1
|
Nourzadegan N, Baghernezhad S, Daliri MR. Influence of individual's age on the characteristics of brain effective connectivity. GeroScience 2025; 47:2455-2474. [PMID: 39549197 PMCID: PMC11978603 DOI: 10.1007/s11357-024-01436-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2024] [Accepted: 11/07/2024] [Indexed: 11/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Given the increasing number of older adults in society, there is a growing need for studies on changes in the aging brain. The aim of this research is to investigate the effective connectivity of different age groups using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and graph theory. By examining connectivity in different age groups, a better understanding of age-related changes can be achieved. Lifespan pilot data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) were used to examine dynamic effective connectivity (dEC) changes across different age groups. The Granger causality method with time windowing was employed to calculate dEC. After extracting graph measures, statistical analyses were performed to compare the age groups. Support vector machine and decision tree classifiers were used to classify the different age groups based on the extracted graph measures. Based on the obtained results, it can be concluded that there are significant differences in the effective connectivity among the three age groups. Statistical analyses revealed disassortativity. The global efficiency exhibited a decreasing trend, and the transitivity measure showed an increasing trend with the advancing age. The decision tree classifier showed an accuracy of 86.67 % with Kruskal-Wallis selected features. This study demonstrates that changes in effective connectivity across different age brackets can serve as a tool for better understanding brain function during the aging process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nakisa Nourzadegan
- Neuroscience & Neuroengineering Research Laboratory, Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Electrical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran
| | - Sepideh Baghernezhad
- Neuroscience & Neuroengineering Research Laboratory, Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Electrical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Reza Daliri
- Neuroscience & Neuroengineering Research Laboratory, Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Electrical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu H, Wu M, Huang H, Chen X, Zeng P, Xu Y. Comparative efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognition function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev 2024; 101:102508. [PMID: 39303877 DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 09/14/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a critical time window for implementing prevention strategies to attenuate or delay cognitive decline. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques are promising non-pharmacological therapies for improving the cognitive function of MCI, but it is unclear which type of NIBS protocol is most effective. This study aimed to compare and rank the beneficial effect of different NIBS methods/protocols on cognitive function and examine the acceptability of NIBS in patients with MCI. METHODS Electronic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and Chongqing VIP Database up to November 2023. Patients with diagnosis of MCI were included. The primary outcomes were acceptability and pre-post treatment changes in global cognitive function, and the secondary outcomes were specific cognitive domains (language and executive function). All network meta‑analysis procedures were performed under the frequentist model. A protocol for this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42023441448). RESULTS A network meta-analysis was conducted on 19 eligible RCTs consisting of 599 subjects. Compared with the sham stimulation, Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over the Bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rTMS-F3F4) showed the strongest improvement in global cognitive function in MCI patients (SMD =1.52[95 %CIs =0.49-2.56]), followed by rTMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rTMS-F3) (SMD =1.25[95 %CIs =0.57-1.93]); Moreover, rTMS-F3F4 showed more significant efficacy in language function (SMD =0.96[95 %CIs = 0.20-1.72]); No statistically significant differences were found among the other cognitive domains. Compared with the rTMS-F4, rTMS-F3F4 showed a stronger improvement in global cognitive function in MCI patients (SMD =1.80[95 %CIs =0.02-3.59]). Similar results were obtained in subgroup analyses of cognitive function. All the methods were well-tolerated with an acceptable safety profile. CONCLUSION The present findings provide evidence of the benefits of NIBS, especially TMS stimulating the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, for the beneficial effect on cognitive and language function in patients with MCI. However, because few studies were available for inclusion, additional well-designed, large-scale RCTs are warranted to support exploring longer-term dynamic effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Liu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Mengyuan Wu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Haoyu Huang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Xiaolin Chen
- Department of Rehabilitation, Dongguan Songshan Lake Tungwah Hospital, DongGuan, China
| | - Peiling Zeng
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Ying Xu
- National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Rehabilitation Medicine Technology, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gong L, Zhao J, Dai Y, Wang Z, Hou F, Zhang Y, Lu ZL, Zhou J. Improving iconic memory through contrast detection training with HOA-corrected vision. FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH 2024; 4:95-102. [PMID: 38933850 PMCID: PMC11197569 DOI: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Iconic memory and short-term memory are not only crucial for perception and cognition, but also of great importance to mental health. Here, we first showed that both types of memory could be improved by improving limiting processes in visual processing through perceptual learning. Normal adults were trained in a contrast detection task for ten days, with their higher-order aberrations (HOA) corrected in real-time. We found that the training improved not only their contrast sensitivity function (CSF), but also their iconic memory and baseline information maintenance for short-term memory, and the relationship between memory and CSF improvements could be well-predicted by an observer model. These results suggest that training the limiting component of a cognitive task with visual perceptual learning could improve visual cognition. They may also provide an empirical foundation for new therapies to treat people with poor sensory memory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Gong
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Optometry and Vision Science, Eye Hospital, School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China
| | - Junlei Zhao
- Institute of Optics and Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610209, China
- The Key Laboratory of Adaptive Optics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610209, China
| | - Yun Dai
- Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, China
| | - Zili Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Optometry and Vision Science, Eye Hospital, School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China
| | - Fang Hou
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Optometry and Vision Science, Eye Hospital, School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China
| | - Yudong Zhang
- The Key Laboratory of Adaptive Optics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610209, China
| | - Zhong-Lin Lu
- Division of Arts and Sciences, New York University Shanghai, Shanghai 200126, China
- Center for Neural Science, Department of Psychology, New York University, New York 10003, United States
- NYU-ECNU Institute of Brain and Cognitive Science at NYU Shanghai, Shanghai 200062, China
| | - Jiawei Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Optometry and Vision Science, Eye Hospital, School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sharbafshaaer M, Gigi I, Lavorgna L, Esposito S, Bonavita S, Tedeschi G, Esposito F, Trojsi F. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Effects on Cognitive Functions-A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6190. [PMID: 37834834 PMCID: PMC10573645 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique also used as a non-pharmacological intervention against cognitive impairment. The purpose of the present review was to summarize what is currently known about the effectiveness of rTMS intervention on different cognitive domains in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and to address potential neuromodulation approaches in combination with electroencephalography (EEG) and neuroimaging, especially functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In this systematic review, we consulted three main databases (PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus), and Google Scholar was selected for the gray literature search. The PRISMA flowchart drove the studies' inclusion. The selection process ensured that only high-quality studies were included; after removing duplicate papers, explicit ratings were given based on the quality classification as high (A), moderate (B), or low (C), considering factors such as risks of bias, inaccuracies, inconsistencies, lack of direction, and publication bias. Seven full-text articles fulfilled the stated inclusion, reporting five double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled studies, a case study, and a randomized crossover trial. The results of the reviewed studies suggested that rTMS in MCI patients is safe and effective for enhancing cognitive functions, thus making it a potential therapeutic approach for MCI patients. Changes in functional connectivity within the default mode network (DMN) after targeted rTMS could represent a valuable indicator of treatment response. Finally, high-frequency rTMS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has been shown to significantly enhance cognitive functions, such as executive performance, together with the increase of functional connectivity within frontoparietal networks. The main limitations were the number of included studies and the exclusion of studies using intermittent theta-burst stimulation, used in studies on Alzheimer's disease. Therefore, neuroimaging techniques in combination with rTMS have been shown to be useful for future network-based, fMRI-guided therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minoo Sharbafshaaer
- MRI Research Center, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.S.); (I.G.); (S.B.); (G.T.); (F.E.); (F.T.)
| | - Ilaria Gigi
- MRI Research Center, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.S.); (I.G.); (S.B.); (G.T.); (F.E.); (F.T.)
| | - Luigi Lavorgna
- First Division of Neurology, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Sabrina Esposito
- First Division of Neurology, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Simona Bonavita
- MRI Research Center, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.S.); (I.G.); (S.B.); (G.T.); (F.E.); (F.T.)
- First Division of Neurology, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Gioacchino Tedeschi
- MRI Research Center, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.S.); (I.G.); (S.B.); (G.T.); (F.E.); (F.T.)
- First Division of Neurology, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Fabrizio Esposito
- MRI Research Center, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.S.); (I.G.); (S.B.); (G.T.); (F.E.); (F.T.)
| | - Francesca Trojsi
- MRI Research Center, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.S.); (I.G.); (S.B.); (G.T.); (F.E.); (F.T.)
- First Division of Neurology, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cao Y, Kuai H, Liang P, Pan JS, Yan J, Zhong N. BNLoop-GAN: a multi-loop generative adversarial model on brain network learning to classify Alzheimer's disease. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1202382. [PMID: 37424996 PMCID: PMC10326383 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1202382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent advancements in AI, big data analytics, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have revolutionized the study of brain diseases such as Alzheimer's Disease (AD). However, most AI models used for neuroimaging classification tasks have limitations in their learning strategies, that is batch training without the incremental learning capability. To address such limitations, the systematic Brain Informatics methodology is reconsidered to realize evidence combination and fusion computing with multi-modal neuroimaging data through continuous learning. Specifically, we introduce the BNLoop-GAN (Loop-based Generative Adversarial Network for Brain Network) model, utilizing multiple techniques such as conditional generation, patch-based discrimination, and Wasserstein gradient penalty to learn the implicit distribution of brain networks. Moreover, a multiple-loop-learning algorithm is developed to combine evidence with better sample contribution ranking during training processes. The effectiveness of our approach is demonstrated through a case study on the classification of individuals with AD and healthy control groups using various experimental design strategies and multi-modal brain networks. The BNLoop-GAN model with multi-modal brain networks and multiple-loop-learning can improve classification performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Cao
- Faculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China
- Beijing International Collaboration Base on Brain Informatics and Wisdom Services, Beijing, China
| | - Hongzhi Kuai
- Faculty of Engineering, Maebashi Institute of Technology, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| | - Peipeng Liang
- School of Psychology and Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Jeng-Shyang Pan
- College of Computer Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China
| | - Jianzhuo Yan
- Faculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China
- Beijing International Collaboration Base on Brain Informatics and Wisdom Services, Beijing, China
| | - Ning Zhong
- Beijing International Collaboration Base on Brain Informatics and Wisdom Services, Beijing, China
- Faculty of Engineering, Maebashi Institute of Technology, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
- School of Psychology and Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang J, Hu S, Liu Y, Lyu H, Huang X, Li X, Chen J, Hu Q, Xu J, Yu H. Acupuncture Treatment Modulate Regional Homogeneity of Dorsal Lateral Prefrontal Cortex in Patients with Amnesic Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Alzheimers Dis 2022; 90:173-184. [DOI: 10.3233/jad-220592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background: Although acupuncture is widely used to improve cognitive and memory in the amnesic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) patients with impressive effectiveness, its neural mechanism remains largely unclear. Objective: We aimed to explore functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) mechanism of acupuncture for aMCI. Methods: A randomized, controlled, single-blind research was performed. A total of 46 aMCI patients were randomly assigned into verum and sham acupuncture group, who received a total of 24 times treatments (3 times/week, 8 weeks). Clinical evaluation and fMRI scanning were performed at baseline and after treatment for all aMCI patients. The interaction effects and inter-group effects of regional homogeneity (ReHo) were performed using mixed effect models, and the correlations between clinical improvement and neuroimaging changes before and after verum acupuncture treatment were analyzed using Pearson correlations. Results: As a result, interaction effects showed increased ReHo value in left dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), increased functional connectivity between left DLPFC and left precuneus, and decreased functional connectivity between left DLPFC and left inferior temporal gyrus after verum acupuncture but inversely after sham acupuncture in the aMCI. Condition effects showed increased ReHo in right lingual gyrus, and bilateral post-central gyrus after verum and sham acupuncture in the aMCI. In addition, the changed Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores in verum acupuncture group were significantly correlated with changed ReHo values in left DLPFC. Conclusion: Together, our findings further confirmed that acupuncture could be used as a promising complementary therapy for aMCI by modulating function of left DLPFC to improve cognitive symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinhuan Zhang
- The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, China
- Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Shan Hu
- The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yongfeng Liu
- Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Hanqing Lyu
- Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Xingxian Huang
- The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, China
| | - Xinbei Li
- Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jianxiang Chen
- Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Qingmao Hu
- Institute of Biomedical and Health Engineering, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jinping Xu
- Institute of Biomedical and Health Engineering, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Haibo Yu
- Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Contemporary Clinical Acupuncture Medicine, Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Xiao F, Wang Z, Yuan S, Liang K, Chen Q. Relational integration predicted numerical inductive reasoning:
ERP
Evidence from the
N400
and
LNC. Psychophysiology 2022; 59:e14046. [DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Xiao
- Department of Education Science Shanxi Normal University Taiyuan China
| | - Zhi‐Dong Wang
- Department of Education Science Shanxi Normal University Taiyuan China
| | - Shang‐Qing Yuan
- Department of Education Science Shanxi Normal University Taiyuan China
- Department of Psychology, Center for Child Development, Learning and Cognitive Key Laboratory Capital Normal University Beijing China
| | - Kun Liang
- Department of Education Science Shanxi Normal University Taiyuan China
| | - Qingfei Chen
- College of Psychology and Sociology Shenzhen University Shenzhen China
- Center for Language and Brain Shenzhen Institute of Neuroscience Shenzhen China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Cognitive Function in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Early/Mid Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Brain Sci 2022; 12:brainsci12050562. [PMID: 35624949 PMCID: PMC9138792 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12050562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) i a non-invasive brain stimulation which is considered to have the potential to improve cognitive impairment in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, previous studies have been controversial on the therapeutic effect of tDCS. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of tDCS on cognitive impairment in patients with MCI and mild-to-moderate AD. Five databases, namely PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library, were searched with relative terms to extract the cognitive function changes measured by an objective cognitive scale in the included studies. The meta-analysis results showed that, compared with sham tDCS treatment, the overall cognitive function of patients with AD and MCI was significantly improved (weighted mean difference = 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.32 to 1.66; p = 0.004) after tDCS treatment, but the behavioral symptoms, recognition memory function, attention and executive function were not significantly improved. The subgroup analysis showed that the treatment would be more efficacious if the temporal-lobe-related brain areas were stimulated, the number of stimulations was greater than or equal to 10 and the current density was 2.5 mA/cm2. Among them, AD patients benefited more than MCI patients. No cognitive improvement was observed in patients with MCI or AD at different follow-up times after treatment. Our meta-analysis provided important evidence for the cognitive enhancement of tDCS in patients with MCI and mild-to-moderate AD and discussed its underlying mechanisms.
Collapse
|
9
|
Jia X, Fan W, Wang Z, Liu Y, Li Y, Li H, Li H, Ma T, Wang J, Yang Q. Progressive Prefrontal Cortex Dysfunction in Parkinson's Disease With Probable REM Sleep Behavior Disorder: A 3-Year Longitudinal Study. Front Aging Neurosci 2022; 13:750767. [PMID: 35082656 PMCID: PMC8784770 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.750767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the disrupted prefrontal cortex activity specific to patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) with rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD) compared with those without and to further examine the associations between these alterations and neuropsychological measurements. Ninety-six patients with early PD underwent both structural and functional MRI, and also neuropsychological assessments in the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database. Of these, 46 patients who completed 1- and 3-year fMRI follow-up examinations were categorized as PD with probable RBD (PD-pRBD+) and without (PD-pRBD−). The left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) seed-to-voxel functional connectivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the progressive neural alterations specific to PD-pRBD+ compared with PD-pRBD− over time. Furthermore, relationships between these alterations and neuropsychological performance were examined. Compared with patients with PD-pRBD−, patients with PD-pRBD+ initially exhibited connectivity deficits between the left DLPFC and the medial frontopolar cortex. Moreover, these patients further exhibited disrupted DLPFC connectivity in the lateral frontopolar cortex at the 3-year follow-up evaluation. Correlation analysis revealed that connectivity between the left DLPFC and frontopolar cortex was positively related to executive function in PD-pRBD+ after adjusting for nuisance variables. Progressive prefrontal cortex dysfunction associated with RBD in early PD may provide an effective subtype-specific biomarker of neurodegenerative progression, which may shed light on the neuropathological mechanisms underlying the clinical heterogeneity of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiuqin Jia
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Key Lab of Medical Engineering for Cardiovascular Disease, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Wentao Fan
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Key Lab of Medical Engineering for Cardiovascular Disease, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Geriatric Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhijiang Wang
- National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Peking University Sixth Hospital (Institute of Mental Health), Beijing, China
| | - Yuehong Liu
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Key Lab of Medical Engineering for Cardiovascular Disease, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Li
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Haibin Li
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Li
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Key Lab of Medical Engineering for Cardiovascular Disease, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Ting Ma
- School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology at Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Clinical Lab, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Jing Wang
| | - Qi Yang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Key Lab of Medical Engineering for Cardiovascular Disease, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, Beijing, China
- Qi Yang
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kim J, Kim H, Jeong H, Roh D, Kim DH. tACS as a promising therapeutic option for improving cognitive function in mild cognitive impairment: A direct comparison between tACS and tDCS. J Psychiatr Res 2021; 141:248-256. [PMID: 34256276 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Neuromodulation has gained attention as a potential non-pharmacological intervention for mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, no studies have directly compared the effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on MCI patients. We aimed to identify the more promising and efficient therapeutic option between tACS and tDCS for cognitive enhancement in MCI patients. We compared the effects of gamma-tACS with tDCS on cognitive function and electroencephalography (EEG) in MCI patients. In this sham-controlled, double-blinded, repeated-measures study with the order of the stimulation counterbalanced across patients (n = 20), both gamma-tACS (40 H z) and tDCS were administered at the same intensity (2 mA) in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for 30 min. Cognitive tests (Stroop and Trail-Making-Test [TMT]) and EEG were performed before and after single-session stimulation. Gamma-tACS improved the Stroop-color in comparison with tDCS (p = .044) and sham (p = .010) and enhanced the TMT-B in comparison with sham (p = .021). However, tDCS was not significantly different from sham in changes of any cognitive test scores. In EEG analysis, gamma-tACS increased beta activity in comparison with sham and tDCS, whereas tDCS decreased delta and theta activity in comparison with sham. Gamma-tACS also increased beta 2 source activity in the anterior cingulate, compared to sham. The cognitive benefits of tACS in MCI patients appeared superior to those of tDCS. tACS facilitated cognitive function by increasing beta activity, while tDCS delayed the progression of MCI symptoms by decreasing slow-frequency activity. Thus, tACS could be used as a new therapeutic option for MCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiheon Kim
- Department of Psychiatry, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea; Mind-Neuromodulation Laboratory, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hansol Kim
- Mind-Neuromodulation Laboratory, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyewon Jeong
- Mind-Neuromodulation Laboratory, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Daeyoung Roh
- Department of Psychiatry, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea; Mind-Neuromodulation Laboratory, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Do Hoon Kim
- Department of Psychiatry, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea; Mind-Neuromodulation Laboratory, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Li Q, Jia M, Yan Z, Li Q, Sun F, He C, Li Y, Zhou X, Zhang H, Liu X, Bu X, Gao P, He H, Zhao Z, Zhu Z. Activation of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Ameliorates Cognitive Decline in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Through a Metabolism-Independent Pathway. J Am Heart Assoc 2021; 10:e020734. [PMID: 34250817 PMCID: PMC8483500 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.120.020734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background Patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus are susceptible to dementia, but regular therapy fails to reduce the risk of dementia. Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists have neuroprotective effects in experimental studies. We aimed to assess the effect of liraglutide, a glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist, on cognitive function and whether its effect was associated with metabolic changes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods and Results Fifty patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were recruited in this prospective study. All patients underwent cognitive assessment and brain activation monitoring by functional near‐infrared spectroscopy. At 12 weeks, patients in the glucagon‐like peptide‐1 group acquired better scores in all cognitive tests and showed remarkable improvement in memory and attention (P=0.040) test compared with the control group after multivariable adjustment. Compared with the control group, liraglutide significantly increased activation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and orbitofrontal cortex brain regions (P=0.0038). After liraglutide treatment, cognitive scores were significantly correlated with changes in these activating brain regions (P<0.05), but no correlation was observed between the changes in cognitive function and changes of body mass index, blood pressure, and glycemic levels. Conclusions We concluded that liraglutide improves cognitive decline in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This beneficial effect is independent of its hypoglycemic effect and weight loss. The optimal intervention should be targeted to cognitive decline in the early stages of dementia. Registration URL: https://www.ClinicalTrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03707171.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Li
- Center for Hypertension and Metabolic Diseases Department of Hypertension and Endocrinology Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Mengxiao Jia
- Center for Hypertension and Metabolic Diseases Department of Hypertension and Endocrinology Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Zhencheng Yan
- Center for Hypertension and Metabolic Diseases Department of Hypertension and Endocrinology Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Qiang Li
- Center for Hypertension and Metabolic Diseases Department of Hypertension and Endocrinology Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Fang Sun
- Center for Hypertension and Metabolic Diseases Department of Hypertension and Endocrinology Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Chengkang He
- Center for Hypertension and Metabolic Diseases Department of Hypertension and Endocrinology Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Yingsha Li
- Center for Hypertension and Metabolic Diseases Department of Hypertension and Endocrinology Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Xunmei Zhou
- Center for Hypertension and Metabolic Diseases Department of Hypertension and Endocrinology Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Hexuan Zhang
- Center for Hypertension and Metabolic Diseases Department of Hypertension and Endocrinology Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Xiaoli Liu
- Center for Hypertension and Metabolic Diseases Department of Hypertension and Endocrinology Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Xiaona Bu
- Center for Hypertension and Metabolic Diseases Department of Hypertension and Endocrinology Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Peng Gao
- Center for Hypertension and Metabolic Diseases Department of Hypertension and Endocrinology Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Hongbo He
- Center for Hypertension and Metabolic Diseases Department of Hypertension and Endocrinology Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Zhigang Zhao
- Center for Hypertension and Metabolic Diseases Department of Hypertension and Endocrinology Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| | - Zhiming Zhu
- Center for Hypertension and Metabolic Diseases Department of Hypertension and Endocrinology Daping Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hong Y, Alvarado RL, Jog A, Greve DN, Salat DH. Serial Reaction Time Task Performance in Older Adults with Neuropsychologically Defined Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Alzheimers Dis 2021; 74:491-500. [PMID: 32039857 DOI: 10.3233/jad-191323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have found that individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) exhibit a range of deficits outside the realm of primary explicit memory, yet the role of response speed and implicit learning in older adults with MCI have not been established. OBJECTIVE The current study aims to explore and document response speed and implicit learning in older adults with neuropsychologically defined MCI using a simple serial reaction (SRT) task. In addition, the study aims to explore the feasibility of a novel utilization of the simple cognitive task using machine learning procedures as a proof of concept. METHOD Participants were 22 cognitively healthy older adults and 20 older adults with MCI confirmed through comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation. Two-sample t-test, multivariate regression, and mixed-effect models were used to investigate group difference in response speed and implicit learning on the SRT task. We also explored the potential utility of SRT feature analysis through random forest classification. RESULTS With demographic variables controlled, the MCI group showed overall slower reaction time and higher error rate compared to the cognitively healthy volunteers. Both groups showed significant simple motor learning and implicit learning. The learning patterns were not statistically different between the two groups. Random forest classification achieved overall accuracy of 80.9%. CONCLUSIONS Individuals with MCI demonstrated slower reaction time and higher error rate compared to cognitively healthy volunteers but demonstrated largely preserved motor learning and implicit sequence learning. Preliminary results from random forest classification using features from SRT performance supported further research in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Hong
- Home Base, A Red Sox Foundation and Massachusetts General Hospital Program, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Radiology, Brain Aging and Dementia (BAnD) Laboratory; MGH/MIT/HMS Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Rachel L Alvarado
- Department of Radiology, Brain Aging and Dementia (BAnD) Laboratory; MGH/MIT/HMS Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.,Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Amod Jog
- IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Douglas N Greve
- Laboratory of Computational Neuroimaging; MGH/MIT/HMS Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David H Salat
- Department of Radiology, Brain Aging and Dementia (BAnD) Laboratory; MGH/MIT/HMS Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Neuroimaging Research for Veterans (NeRVe) Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jia X, Zhang Y, Yao Y, Chen F, Liang P. Neural correlates of improved inductive reasoning ability in abacus-trained children: A resting state fMRI study. Psych J 2021; 10:566-573. [PMID: 33709543 DOI: 10.1002/pchj.439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2018] [Revised: 12/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Abacus-based mental calculation (AMC) training may improve mathematics-related abilities and transfer to other cognitive domains. Thus, it was hypothesized that inductive reasoning abilities can be improved by AMC training given the overlapping cognitive processes and neural correlates between AMC and inductive reasoning. The aim of the current study was to examine the underlying neurobiological mechanisms of this possible adaption by resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). Sixty-three children were randomly assigned to either the AMC-trained or the nontrained group. The AMC-trained group was required to perform abacus training for 2 hours per week for 5 years whereas the nontrained group was not required to perform any abacus training. Each participant's rs-fMRI data were collected after abacus training, and regional homogeneity (ReHo) analysis was performed to determine the neural activity differences between groups. The participants' posttraining mathematical ability, intelligence quotients, and inductive reasoning ability were recorded and evaluated. The results revealed that AMC-trained children exhibited a significantly higher mathematical ability and inductive reasoning performance and higher ReHo in the rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (RLPFC) compared to the nontrained group. In particular, the increased ReHo in the RLPFC was found to be positively correlated with improved inductive reasoning performance. Our findings suggest that rs-fMRI may reflect the modulation of training in task-related networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiuqin Jia
- School of Psychology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China.,Department of Radiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Zhang
- Bio-X Laboratory, Department of Physics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yuzhao Yao
- Bio-X Laboratory, Department of Physics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Feiyan Chen
- Bio-X Laboratory, Department of Physics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Peipeng Liang
- School of Psychology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yao Y, Jia X, Luo J, Chen F, Liang P. Involvement of the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Numerical Rule Induction: A Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Study. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 14:566675. [PMID: 33424561 PMCID: PMC7785589 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.566675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Numerical inductive reasoning has been considered as one of the most important higher cognitive functions of the human brain. Importantly, previous behavioral studies have consistently reported that one critical component of numerical inductive reasoning is checking, which often occurs when a discrepant element is discovered, and reprocessing is needed to determine whether the discrepancy is an error of the original series. However, less is known about the neural mechanism underlying the checking process. Given that the checking effect involves cognitive control processes, such as the incongruent resolution, that are linked to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), this study hypothesizes that the right DLPFC may play a specific role in the checking process. To test the hypothesis, this study utilized the transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive brain stimulation method that could modulate cortical excitability, and examined whether and how the stimulation of the right DLPFC via tDCS could modulate the checking effect during a number-series completion problem task. Ninety healthy participants were allocated to one of the anodal, cathodal, and sham groups. Subjects were required to verify whether number sequences formed rule-based series, and checking effect was assessed by the difference in performance between invalid and valid conditions. It was found that significantly longer response times (RTs) were exhibited in invalid condition compared with valid condition in groups of anodal, cathodal, and sham tDCS. Furthermore, the anodal tDCS significantly shortened the checking effect than those of the cathodal and sham groups, whereas no significantly prolonged checking effect was detected in the cathodal group. The current findings indicated that anodal tDCS affected the process of checking, which suggested that the right DLPFC might play a critical role in the checking process of numerical inductive reasoning by inhibiting incongruent response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzhao Yao
- Bio-X Laboratory, Department of Physics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiuqin Jia
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Luo
- Center for Economic Behavior and Decision-making (CEBD), and School of Economics, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou, China
| | - Feiyan Chen
- Bio-X Laboratory, Department of Physics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Peipeng Liang
- School of Psychology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
A Brain Network Constructed on an L1-Norm Regression Model Is More Sensitive in Detecting Small World Network Changes in Early AD. Neural Plast 2020; 2020:9436406. [PMID: 32684926 PMCID: PMC7351016 DOI: 10.1155/2020/9436406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Revised: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Most previous imaging studies have used traditional Pearson correlation analysis to construct brain networks. This approach fails to adequately and completely account for the interaction between adjacent brain regions. In this study, we used the L1-norm linear regression model to test the small-world attributes of the brain networks of three groups of patients, namely, those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and healthy controls (HCs); we attempted to identify the method that may detect minor differences in MCI and AD patients. Twenty-four AD patients, 33 MCI patients, and 27 HC elderly subjects were subjected to functional MRI (fMRI). We applied traditional Pearson correlation and the L1-norm to construct the brain networks and then tested the small-world attributes by calculating the following parameters: clustering coefficient (Cp), path length (Lp), global efficiency (Eg), and local efficiency (Eloc). As expected, L1 could detect slight changes, mainly in MCI patients expressing higher Cp and Eloc; however, no statistical differences were found between MCI patients and HCs in terms of Cp, Lp, Eg, and Eloc, using Pearson correlation. Compared with HCs, AD patients expressed a lower Cp, Eloc, and Lp and an increased Eg using both connectivity metrics. The statistical differences between the groups indicated the brain networks constructed by the L1-norm were more sensitive to detect slight small-world network changes in early stages of AD.
Collapse
|
16
|
Li H, Liu T, Woolley JD, Zhang P. Reality Status Judgments of Real and Fantastical Events in Children's Prefrontal Cortex: An fNIRS Study. Front Hum Neurosci 2019; 13:444. [PMID: 31992977 PMCID: PMC6933013 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The present study aimed to examine neural mechanisms underlying the ability to differentiate reality from fantasy. Using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), we measured prefrontal activations in children and adults while they performed a reality judgment task. Participants’ task was to judge the reality status of events in fantastical and realistic videos. Behavioral data revealed that, although there was no accuracy difference, children showed significantly longer reaction times in making the judgments than did adults. The fNIRS data consistently revealed higher prefrontal activations in children than in adults when watching the videos and judging the reality of the events. These results suggest that when making judgments of event reality, children may require more cognitive resources and also mainly rely on their own personal experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Li
- School of Education, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China
| | - Tao Liu
- School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jacqueline D Woolley
- Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - Peng Zhang
- Faculty of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Liu J, Zhang B, Wilson G, Kong J. New Perspective for Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Site Selection in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Based on Meta- and Functional Connectivity Analyses. Front Aging Neurosci 2019; 11:228. [PMID: 31551754 PMCID: PMC6736566 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has been widely used to treat mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, there exists no consensus on the best stimulation sites. Objective To explore potential stimulation locations for NIBS treatment in patients with MCI, combining meta- and resting state functional connectivity (rsFC) analyses. Methods The meta-analysis was conducted to identify brain regions associated with MCI. Regions of interest (ROIs) were extracted based on this meta-analysis. The rsFC analysis was applied to 45 MCI patients to determine brain surface regions that are functionally connected with the above ROIs. Results We found that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) were the overlapping brain regions between our results and those of previous studies. In addition, we recommend that the temporoparietal junction (including the angular gyrus), which was found in both the meta- and rsFC analysis, should be considered in NIBS treatment of MCI. Furthermore, the bilateral orbital prefrontal gyrus, inferior temporal gyrus, medial superior frontal gyrus, and right inferior occipital gyrus may be potential brain stimulation sites for NIBS treatment of MCI. Conclusion Our results provide several potential sites for NIBS, such as the DLFPC and IFG, and may shed light on the locations of NIBS sites in the treatment of patients with MCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiao Liu
- Author Affiliations: UC San Francisco; University of Southern California; UC San Francisco University of Southern California Mayo Clinic, Rochester Mayo Clinic, Rochester; UC Berkeley; U Pennsylvania; USC; UC Davis; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School Indiana University Washington University St. Louis University of Pennsylvania; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020 (Chair) Siemens; Alzheimer's Association University of Pittsburgh Washington University St. Louis Cornell University; Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University; AD Drug Discovery Foundation; Acumen Pharmaceuticals; Washington University St. Louis; Northwestern University; National Institute of Mental Health; Brown University; Eli Lilly (Chair); BWH/HMS (Chair); University of Washington (Chair); Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI) University of Southern California; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC Davis (Core PI); UC Davis; UC San Diego; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); Mayo Clinic, Rochester; University of London; UCLA School of Medicine; UCSF MRI; UC Davis; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; UC Berkeley (Core PI); University of Michigan; University of Utah; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; University of Pittsburgh; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; USC (Core PI); USC; USC; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC Irvine; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC San Francisco; UC San Diego; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020; UC San Diego; National Institute on Aging; UC San Francisco; Brown University; National Institute of Mental Health; Cornell University; Johns Hopkins University; Richard Frank Consulting; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020; National Institute on Aging; Oregon Health & Science University; University of Southern California; University of California - San Diego; University of Michigan; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Baylor College of Medicine; Columbia University Medical Center; Washington University, St. Louis; University of Alabama - Birmingham; Mount Sinai School of Medicine; Rush University Medical Center; Wien Center; Johns Hopkins University; New York University; Duke University Medical Center; University of Pennsylvania; University of Kentucky; University of Pittsburgh; University of Rochester Medical Center; University of California, Irvine; University of Texas Southwestern Medical School; Emory University; University of Kansas, Medical Center; University of California, Los Angeles; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Indiana University; Yale University School of Medicine; McGill Univ., Montreal-Jewish General Hospital; Sunnybrook Health Sciences, Ontario; U.B.C. Clinic for AD & Related Disorders; Cognitive Neurology - St. Joseph's, Ontario; Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health; Northwestern University; Premiere Research Inst (Palm Beach Neurology); Georgetown University Medical Center; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Stanford University; Banner Sun Health Research Institute; Boston University; Howard University; Case Western Reserve University; University of California, Davis - Sacramento; Neurological Care of CNY; Parkwood Hospital; University of Wisconsin; University of California, Irvine - BIC; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Dent Neurologic Institute; Ohio State University; Albany Medical College; Hartford Hospital, Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; Wake Forest University Health Sciences; Rhode Island Hospital; Butler Hospital; UC San Francisco; Medical University South Carolina; St. Joseph's Health Care; Nathan Kline Institute; University of Iowa College of Medicine; Cornell University; University of South Florida: USF Health Byrd Alzheimer's Institute; University of California, San Francisco; University of Southern California; UC San Francisco; University of Southern California; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Brigham and Women's Hospital/ Harvard Medical School; UC Davis; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Indiana University; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; USC; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; UC San Francisco; Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University; BWH/HMS (Chair); University of Washington (Chair); Core PI; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); University of Southern California; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Francisco; UC San Francisco; UC San Francisco; UC Davis (Core PI); UC San Diego; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; UC Berkeley (Core PI); University of Michigan; University of Utah; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; USC (Core PI); USC; USC; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC Irvine; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC San Francisco; Department of Defense (retired); University of Southern California; University of California, San Diego; Columbia University Medical Center; Rush University Medical Center; Wien Center; Duke University Medical Center; University of Rochester Medical Center; University of California, Irvine; Medical University South Carolina; Premiere Research Inst (Palm Beach Neurology); University of California, San Francisco; Georgetown University Medical Center; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Banner Sun Health Research Institute; Howard University; University of Wisconsin; University of Washington; Stanford University; Cornell University.,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Binlong Zhang
- Author Affiliations: UC San Francisco; University of Southern California; UC San Francisco University of Southern California Mayo Clinic, Rochester Mayo Clinic, Rochester; UC Berkeley; U Pennsylvania; USC; UC Davis; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School Indiana University Washington University St. Louis University of Pennsylvania; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020 (Chair) Siemens; Alzheimer's Association University of Pittsburgh Washington University St. Louis Cornell University; Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University; AD Drug Discovery Foundation; Acumen Pharmaceuticals; Washington University St. Louis; Northwestern University; National Institute of Mental Health; Brown University; Eli Lilly (Chair); BWH/HMS (Chair); University of Washington (Chair); Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI) University of Southern California; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC Davis (Core PI); UC Davis; UC San Diego; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); Mayo Clinic, Rochester; University of London; UCLA School of Medicine; UCSF MRI; UC Davis; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; UC Berkeley (Core PI); University of Michigan; University of Utah; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; University of Pittsburgh; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; USC (Core PI); USC; USC; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC Irvine; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC San Francisco; UC San Diego; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020; UC San Diego; National Institute on Aging; UC San Francisco; Brown University; National Institute of Mental Health; Cornell University; Johns Hopkins University; Richard Frank Consulting; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020; National Institute on Aging; Oregon Health & Science University; University of Southern California; University of California - San Diego; University of Michigan; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Baylor College of Medicine; Columbia University Medical Center; Washington University, St. Louis; University of Alabama - Birmingham; Mount Sinai School of Medicine; Rush University Medical Center; Wien Center; Johns Hopkins University; New York University; Duke University Medical Center; University of Pennsylvania; University of Kentucky; University of Pittsburgh; University of Rochester Medical Center; University of California, Irvine; University of Texas Southwestern Medical School; Emory University; University of Kansas, Medical Center; University of California, Los Angeles; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Indiana University; Yale University School of Medicine; McGill Univ., Montreal-Jewish General Hospital; Sunnybrook Health Sciences, Ontario; U.B.C. Clinic for AD & Related Disorders; Cognitive Neurology - St. Joseph's, Ontario; Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health; Northwestern University; Premiere Research Inst (Palm Beach Neurology); Georgetown University Medical Center; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Stanford University; Banner Sun Health Research Institute; Boston University; Howard University; Case Western Reserve University; University of California, Davis - Sacramento; Neurological Care of CNY; Parkwood Hospital; University of Wisconsin; University of California, Irvine - BIC; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Dent Neurologic Institute; Ohio State University; Albany Medical College; Hartford Hospital, Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; Wake Forest University Health Sciences; Rhode Island Hospital; Butler Hospital; UC San Francisco; Medical University South Carolina; St. Joseph's Health Care; Nathan Kline Institute; University of Iowa College of Medicine; Cornell University; University of South Florida: USF Health Byrd Alzheimer's Institute; University of California, San Francisco; University of Southern California; UC San Francisco; University of Southern California; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Brigham and Women's Hospital/ Harvard Medical School; UC Davis; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Indiana University; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; USC; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; UC San Francisco; Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University; BWH/HMS (Chair); University of Washington (Chair); Core PI; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); University of Southern California; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Francisco; UC San Francisco; UC San Francisco; UC Davis (Core PI); UC San Diego; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; UC Berkeley (Core PI); University of Michigan; University of Utah; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; USC (Core PI); USC; USC; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC Irvine; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC San Francisco; Department of Defense (retired); University of Southern California; University of California, San Diego; Columbia University Medical Center; Rush University Medical Center; Wien Center; Duke University Medical Center; University of Rochester Medical Center; University of California, Irvine; Medical University South Carolina; Premiere Research Inst (Palm Beach Neurology); University of California, San Francisco; Georgetown University Medical Center; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Banner Sun Health Research Institute; Howard University; University of Wisconsin; University of Washington; Stanford University; Cornell University.,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Georgia Wilson
- Author Affiliations: UC San Francisco; University of Southern California; UC San Francisco University of Southern California Mayo Clinic, Rochester Mayo Clinic, Rochester; UC Berkeley; U Pennsylvania; USC; UC Davis; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School Indiana University Washington University St. Louis University of Pennsylvania; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020 (Chair) Siemens; Alzheimer's Association University of Pittsburgh Washington University St. Louis Cornell University; Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University; AD Drug Discovery Foundation; Acumen Pharmaceuticals; Washington University St. Louis; Northwestern University; National Institute of Mental Health; Brown University; Eli Lilly (Chair); BWH/HMS (Chair); University of Washington (Chair); Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI) University of Southern California; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC Davis (Core PI); UC Davis; UC San Diego; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); Mayo Clinic, Rochester; University of London; UCLA School of Medicine; UCSF MRI; UC Davis; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; UC Berkeley (Core PI); University of Michigan; University of Utah; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; University of Pittsburgh; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; USC (Core PI); USC; USC; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC Irvine; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC San Francisco; UC San Diego; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020; UC San Diego; National Institute on Aging; UC San Francisco; Brown University; National Institute of Mental Health; Cornell University; Johns Hopkins University; Richard Frank Consulting; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020; National Institute on Aging; Oregon Health & Science University; University of Southern California; University of California - San Diego; University of Michigan; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Baylor College of Medicine; Columbia University Medical Center; Washington University, St. Louis; University of Alabama - Birmingham; Mount Sinai School of Medicine; Rush University Medical Center; Wien Center; Johns Hopkins University; New York University; Duke University Medical Center; University of Pennsylvania; University of Kentucky; University of Pittsburgh; University of Rochester Medical Center; University of California, Irvine; University of Texas Southwestern Medical School; Emory University; University of Kansas, Medical Center; University of California, Los Angeles; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Indiana University; Yale University School of Medicine; McGill Univ., Montreal-Jewish General Hospital; Sunnybrook Health Sciences, Ontario; U.B.C. Clinic for AD & Related Disorders; Cognitive Neurology - St. Joseph's, Ontario; Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health; Northwestern University; Premiere Research Inst (Palm Beach Neurology); Georgetown University Medical Center; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Stanford University; Banner Sun Health Research Institute; Boston University; Howard University; Case Western Reserve University; University of California, Davis - Sacramento; Neurological Care of CNY; Parkwood Hospital; University of Wisconsin; University of California, Irvine - BIC; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Dent Neurologic Institute; Ohio State University; Albany Medical College; Hartford Hospital, Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; Wake Forest University Health Sciences; Rhode Island Hospital; Butler Hospital; UC San Francisco; Medical University South Carolina; St. Joseph's Health Care; Nathan Kline Institute; University of Iowa College of Medicine; Cornell University; University of South Florida: USF Health Byrd Alzheimer's Institute; University of California, San Francisco; University of Southern California; UC San Francisco; University of Southern California; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Brigham and Women's Hospital/ Harvard Medical School; UC Davis; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Indiana University; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; USC; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; UC San Francisco; Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University; BWH/HMS (Chair); University of Washington (Chair); Core PI; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); University of Southern California; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Francisco; UC San Francisco; UC San Francisco; UC Davis (Core PI); UC San Diego; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; UC Berkeley (Core PI); University of Michigan; University of Utah; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; USC (Core PI); USC; USC; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC Irvine; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC San Francisco; Department of Defense (retired); University of Southern California; University of California, San Diego; Columbia University Medical Center; Rush University Medical Center; Wien Center; Duke University Medical Center; University of Rochester Medical Center; University of California, Irvine; Medical University South Carolina; Premiere Research Inst (Palm Beach Neurology); University of California, San Francisco; Georgetown University Medical Center; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Banner Sun Health Research Institute; Howard University; University of Wisconsin; University of Washington; Stanford University; Cornell University.,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jian Kong
- Author Affiliations: UC San Francisco; University of Southern California; UC San Francisco University of Southern California Mayo Clinic, Rochester Mayo Clinic, Rochester; UC Berkeley; U Pennsylvania; USC; UC Davis; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School Indiana University Washington University St. Louis University of Pennsylvania; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020 (Chair) Siemens; Alzheimer's Association University of Pittsburgh Washington University St. Louis Cornell University; Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University; AD Drug Discovery Foundation; Acumen Pharmaceuticals; Washington University St. Louis; Northwestern University; National Institute of Mental Health; Brown University; Eli Lilly (Chair); BWH/HMS (Chair); University of Washington (Chair); Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI) University of Southern California; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC Davis (Core PI); UC Davis; UC San Diego; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); Mayo Clinic, Rochester; University of London; UCLA School of Medicine; UCSF MRI; UC Davis; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; UC Berkeley (Core PI); University of Michigan; University of Utah; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; University of Pittsburgh; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; USC (Core PI); USC; USC; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC Irvine; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC San Francisco; UC San Diego; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020; UC San Diego; National Institute on Aging; UC San Francisco; Brown University; National Institute of Mental Health; Cornell University; Johns Hopkins University; Richard Frank Consulting; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020; National Institute on Aging; Oregon Health & Science University; University of Southern California; University of California - San Diego; University of Michigan; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Baylor College of Medicine; Columbia University Medical Center; Washington University, St. Louis; University of Alabama - Birmingham; Mount Sinai School of Medicine; Rush University Medical Center; Wien Center; Johns Hopkins University; New York University; Duke University Medical Center; University of Pennsylvania; University of Kentucky; University of Pittsburgh; University of Rochester Medical Center; University of California, Irvine; University of Texas Southwestern Medical School; Emory University; University of Kansas, Medical Center; University of California, Los Angeles; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Indiana University; Yale University School of Medicine; McGill Univ., Montreal-Jewish General Hospital; Sunnybrook Health Sciences, Ontario; U.B.C. Clinic for AD & Related Disorders; Cognitive Neurology - St. Joseph's, Ontario; Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health; Northwestern University; Premiere Research Inst (Palm Beach Neurology); Georgetown University Medical Center; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Stanford University; Banner Sun Health Research Institute; Boston University; Howard University; Case Western Reserve University; University of California, Davis - Sacramento; Neurological Care of CNY; Parkwood Hospital; University of Wisconsin; University of California, Irvine - BIC; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Dent Neurologic Institute; Ohio State University; Albany Medical College; Hartford Hospital, Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; Wake Forest University Health Sciences; Rhode Island Hospital; Butler Hospital; UC San Francisco; Medical University South Carolina; St. Joseph's Health Care; Nathan Kline Institute; University of Iowa College of Medicine; Cornell University; University of South Florida: USF Health Byrd Alzheimer's Institute; University of California, San Francisco; University of Southern California; UC San Francisco; University of Southern California; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Brigham and Women's Hospital/ Harvard Medical School; UC Davis; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Indiana University; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; USC; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; UC San Francisco; Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University; BWH/HMS (Chair); University of Washington (Chair); Core PI; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); University of Southern California; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Francisco; UC San Francisco; UC San Francisco; UC Davis (Core PI); UC San Diego; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; UC Berkeley (Core PI); University of Michigan; University of Utah; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; USC (Core PI); USC; USC; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC Irvine; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC San Francisco; Department of Defense (retired); University of Southern California; University of California, San Diego; Columbia University Medical Center; Rush University Medical Center; Wien Center; Duke University Medical Center; University of Rochester Medical Center; University of California, Irvine; Medical University South Carolina; Premiere Research Inst (Palm Beach Neurology); University of California, San Francisco; Georgetown University Medical Center; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Banner Sun Health Research Institute; Howard University; University of Wisconsin; University of Washington; Stanford University; Cornell University.,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gomes MA, Akiba HT, Gomes JS, Trevizol AP, de Lacerda ALT, Dias ÁM. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in elderly with mild cognitive impairment: A pilot study. Dement Neuropsychol 2019; 13:187-195. [PMID: 31285793 PMCID: PMC6601303 DOI: 10.1590/1980-57642018dn13-020007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Accepted: 03/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive, painless and easy-to use-technology. It can be used in depression, schizophrenia and other neurological disorders. There are no studies about longer usage protocols regarding the ideal duration and weekly frequency of tDCS. OBJECTIVE to study the use of tDCS twice a week for longer periods to improve memory in elderly with MCI. METHODS a randomized double-blind controlled trial of anodal tDCS on cognition of 58 elderly aged over 60 years was conducted. A current of 2.0 mA was applied for 30 minutes for 10 sessions, twice a week. The anode was placed over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (LDLFC). Subjects were evaluated before and after 10 sessions by the following tests: CAMCOG, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Trail Making, Semantic Verbal Fluency (Animals), Boston naming, Clock Drawing Test, Word list memory (WLMT), Direct and Indirect Digit Order (WAIS-III and WMS-III) and N-back. RESULTS After 10 sessions of tDCS, significant group-time interactions were found for the CAMCOG - executive functioning (χ2 = 3.961, p = 0.047), CAMCOG - verbal fluency (χ2 = 3.869, p = 0.049), CAMCOG - Memory recall (χ2 = 9.749, p = 0.004), and WMLT - recall (χ2 = 7.254, p = 0.007). A decline in performance on the CAMCOG - constructional praxis (χ2 = 4.371, p = 0.037) was found in the tDCS group after intervention. No significant differences were observed between the tDCS and Sham groups for any other tasks. CONCLUSION tDCS at 2 mA for 30 min twice a week over 5 consecutive weeks proved superior to placebo (Sham) for improving memory recall, verbal fluency and executive functioning in elderly with MCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Alisson Paulino Trevizol
- Department of Morphology, Faculty of Medical Sciences at São Paulo´s
Holy House, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wertheim J, Ragni M. The Neural Correlates of Relational Reasoning: A Meta-analysis of 47 Functional Magnetic Resonance Studies. J Cogn Neurosci 2018; 30:1734-1748. [DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
It is a core cognitive ability of humans to represent and reason about relational information, such as “the train station is north of the hotel” or “Charles is richer than Jim.” However, the neural processes underlying the ability to draw conclusions about relations are still not sufficiently understood. Central open questions are as follows: (1) What are the neural correlates of relational reasoning? (2) Where can deductive and inductive reasoning be localized? (3) What is the impact of different informational types on cerebral activity? For that, we conducted a meta-analysis of 47 neuroimaging studies. We found activation of the frontoparietal network during both deductive and inductive reasoning, with additional activation in an extended network during inductive reasoning in the basal ganglia and the inferior parietal cortex. Analyses revealed a double dissociation concerning the lateral and medial Brodmann's area 6 during deductive and inductive reasoning, indicating differences in terms of processing verbal information in deductive and spatial information in inductive tasks. During semantic and symbolic tasks, the frontoparietal network was found active, whereas geometric tasks only elicited prefrontal activation, which can be explained by the reduced demand for the construction of a mental representation in geometric tasks. Our study provides new insights into the cognitive mechanisms underlying relational reasoning and clarifies previous controversies concerning involved brain areas.
Collapse
|
20
|
Liu H, Zhang L, Xi Q, Zhao X, Wang F, Wang X, Men W, Lin Q. Changes in Brain Lateralization in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease: A Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Study from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Front Neurol 2018; 9:3. [PMID: 29472886 PMCID: PMC5810419 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2017] [Accepted: 01/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To detect changes in brain lateralization in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Materials and methods Data from 61 well-matched right-handed subjects were obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, including 19 healthy controls (HCs), 25 patients with MCI, and 17 patients with AD. First, we divided 256 pairs of seed regions from each hemisphere covering the entire cerebral gray matter. Then, we used the intrinsic laterality index (iLI) approach to quantify the functional laterality using fMRI. One-way ANOVA was employed to estimate the differences in iLI among the three groups. The sum, number and mean value of the iLI were calculated within the thresholds of 0 < |iLI| < 0.2, 0.2 ≤ |iLI| < 0.4, 0.4 ≤ |iLI| < 0.8, and |iLI| ≥ 0.8, to explore the changes in the lateralization of resting-state brain function in patients with MCI and AD. Results One-way ANOVA revealed that the iLIs of the three groups were significantly different. The HCs showed a significant leftward interhemispheric difference within |iLI| ≥ 0.8. Compared with the HCs, the patients with MCI manifested a distinct abnormal rightward interhemispheric asymmetry, mainly within the thresholds of 0.2 ≤ |iLI| < 0.4 and 0.4 ≤ |iLI| < 0.8; in the patients with AD, the normal leftward lateralization that was observed in the HCs disappeared, and an abnormal rightward laterality was expressed within 0.4 ≤ |iLI| < 0.8. By directly comparing the patients with MCI with the patients with AD, an exclusive abnormal rightward laterality was observed in the patients with MCI within the 0.2 ≤ |iLI| < 0.4 threshold, and the normal leftward asymmetry vanished in the patients with AD within the |iLI| ≥ 0.8 threshold. Conclusion Global brain lateralization was different among three groups. The abnormal rightward dominance observed in the patients with MCI and AD may indicate that these patients use additional brain resources to compensate for the loss of cognitive function, and the observed disappearance of the leftward laterality in the patients with AD was likely associated with the damage in the left hemisphere. The observed disappearance of the rightward asymmetry in the patients with AD using the 0.2 ≤ |iLI| < 0.4 threshold was likely a sign of decompensation. Our study provides new insights that may improve our understanding of MCI and AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Liu
- Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Lele Zhang
- Department of Imaging, Changping District Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Qian Xi
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaohu Zhao
- Department of Imaging, The Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Imaging, Shanghai TongJi Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Fei Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai TongJi Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiangbin Wang
- Department of Imaging, Shanghai TongJi Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Weiwei Men
- Institute of Heavy Ion Physics, Peking University, Beijing, China.,Center for MRI Research, Beijing Key Laboratory for Medical Physics and Engineering, Beijing, China
| | - Qixiang Lin
- National Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zhou X, Li M, Li L, Zhang Y, Cui J, Liu J, Chen C. The semantic system is involved in mathematical problem solving. Neuroimage 2018; 166:360-370. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2017] [Revised: 08/26/2017] [Accepted: 11/08/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
22
|
Cao B, Li W, Li F, Li H. Dissociable roles of medial and lateral PFC in rule learning. Brain Behav 2016; 6:e00551. [PMID: 27843701 PMCID: PMC5102646 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2016] [Revised: 07/13/2016] [Accepted: 07/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although the neural basis of rule learning is of great interest to cognitive neuroscientists, the pattern of transient brain activation during rule discovery remains to be investigated. METHOD In this study, we measured event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during distinct phases of rule learning. Twenty-one healthy human volunteers were presented with a series of cards, each containing a clock-like display of 12 circles numbered sequentially. Participants were instructed that a fictitious animal would move from one circle to another either in a regular pattern (according to a rule hidden in consecutive trials) or randomly. Participants were then asked to judge whether a given step followed a rule. RESULTS While the rule-search phase evoked more activation in the posterior lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC), the rule-following phase caused stronger activation in the anterior medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC). Importantly, the intermediate phase, the rule-discovery phase evoked more activations in MPFC and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) than rule search, and more activations in LPFC than rule following. CONCLUSION Therefore, we can conclude that the medial and lateral PFC have dissociable contributions in rule learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bihua Cao
- School of Psychology JiangXi Normal University Nanchang China
| | - Wei Li
- School of Psychology JiangXi Normal University Nanchang China
| | - Fuhong Li
- School of Psychology JiangXi Normal University Nanchang China
| | - Hong Li
- School of Psychology and Sociology Shengzhen University Shenzhen China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Activity in the fronto-parietal network indicates numerical inductive reasoning beyond calculation: An fMRI study combined with a cognitive model. Sci Rep 2016; 6:25976. [PMID: 27193284 PMCID: PMC4872123 DOI: 10.1038/srep25976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2015] [Accepted: 04/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Numerical inductive reasoning refers to the process of identifying and extrapolating the rule involved in numeric materials. It is associated with calculation, and shares the common activation of the fronto-parietal regions with calculation, which suggests that numerical inductive reasoning may correspond to a general calculation process. However, compared with calculation, rule identification is critical and unique to reasoning. Previous studies have established the central role of the fronto-parietal network for relational integration during rule identification in numerical inductive reasoning. The current question of interest is whether numerical inductive reasoning exclusively corresponds to calculation or operates beyond calculation, and whether it is possible to distinguish between them based on the activity pattern in the fronto-parietal network. To directly address this issue, three types of problems were created: numerical inductive reasoning, calculation, and perceptual judgment. Our results showed that the fronto-parietal network was more active in numerical inductive reasoning which requires more exchanges between intermediate representations and long-term declarative knowledge during rule identification. These results survived even after controlling for the covariates of response time and error rate. A computational cognitive model was developed using the cognitive architecture ACT-R to account for the behavioral results and brain activity in the fronto-parietal network.
Collapse
|
24
|
Turner BO, Marinsek N, Ryhal E, Miller MB. Hemispheric lateralization in reasoning. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2015; 1359:47-64. [PMID: 26426534 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2015] [Revised: 08/17/2015] [Accepted: 08/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
A growing body of evidence suggests that reasoning in humans relies on a number of related processes whose neural loci are largely lateralized to one hemisphere or the other. A recent review of this evidence concluded that the patterns of lateralization observed are organized according to two complementary tendencies. The left hemisphere attempts to reduce uncertainty by drawing inferences or creating explanations, even at the cost of ignoring conflicting evidence or generating implausible explanations. Conversely, the right hemisphere aims to reduce conflict by rejecting or refining explanations that are no longer tenable in the face of new evidence. In healthy adults, the hemispheres work together to achieve a balance between certainty and consistency, and a wealth of neuropsychological research supports the notion that upsetting this balance results in various failures in reasoning, including delusions. However, support for this model from the neuroimaging literature is mixed. Here, we examine the evidence for this framework from multiple research domains, including an activation likelihood estimation analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of reasoning. Our results suggest a need to either revise this model as it applies to healthy adults or to develop better tools for assessing lateralization in these individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin O Turner
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California
| | - Nicole Marinsek
- Dynamical Neuroscience, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California
| | - Emily Ryhal
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California
| | - Michael B Miller
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Babcock L, Vallesi A. The interaction of process and domain in prefrontal cortex during inductive reasoning. Neuropsychologia 2014; 67:91-9. [PMID: 25498406 PMCID: PMC4410791 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2014] [Revised: 11/22/2014] [Accepted: 12/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Inductive reasoning is an everyday process that allows us to make sense of the world by creating rules from a series of instances. Consistent with accounts of process-based fractionations of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) along the left-right axis, inductive reasoning has been reliably localized to left PFC. However, these results may be confounded by the task domain, which is typically verbal. Indeed, some studies show that right PFC activation is seen with spatial tasks. This study used fMRI to examine the effects of process and domain on the brain regions recruited during a novel pattern discovery task. Twenty healthy young adult participants were asked to discover the rule underlying the presentation of a series of letters in varied spatial locations. The rules were either verbal (pertaining to a single semantic category) or spatial (geometric figures). Bilateral ventrolateral PFC activations were seen for the spatial domain, while the verbal domain showed only left ventrolateral PFC. A conjunction analysis revealed that the two domains recruited a common region of left ventrolateral PFC. The data support a central role of left PFC in inductive reasoning. Importantly, they also suggest that both process and domain shape the localization of reasoning in the brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antonino Vallesi
- Department of Neurosciences, SNPSRR, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Centro di Neuroscienze Cognitive, University of Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jia X, Liang P, Shi L, Wang D, Li K. Prefrontal and parietal activity is modulated by the rule complexity of inductive reasoning and can be predicted by a cognitive model. Neuropsychologia 2014; 66:67-74. [PMID: 25447072 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2014] [Revised: 09/11/2014] [Accepted: 10/13/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In neuroimaging studies, increased task complexity can lead to increased activation in task-specific regions or to activation of additional regions. How the brain adapts to increased rule complexity during inductive reasoning remains unclear. In the current study, three types of problems were created: simple rule induction (i.e., SI, with rule complexity of 1), complex rule induction (i.e., CI, with rule complexity of 2), and perceptual control. Our findings revealed that increased activations accompany increased rule complexity in the right dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and medial posterior parietal cortex (precuneus). A cognitive model predicted both the behavioral and brain imaging results. The current findings suggest that neural activity in frontal and parietal regions is modulated by rule complexity, which may shed light on the neural mechanisms of inductive reasoning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiuqin Jia
- Department of Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of MRI and Brain Informatics, Beijing, China
| | - Peipeng Liang
- Department of Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of MRI and Brain Informatics, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Shi
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, China
| | - Defeng Wang
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kuncheng Li
- Department of Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of MRI and Brain Informatics, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Different strategies in solving series completion inductive reasoning problems: an fMRI and computational study. Int J Psychophysiol 2014; 93:253-60. [PMID: 24841995 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2013] [Revised: 05/06/2014] [Accepted: 05/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Neural correlate of human inductive reasoning process is still unclear. Number series and letter series completion are two typical inductive reasoning tasks, and with a common core component of rule induction. Previous studies have demonstrated that different strategies are adopted in number series and letter series completion tasks; even the underlying rules are identical. In the present study, we examined cortical activation as a function of two different reasoning strategies for solving series completion tasks. The retrieval strategy, used in number series completion tasks, involves direct retrieving of arithmetic knowledge to get the relations between items. The procedural strategy, used in letter series completion tasks, requires counting a certain number of times to detect the relations linking two items. The two strategies require essentially the equivalent cognitive processes, but have different working memory demands (the procedural strategy incurs greater demands). The procedural strategy produced significant greater activity in areas involved in memory retrieval (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, DLPFC) and mental representation/maintenance (posterior parietal cortex, PPC). An ACT-R model of the tasks successfully predicted behavioral performance and BOLD responses. The present findings support a general-purpose dual-process theory of inductive reasoning regarding the cognitive architecture.
Collapse
|
28
|
Liang P, Li Z, Deshpande G, Wang Z, Hu X, Li K. Altered causal connectivity of resting state brain networks in amnesic MCI. PLoS One 2014; 9:e88476. [PMID: 24613934 PMCID: PMC3948954 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2013] [Accepted: 01/07/2014] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Most neuroimaging studies of resting state networks in amnesic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) have concentrated on functional connectivity (FC) based on instantaneous correlation in a single network. The purpose of the current study was to investigate effective connectivity in aMCI patients based on Granger causality of four important networks at resting state derived from functional magnetic resonance imaging data--default mode network (DMN), hippocampal cortical memory network (HCMN), dorsal attention network (DAN) and fronto-parietal control network (FPCN). Structural and functional MRI data were collected from 16 aMCI patients and 16 age, gender-matched healthy controls. Correlation-purged Granger causality analysis was used, taking gray matter atrophy as covariates, to compare the group difference between aMCI patients and healthy controls. We found that the causal connectivity between networks in aMCI patients was significantly altered with both increases and decreases in the aMCI group as compared to healthy controls. Some alterations were significantly correlated with the disease severity as measured by mini-mental state examination (MMSE), and California verbal learning test (CVLT) scores. When the whole-brain signal averaged over the entire brain was used as a nuisance co-variate, the within-group maps were significantly altered while the between-group difference maps did not. These results suggest that the alterations in causal influences may be one of the possible underlying substrates of cognitive impairments in aMCI. The present study extends and complements previous FC studies and demonstrates the coexistence of causal disconnection and compensation in aMCI patients, and thus might provide insights into biological mechanism of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peipeng Liang
- Department of Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Brain Informatics, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Ministry of Education, Beijing, PR China
| | - Zhihao Li
- Wallace H Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Gopikrishna Deshpande
- Auburn University MRI Research Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Department of Psychology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America
| | - Zhiqun Wang
- Department of Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Brain Informatics, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Ministry of Education, Beijing, PR China
| | - Xiaoping Hu
- Wallace H Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Kuncheng Li
- Department of Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Brain Informatics, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Ministry of Education, Beijing, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Meunier D, Stamatakis EA, Tyler LK. Age-related functional reorganization, structural changes, and preserved cognition. Neurobiol Aging 2013; 35:42-54. [PMID: 23942392 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2013] [Revised: 06/11/2013] [Accepted: 07/05/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Although healthy aging is associated with general cognitive decline, there is considerable variability in the extent to which cognitive functions decline or are preserved. Preserved cognitive function in the context of age-related neuroanatomical and functional changes, has been attributed to compensatory mechanisms. However, the existing sparse evidence is largely focused on functions associated with the frontal cortex, leaving open the question of how wider age-related brain changes relate to compensation. We evaluated relationships between age-related neural and functional changes in the context of preserved cognitive function by combining measures of structure, function, and cognitive performance during spoken language comprehension using a paradigm that does not involve an explicit task. We used a graph theoretical approach to derive cognitive activation-related functional magnetic resonance imaging networks. Correlating network properties with age, neuroanatomical variations, and behavioral data, we found that decreased gray matter integrity was associated with decreased connectivity within key language regions but increased overall functional connectivity. However, this network reorganization was less efficient, suggesting that engagement of a more distributed network in aging might be triggered by reduced connectivity within specialized networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Meunier
- Centre for Speech, Language and the Brain, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Liang P, Wang Z, Yang Y, Jia X, Li K. Functional disconnection and compensation in mild cognitive impairment: evidence from DLPFC connectivity using resting-state fMRI. PLoS One 2011; 6:e22153. [PMID: 21811568 PMCID: PMC3141010 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2010] [Accepted: 06/17/2011] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The known regional abnormality of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and its role in various neural circuits in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has given prominence to its importance in studies on the disconnection associated with MCI. The purpose of the current study was to examine the DLPFC functional connectivity patterns during rest in MCI patients and the impact of regional grey matter (GM) atrophy on the functional results. Structural and functional MRI data were collected from 14 MCI patients and 14 age, gender-matched healthy controls. We found that both the bilateral DLPFC showed reduced functional connectivity with the inferior parietal lobule (IPL), superior/medial frontal gyrus and sub-cortical regions (e.g., thalamus, putamen) in MCI patients when compared with healthy controls. Moreover, the DLPFC connectivity with the IPL and thalamus significantly correlated with the cognitive performance of patients as measured by mini-mental state examination (MMSE), clock drawing test (CDT), and California verbal learning test (CVLT) scores. When taking GM atrophy as covariates, these results were approximately consistent with those without correction, although there may be a decrease in the statistical power. These results suggest that the DLPFC disconnections may be the substrates of cognitive impairments in MCI patients. In addition, we also found enhanced functional connectivity between the left DLPFC and the right prefrontal cortex in MCI patients. This is consistent with previous findings of MCI-related increased activation during cognitive tasks, and may represent a compensatory mechanism in MCI patients. Together, the present study demonstrated the coexistence of functional disconnection and compensation in MCI patients using DLPFC functional connectivity analysis, and thus might provide insights into biological mechanism of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peipeng Liang
- Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- The International WIC Institute, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China
- Beijing Municipal Lab of Brain Informatics, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiqun Wang
- Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yanhui Yang
- Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiuqin Jia
- Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Municipal Lab of Brain Informatics, Beijing, China
| | - Kuncheng Li
- Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Municipal Lab of Brain Informatics, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
A dissociation between social mentalizing and general reasoning. Neuroimage 2010; 54:1589-99. [PMID: 20869452 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2010] [Revised: 09/07/2010] [Accepted: 09/15/2010] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
It has recently been suggested that brain areas crucial for mentalizing, including the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), are not activated exclusively during mentalizing about the intentions, beliefs, morals or traits of the self or others, but also more generally during cognitive reasoning including relational processing about objects. Contrary to this notion, a meta-analysis of cognitive reasoning tasks demonstrates that the core mentalizing areas are not systematically recruited during reasoning, but mostly when these tasks describe some human agency or general evaluative and enduring traits about humans, and much less so when these social evaluations are absent. There is a gradient showing less mPFC activation as less mentalizing content is contained in the stimulus material used in reasoning tasks. Hence, it is more likely that cognitive reasoning activates the mPFC because inferences about social agency and mind are involved.
Collapse
|