Diaphragmatic injuries: why do we struggle to detect them?

The edemiological state of blunt diaphragmatic injury: An analysis of a nationwide trauma registry in Japan

BACKGROUND

Little is known about blunt traumatic diaphragmatic injury (BTDI). This study aimed to investigate the epidemiological state of BTDI, using a nationwide trauma registry in Japan.

METHODS

Data of patients aged ≥18 years who experienced blunt injury between January 2004 and May 2019 were extracted from the Japan Trauma Data Bank. Demographics, cause of trauma, mechanism of injury, physiological parameters, organ injuries, and bone fractures were compared between patients with and those without BTDI. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with BTDI.

RESULTS

A total of 305,141 patients from 244 hospitals were analyzed. The median patient age (interquartile range) was 65 (44-79) years, and 185,750 (60.9%) were men. BTDI was diagnosed in 868 patients (0.3%). The prevalence of BTDI was stable, between 0.2 and 0.6%, over the study period. Among the 868 patients with BTDI, 408 (47.0%) fatalities were recorded. Mortality rates in each year were 42.5-68.2%, with no significant trend toward an improved outcome (P = 0.925). Our multivariable logistic regression analysis found that mechanism of injury, Glasgow Coma Scale score (9-12 or 3-8) on hospital arrival, hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) on hospital arrival, organ injuries (lung, heart, spleen, bladder, kidney, pancreas, stomach, and liver), and bone fractures (rib, pelvis, lumbar spine, and upper extremities) were independently associated with BTDI.

CONCLUSION

Using a nationwide trauma registry, this study revealed the epidemiological state of BTDI in Japan. BTDI was found to be a very rare but devastating injury, with high in-hospital mortality. Some clinical factors, such as mechanism of injury, Glasgow Coma Scale score, organ injuries, and bone fractures, were independently associated with BTDI.

Laparotomy management of diaphragmatic and hollow viscera rupture combined with thoracic endovascular aortic repair after a traffic accident: A case report

Introduction

Road traffic incidents are the most common cause of multiple organ trauma in low- and middle-income countries. Multiple blunt intra-abdominal organs that rupture in conjunction with a ruptured aorta are terrible and rare.

Case presentation

A 65-year-old man sustained critical injuries during a traffic collision between a motorcycle and truck. The Injury Severity Score was 42 points,. After open abdominal exploration, we repaired the left diaphragmatic rupture with a 13-cm-long tear of IV grade (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma), resected partial small bowel, simple suture of the transverse colon, and Hartmann procedure in the descending colon. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was performed 22 h after laparotomy. Reconstruction of the head depicting a cheekbone fracture and inferior to the left orbital bone was performed on the 14th day. The patients survived and were discharged from the hospital, at 22 days without morbidity or mortality.

Discussion

Diaphragmatic rupture provides a signal to relate head, thoracic, and abdominal blunt trauma. If the patient sustains more serious life-threatening injuries that require emergency laparotomy or craniotomy, and aortic repair may be delayed. Laparotomy is the best initial surgical method in this case. TEVAR is a feasible and gold standard procedure for the treatment of patients with the necessary indications.

Conclusion

It is essential to evaluate the level of organ damage to properly coordinate the specialists. The timing of the operation and therapeutic alternatives should be decided for each patient.

•

Traumatic diaphragmatic rupture (TDR) provides a signal to relate head, thoracic, and abdominal injuries.

•

Multiple blunt intra-abdominal organs ruptured in conjunction with a ruptured aorta are terrible and rare traumas.

•

Laparotomy is the best initial method and TEVAR is feasible for hemodynamically stable patients.

Trans-diaphragmatic Pathologies: Anatomical Background and Spread of Disease on Cross-sectional Imaging

The diaphragm is not only a sheet of muscle separating the abdominal and thoracic cavities: it plays an essential role in ventilation and can act as a gateway for the spread of different disease processes between the abdominal and the thoracic cavity. Careful attention to the appearance of the diaphragm on various imaging modalities is essential to ensure the accurate diagnosis of diaphragmatic disorders, which may be secondary to functional or anatomical derangements.

Imaging evaluation of diaphragmatic injuries: Improving interpretation accuracy

Diaphragmatic Injuries (DIs) remain a challenging diagnosis with potential catastrophic delayed complications. A high degree of suspicion in every case of severe blunt thoracoabdominal trauma or penetrating thoracoabdominal injury is essential. This review will present the evidence and controversies on this topic providing a practical tutorial for radiologists hoping to improve their interpretive accuracy for both blunt and penetrating DIs. The imaging signs of diaphragmatic injuries will be explained with emphasis on multidetector CT. Diagnostic pitfalls, available protocols and other issues will be presented.

Evaluation and management of abdominal stab wounds: A Western Trauma Association critical decisions algorithm

This is a recommended management algorithm from the Western Trauma Association addressing the management of adult patients with abdominal stab wounds. Because there is a paucity of published prospective randomized clinical trials that have generated Class I data, these recommendations are based primarily on published observational studies and expert opinion of Western Trauma Association members. The algorithm and accompanying comments represent a safe and sensible approach that can be followed at most trauma centers. We recognize that there will be patient, personnel, institutional, and situational factors that may warrant or require deviation from the recommended algorithm. We encourage institutions to use this as a guideline to develop their own local protocols.

Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding as Delayed Presentation of Traumatic Diaphragmatic Hernia; a Case Report

Introduction:

Traumatic diaphragmatic hernia (TDH) is one of the critical complications resulting from penetrating chest trauma. The rate of undiagnosed TDH equivocates 12-60%. The significant part of complications happens 1-4 years after the primary damage. Here, we report a case of delayed TDH presented with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) as an excuse to discuss this issue.

Case presentation:

The patient was a 35-year-old man, admitted with objection of abdominal pain. A nasogastric tube was inserted and fixed that resulted in drainage of about 500cc dark blood. He was candidate for emergent endoscopy due to upper GIB. During resuscitation measures, he suddenly developed respiratory distress that could not be justified by upper GIB alone. Therefore, bedside sonography discovered some soft tissue apart from lung tissue in the left hemithorax. After performing diagnostic measures, with diagnosis of diaphragmatic herniation and strangulation he underwent emergent surgery.

Conclusion:

Small diaphragmatic lesions, which usually result from stab wounds, may develop into larger injuries if left untreated and they might lead to a diaphragmatic hernia with a potential risk of early or late complications and mortality. One of the rare complications is GIB, which should be considered in a patient with past history of trauma and presentation of GIB.

Imaging of Traumatic Diaphragmatic Rupture: Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy at a Level 1 Trauma Centre

Purpose

Traumatic diaphragmatic rupture (TDR) is an uncommon injury that can be associated with significant morbidity if not detected and treated in a timely manner. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (64-MDCT) for the detection of TDR in patients at our level 1 trauma centre.

Methods

We used our hospital's trauma registry to identify patients with a diagnosis of TDR from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2012. Only patients with a 64-MDCT scan at presentation who subsequently underwent laparotomy/laparoscopy were included in the study cohort. Using surgical findings as the gold standard, the accuracy of the prospective radiology reports was analyzed.

Results

Of the 3225 trauma patients who presented to our institution, 38 (1.2%) had a TDR. Fourteen of the 38 were excluded as they did not have MDCT before surgery. The study cohort consisted of 20 males and 4 females with a median age of 34.5 years and a median Injury Severity Score (ISS90) of 26. Fifteen had blunt trauma while 9 had a penetrating injury. The overall sensitivity of the radiology reports was 66.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 46.7%-82.0%), specificity was 100% (95% CI: 94.1%-100%), positive predictive value was 100% (95% CI: 80.6%-100%), negative predictive value was 88.4% (95% CI: 78.8%-94.0%), and accuracy was 90.6% (95% CI: 82.5%-95.2%). However, only 3 of 9 patients with penetrating injury had a correct preoperative diagnosis. Two of the 6 missed penetrating trauma cases had only indirect signs of injury.

Conclusions

The detection of TDR in trauma patients on 64-MDCT can be improved, especially in patients presenting with penetrating injury. A careful search for subtle diaphragmatic defects and indirect evidence of injury is important to avoid missing the diagnosis.