Endovascular treatment for hepatic vein-type Budd-Chiari syndrome: effectiveness and long-term outcome

Accessory hepatic vein recanalization for Budd-Chiari syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) results when the outflow of the hepatic vein (HV) is obstructed. BCS patients exhibiting an accessory HV (AHV) that is dilated but obstructed can achieve significant alleviation of liver congestion after undergoing AHV recanalization. This meta-analysis was developed to explore the clinical efficacy of AHV recanalization in patients with BCS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Wanfang databases were searched for relevant studies published as of November 2022, and RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0 were used for pooled endpoint analyses.

RESULTS

Twelve total studies were identified for analysis. Pooled primary clinical success, re-stenosis, 1- and 5-year primary patency, 1- and 5-year secondary patency, 1-year overall survival (OS), and 5-year OS rates of patients in these studies following AHV recanalization were 96%, 17%, 91%, 75%, 98%, 91%, 97%, and 96%, respectively. Patients also exhibited a significant reduction in AHV pressure after recanalization relative to preoperative levels (P < 0.00001). Endpoints exhibiting significant heterogeneity among these studies included, AHV pressure (I2 = 95%), 1-year primary patency (I2 = 51.2%), and 5-year primary patency (I2 = 62.4%). Relative to HV recanalization, AHV recanalization was related to a lower rate of re-stenosis (P = 0.002) and longer primary patency (P < 0.00001), but was not associated with any improvements in clinical success (P = 0.88) or OS (P = 0.29) relative to HV recanalization.

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis highlights AHV recanalization as an effective means of achieving positive long-term outcomes in patients affected by BCS, potentially achieving better long-term results than those associated with HV recanalization.

Percutaneous recanalization in hepatic vein-type Budd-Chiari syndrome: hepatic or accessory hepatic vein

PURPOSE

This study was designed to assess the clinical efficiency and long-term outcomes of hepatic vein (HV) and accessory hepatic vein (AHV) recanalization in patients with HV-type Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 27 patients with HV-type BCS underwent AHV recanalization and 94 patients had HV recanalization at our center from January 2012 to December 2019. The treatment effectiveness and long-term outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Technical success was accomplished in all patients, without any procedure-related complications. The clinical success rates were 96.3% (26/27) and 95.7% (90/94) (p = 1.000). In the AHV and HV groups, re-obstruction was observed in 5 and 36 patients, respectively (p = 0.056). The median primary durations of AHV and HV patency were 64 and 49 months, respectively (p = 0.036), while the median secondary durations of AHV and HV patency were 70 and 64 months, respectively (p = 0.134). The median overall survival after AHV and HV recanalization was 73 and 78 months, respectively (p = 0.263).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that AHV could be employed as a replacement for HV, as a hepatic drainage vein, in HV-type BCS patients.

Survival and clinical success of endovascular intervention in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome: A systematic review

Budd-Chiari syndrome is a complex clinical disorder of hepatic venous outflow obstruction, originating from the accessory hepatic vein (HV), large HV, and suprahepatic inferior vena cava (IVC). This disorder includes both HV and IVC obstructions and hepatopathy. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the survival rate and clinical success of different types of endovascular treatments for Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS). All participant studies were retrieved from four databases and selected according to the eligibility criteria for systematic review of patients with BCS. The survival rate, clinical success of endovascular treatments in BCS, and survival rates at 1 and 5 years of publication year were calculated accordingly. A total of 3398 patients underwent an endovascular operation; among them, 93.6% showed clinical improvement after initial endovascular treatment. The median clinical success rates for recanalization, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), and combined procedures were 51%, 17.50%, and 52.50%, respectively. The median survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 51% and 51% for recanalization, 17.50% and 16% for TIPS, and 52.50% and 49.50% for combined treatment, respectively. Based on the year of publication, the median survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 23.50% and 22.50% before 2000, 41% and 41% in 2000‒2005, 35% and 35% in 2006‒2010, 51% and 48.50% in 2010‒2015, and 56% and 55.50% after 2015, respectively. Our findings indicate that the median survival rate at 1 and 5 years of recanalization treatment is higher than that of TIPS treatment, and recanalization provides better clinical improvement. The publication year findings strongly suggest progressive improvements in interventional endovascular therapy for BCS. Thus, interventional therapy restoring the physiologic hepatic venous outflow of the liver can be considered as the treatment of choice for patients with BCS which is a physiological modification procedure.

Evaluation of outcome from endovascular therapy for Budd-Chiari syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This study was performed to evaluate the outcome of endovascular intervention therapy for Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) and compare recanalization, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)/direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (DIPS), and combined procedure treatment. For the meta-analysis, 71 studies were identified by searching four databases. The individual studies’ samples were used to calculate a confidence interval (CI 95%), and data were pooled using a fixed-effect model and random effect model. The pooled measure and an equal-weighted average rate were calculated in all participant studies. Heterogeneity between the studies was assessed with I², and T² tests, and publication bias was estimated using Egger’s regression test. A total of 4,407 BCS patients had undergone an endovascular intervention procedure. The pooled results were 98.9% (95% CI 97.8‒98.9%) for a technical success operation, and 96.9% (95% CI 94.9‒98.9%) for a clinical success operation. The re-intervention rate after the initial intervention procedure was 18.9% (95% CI 14.7‒22.9%), and the survival rates at 1 and 5 years after the initial intervention procedure were 98.9% (95% CI 96.8‒98.9%) and 94.9% (95% CI 92.9‒96.9%), respectively. Patients receiving recanalization treatment (98%) had a better prognosis than those with a combined procedure (95.6%) and TIPS/DIPS treatment (94.5%). The systematic review and meta-analysis further solidify the role of endovascular intervention treatment in BCS as safe and effective. It maintains high technical and clinical success and long-term survival rates. The recanalization treatment had a better prognosis and outcome than the combined procedures and TIPS/DIPS treatment.

4D Flow MRI in the portal venous system: imaging and analysis methods, and clinical applications

Thus far, ultrasound, CT, and 2D cine phase-contrast MRI has been adopted to evaluate blood flow and vascular morphology in the portal venous system; however, all these techniques have some shortcomings, such as limited field of view and difficulty in accurately evaluating blood flow. A new imaging technique, namely 3D cine phase-contrast (4D Flow) MRI, can acquire blood flow data of the entire abdomen at once and in a time-resolved manner, allowing visual, quantitative, and comprehensive assessment of blood flow in the portal venous system. In addition, a retrospective blood flow analysis, i.e., "retrospective flowmetry," is possible. Although the development of 4D Flow MRI for the portal system has been delayed compared to that for the arterial system owing to the lower flow velocity of the portal venous system and the presence of respiratory artifacts, several useful reports have recently been published as the technology has advanced. In the first part of this narrative review article, technical considerations of image acquisition and analysis methods of 4D Flow MRI for the portal venous system and the validations of their results are described. In the second part, the current clinical application of 4D Flow MRI for the portal venous system is reviewed.

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for symptomatic hepatic vein-type Budd-Chiari syndrome: feasibility and long-term outcomes

For management of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS), a step-wise therapeutic approach starting with medical treatment, followed by endovascular recanalization, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, and finally liver transplantation has been adopted. We retrospectively analyzed 51 patients with symptomatic short segment (≤ 30 mm) hepatic vein (HV)-type BCS who underwent percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTBA) with/without stenting to determine the feasibility, clinical effectiveness, and long-term outcomes. The intervention was technically successful in 94.1% of cases (48/51)—32 patients underwent PTBA and 16 patients underwent HV stenting. Procedure-related complications occurred in 14 patients (29.1%). The clinical success rate at 4 weeks was 91.7% (44/48). Nine patients underwent reintervention, six patients due to restenosis/occlusion and three patients with clinical failure. The mean primary patency duration was 64.6 ± 19.9 months (CI, 58.5–70.8; range, 1.2–81.7 months). The cumulative 1-, 2-, and 5-year primary patency rates were 85.4, 74.5, and 58.3%, respectively. The cumulative 1-, 2-, and 5-year secondary patency rates were 93.8, 87.2, and 75%, respectively. The cumulative 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 97.9, 91.5, and 50%, respectively. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with and without stenting is effective and achieves excellent long-term patency and survival rates in patients with symptomatic HV-type BCS. With its lower incidence of re-occlusion and higher clinical success rate, HV angioplasty combined with stenting should be the preferred option especially in patients with segmental HV-type BCS.

Recanalization of accessory hepatic vein for hepatic vein-type Budd-Chiari syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and long-term outcomes associated with the treatment of hepatic vein (HV)-type Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) via accessory HV (AHV) recanalization.

METHODS

In total, 26 HV-type BCS patients underwent AHV recanalization between July 2014 and December 2019 at our hospital, while 73 HV-type BCS patients without compensatory AHV underwent main HV (MHV) recanalization and served as controls in the present study. Short- and long-term clinical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

AHV and MHV recanalization approaches were both associated with 100% technical success rates, with one recanalization procedure being performed per patient. Respective clinical success rates for the AHV and MHV recanalization approaches were 96.2% and 94.5% (P = 0.744). Re-obstruction rates were comparable between these two approaches at 20% and 34.8%, respectively (P = 0.17). Primary cumulative 1-, 2-, and 5-year patency rates in the AHV group were 96.0%, 91.6%, and 76.3%, respectively, whereas in the MHV group, these three respective rates were 87.0%, 78.6%, and 58.6% (P = 0.048). Secondary cumulative 1-, 2-, and 5-year patency rates in the AHV group were 96.0%, 96.0%, and 96.0%, respectively, whereas in the MHV group, they were 97.1%, 97.1%, and 81.8%, respectively (P = 0.289). Cumulative 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates for AHV group patients were 96.0%, 96.0%, and 96.0%, respectively, while for the MHV group, these respective rates were 98.6%, 95.2%, and 89.7% (P = 0.462).

CONCLUSION

HV-type BCS can be safely and effectively treated via AHV recanalization, which may achieve longer patency relative to MHV recanalization.

Budd-Chiari syndrome: consensus guidance of the Asian Pacific Association for the study of the liver (APASL)

Budd Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a diverse disease with regard to the site of obstruction, the predisposing thrombophilic disorders and clinical presentation across the Asia-Pacific region. The hepatic vein ostial stenosis and short segment thrombosis are common in some parts of Asia-Pacific region, while membranous obstruction of the vena cava is common in some and complete thrombosis of hepatic veins in others. Prevalence of myeloproliferative neoplasms and other thrombophilic disorders in BCS varies from region to region and with different sites of obstruction. This heterogeneity also raises several issues and dilemmas in evaluation and approach to management of a patient with BCS. The opportunity to recanalize hepatic vein in patients with hepatic vein ostial stenosis or inferior vena cava stenting or pasty among those membranous obstruction of the vena cava is a unique opportunity in the Asia-Pacific region to restore hepatic outflow closely mimicking physiology. In order to address these issues arising out of the diversity as well as the unique features in the region, the Asia Pacific Association for Study of Liver has formulated these guidelines for clinicians.

Inferior vena cava-syndrome

Inferior vena cava syndrome (IVCS) is caused by agenesis, compression, invasion, or thrombosis of the IVC, or may be associated with Budd-Chiari syndrome. Its incidence and prevalence are unknown. Benign IVCS is separated from malignant IVCS. Both cover a wide clinical spectrum reaching from asymptomatic to highly symptomatic cases correlated to the underlying cause, the acuity, the extent of the venous obstruction, and the recruitment and development of venous collateral circuits. Imaging is necessary to determine the underlying cause of IVCS and to guide clinical decisions. Interventional therapy has changed the therapeutic approach in symptomatic patients. This article provides an overview over IVCS and focuses on interventional therapeutic methods and results.

Accessory hepatic vein recanalization for hepatic vein-type Budd-Chiari syndrome

PURPOSE

To explore the clinical efficacy and long-term outcomes of accessory hepatic vein (AHV) recanalization as a means of treating hepatic vein (HV)-type Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS).

METHODS

Between January 2011 and December 2018, a total of 46 symptomatic HV-type BCS patients were treated by AHV recanalization in our hospital. The technical and clinical success of this treatment, as well as associated long-term patient prognosis was assessed herein.

RESULTS

The AHV recanalization approach was technically successful in 100% of patients, without any instances of complications associated with the operation. This procedure was 95.7% (44/46) clinically successful and resultant. AHV re-obstruction occurred in 12 patients. The cumulative primary one-, two-, and five-year patency rates were 77.3%, 71.7%, and 71.7%, respectively. The secondary cumulative one-, two-, and five-year patency rates were 97.7, 87.1, and 87.1%, respectively. The five-year patency rates did not differ significantly between patients treated with balloons and stents (p  =  .674). Based on Cox-regression analysis, younger age was an independent predictor of re-obstruction (p = .005). The cumulative one-, two-, and five-year survival rates were 97.7, 92.2, and 92.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

AHV recanalization is a safe and effective treatment for HV-type BCS.