1
|
Lin SY, Chuang CC, Huang YC, Pai PC, Lee CC, Wei KC, Tseng CK, Yang CC. Neuropsychological performances in patients with infiltrative non-GBM gliomas after postoperative adjuvant photon or proton radiotherapy: A prospective and preliminary investigation. APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY. ADULT 2024; 31:606-615. [PMID: 35343323 DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2022.2048830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Infiltrative non-GBM gliomas are common primary intracranial malignancies, and postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy is recommended for most adult patients diagnosed with this disease to enhance local control and prolong intracranial progression-free survival (PFS). However, RT-related neurocognitive function (NCF) consequences should not be ignored. Early neurocognitive decline principally includes episodic memory, associated significantly with functions of the hippocampus. This prospective study aims to investigate the impact of adjuvant brain irradiation on neurocognitive performances and relevant oncological outcomes.Twenty-five patients with intracranial infiltrative non-GBM gliomas were enrolled when postoperative adjuvant RT was recommended. All recruited patients should receive baseline brain magnetic resonance imaging, and neuropsychological assessments before and 4 months after the RT course. A battery of neuropsychological measures, mainly including executive functions, memory, psychomotor speed and visuoconstructive ability, was used to evaluate NCFs of interest.Analyzing the delta values between post-irradiation and baseline NCF scores, we observed a robust trend reflecting cognitive stabilization rather than deterioration in almost all NCF. Both verbal and visual memory functions exhibited significant differences in the corresponding scaled scores (Z = -2.722, p = .006, regarding verbal memory; Z = -2.246, p = .025, concerning non-verbal memory). Moreover, patients' neuropsychological performances associated with psychomotor speed and executive functions also disclosed a tendency toward stabilization/improvement.This prospective study demonstrated that patients with infiltrative non-GBM exhibited a marked tendency toward neurocognitive stabilization after receiving postoperative adjuvant RT. Clinical trial registration: Trial Registration with ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03534050.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinn-Yn Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Cheng Chuang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yin-Cheng Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ping-Ching Pai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Chi Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Chen Wei
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Neurosurgery, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Kan Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Cheng Yang
- Department of Psychology, National ChengChi University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Williamson A, Houston P, Paterson J, Chalmers AJ, McLoone P, Fullerton N, Foo SY, James A, Nowicki S. Dosimetric comparison of hippocampal-sparing technologies in patients with low-grade glioma. Neurooncol Adv 2024; 6:vdae131. [PMID: 39220244 PMCID: PMC11364934 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Radiotherapy (RT) plays an integral role in the management of low-grade gliomas (LGG). Late toxicity from RT can cause progressive neurocognitive dysfunction. Radiation-induced damage to the hippocampus (HCP) plays a considerable role in memory decline. Advancements in photon planning software have resulted in the development of multi-criteria optimization (MCO) and HyperArc technologies which may improve HCP sparing while maintaining planning target volume (PTV) target coverage. Methods Three planning methods for hippocampal sparing (HS) were compared, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) without HS (VMAT_noHS), VMAT with HS (VMAT_HS), MCO with HS (MCO_HS), and HyperArc with HS (HyperArc_HS). Results Twenty-five patients were identified. The contralateral HCP was spared in 16 patients and bilateral HCP in 9 patients with superiorly located tumors. All 3 HS planning techniques showed significant reductions in dose to the spared HCP in contralateral cases but only VMAT_HS and MCO_HS achieved this in bilateral cases (P < .008). Only MCO_HS was superior to VMAT_HS in lowering the dose to both contralateral HCP and bilateral HCP in all measured metrics (P < .008). PTV and OAR (organ at risk) dose constraints were achieved for all plans. Conclusions This retrospective dosimetric study demonstrated the feasibility of HS for low-grade glioma. All 3 HS planning techniques achieved significant dose reductions to the spared contralateral hippocampus, but only MCO_HS and VMAT_HS achieved this in bilateral cases. MCO was superior to other planning techniques for sparing both bilateral and contralateral hippocampi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aoife Williamson
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Peter Houston
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jennifer Paterson
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Philip McLoone
- School of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Natasha Fullerton
- Department of Neuroradiology, Institute of Neurosciences, QEUH, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sin Yee Foo
- Department of Neuroradiology, Institute of Neurosciences, QEUH, Glasgow, UK
| | - Allan James
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Stefan Nowicki
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sun M, Wang LL, Wang SQ, Lin X, Zhou W. Dosimetry comparison with helical tomotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for grade II gliomas: A single‑institution case series. Open Life Sci 2023; 18:20220550. [PMID: 36820205 PMCID: PMC9938533 DOI: 10.1515/biol-2022-0550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is an essential postoperative treatment for grade II gliomas. However, comparative dosimetric studies of different radiotherapy plans for grade II gliomas are still lacking. Therefore, we conducted this case series analysis to compare the dosimetric differences among helical tomotherapy (TOMO), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for grade II gliomas. To achieve that, seven diagnosed postoperative patients with grade II gliomas were analyzed by computed tomography and then planned with TOMO, VMAT, and IMRT. The plan target volume (PTV) prescribed dose was 50 Gy (daily fraction of 2.0 Gy, 5 days/week). The expected treatment efficiency was measured by monitor units (MUs) scoring. Treatment plans of the patients were compared in the quality of target volumes dosage coverage, the efficiency of dosage delivery, and the dosage exposure of normal adjacent organs at risk (OAR). Differences in each method were measured by utilizing the Nonparametric ANOVA. The study shows that TOMO achieved a significantly higher PTV-D98% (doses received by 98% of the PTV volume) than VMAT and IMRT (50.30 ± 0.13 vs 49.21 ± 0.19, p = 0.006; 50.30 ± 0.13 vs 49.78 ± 0.18, p = 0.014), while there was no difference in PTV-D2% (doses received by 2% of the PTV volume). IMRT achieved a conformity index (CI) preferably, and TOMO generated a favorable homogeneity index (HI) (p < 0.05 for both). The MUs were fewer for VMAT than IMRT and TOMO (294 ± 19, 572 ± 24, 317 ± 97, respectively). IMRT achieved better protection for the lens and brain stems. Our case series study indicated that TOMO, VMAT, and IMRT achieved a comparatively good target dosimetric coverage, and most OARs were protected well. IMRT is not inferior to TOMO and VMAT and is still very suitable for treating most grade II glioma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mao Sun
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400010, China
| | - Lu Lu Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400010, China
| | - Shi Qiang Wang
- Department of Neurooncology Surgery Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400010, China
| | - Xin Lin
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400010, China
| | - Wei Zhou
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400010, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jaspers J, Mèndez Romero A, Hoogeman MS, van den Bent M, Wiggenraad RGJ, Taphoorn MJB, Eekers DBP, Lagerwaard FJ, Lucas Calduch AM, Baumert BG, Klein M. Evaluation of the Hippocampal Normal Tissue Complication Model in a Prospective Cohort of Low Grade Glioma Patients-An Analysis Within the EORTC 22033 Clinical Trial. Front Oncol 2019; 9:991. [PMID: 31681562 PMCID: PMC6797857 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the performance of the hippocampal normal tissue complication model that relates dose to the bilateral hippocampus to memory impairment at 18 months post-treatment in a population of low-grade glioma (LGG) patients. Methods: LGG patients treated within the radiotherapy-only arm of the EORTC 22033-26033 trial were analyzed. Hippocampal dose parameters were calculated from the original radiotherapy plans. Difference in Rey Verbal Auditory Learning test delayed recall (AVLT-DR) performance pre-and 18 (±4) months post-treatment was compared to reference data from the Maastricht Aging study. The NTCP model published by Gondi et al. was applied to the dosimetric data and model predictions were compared to actual neurocognitive outcome. Results: A total of 29 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean dose in EQD2 Gy to the bilateral hippocampus was 39.8 Gy (95% CI 34.3–44.4 Gy), the median dose to 40% of the bilateral hippocampus was 47.2 EQD2 Gy. The model predicted a risk of memory impairment exceeding 99% in 22 patients. However, only seven patients were found to have a significant decline in AVLT-dr score. Conclusions: In this dataset of only LGG patients treated with radiotherapy the hippocampus NTCP model did not perform as expected to predict cognitive decline based on dose to 40% of the bilateral hippocampus. Caution should be taken when extrapolating this model outside of the range of dose-volume parameters in which it was developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaap Jaspers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Alejandra Mèndez Romero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mischa S Hoogeman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Ruud G J Wiggenraad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Center, Leidschendam, Netherlands
| | | | - Danielle B P Eekers
- Department of Radiotherapy, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Frank J Lagerwaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Brigitta G Baumert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Martin Klein
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lawrie TA, Gillespie D, Dowswell T, Evans J, Erridge S, Vale L, Kernohan A, Grant R. Long-term neurocognitive and other side effects of radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy, for glioma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 8:CD013047. [PMID: 31425631 PMCID: PMC6699681 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013047.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gliomas are brain tumours arising from glial cells with an annual incidence of 4 to 11 people per 100,000. In this review we focus on gliomas with low aggressive potential in the short term, i.e. low-grade gliomas. Most people with low-grade gliomas are treated with surgery and may receive radiotherapy thereafter. However, there is concern about the possible long-term effects of radiotherapy, especially on neurocognitive functioning. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the long-term neurocognitive and other side effects of radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy) compared with no radiotherapy, or different types of radiotherapy, among people with glioma (where 'long-term' is defined as at least two years after diagnosis); and to write a brief economic commentary. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases on 16 February 2018 and updated the search on 14 November 2018: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2018, Issue 11) in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE via Ovid; and Embase via Ovid. We also searched clinical trial registries and relevant conference proceedings from 2014 to 2018 to identify ongoing and unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised and non-randomised trials, and controlled before-and-after studies (CBAS). Participants were aged 16 years and older with cerebral glioma other than glioblastoma. We included studies where patients in at least one treatment arm received radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy, and where neurocognitive outcomes were assessed two or more years after treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We assessed the certainty of findings using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS The review includes nine studies: seven studies were of low-grade glioma and two were of grade 3 glioma. Altogether 2406 participants were involved but there was high sample attrition and outcome data were available for a minority of people at final study assessments. In seven of the nine studies, participants were recruited to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which longer-term follow-up was undertaken in a subset of people that had survived without disease progression. There was moderate to high risk of bias in studies due to lack of blinding and high attrition, and in two observational studies there was high risk of selection bias. Paucity of data and risk of bias meant that evidence was of low to very low certainty. We were unable to combine results in meta-analysis due to diversity in interventions and outcomes.The studies examined the following five comparisons.Radiotherapy versus no adjuvant treatmentTwo observational studies contributed data. At the 12-year follow-up in one study, the risk of cognitive impairment (defined as cognitive disability deficits in at least five of 18 neuropsychological tests) was greater in the radiotherapy group (risk ratio (RR) 1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 3.71; n = 65); at five to six years the difference between groups did not reach statistical significance (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.06; n = 195). In the other study, one subject in the radiotherapy group had cognitive impairment (defined as significant deterioration in eight of 12 neuropsychological tests) at two years compared with none in the control group (very low certainty evidence).With regard to neurocognitive scores, in one study the radiotherapy group was reported to have had significantly worse mean scores on some tests compared with no radiotherapy; however, the raw data were only given for significant findings. In the second study, there were no clear differences in any of the various cognitive outcomes at two years (n = 31) and four years (n = 15) (very low certainty evidence).Radiotherapy versus chemotherapyOne RCT contributed data on cognitive impairment at up to three years with no clear difference between arms (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.36 to 5.70, n = 117) (low-certainty evidence).High-dose radiotherapy versus low-dose radiotherapyOnly one of two studies reporting this comparison contributed data, and at two and five years there were no clear differences between high- and low-dose radiotherapy arms (very low certainty evidence).Conventional radiotherapy versus stereotactic conformal radiotherapyOne study involving younger people contributed limited data from the subgroup aged 16 to 25 years. The numbers of participants with neurocognitive impairment at five years after treatment were two out of 12 in the conventional arm versus none out of 11 in the stereotactic conformal radiotherapy arm (RR 4.62, 95% CI 0.25 to 86.72; n = 23; low-certainty evidence).Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapyTwo RCTs tested for cognitive impairment. One defined cognitive impairment as a decline of more than 3 points in MMSE score compared with baseline and reported data from 2-year (110 participants), 3-year (91 participants), and 5-year (57 participants) follow-up with no clear difference between the two arms at any time point. A second study did not report raw data but measured MMSE scores over five years in 126 participants at two years, 110 at three years, 69 at four years and 53 at five years. Authors concluded that there was no difference in MMSE scores between the two study arms (P = 0.4752) (low-certainty evidence).Two RCTs reported quality of life (QoL) outcomes for this comparison. One reported no differences in Brain-QoL scores between study arms over a 5-year follow-up period (P = 0.2767; no raw data were given and denominators were not stated). The other trial reported that the long-term results of health-related QoL showed no difference between the arms but did not give the raw data for overall HRQoL scores (low-certainty evidence).We found no comparative data on endocrine dysfunction; we planned to develop a brief economic commentary but found no relevant economic studies for inclusion. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Radiotherapy for gliomas with a good prognosis may increase the risk of neurocognitive side effects in the long term; however the magnitude of the risk is uncertain. Evidence on long-term neurocognitive side effects associated with chemoradiotherapy is also uncertain. Neurocognitive assessment should be an integral part of long-term follow-up in trials involving radiotherapy for lower-grade gliomas to improve the certainty of evidence regarding long-term neurocognitive effects. Such trials should also assess other potential long-term effects, including endocrine dysfunction, and evaluate costs and cost effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa A Lawrie
- 1st Floor Education Centre, Royal United HospitalCochrane Gynaecological, Neuro‐oncology and Orphan Cancer GroupCombe ParkBathUKBA1 3NG
| | - David Gillespie
- Western General HospitalDepartment of Neuropsychology133 Grange LoanEdinburghUKEH9 2HL
| | - Therese Dowswell
- The University of LiverpoolC/o Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women's and Children's HealthFirst Floor, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation TrustCrown StreetLiverpoolUKL8 7SS
| | - Jonathan Evans
- University of GlasgowSchool of Psychological MedicineGartnavel Royal Hospital1055 Great Western RoadGlasgowUKG12 0XH
| | - Sara Erridge
- NHS LothianEdinburgh Cancer CentreWestern General HospitalCrewe RoadEdinburghUKEH4 2XU
| | - Luke Vale
- Newcastle UniversityInstitute of Health & SocietyBaddiley‐Clarke Building, Richardson RoadNewcastle upon TyneUKNE2 4AX
| | - Ashleigh Kernohan
- Newcastle UniversityInstitute of Health & SocietyBaddiley‐Clarke Building, Richardson RoadNewcastle upon TyneUKNE2 4AX
| | - Robin Grant
- Western General HospitalEdinburgh Centre for Neuro‐Oncology (ECNO)Crewe RoadEdinburghUKEH4 2XU
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Uppstrom TJ, Singh R, Hadjigeorgiou GF, Magge R, Ramakrishna R. Repeat surgery for recurrent low-grade gliomas should be standard of care. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2016; 151:18-23. [PMID: 27736650 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2016] [Revised: 09/20/2016] [Accepted: 09/21/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
The importance of surgery and maximal extent of resection (EOR) is well established in primary low-grade glioma (LGG) management. However, the role of surgery in the management of recurrent LGG is less clear. A recent review on the management of recurrent LGG concluded there was insufficient evidence to recommend surgery. Here, we summarize the recent advances regarding the role of surgery, radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy in the management of recurrent LGG. There is increasing evidence to support maximal EOR for treating recurrent LGG, as it may improve progression free survival (PFS) after recurrence and overall survival (OS). Based on the studies presented in this review, we suggest that repeat surgery with maximal EOR should be standard of care for recurrent LGG treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler J Uppstrom
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, United States.
| | - Ranjodh Singh
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, United States.
| | - Georgios F Hadjigeorgiou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Red Cross Hospital, Athanasaki 1 & Erithrou Stavrou, Athens, Greece.
| | - Rajiv Magge
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, United States.
| | - Rohan Ramakrishna
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Low-grade gliomas (LGGs) are a heterogenous group of primary brain neoplasms that most commonly occur in children and young adults, characterized by a slow, indolent course and overall favorable prognosis. Standard therapies used to treat LGGs have included surgical resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or a combination thereof. Given the anticipated long survival and typical young age of patients with LGG, the long-term sequelae of therapy require special attention, especially as they affect neurocognitive function and quality of life. We review the complex interplay of baseline and treatment-related factors that perturb neurocognition as well as the effect of each treatment modality on altering neurocognitive outcomes in this patient population.
Collapse
|