 4% [events/h; MD: - 6.50; 95% CI (- 8.74, - 4.26 events/h); P < 0.00001]. All gasometric measures significantly improved in the combined regimen group except mean SpO2. No difference was found in total sleep time between the treatment and placebo. However, compared to placebo, the combined regimen altered sleep architecture and decreased sleep efficiency. Regarding OSA endotypes, the combined regimen significantly improved loop gain, pharyngeal muscle compensation, pharyngeal muscle recruitment, and respiratory arousal threshold.

CONCLUSION

The combined regimen effectively reduces AHI and OSA severity with improvement in almost all OSA endotypes. However, this regimen decreased sleep efficiency and altered sleep architecture. Short-term side effects can be confined to increased heart rate, dry mouth and urinary hesitancy. Therefore, noradrenergics and anti-muscarinics is a promising regimen for treating OSA, yet this optimism must be titrated by the lack of long-term effects of the regimen. Future RCTs with focus on the long-term efficacy of the regimen and cardiovascular outcomes is recommended.

Nocturia and obstructive sleep apnoea

Nocturia, the need to urinate at night, is a common symptom in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Continuous positive airway pressure treatment can reduce nocturia in some patients, but the underlying mechanisms are complex and not fully understood. OSA affects the autonomic nervous system, oxidative stress and endothelial damage. Furthermore, the commonly held theory attributing polyuria to a false signal of cardiac overload and response natriuresis has limitations. A comprehensive approach to the management of nocturia in OSA, considering factors such as comorbidities, medication use, alcohol consumption and lifestyle, is needed. Effective management of nocturia in OSA requires a multidisciplinary approach, and urologists should be aware of the potential effect of OSA on physiology and refer patients for further testing at a sleep centre. In addition to continuous positive airway pressure, other interventions such as oral appliances and surgical obstruction treatment could be beneficial for some patients. Overall, understanding the complex interplay between OSA and nocturia is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

Aerobic exercise training and obstructive sleep apnea: dose-response meta-analyses

PURPOSE

Several studies have shown that aerobic exercise training improves obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity. However, a dose-response relationship has never been shown. This study aimed to quantify any dose-response relationships between time spent per week in aerobic exercise and key sleep apnea outcomes.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCT) were selected from literature search studying the effects of supervised aerobic exercise training on patients with OSA. Dose-response meta-analyses were performed, where the 'dose' was the total weekly duration of aerobic exercise training. Primary outcomes were apnea hypopnea index (AHI), cardiorespiratory fitness (maximum oxygen consumption or VO2peak) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS).

RESULTS

Analysis of data from 11 RCTs showed a non-linear dose-response relationship between the total weekly duration of aerobic exercise training and mean differences in AHI. Maximum effects on AHI (-10.92 (95%CIs: -15.57; -6.27)) were observed when the weekly duration of aerobic exercise reached 100 min/week. Similar non-linear dose-response trend was observed in the mean differences in VO2peak. Studies in which aerobic exercise training lasted ≥ 12 weeks showed greater proportional changes in mean AHI differences with maximal effects reaching a peak at ∼ 70 min/week of aerobic exercise training. ESS and total weekly duration of aerobic exercise training showed a linear dose-response relationship based on 4 RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these analyses, aerobic exercise training of 70-100 min/week over 3 or 5 days a week should be recommended as adjunctive treatment for patients with OSA.

Atomoxetine and spironolactone combine to reduce obstructive sleep apnea severity and blood pressure in hypertensive patients

BACKGROUND

Norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors such as atomoxetine (ato) can improve OSA by increasing pharyngeal muscle activity. Mineralocorticoid antagonists such as spironolactone, may potentiate the reduction of OSA severity and reduce blood pressure. We evaluated whether adding spironolactone to atomoxetine (ato-spiro) improved responses in hypertensive OSA patients.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) between 10 and 50 events/h and a history of hypertension were recruited and crossed-over in random order to ato 80 mg and ato-spiro 80/50 mg for 1 week after a 3-day low dose run-in period. Two dropped out due to drug related side effects. Polysomnography and 24-hour blood pressure (BP) monitoring were performed at baseline and after each treatment period.

RESULTS

AHI decreased on both ato and ato-spiro from a baseline median(IQR) of 20.3(18.8 to 28.5) to 8.2(7 to 13.1) and 6.2(5.7 to 14.1), respectively (p < 0.001 for both). Systolic BP (mmHg) fell by mean(95%CI) -4.5(-13.8 to 4.8, p = 0.33) on ato and - 10.3(-19.2 to -1.5, p = 0.02) on ato-spiro, and diastolic BP dropped by -3.0(-8.0 to 2.0, p = 0.23) on ato and - 5.0(-9.1 to -0.9; p = 0.02) on ato-spiro. Both ato and ato-spiro led to a significant shift from apnea to hypopnea predominance (p < 0.001), and significant reductions in hypoxic burden (p ≤ 0.001) and REM sleep (p ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both ato-spiro and ato alone decreased OSA severity similarly, but ato-spiro led to even greater, statistically significant and clinically meaningful falls in systolic and diastolic BP. BP reductions were likely due to ato-related improvements in upper airway patency and hypoxemia, and to spiro-related reduced fluid retention. These findings show promise for ato-spiro as an oral treatment for hypertensive OSA patients. REGISTERED AT CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT04905979.

Effect of norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors combined with antimuscarinic agents vs monotherapy for OSA: a systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Randomized controlled trials have shown that combining norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and antimuscarinics can ameliorate the severity of obstructive sleep apnea. This article explores whether the effectiveness and safety of combining norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors with antimuscarinic agents surpass monotherapy for treating obstructive sleep apnea.

METHODS

We searched randomized controlled trials including adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea who received combination therapy and monotherapy in 8 databases from inception until April 5, 2023 and evaluated the studies' quality and conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review. The primary outcome was the apnea-hypopnea index. Secondary outcome measures included loop gain, hypoxic burden, oxygen desaturation index, and ventilation at low ventilatory drive, among other indicators. We assessed the quality of the studies using Cochrane Methods criteria.

RESULTS

We identified 4 randomized controlled trials for systematic review and 2 for meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors combined with antimuscarinic agents in patients with obstructive sleep apnea prolonged total sleep time by a mean of 28.20 minutes [95% confidence interval (5.78, 50.61), P = .01] and increased sleep efficiency by 4.73% [95% confidence interval (0.50, 8.97), P = .03] compared with norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors alone. Other indices and adverse events were of no statistical significance. The systematic reviews revealed that norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors combined with antimuscarinics may be superior to monotherapy in improving apnea-hypopnea index and endotypic traits.

CONCLUSIONS

This evaluation demonstrated the potential advantages of combining norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors plus antimuscarinics for treating OSA compared with norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors alone and revealed no statistically significant difference in drug safety.

CITATION

Wang J, Ye Y, Shang Z, et al. Effect of norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors combined with antimuscarinic agents vs monotherapy for OSA: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(8):1363-1372.

The Hypoxic Burden, Clinical Implication of a New Biomarker in the Cardiovascular Management of Sleep Apnea Patients: A Systematic Review

Background

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent sleep-disordered breathing. It is associated with adverse co-morbidities, being the most scientific evidence of cardiovascular (CV) disease. Currently, OSA is measured through the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), the total number of respiratory events per hour of sleep. However, different studies have questioned its utility in OSA management, highlighting the need to search for new parameters that better reflect the heterogeneity of the disease. Hypoxic burden (HB) has emerged as a novel biomarker that informs about the frequency, duration and depth of the desaturation related to the respiratory events. We conducted a systematic review in order to find publications about the heterogeneity of OSA measured by HB and its associations with future disease.

Methods

Systematic review was conducted using PubMed and Web of Science. The terms "sleep apne" and "hypoxic burden" were used to look for publications from the date of inception to August 15, 2023. Inclusion criteria: articles in English published in peer-reviewed journals. Exclusion criteria: (1) not available publications; (2) duplicated articles; (3) letters, editorials, and congress communications; (4) articles not including information about HB as a specific biomarker of OSA.

Results

33 studies were included. The results were classified in 2 main sections: (1) HB implication in the CV sphere: HB showed to be a better predictor of CV risk in OSA patients than traditional measures such as AHI with possible clinical management implication in OSA. (2) HB response to OSA treatment: pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments have demonstrated to be effective in improving hypoxia measured through the HB.

Conclusions

HB could be a better and more effective parameter than traditional measurements in terms of diagnosis, risk prediction and therapeutic decisions in patients with OSA. This measure could be incorporated in sleep units and could play a role in OSA management, driving the clinic to a more personalized medicine.

Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) affects 13-33% of males and 6-9% of females globally and poses significant treatment challenges, including poor adherence to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and residual excessive sleepiness (RES). This review aims to elucidate the emerging interest in pharmacological treatments for OSAS, focusing on recent advancements in this area. A thorough analysis of extensive clinical trials involving various drugs, including selective dopamine reuptake inhibitors, selective norepinephrine inhibitors, combined antimuscarinic agents, and orexin agonists, was conducted. These trials focused on ameliorating respiratory metrics and enhancing sleep quality in individuals affected by OSAS. The studied pharmacological agents showed potential in improving primary outcomes, notably the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS). These improvements suggest enhanced sleep quality and symptom management in OSAS patients. With a deeper understanding of OSAS, pharmacological interventions are emerging as a promising direction for its effective management. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of drug research in OSAS, highlighting the potential of these treatments in addressing the disorder's complex challenges.

Combination pharmacological therapy targeting multiple mechanisms of sleep apnoea: a randomised controlled cross-over trial

RATIONALE

Acetazolamide and atomoxetine-plus-oxybutynin ('AtoOxy') can improve obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) by stabilising ventilatory control and improving dilator muscle responsiveness respectively. Given the different pathophysiological mechanisms targeted by each intervention, we tested whether AtoOxy-plus-acetazolamide would be more efficacious than AtoOxy alone.

METHODS

In a multicentre randomised crossover trial, 19 patients with moderate-to-severe OSA received AtoOxy (80/5 mg), acetazolamide (500 mg), combined AtoOxy-plus-acetazolamide or placebo at bedtime for three nights (half doses on first night) with a 4-day washout between conditions. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and night 3 of each treatment period. Mixed model analysis compared the reduction in Apnoea-Hypopnoea Index (AHI) from baseline between AtoOxy-plus-acetazolamide and AtoOxy (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes included hypoxic burden and arousal index.

RESULTS

Although AtoOxy lowered AHI by 49 (33, 62)%baseline (estimate (95% CI)) vs placebo, and acetazolamide lowered AHI by+34 (14, 50)%baseline vs placebo, AtoOxy-plus-acetazolamide was not superior to AtoOxy alone (difference: -2 (-18, 11)%baseline, primary outcome p=0.8). Likewise, the hypoxic burden was lowered with AtoOxy (+58 (37, 71)%baseline) and acetazolamide (+37 (5, 58)%baseline), but no added benefit versus AtoOxy occurred when combined (difference: -13 (-5, 39)%baseline). Arousal index was also modestly reduced with each intervention (11%baseline-16%baseline). Mechanistic analyses revealed that similar traits (ie, higher baseline compensation, lower loop gain) were associated with both AtoOxy and acetazolamide efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

While AtoOxy halved AHI, and acetazolamide lowered AHI by a third, the combination of these leading experimental interventions provided no greater efficacy than AtoOxy alone. Failure of acetazolamide to further increase efficacy suggests overlapping physiological mechanisms.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03892772.

Pharmacological treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Summarize the evidence on drug therapies for obstructive sleep apnea.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, LILACS, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched on February 17th, 2023. A search strategy retrieved randomized clinical trials comparing the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) in pharmacotherapies. Studies were selected and data was extracted by two authors independently. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. RevMan 5.4. was used for data synthesis.

RESULTS

4930 articles were obtained, 68 met inclusion criteria, and 29 studies (involving 11 drugs) were combined in a meta-analysis. Atomoxetine plus oxybutynin vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -7.71 (-10.59, -4.83) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 50 %, overall effect: Z = 5.25, p < 0.001]. Donepezil vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -8.56 (-15.78, -1.33) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 21 %, overall effect: Z = 2.32, p = 0.02]. Sodium oxybate vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -5.50 (-9.28, -1.73) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 32 %, overall effect: Z = 2.86, p = 0.004]. Trazodone vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -12.75 (-21.30, -4.19) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 0 %, overall effect: Z = 2.92, p = 0.003].

CONCLUSION

The combination of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic drugs shows promising results. Identifying endotypes may be the key to future drug therapies for obstructive sleep apnea. Moreover, studies with longer follow-up assessing the safety and sustained effects of these treatments are needed.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022362639.

The Combination of Aroxybutynin and Atomoxetine in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (MARIPOSA): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Rationale: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep disorder for which the principal treatment option, continuous positive airway pressure, is often poorly tolerated. There is currently no approved pharmacotherapy for OSA. However, recent studies have demonstrated improvement in OSA with combined antimuscarinic and noradrenergic drugs. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AD109, a combination of the novel antimuscarinic agent aroxybutynin and the norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine, in the treatment of OSA. Methods: Phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 4-week trial comparing AD109 2.5/75 mg, AD109 5/75 mg, atomoxetine 75 mg alone, and placebo (www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT05071612). Measurements and Main Results: Of 211 randomized patients, 181 were included in the prespecified efficacy analyses. Sleep was assessed by two baseline and two treatment polysomnograms. Apnea-hypopnea index with a 4% desaturation criterion (primary outcome) was reduced from a median (IQR) of 20.5 (12.3-27.2) to 10.8 (5.6-18.5) in the AD109 2.5/75 mg arm (-47.1%), from 19.4 (13.7-26.4) to 9.5 (6.1-19.3) in the AD109 5/75 mg arm (-42.9%; both P < 0.0001 vs. placebo), and from 19.0 (11.8-28.8) to 11.8 (5.5-21.5) with atomoxetine alone (-38.8%; P < 0.01 vs. placebo). Apnea-hypopnea index with a 4% desaturation criterion decreased from 20.1 (11.9-25.9) to 16.3 (11.1-28.9) in the placebo arm. Subjectively, there was improvement in fatigue with AD109 2.5/75 mg (P < 0.05 vs. placebo and atomoxetine). Atomoxetine taken alone decreased total sleep time (P < 0.05 vs. AD109 and placebo). The most common adverse events were dry mouth, insomnia, and urinary hesitancy. Conclusions: AD109 showed clinically meaningful improvement in OSA, suggesting that further development of the compound is warranted. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05071612).

The combination of atomoxetine and oxybutynin for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in children with Down syndrome

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Children with Down syndrome (DS) are at very high risk for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Current OSA treatments have limited effectiveness in this population. We evaluated the effectiveness of atomoxetine and oxybutynin (ato-oxy) to treat OSA in children with Down syndrome.

METHODS

Children ages 6-7 years old with Down syndrome and OSA participated in a double-blind crossover clinical trial evaluating two dose regimens of ato-oxy. Participants received low-dose ato-oxy (0.5 mg/kg atomoxetine and 5 mg oxybutynin) and high-dose ato-oxy (1.2 mg/kg atomoxetine and 5 mg oxybutynin) for 1 month in random order. The primary study outcome was change in obstructive apnea-hypopnea index. Health-related quality of life as measured by the OSA-18 as well as changes in sleep architecture were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Fifteen participants qualified for randomization and 11 participants had complete data at all points. Baseline obstructive apnea-hypopnea index was 7.4 ± 3.7 (mean ± standard deviation), obstructive apnea-hypopnea index with low-dose ato-oxy was 3.6 ± 3.3 (P = .001 vs baseline), and obstructive apnea-hypopnea index with high-dose ato-oxy was 3.9 ± 2.8 (P = .003 vs baseline). No significant sleep architecture differences were present with ato-oxy. No significant difference in OSA-18 score was present. OSA-18 total score was 51 ± 19 at baseline, 45 ± 17 (P = .09) at the end of 4 weeks of low-dose ato-oxy, and 45 ± 16 (P = .37) at the end of high-dose ato-oxy therapy. The most common adverse effects were irritability and fatigue, and these were generally mild.

CONCLUSIONS

Ato-oxy is a promising treatment for OSA in children with Down syndrome.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: Clinicaltrials.gov; Name: Medications for Obstructive Sleep Apnea In Children With Down Syndrome (MOSAIC); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04115878; Identifier: NCT04115878.

CITATION

Combs D, Edgin J, Hsu C-H, et al. The combination of atomoxetine and oxybutynin for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in children with Down syndrome. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(12):2065-2073.

A Narrative Review of the Clinical Trials in Sleep-Related Breathing Disorders from 2022 to Present

Sleep-related breathing disorders (SRBD) comprise obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), central sleep apnea (CSA), obesity-hypoventilation syndrome (OHS), as well as isolated sleep-related hypoxemia (ISRH), according to the recent International Classification of Sleep Disorders 3. During the last decades, there have been cumulative research reports indicating an association between the SRBD and increased cardiometabolic illness and death, as well as decreased quality of life. Notwithstanding, the results have been inconclusive, and the evidence level was not high regarding the effect of treatment for the SRBD on adverse outcomes. In the current work, we aim to give a comprehensive review of the clinical trials published from January 2022 to August 31, 2023. We highlight the heterogeneity of cardiometabolic disorders among adults with SRBD and particularly emphasize OSA management, drug therapy for OSA, positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy and cardiovascular outcomes, other effects of PAP in pregnancy and neurocognitive function, as well as the effects of surgical treatment and oral appliances. We also underline future directions in OSA management, telemonitoring, and druginduced sleep endoscopy in managing the SRBD, especially OSA. We ascertain that more studies are needed within the CSA, OHS, and ISRH research fields.

Systematic analysis of various RNA transcripts and construction of biological regulatory networks at the post-transcriptional level for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Although chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, airway remodeling, and protease-antiprotease imbalance have been implicated in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the exact pathogenesis is still obscure. Gene transcription and post-transcriptional regulation have been taken into account as key regulators of COPD occurrence and development. Identifying the hub genes and constructing biological regulatory networks at the post-transcriptional level will help extend current knowledge on COPD pathogenesis and develop potential drugs.

METHODS

All lung tissues from non-smokers (n = 6), smokers without COPD (smokers, n = 7), and smokers with COPD (COPD, n = 7) were collected to detect messenger RNA (mRNA), microRNA (miRNA), circular RNA (circRNA), and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) expression and identify the hub genes. Biological regulatory networks were constructed at the post-transcriptional level, including the RNA-binding protein (RBP)-hub gene interaction network and the competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network. In addition, we assessed the composition and abundance of immune cells in COPD lung tissue and predicted potential therapeutic drugs for COPD. Finally, the hub genes were confirmed at both the RNA and protein levels.

RESULTS

Among the 20 participants, a total of 121169 mRNA transcripts, 1871 miRNA transcripts, 4244 circRNA transcripts, and 122130 lncRNA transcripts were detected. There were differences in the expression of 1561 mRNAs, 48 miRNAs, 33 circRNAs, and 545 lncRNAs between smokers and non-smokers, as well as 1289 mRNAs, 69 miRNAs, 32 circRNAs, and 433 lncRNAs between smokers and COPD patients. 18 hub genes were identified in COPD. TGF-β signaling and Wnt/β-catenin signaling may be involved in the development of COPD. Furthermore, the circRNA/lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA ceRNA networks and the RBP-hub gene interaction network were also constructed. Analysis of the immune cell infiltration level revealed that M2 macrophages and activated NK cells were increased in COPD lung tissues. Finally, we identified that the ITK inhibitor and oxybutynin chloride may be effective in treating COPD.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified several novel hub genes involved in COPD pathogenesis. TGF-β signaling and Wnt/β-catenin signaling were the most dysregulated pathways in COPD patients. Our study constructed post-transcriptional biological regulatory networks and predicted small-molecule drugs for the treatment of COPD, which enhanced the existing understanding of COPD pathogenesis and suggested an innovative direction for the therapeutic intervention of the disease.

A muscarinic, GIRK channel-mediated inhibition of inspiratory-related XII nerve motor output emerges in early postnatal development in mice

In neonatal rhythmic medullary slices, muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) activation of hypoglossal (XII) motoneurons that innervate the tongue has a net excitatory effect on XII inspiratory motor output. Conversely, during rapid eye movement sleep in adult rodents, XII motoneurons experience a loss of excitability partly due to activation of mAChRs. This may be mediated by activation of G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate whether muscarinic modulation of XII inspiratory motor output in mouse rhythmic medullary slices includes GIRK channel-mediated inhibition and, if so, when this inhibitory mechanism emerges. Local pressure injection of the mAChR agonist muscarine potentiated inspiratory bursting by 150 ± 28% in postnatal day (P)0-P5 rhythmic medullary slice preparations. In the absence of muscarine, pharmacological GIRK channel block by Tertiapin-Q did not affect inspiratory burst parameters, whereas activation with ML297 decreased inspiratory burst area. Blocking GIRK channels by local preapplication of Tertiapin-Q revealed a developmental change in muscarinic modulation of inspiratory bursting. In P0-P2 rhythmic medullary slices, Tertiapin-Q preapplication had no significant effect on muscarinic potentiation of inspiratory bursting (a negligible 6% decrease). However, preapplication of Tertiapin-Q to P3-P5 rhythmic medullary slices caused a 19% increase in muscarinic potentiation of XII inspiratory burst amplitude. Immunofluorescence experiments revealed expression of GIRK 1 and 2 subunits and M1, M2, M3, and M5 mAChRs from P0 to P5. Overall, these data support that mechanisms underlying muscarinic modulation of inspiratory burst activity change postnatally and that potent GIRK-mediated inhibition described in adults emerges early in postnatal life.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Muscarinic modulation of inspiratory bursting at hypoglossal motoneurons has a net excitatory effect in neonatal rhythmic medullary slice preparations and a net inhibitory effect in adult animals. We demonstrate that muscarinic modulation of inspiratory bursting undergoes maturational changes from postnatal days 0 to 5 that include emergence of an inhibitory component mediated by G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channels after postnatal day 3 in neonatal mouse rhythmic medullary slice preparations.

Pharmacotherapy for obstructive sleep apnea: targeting specific pathophysiological traits

INTRODUCTION

The pathophysiology of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is multi-factorial and complex. Varying OSA's pathophysiological traits have been identified, including pharyngeal collapsibility, upper airway muscle reactivity, arousal threshold, and regulation of the ventilatory drive. Being CPAP of difficult tolerance and other interventions reserved to specific subpopulations new pharmacological treatments for OSA might be resolutive.

AREAS COVERED

Several existing and newly developed pharmacological drugs can impact one or more endotypes and could therefore be proposed as treatment options for sleep disordered breathing. With this review we will explore different pathophysiological traits as new targets for OSA therapy. This review will summarize the most promising pharmacological treatment for OSA accordingly with their mechanisms of action on upper airway collapsibility, muscle responsiveness, arousal threshold, and loop gain.

EXPERT OPINION

Only understanding the pathophysiological traits causing OSA in each patient and placing the disease in the framework of patient comorbidities, we will be able to evolve interventions toward OSA. The development of new drug's combinations will permit different approaches and different choices beside conventional treatments. In the next future, we hope that sleep specialists will select the treatment for a specific patient on the base of its pathophysiology, defining a precision medicine for OSA.

Pharmacotherapy for obstructive sleep apnea - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Continuous positive airway pressure is the first-line and gold-standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Pharmacotherapy is not commonly used in treating OSA until recently. Combined noradrenergic and antimuscarinic agents have been clinically applied for OSA patients with variable results. This meta-analysis study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the combined regimen on OSA. A systematic literature search was performed up to November 2022 for the effects of the combined regimen on OSA. Eight randomized controlled trials were identified and systematically reviewed for meta-analysis. There were significant mean differences between OSA patients taking a combined regimen and placebo in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) [mean difference (MD) -9.03 events/h, 95%CI (-16.22, -1.83 events/h; P = 0.01] and lowest oxygen saturation [MD 5.61%, 95% CI % (3.43, 7.80); P < 0.01]. Meta-regression showed that a higher proportion of male participants was associated with a greater reduction of AHI (p = 0.04). This study showed a positive but modest effect of pharmacotherapy in the reduction of OSA severity. The combination drugs are most applicable to male OSA patients based on their efficacy and pharmacological susceptibility. Pharmacotherapy may be applied as an alternative, adjunctive or synergistic treatment under careful consideration of its side effects.

Oxygen desaturation index, lowest arterial oxygen saturation and time spent below 90% oxygen saturation as diagnostic markers for obstructive sleep apnea

BACKGROUND

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) syndrome is associated with a high mortality, and blood oxygen indexes play an important role in evaluating this disease. The objective of this study was to explore the value of blood oxygen indexes, including minimum oxygen saturation (LSpO2), oxygen reduction index (ODI) and time spent with oxygen saturation below 90% (TS 90%), as diagnostic markers for OSA syndrome.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 320 patients with OSA treated in Ningbo First Hospital from June 2018 to June 2021 were included and divided into mild, moderate, and severe groups according to the severity of the condition (n = 104, 92, and 124, respectively). The blood oxygen indexes as well as the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) were compared. The Spearman correlation analysis was performed to explore the relationship between the parameters. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to evaluate the diagnostic value of the blood oxygen indexes for OSA syndrome.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in body weight, body mass index, and blood pressure before and after sleep among the groups (P < 0.05). LSpO2 levels followed a pattern with the severe group showing the lowest values, followed by the moderate group, and then the mild group, whereas ODI and TS 90% levels showed the opposite (P < 0.05). Spearman correlation analysis showed that AHI, ODI, TS 90% were positively correlated with severity of OSA, whereas LSpO2 was negatively correlated with severity of OSA. ODI showed a high diagnostic value for OSA (area under curve (AUC) = 0.823, 95% CI: 0.730-0.917). TS 90% showed a high diagnostic value for OSA (AUC = 0.872, 95% CI: 0.794-0.950). LSpO2 showed high accuracy in diagnostic value for OSA (AUC = 0.716, 95% CI: 0.596-0.835). The combination of the 3 indexes demonstrated a high diagnostic value for OSA (AUC = 0.939, 95% CI: 0.890-0.989). The diagnostic value of the combined signature was found to be significantly higher compared to the value of individual indexes (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The evaluation of the severity of OSA should not rely solely on a single observation index, but rather on a combination of ODI, LSpO2 and TS 90%. This combined diagnostic signature can provide a more comprehensive assessment of the patient's condition and serve as an alternative diagnostic basis to ensure timely diagnosis and appropriate clinical treatment for OSA.