Association of Expression Levels or Activation Status of STAT3 with Treatment Outcomes of Sunitinib in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma

SCGN and STAT3 expressions are associated with the prognosis of ccRCC

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is highly heterogeneous and accounts for about 70% of RCC. Its prognosis is worse than that of most histological types of RCC. In order to find potential biomarkers that may influence the prognosis and survival in ccRCC patients, we explored the expressions of STAT3, PDL1 and SCGN (secretagogin) in ccRCC based on the data of TCGA (n = 529), EMATAB-1980 (n = 99) and our own cohort (n = 99). Our study demonstrated that ccRCC patients with low STAT3 expression and high SCGN expression might have a better prognosis. No significant difference in the positive rate of SCGN expression was found when comparing the primary lesion with the matched metastatic liver lesions. The percentage of high SCGN expression in the primary lesion of metastatic ccRCC patients was significantly lower than that of patients with only the renal lesion. In view of the conclusion that STAT3 high expression cases are resistant to sunitinib, STAT3 immunohistochemistry results are essential for designing non-operative treatments. SCGN has the potential to become an indicator for subtype classification of ccRCC.

Predictive genomic biomarkers of therapeutic effects in renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In recent years, there have been great improvements in the therapy of renal cell carcinoma. Nevertheless, the therapeutic effect varies significantly from person to person. To discern the effective treatment for different populations, predictive molecular biomarkers in response to target, immunological, and combined therapies are widely studied.

CONCLUSION

This review summarized those studies from three perspectives (SNPs, mutation, and expression level) and listed the relationship between biomarkers and therapeutic effect, highlighting the great potential of predictive molecular biomarkers in metastatic RCC therapy. However, due to a series of reasons, most of these findings require further validation.

CAIX-specific CAR-T Cells and Sunitinib Show Synergistic Effects Against Metastatic Renal Cancer Models

Treatment with chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cell (CAR-T) has demonstrated promising therapeutic efficacy in hematologic malignancies. However, the therapeutic efficacy is still very limited for solid tumors. An immunosuppressive microenvironment is one of the main reasons for the limited efficacy. Some chemotherapeutic agents exhibit immune microenvironment modulation. Therefore, combination with chemotherapeutic agents may be one of the promising strategies to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of CAR-T against solid tumors. Sunitinib modulates the antitumor immune response by improving T-cell infiltration and function while reducing immunosuppressive factors. The authors constructed a second-generation CAR targeting human renal cell carcinoma (RCC)-specific antigen carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) with the costimulatory domain of 4-1BB. The results of cytokine releasing and cell killing assays showed that the CAIX-CAR-T cells have specific effector functions against CAIX renal cancer cells in vitro. Combination therapy with CAIX-CAR-T and sunitinib showed synergistic efficacy against a mouse lung metastasis model of human RCC. CAIX-CAR-T cells in the mice of the combination therapy group showed stronger proliferation and tumor infiltration than that in the mice of the CAIX-CAR-T monotherapy group. The possible mechanisms of the synergistic efficacy are: (1) sunitinib caused upregulation of CAIX in tumor cells; (2) sunitinib decreased frequency of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment. Our study supplied an innovative immunotherapeutic approach whereby combining CAIX-CAR-T with sunitinib induces a potent antitumor response in an experimental model of metastatic RCC. The combination strategy should be considered as a potential approach to augment adoptive CAR-T cell immunotherapy.

RCC Immune Microenvironment Subsequent to Targeted Therapy: A Friend or a Foe?

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is composed of different subtypes with distinct molecular and histological tumor heterogeneity. Although the advent of various targeted therapies has improved the survival of patients with advanced RCC over the past 15 years (since 2006), few cases experienced complete response due to drug resistance. Recent studies have demonstrated that the outcomes following targeted therapies are potentially associated with intricate cross-links between immune responses and suppressors in the tumor microenvironment (TME). In addition, progress on drug research and development enhances our awareness and understanding about immunotherapy and combined treatment. In this review article, we intend to make a comprehensive summary about TME and its alterations following targeted therapies, provide valid evidence in this aspect, and discuss optimal matches between targeted therapy and immunotherapy.

Analysis of the nuclear expression of pSer727-STAT3 as a prognostic factor in patients with clear cell renal carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Currently, clear cell renal carcinoma (CCRCC) has no prognostic markers. STAT3 protein (Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3) is involved in the carcinogenesis of CCRCC. Its activation is produced by phosphorylation of the serine 727 residue, translocating to the nucleus where it is involved in carcinogenesis and tumor progression. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate cancer-specific survival rates in a series of 166 patients with CCRCC, and its subsequent correlation with the expression of pSer727-STAT3 as a prognostic marker of CCRCC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on 166 patients with CCRCC undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy between 2000 and 2010. A tumor tissue microarray was constructed for immunohistochemical analysis of pSer727-STAT3 expression. The main variable of the study was cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

Patients were classified according to the UICC risk groups as follows: low in 78 patients (47%), intermediate in 52 (31.3%) and high 36 (21.7%); 11 patients (6.7%) were diagnosed with metastatic disease. During a mean follow-up of 97.2 months (1-208), 37 patients (22.3%) developed local and/or distant recurrence. Cancer-specific and overall mortality rates were 28.3% and 67.5%, respectively. The mean expression of pSer727-STAT3 was 92.9 (95% CI: 84.6-101.1) without showing any relationship with risk groups or other prognostic factors. In a Cox logistic regression analysis, pSer727-STAT3 did not behave as an independent predictor of cancer-specific mortality. However, in high-risk and metastatic patients, cancer-specific survival was significantly higher when the expression of pSer727-STAT3 was lower than 110, HR: 5.4 (96% CI: 1.8-16.4) and HR: 2.3 (95% CI: 1.1-4.6) respectively, P<.001.

CONCLUSIONS

pSer727-STAT3 is not a survival marker in patients with CCRCC. However, it is a cancer-specific survival marker in high-risk patients, even in metastatic patients undergoing treatment with antiangiogenic agents.