1
|
Nociti V, Romozzi M, Mirabella M. Challenges in Diagnosis and Therapeutic Strategies in Late-Onset Multiple Sclerosis. J Pers Med 2024; 14:400. [PMID: 38673027 PMCID: PMC11051411 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14040400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and degenerative demyelinating disease of the central nervous system of unknown etiology, which affects individuals in their early adulthood. However, nearly 5-10% of people with MS can be diagnosed at ages above 50 years old, referred to as late-onset multiple sclerosis (LOMS). Some studies have reported a distinctive presentation, clinical course, and prognosis for LOMS, implicating a different diagnostic and therapeutic approach for this population. Furthermore, similar manifestations between LOMS and other age-related conditions may lead to potential misdiagnosis and diagnostic delays, and a higher burden of multimorbidity associated with aging can further complicate the clinical picture. This review aims to explore the clinical characteristics, the disease course, and the differential diagnosis of LOMS and addresses therapeutic considerations for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viviana Nociti
- Centro Sclerosi Multipla, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy;
- Dipartimento Universitario di Neuroscienze, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Rome, Italy;
| | - Marina Romozzi
- Dipartimento Universitario di Neuroscienze, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Rome, Italy;
| | - Massimiliano Mirabella
- Centro Sclerosi Multipla, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy;
- Dipartimento Universitario di Neuroscienze, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Rome, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Macaron G, Larochelle C, Arbour N, Galmard M, Girard JM, Prat A, Duquette P. Impact of aging on treatment considerations for multiple sclerosis patients. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1197212. [PMID: 37483447 PMCID: PMC10361071 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1197212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
With a rapidly aging global population and improvement of outcomes with newer multiple sclerosis (MS)-specific disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), the epidemiology of MS has shifted to an older than previously described population, with a peak prevalence of the disease seen in the 55-65 years age group. Changes in the pathophysiology of MS appear to be age-dependent. Several studies have identified a consistent phase of disability worsening around the fifth decade of life. The latter appears to be independent of prior disease duration and inflammatory activity and concomitant to pathological changes from acute focal active demyelination to chronic smoldering plaques, slow-expanding lesions, and compartmentalized inflammation within the central nervous system (CNS). On the other hand, decreased CNS tissue reserve and poorer remyelinating capacity with aging lead to loss of relapse recovery potential. Aging with MS may imply longer exposure to DMTs, although treatment efficacy in patients >55 years has not been evaluated in pivotal randomized controlled trials and appears to decrease with age. Older individuals are more prone to adverse effects of DMTs, an important aspect of treatment individualization. Aging with MS also implies a higher global burden of comorbid illnesses that contribute to overall impairments and represent a crucial confounder in interpreting clinical worsening. Discontinuation of DMTs after age 55, when no evidence of clinical or radiological activity is detected, is currently under the spotlight. In this review, we will discuss the impact of aging on MS pathobiology, the effect of comorbidities and other confounders on clinical worsening, and focus on current therapeutic considerations in this age group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabrielle Macaron
- Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Neuroimmunology Research Laboratory, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Faculté de Médecine, Université Saint-Joseph de Beyrouth, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Catherine Larochelle
- Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Neuroimmunology Research Laboratory, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Nathalie Arbour
- Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Neuroimmunology Research Laboratory, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Manon Galmard
- Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Jean Marc Girard
- Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Neuroimmunology Research Laboratory, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Alexandre Prat
- Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Neuroimmunology Research Laboratory, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Pierre Duquette
- Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Neuroimmunology Research Laboratory, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kohle F, Dalakas MC, Lehmann HC. Repurposing MS immunotherapies for CIDP and other autoimmune neuropathies: unfulfilled promise or efficient strategy? Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2023; 16:17562864221137129. [PMID: 36620728 PMCID: PMC9810996 DOI: 10.1177/17562864221137129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite advances in the treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and other common autoimmune neuropathies (AN), still-many patients with these diseases do not respond satisfactorily to the available treatments. Repurposing of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) from other autoimmune conditions, particularly multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), is a promising strategy that may accelerate the establishment of novel treatment choices for AN. This approach appears attractive due to homologies in the pathogenesis of these diseases and the extensive post-marketing experience that has been gathered from treating MS and NMOSD patients. The idea is also strengthened by a number of studies that explored the efficacy of DMTs in animal models of AN but also in some CIDP patients. We here review the available preclinical and clinical data of approved MS therapeutics in terms of their applicability to AN, especially CIDP. Promising therapeutic approaches appear to be B cell-directed and complement-targeting strategies, such as anti-CD20/anti-CD19 agents, Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors and anti-C5 agents, as they exert their effects in the periphery. This is a major advantage because, in contrast to MS, their action in the periphery is sufficient to exert significant immunomodulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Kohle
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine,
University of Cologne and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne,
Germany
| | - Marinos C. Dalakas
- Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson
University, Philadelphia, PA, USA,Neuroimmunology Unit, National and Kapodistrian
University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mirabella M, Annovazzi P, Brownlee W, Cohen JA, Kleinschnitz C, Wolf C. Treatment Challenges in Multiple Sclerosis – A Continued Role for Glatiramer Acetate? Front Neurol 2022; 13:844873. [PMID: 35493825 PMCID: PMC9051342 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.844873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Earlier diagnosis, access to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), and improved supportive care have favorably altered the disease course of multiple sclerosis (MS), leading to an improvement in long-term outcomes for people with MS (PwMS). This success has changed the medical characteristics of the population seen in MS clinics. Comorbidities and the accompanying polypharmacy, immune senescence, and the growing number of approved DMTs make selecting the optimal agent for an individual patient more challenging. Glatiramer acetate (GA), a moderately effective DMT, interacts only minimally with comorbidities, other medications, or immune senescence. We describe here several populations in which GA may represent a useful treatment option to overcome challenges due to advanced age or comorbidities (e.g., hepatic or renal disease, cancer). Further, we weigh GA's potential merits in other settings where PwMS and their neurologists must base treatment decisions on factors other than selecting the most effective DMT, e.g., family planning, conception and pregnancy, or the need for vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimiliano Mirabella
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Centro di Ricerca Sclerosi Multipla (CERSM), Università Cattolica, Rome, Italy
- *Correspondence: Massimiliano Mirabella ; orcid.org/0000-0002-7783-114X
| | - Pietro Annovazzi
- MS Center, ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate Hospital, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Wallace Brownlee
- Queen Square MS Centre, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jeffrey A. Cohen
- Department of Neurology, Mellen Center, Neurologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW A variety of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are available for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). After evaluation and approval by regulatory agencies, DMTs are likely to be administered to patients whose characteristics differ from those enrolled in clinical trials. This may contribute to the emergence of unexpected adverse events observed in the real-world setting. Higher age may be a relevant factor that could change the benefit-risk balance of DMTs, as it may associate with lower efficiency and higher frequency of adverse events. RECENT FINDINGS The absolute and relative number of patients with MS who reach the age of 55 and higher increases. Growing evidence demonstrates lower efficacy of DMTs in older persons with MS. Specific risks during DMTs for MS, such as the risk of developing progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) or the outcome following PML, have been associated with age. It is hypothesized that age-related and therapy-induced alterations to the immune system may have (super)additive effects, resulting in an acceleration of physiological immunosenescence and inflamm-aging. SUMMARY In this article, we review the risks of high-efficacy DMTs in MS with a specific focus on age-related efficacy and risks, including opportunistic infections, malignancies, and autoimmune reactions.
Collapse
|