Safety and efficacy of transcatheter embolization in patients with massive hemoptysis due to intercostal pulmonary venous shunts

Efficacy and safety of particle embolization in bronchial arteries of hemoptysis patients with shunts

AIM

This study assesses the safety and efficacy of particle embolization during bronchial artery embolization (BAE) in patients with shunts between bronchial and non-bronchial systemic arteries and the pulmonary artery.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center study, we analyzed 312 BAE procedures performed from June 2020 to April 2023. The patient cohort had shunts between bronchial and non-bronchial systemic arteries and the pulmonary artery. We meticulously collected and examined comprehensive data, including clinical characteristics, computed tomography (CT) imaging, and embolization procedural details.

RESULTS

Vascular shunts were identified in 49 patients. The etiologies of hemoptysis included post-TB sequelae (42.8%), bronchiectasis (26.5%), active TB (12.2%), aspergilloma (8.1%), bacterial pneumonia (4.1%), lung cancer (4.1%), and non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection (2%). The technical success rate of the procedures was 98%, with 149 out of 152 identified vessels successfully embolized. All patients experienced cessation or significant reduction of hemoptysis within 24 hours following the procedure. The clinical success rates were 97.9% at one month, 93.9% at six months, and 89.8% at one year. No shunt-related complications were detected.

CONCLUSION

BAE with particle embolization is a safe and effective treatment for hemoptysis, particularly in cases with complex shunts between bronchial and non-bronchial systemic arteries and the pulmonary artery.

Systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt treated with transcatheter arterial embolization and subsequent lung segmentectomy

BACKGROUND

Systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt (SPAS) is a rare condition that can occur as a result of congenital heart disease or chronic pulmonary inflammation, occasionally leading to life-threatening hemoptysis. Computed tomography (CT) imaging is crucial in the diagnosis of SPAS, and the optimal management approach for SPAS remains uncertain. This case report presents a novel approach to the treatment of SPAS, consisting of transcatheter arterial embolization of the systemic artery followed by lung segmentectomy.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 42-year-old man with abnormal chest findings was referred to us and a diagnosis of SPAS was established based on the CT findings showing a blood flow regurgitation from the dilated left 4th intercostal artery to the Lt. A6. The patient was asymptomatic but we decided to treat him to prevent a risk of future hemoptysis. Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) of systemic arteries followed by S6 segmentectomy was successfully performed with minimal blood loss and complete removal of the dilated intra-pulmonary blood vessels. Histological analysis confirmed the diagnosis of SPAS.

CONCLUSION

We reported a case of SPAS, who was successfully treated with the combination of TAE and subsequent segmentectomy. The blood loss during surgery was minimal and this strategy appeared to minimize future recanalization and hemoptysis. Further studies and long-term follow-up of SPAS patients are required to establish standardized management guidelines for this rare condition.

Which Is the Best Way to Treat Massive Hemoptysis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

INTRODUCTION

Hemoptysis is one of the most common symptoms of respiratory system diseases. Common causes include bronchiectasis, tumors, tuberculosis, aspergilloma, and cystic fibrosis. The severity of hemoptysis varies from mild to moderate to massive hemoptysis and can easily lead to hemodynamic instability and death from suffocation or shock. Nevertheless, the most threatening hemoptysis that is presented to the emergency department and requires hospitalization is the massive one. In these cases, today, the most common way to manage hemoptysis is bronchial artery embolization (BAE).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus from January 2017 (with the aim of selecting the newest possible reports in the literature) until May 2023 for studies reporting massive hemoptysis. All studies that included technical and clinical success rates of hemoptysis management, as well as rebleeding and mortality rates, were included. A proportional meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Of the 30 studies included in this systematic review, 26 used bronchial artery embolization as a means of treating hemoptysis, with very high levels of both technical and clinical success (greater than 73.7% and 84.2%, respectively). However, in cases where it was not possible to use bronchial artery embolization, alternative methods were used, such as dual-vessel intervention (80% technical success rate and 66.7% clinical success rate), customized endobronchial silicone blockers (92.3% technical success rate and 92.3% clinical success rate), antifibrinolytic agents (50% clinical success rate), and percutaneous transthoracic embolization (93.1% technical success rate and 88.9% clinical success rate), which all had high success rates apart from antifibrinolytic agents. Of the 2467 patients included in these studies, 341 experienced rebleeding during the follow-up period, while 354 other complications occurred, including chest discomfort, fever, dysphagia, and paresis. A total of 89 patients died after an episode of massive hemoptysis or during the follow-up period. The results of the meta-analysis showed a pooled technical success of bronchial artery embolization equal to 97.22% and a pooled clinical success equal to 92.46%. The pooled recurrence was calculated to be 21.46%, while the mortality was 3.5%. These results confirm the ability of bronchial artery embolization in the treatment of massive hemoptysis but also emphasize the high rate of recurrence following the intervention, as well as the risk of death.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, massive hemoptysis can be treated with great clinical and technical success using bronchial artery embolization, reducing mortality. Mortality has now been reduced to a small percentage of cases.

Which Is the Best Way to Treat Massive Hemoptysis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Introduction: Hemoptysis is one of the most common symptoms of respiratory system diseases. Common causes include bronchiectasis, tumors, tuberculosis, aspergilloma, and cystic fibrosis. The severity of hemoptysis varies from mild to moderate to massive hemoptysis and can easily lead to hemodynamic instability and death from suffocation or shock. Nevertheless, the most threatening hemoptysis that is presented to the emergency department and requires hospitalization is the massive one. In these cases, today, the most common way to manage hemoptysis is bronchial artery embolization (BAE). Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus from January 2017 (with the aim of selecting the newest possible reports in the literature) until May 2023 for studies reporting massive hemoptysis. All studies that included technical and clinical success rates of hemoptysis management, as well as rebleeding and mortality rates, were included. A proportional meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. Results: Of the 30 studies included in this systematic review, 26 used bronchial artery embolization as a means of treating hemoptysis, with very high levels of both technical and clinical success (greater than 73.7% and 84.2%, respectively). However, in cases where it was not possible to use bronchial artery embolization, alternative methods were used, such as dual-vessel intervention (80% technical success rate and 66.7% clinical success rate), customized endobronchial silicone blockers (92.3% technical success rate and 92.3% clinical success rate), antifibrinolytic agents (50% clinical success rate), and percutaneous transthoracic embolization (93.1% technical success rate and 88.9% clinical success rate), which all had high success rates apart from antifibrinolytic agents. Of the 2467 patients included in these studies, 341 experienced rebleeding during the follow-up period, while 354 other complications occurred, including chest discomfort, fever, dysphagia, and paresis. A total of 89 patients died after an episode of massive hemoptysis or during the follow-up period. The results of the meta-analysis showed a pooled technical success of bronchial artery embolization equal to 97.22% and a pooled clinical success equal to 92.46%. The pooled recurrence was calculated to be 21.46%, while the mortality was 3.5%. These results confirm the ability of bronchial artery embolization in the treatment of massive hemoptysis but also emphasize the high rate of recurrence following the intervention, as well as the risk of death. Conclusion: In conclusion, massive hemoptysis can be treated with great clinical and technical success using bronchial artery embolization, reducing mortality. Mortality has now been reduced to a small percentage of cases.