1
|
Sheehan F, Graham A, Tait NP, Ind P, Alsafi A, Jackson JE. Bronchial artery embolization using small particles is safe and effective: a single center 12-year experience. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:7786-7794. [PMID: 38861163 PMCID: PMC11557673 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10836-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Revised: 04/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bronchial artery embolization (BAE) using particles is an established treatment for hemoptysis. The use of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) with a particle size of 300 µm or larger is thought to reduce the risk of non-target embolization but may result in more proximal vessel occlusion than is ideal, resulting in a high rate of early recurrent hemorrhage. OBJECTIVE This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of BAE using PVA particles with a size of less than 300 µm. METHODS All patients who underwent BAE between 2010 and 2022 at a tertiary center were included. Demographic data, etiology and volume of hemoptysis, technical and clinical success, procedure-related complications, and follow-up information were collected from patients' electronic records. 150-250 µm PVA particles were used to commence embolization in all patients with the subsequent use of larger-sized particles in some individuals. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate recurrence and survival rates. RESULTS One hundred forty-four patients underwent 189 embolization procedures between 2010 and 2022 and were followed up for a median of 35 months [IQR 19-89]. 150 µm to 250 µm PVA particles were used as the sole embolic agent in 137 cases. Hemoptysis recurred within 30 days in 7%. The median time to repeat intervention was 144 days [IQR 42-441]. Seventeen out of 144 patients had a pulmonary artery branch pseudoaneurysm. The rate of major complications was 1% with no instances of stroke or spinal artery ischemia. Thirty-day mortality was 2% (4/189). CONCLUSION BAE using 150-250 µm PVA particles is safe and effective with few complications and low rates of early hemoptysis recurrence. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT BAE using small particles is likely to improve outcomes, particularly the rate of early recurrence, in patients with hemoptysis, without an increase in procedural complications. KEY POINTS BAE is a safe and effective treatment for patients with hemoptysis. Using small PVA particles in BAE has few complications and low rates of early recurrence. Pulmonary artery pseudoaneurysms should be actively sought in those with hemoptysis undergoing BAE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances Sheehan
- Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Alison Graham
- Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - N Paul Tait
- Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Philip Ind
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Ali Alsafi
- Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - James E Jackson
- Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guzelbey T, Arslan MF, Cingoz M, Erdim C, Altun O, Mutlu IN, Kilickesmez O. Efficacy and safety of particle embolization in bronchial arteries of hemoptysis patients with shunts. Clin Radiol 2024; 79:704-710. [PMID: 38942705 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2024.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
AIM This study assesses the safety and efficacy of particle embolization during bronchial artery embolization (BAE) in patients with shunts between bronchial and non-bronchial systemic arteries and the pulmonary artery. METHODS In this retrospective, single-center study, we analyzed 312 BAE procedures performed from June 2020 to April 2023. The patient cohort had shunts between bronchial and non-bronchial systemic arteries and the pulmonary artery. We meticulously collected and examined comprehensive data, including clinical characteristics, computed tomography (CT) imaging, and embolization procedural details. RESULTS Vascular shunts were identified in 49 patients. The etiologies of hemoptysis included post-TB sequelae (42.8%), bronchiectasis (26.5%), active TB (12.2%), aspergilloma (8.1%), bacterial pneumonia (4.1%), lung cancer (4.1%), and non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection (2%). The technical success rate of the procedures was 98%, with 149 out of 152 identified vessels successfully embolized. All patients experienced cessation or significant reduction of hemoptysis within 24 hours following the procedure. The clinical success rates were 97.9% at one month, 93.9% at six months, and 89.8% at one year. No shunt-related complications were detected. CONCLUSION BAE with particle embolization is a safe and effective treatment for hemoptysis, particularly in cases with complex shunts between bronchial and non-bronchial systemic arteries and the pulmonary artery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Guzelbey
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, 34480, Turkey.
| | - M F Arslan
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, 34480, Turkey.
| | - M Cingoz
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, 34480, Turkey.
| | - C Erdim
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, 34480, Turkey.
| | - O Altun
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, 34480, Turkey.
| | - I N Mutlu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, 34480, Turkey.
| | - O Kilickesmez
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, 34480, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Floridi C, Cellina M, Irmici G, Bruno A, Rossini N, Borgheresi A, Agostini A, Bruno F, Arrigoni F, Arrichiello A, Candelari R, Barile A, Carrafiello G, Giovagnoni A. Precision Imaging Guidance in the Era of Precision Oncology: An Update of Imaging Tools for Interventional Procedures. J Clin Med 2022; 11:4028. [PMID: 35887791 PMCID: PMC9322069 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11144028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Interventional oncology (IO) procedures have become extremely popular in interventional radiology (IR) and play an essential role in the diagnosis, treatment, and supportive care of oncologic patients through new and safe procedures. IR procedures can be divided into two main groups: vascular and non-vascular. Vascular approaches are mainly based on embolization and concomitant injection of chemotherapeutics directly into the tumor-feeding vessels. Percutaneous approaches are a type of non-vascular procedures and include percutaneous image-guided biopsies and different ablation techniques with radiofrequency, microwaves, cryoablation, and focused ultrasound. The use of these techniques requires precise imaging pretreatment planning and guidance that can be provided through different imaging techniques: ultrasound, computed tomography, cone-beam computed tomography, and magnetic resonance. These imaging modalities can be used alone or in combination, thanks to fusion imaging, to further improve the confidence of the operators and the efficacy and safety of the procedures. This article aims is to provide an overview of the available IO procedures based on clinical imaging guidance to develop a targeted and optimal approach to cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Floridi
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (A.B.); (N.R.); (A.A.); (A.G.)
- Division of Special and Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Umberto I—Lancisi—Salesi”, 60126 Ancona, Italy;
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiological Sciences, University Politecnica Delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy;
| | - Michaela Cellina
- Radiology Department, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Giovanni Irmici
- Post-Graduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.I.); (A.A.)
| | - Alessandra Bruno
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (A.B.); (N.R.); (A.A.); (A.G.)
| | - Nicolo’ Rossini
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (A.B.); (N.R.); (A.A.); (A.G.)
| | - Alessandra Borgheresi
- Division of Special and Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Umberto I—Lancisi—Salesi”, 60126 Ancona, Italy;
| | - Andrea Agostini
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (A.B.); (N.R.); (A.A.); (A.G.)
| | - Federico Bruno
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (F.B.); (A.B.)
| | - Francesco Arrigoni
- Emergency and Interventional Radiology, San Salvatore Hospital, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
| | - Antonio Arrichiello
- Post-Graduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.I.); (A.A.)
| | - Roberto Candelari
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiological Sciences, University Politecnica Delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy;
| | - Antonio Barile
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (F.B.); (A.B.)
| | - Gianpaolo Carrafiello
- Operative Unit of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (A.B.); (N.R.); (A.A.); (A.G.)
- Division of Special and Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Umberto I—Lancisi—Salesi”, 60126 Ancona, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|