1
|
She Z, Gawne TJ. The Parameters Governing the Anti-Myopia Efficacy of Chromatically Simulated Myopic Defocus in Tree Shrews. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2024; 13:6. [PMID: 38722277 PMCID: PMC11090138 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.13.5.6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose We previously showed that exposing tree shrews (Tupaia belangeri, small diurnal mammals closely related to primates) to chromatically simulated myopic defocus (CSMD) counteracted small-cage myopia and instead induced hyperopia (approximately +4 diopters [D]). Here, we explored the parameters of this effect. Methods Tree shrews were exposed to the following interventions for 11 days: (1) rearing in closed (n = 7) or open (n = 6) small cages; (2) exposed to a video display of Maltese cross images with CSMD combined with overhead lighting (n = 4); (3) exposed to a video display of Maltese cross images with zero blue contrast ("flat blue," n = 8); and (4) exposed to a video display of black and white grayscale tree images with different spatial filtering (blue pixels lowpass <1 and <2 cycles per degree [CPD]) for the CSMD. Results (1) Tree shrews kept in closed cages, but not open cages, developed myopia. (2) Overhead illumination reduced the hyperopia induced by CSMD. (3) Zero-blue contrast produced hyperopia but slightly less than the CSMD. (4) Both of the CSMD tree images counteracted small cage myopia, but the one low pass filtering blue <1 CPD was more effective at inducing hyperopia. Conclusions Any pattern with reduced blue contrast at and below approximately 1 CPD counteracts myopia/promotes hyperopia, but maximal effectiveness may require that the video display be the brightest object in the environment. Translational Relevance Chromatically simulated myopic blur might be a powerful anti-myopia therapy in children, but the parameter selection could be critical. Issues for translation to humans are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhihui She
- Department of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Timothy J. Gawne
- Department of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fu Q, Zhang Y, Chen L, Dong M, Tang W, Chen S, Qu J, Zhou X, Zhi Z. Near work induces myopia in Guinea pigs. Exp Eye Res 2022; 224:109202. [PMID: 35961425 DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2022.109202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The association between near work activities and myopia has not been clearly established. This study establishes a model for near work myopia (NWM) induced by short viewing distance in guinea pigs with a carefully controlled visual environment, and evaluates the effect of viewing distance in myopia development. Pigmented guinea pigs (3 weeks old) were randomly assigned to 3 groups: near work (NW)-, form-deprivation (FD)-, and -4D hyperopic-defocus (HD)-induced myopia. Animals in NW groups were kept in cylindrical cages with vertical square-wave gratings, providing short- (S, d = 18 cm), middle- (M, d = 44 cm), and long- (L, d = 88 cm) mean viewing distances, all at the same illuminance, during daily treatment for 14 days. Biometric parameters, including refraction, anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), vitreous chamber depth (VCD), and axial length (AL), were measured at the beginning and end of 14 days' treatment. Choroidal thickness (ChT) and choroidal blood perfusion (ChBP) were measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT-angiography (OCTA), respectively, at the end of treatment. Refraction was shifted towards myopia in the S-cage group, compared with the M- and L-cage groups; refractions in the L-, M- and S-cage groups were 5.19 ± 0.65 D, 4.30 ± 0.64 D, and 0.53 ± 0.61 D, respectively (p < 0.001). VCD and AL in the S-cage group increased in parallel with the myopic shift (L vs M vs S: VCD: 3.15 ± 0.02 mm vs 3.17 ± 0.02 mm vs 3.26 ± 0.02 mm, p < 0.001; AL: 7.99 ± 0.03 mm vs 8.03 ± 0.03 mm vs 8.15 ± 0.02 mm, p = 0.001). In FD and HD eyes, changes similar to those in the S-cage group (near-work group, NW) were seen in refraction (NW vs FD vs HD: 5.36 ± 0.82 D vs -5.78 ± 0.44 D vs -4.96 ± 0.54 D, p = 0.734), ACD, LT, VCD and AL. Also, ChT and ChBP were significantly less in the S-cage group than in the M- and L-cage groups after 14 days' treatment (L vs M vs S: ChT: 74.84 ± 3.27 vs 76.07 ± 3.49 vs 61.95 ± 3.31, P = 0.002; ChBP: 48.32 ± 2.23 vs 48.66 ± 2.30 vs 38.14 ± 2.06, p = 0.002). Rearing in S-cages induced myopia in guinea pigs and correspondingly decreased ChBP and ChT. The present study provides objective evidence that short viewing distance could be a risk factor for myopia, and describes a useful model for studying the underlying mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Fu
- School of Optometry and Ophthalmology, and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325003, China; State Key Laboratory of Optometry, Ophthalmology, and Vision Science, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325003, China.
| | - Yue Zhang
- School of Optometry and Ophthalmology, and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325003, China; State Key Laboratory of Optometry, Ophthalmology, and Vision Science, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325003, China.
| | - Linji Chen
- School of Optometry and Ophthalmology, and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325003, China; State Key Laboratory of Optometry, Ophthalmology, and Vision Science, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325003, China.
| | - Mengmeng Dong
- School of Optometry and Ophthalmology, and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325003, China; State Key Laboratory of Optometry, Ophthalmology, and Vision Science, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325003, China.
| | - Wenyu Tang
- School of Optometry and Ophthalmology, and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325003, China; State Key Laboratory of Optometry, Ophthalmology, and Vision Science, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325003, China.
| | - Si Chen
- School of Optometry and Ophthalmology, and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325003, China; State Key Laboratory of Optometry, Ophthalmology, and Vision Science, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325003, China.
| | - Jia Qu
- School of Optometry and Ophthalmology, and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325003, China; State Key Laboratory of Optometry, Ophthalmology, and Vision Science, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325003, China; Oujiang Laboratory (Zhejiang Lab for Regenerative Medicine, Vision and Brain Health), Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325038, China; Research Unit of Myopia Basic Research and Clinical Prevention and Control, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wenzhou, 325027, China.
| | - Xiangtian Zhou
- School of Optometry and Ophthalmology, and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325003, China; State Key Laboratory of Optometry, Ophthalmology, and Vision Science, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325003, China; Oujiang Laboratory (Zhejiang Lab for Regenerative Medicine, Vision and Brain Health), Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325038, China; Research Unit of Myopia Basic Research and Clinical Prevention and Control, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wenzhou, 325027, China.
| | - Zhina Zhi
- School of Optometry and Ophthalmology, and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325003, China; State Key Laboratory of Optometry, Ophthalmology, and Vision Science, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325003, China.
| |
Collapse
|