Targeted Therapies for the Treatment of Brain Metastases in Solid Tumors

Utilizing a Dual Human Transporter MDCKII-MDR1-BCRP Cell Line to Assess Efflux at the Blood Brain Barrier

To facilitate the design of drugs readily able to cross the blood brain barrier (BBB), a Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cell line was established that over expresses both P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), the main human efflux transporters of the BBB. Proteomics analyses indicate BCRP is expressed at a higher level than Pgp in this cell line. This cell line shows good activity for both transporters [BCRP substrate dantrolene efflux ratio (ER) 16.3 ± 0.9, Pgp substrate quinidine ER 27.5 ± 1.2], and use of selective transporter inhibitors enables an assessment of the relative contributions to overall ERs. The MDCKII-MDR1-BCRP ER negatively correlates with rat unbound brain/unbound plasma ratio, Kpuu Highly brain penetrant compounds with rat Kpuu ≥ 0.3 show ERs ≤ 2 in the MDCKII-MDR1-BCRP assay while compounds predominantly excluded from the brain, Kpuu ≤ 0.05, demonstrate ERs ≥ 20. A subset of compounds with MDCKII-MDR1-BCRP ER < 2 and rat Kpuu < 0.3 were shown to be substrates of rat Pgp using a rat transfected cell line, MDCKII-rMdr1a. These compounds also showed ERs > 2 in the human National Institutes of Health (NIH) MDCKI-MDR1 (high Pgp expression) cell line, which suggests that they are weak human Pgp substrates. Characterization of 37 drugs targeting the central nervous system in the MDCKII-MDR1-BCRP efflux assay show 36 have ERs < 2. In drug discovery, use of the MDCKII-MDR1-BCRP in parallel with the NIH MDCKI-MDR1 cell line is useful for identification of compounds with high brain penetration. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: A single cell line that includes both the major human efflux transporters of the blood brain barrier (MDCKII-MDR1-BCRP) has been established facilitating the rapid identification of efflux substrates and enabling the design of brain penetrant molecules. Efflux ratios using this cell line demonstrate a clear relationship with brain penetration as defined by rat brain Kpuu.

Emerging therapeutics and evolving assessment criteria for intracranial metastases in patients with oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer

The improved survival outcomes of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), largely owing to the improved control of systemic disease provided by immune-checkpoint inhibitors and novel targeted therapies, have highlighted the challenges posed by central nervous system (CNS) metastases as a devastating yet common complication, with up to 50% of patients developing such lesions during the course of the disease. Early-generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) often provide robust systemic disease control in patients with oncogene-driven NSCLCs, although these agents are usually unable to accumulate to therapeutically relevant concentrations in the CNS owing to an inability to cross the blood-brain barrier. However, the past few years have seen a paradigm shift with the emergence of several novel or later-generation TKIs with improved CNS penetrance. Such agents have promising levels of activity against brain metastases, as demonstrated by data from preclinical and clinical studies. In this Review, we describe current preclinical and clinical evidence of the intracranial activity of TKIs targeting various oncogenic drivers in patients with NSCLC, with a focus on newer agents with enhanced CNS penetration, leptomeningeal disease and the need for intrathecal treatment options. We also discuss evolving assessment criteria and regulatory considerations for future clinical investigations.

Chemotherapy for the Management of Cerebral Metastases

Chemotherapy has played a minor role as adjuvant therapy in treatment of cerebral metastases from solid cancers. The blood-brain barrier and cerebral metastases' considerable machinery of self-preservation have been significant obstacles to delivery and efficacy of chemotherapy. However, several methods intended to surmount these challenges have arisen alongside advent of technology and with the development of targeted molecular therapies. Focused ultrasound and molecular Trojan horses represent two such novel means of increasing permeability of the blood-brain barrier to effector agents. Published data on efficacy of these targeted therapies remain mostly restricted to retrospective studies and phase II prospective clinical trials.

Ultrasmall Core-Shell Silica Nanoparticles for Precision Drug Delivery in a High-Grade Malignant Brain Tumor Model

PURPOSE

Small-molecule inhibitors have revolutionized treatment of certain genomically defined solid cancers. Despite breakthroughs in treating systemic disease, central nervous system (CNS) metastatic progression is common, and advancements in treating CNS malignancies remain sparse. By improving drug penetration across a variably permeable blood-brain barrier and diffusion across intratumoral compartments, more uniform delivery and distribution can be achieved to enhance efficacy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Ultrasmall fluorescent core-shell silica nanoparticles, Cornell prime dots (C' dots), were functionalized with α_v integrin-binding (cRGD), or nontargeting (cRAD) peptides, and PET labels (¹²⁴I, ⁸⁹Zr) to investigate the utility of dual-modality cRGD-C' dots for enhancing accumulation, distribution, and retention (ADR) in a genetically engineered mouse model of glioblastoma (mGBM). mGBMs were systemically treated with ¹²⁴I-cRGD- or ¹²⁴I-cRAD-C' dots and sacrificed at 3 and 96 hours, with concurrent intravital injections of FITC-dextran for mapping blood-brain barrier breakdown and the nuclear stain Hoechst. We further assessed target inhibition and ADR following attachment of dasatinib, creating nanoparticle-drug conjugates (Das-NDCs). Imaging findings were confirmed with ex vivo autoradiography, fluorescence microscopy, and p-S6RP IHC.

RESULTS

Improvements in brain tumor delivery and penetration, as well as enhancement in the ADR, were observed following administration of integrin-targeted C' dots, as compared with a nontargeted control. Furthermore, attachment of the small-molecule inhibitor, dasatinib, led to its successful drug delivery throughout mGBM, demonstrated by downstream pathway inhibition.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that highly engineered C' dots are promising drug delivery vehicles capable of navigating the complex physiologic barriers observed in a clinically relevant brain tumor model.

Potential of Protein-based Anti-metastatic Therapy with Serpins and Inter α-Trypsin Inhibitors

In this review we summarize the principles of anti-metastatic therapy with selected serpin family proteins, such as pigment epithelial-derived factor (PEDF) and maspin, as well as inter α-trypsin inhibitor (IαIs) light chains (bikunin) and heavy chains (ITIHs). Case-by-case, antimetastatic activity may be dependent or independent of the protease-inhibitory activity of the corresponding proteins. We discuss the incidence of target deregulation in different tumor entities, mechanisms of deregulation, context-dependent functional issues as well as in vitro and in vivo target validation studies with transfected tumor cells or recombinant protein as anti-metastatic agents. Finally, we comment on possible clinical evaluation of these proteins in adjuvant therapy.

Drug Resistance in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: Blame the Barrier or the Brain?

The brain is the most common site of first metastasis for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer treated with HER2-targeting drugs. However, the development of effective therapies for breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) is limited by an incomplete understanding of the mechanisms governing drug sensitivity in the central nervous system. Pharmacodynamic data from patients and in vivo models suggest that inadequate drug penetration across the "blood-tumor" barrier is not the whole story. Using HER2-positive BCBMs as a case study, we highlight recent data from orthotopic brain metastasis models that implicate brain-specific drug resistance mechanisms in BCBMs and suggest a translational research paradigm to guide drug development for treatment of BCBMs. Clin Cancer Res; 24(8); 1795-804. ©2018 AACR.

Nanotechnology Strategies To Advance Outcomes in Clinical Cancer Care

Ongoing research into the application of nanotechnology for cancer treatment and diagnosis has demonstrated its advantages within contemporary oncology as well as its intrinsic limitations. The National Cancer Institute publishes the Cancer Nanotechnology Plan every 5 years since 2005. The most recent iteration helped codify the ongoing basic and translational efforts of the field and displayed its breadth with several evolving areas. From merely a technological perspective, this field has seen tremendous growth and success. However, an incomplete understanding of human cancer biology persists relative to the application of nanoscale materials within contemporary oncology. As such, this review presents several evolving areas in cancer nanotechnology in order to identify key clinical and biological challenges that need to be addressed to improve patient outcomes. From this clinical perspective, a sampling of the nano-enabled solutions attempting to overcome barriers faced by traditional therapeutics and diagnostics in the clinical setting are discussed. Finally, a strategic outlook of the future is discussed to highlight the need for next-generation cancer nanotechnology tools designed to address critical gaps in clinical cancer care.

Overview of metastatic disease of the central nervous system

In 2016, the American Society of Clinical Oncology reported that 1.7 million Americans were diagnosed with cancer; this number will rise to 2.3 million in the United States and 22 million worldwide in 2030. This rising need is being met by an explosion of new cancer therapies, including: immune checkpoint inhibitors, T-cell therapies, tumor vaccines, antiangiogenic therapies, and various targeted therapies. This armamentarium of targeted therapies has led to better systemic control of disease and longer patient overall survival (OS). The incidence of metastatic disease to the central nervous system (CNS) is rising as patients are living longer with these more effective systemic therapies. Prolonged OS allows increased time to develop CNS metastases. The CNS is also a sanctuary for metastatic tumor cells that are protected from full exposure to therapeutic concentrations of most anticancer agents by the blood-brain barrier, the tumor microenvironment, and immune system. In addition, CNS metastases often develop late in the course of the disease, so patients are frequently heavily pretreated, resulting in drug resistance. Although genomic profiling has led to more effective therapies for systemic disease, the same therapy may not be effective in treating CNS disease, not only due to failure of blood-brain barrier penetration, but from discordance between the molecular profile in systemic and CNS tumor.

Sequencing brain metastases and opportunities for targeted therapies

CNS metastases have long been recognized as a common and late complication of systemic malignancies. They represent the most common tumor of the brain. As outcomes and overall survival improve with better tolerated and more durable responses from therapies for systemic cancers, the incidence and prevalence of brain metastases is likely to increase. Among the most common systemic cancers leading to brain metastases include lung, melanoma, breast (triple-negative histology) and renal cell cancers. To date, there has been infrequent involvement of gastrointestinal and gynecologic malignancies; however, this may also change, reflecting improvement in overall survival and therapeutic regimens. Traditional therapy of brain metastases has focused on surgery, radiation therapy or best supportive/palliative care. The advent of modern genomic techniques, including next-generation and whole-exome sequencing, has allowed for the identification of unique markers and potential drivers of metastatic pathways. This review aims to discuss and highlight the known drivers of disease and the opportunities for ultimate development of targeted therapies.