Enhancing nitrogen removal from wastewater in sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) using additional carbon source produced from food waste acidogenic fermentation at different temperatures

Enhancing biological conversion of NO to N2O by utilizing thermophiles instead of mesophiles

The production of nitrous oxide (N2O) through the biological denitrification of nitric oxide (NO) from flue gases has recently been achieved. Although the temperature of flue gas after desulphurization is usually 45-70 °C, all previous studies conducted microbial denitrification of NO under mesophilic conditions (22-35 °C). This study investigated the biological conversion of NO to N2O in both mesophilic (35-45 °C) and thermophilic conditions (45-50 °C). The results showed that temperature has a great impact on N2O production, with a maximum conversion efficiency (from NO to N2O) of 82% achieved at 45 °C, which is obviously higher than the reported conversion efficiencies (24-71%) under mesophilic conditions. Additionally, high-throughput sequencing result showed that the genera Enterococcus, Clostridium, Romboutsia, and Streptococcus were closely related to NO denitrification and N2O production. Microbial communities at 40 and 45 °C had greater metabolizing capacities for polymeric carbon sources. This study suggests that thermophilic condition (45 °C) is more suitable for biological production of N2O from NO.

Effect of thermal hydrolyzed sludge filtrate as an external carbon source on biological nutrient removal performance of A2/O system

Thermal hydrolyzed sludge filtrate (THSF) rich in biodegradable organics could be a promising external carbon source for biological nutrient removal (BNR). The use of THSF can effectively reduce wastewater treatment plants operating costs and recover bioresources and bioenergy from the waste activated sludge. In this study, the effect of THSF on the BNR process was investigated using a lab-scale anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (A²/O) system. Total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) removal efficiencies of 74.26 ± 3.36% and 92.20 ± 3.13% at a 0.3% dosing ratio were achieved, respectively. Moreover, 20.42% of the chemical oxygen demand (COD) contained in THSF contributed to denitrification, enhancing nitrogen removal efficiency from 55.30 to 74.26%. However, the effluent COD increased by approximately 36.80%, due to 18.39% of the COD contained in THSF discharged with effluent. In addition, the maximum denitrification rate was approximately 16.01 mg N g VSS^-1 h^-1, while the nitrification rate was not significantly affected by THSF. Nitrosomonas, a common chemoautotrophic nitrifier, was not detected after the introduction of THSF. The aerobic denitrifier Rubellimicrobium was stimulated, and its relative abundance increased from 0.16 to 3.03%. Moreover, the relative abundance of Dechloromonas was 3.93%, indicating that the denitrifying phosphorus removal process was enhanced. This study proposes an engineering application route of THSF, and the chemical phosphate removal pretreatment might be a means to suppress the phosphate recirculation.

Application of external carbon source in heterotrophic denitrification of domestic sewage: A review

The carbon source is essential as an electron donor in the heterotrophic denitrification process. When there is a lack of organic carbon sources in the system, an external carbon source is needed to improve denitrification efficiency. This review compiles the effects of liquid, solid and gaseous carbon sources on denitrification. Sodium acetate has better denitrification efficiency and is usually the first choice for external carbon sources. Fermentation by-products have been demonstrated to have the same denitrification efficiency as sodium acetate. Compared with cellulose-rich materials, biodegradable polymers have better and more stable denitrification performance in solid-phase nitrification, but their price is higher than the former. Methane as a gaseous carbon source is studied mainly by aerobic methane oxidation coupled with denitrification, which is feasible using methane as a carbon source. Liquid carbon sources are better controlled and utilized than solid carbon sources and gaseous carbon sources. In addition, high carbon to nitrogen ratio and hydraulic retention time can promote denitrification, while high dissolved oxygen (DO>2.0 mg L^-1) will inhibit the denitrification process. At the same time, high temperature is conducive to the decomposition of carbon sources by microorganisms. This review also considers the advantages and disadvantages of different carbon sources and cost analysis to provide a reference for looking for more economical and effective external carbon sources in the future.