Open issues for education in radiological research: data integrity, study reproducibility, peer-review, levels of evidence, and cross-fertilization with data scientists

The radiologist as an independent "third party" to the patient and clinicians in the era of generative AI

Radiologists are crucial in the diagnostic workflow. They must maintain an independent perspective, being a "third party" to the patients and referral clinicians. This is important when documenting the absence of relevant abnormalities or providing information that contradicts the self-reported symptoms and/or the impression of the colleagues, as well as in the case of incidental findings that impact patient management. Appropriate communication is the outcome of this professional independence, becoming more and more important in the current era of application of generative artificial intelligence to the radiological world. In fact, while radiological reports could be improved by our smart use of large language models, patients are already using such tools to understand their meaning and practical implications.

Multimodal Imaging of Osteosarcoma: From First Diagnosis to Radiomics

Osteosarcoma is a primary malignant bone tumor characterized by the production of an osteoid matrix. Although histology remains the definitive diagnostic standard, imaging plays a crucial role in diagnosis, therapeutic planning, and follow-up. Conventional radiography serves as the initial checkpoint for detecting this pathology, which often presents diagnostic challenges due to vague and nonspecific symptoms, especially in its early stages. Today, the integration of different imaging techniques enables an increasingly personalized diagnosis and management, with each contributing unique and complementary information. Conventional radiography typically initiates the imaging assessment, and the Bone Reporting and Data System (Bone-RADS) of the Society of Skeletal Radiology (SSR) is a valuable tool for stratifying the risk of suspicious bone lesions. CT is the preferred modality for evaluating the bone matrix, while bone scans and PET/CT are effective for detecting distant metastases. MRI reveals the extent of the lesion in adjacent soft tissues, the medullary canal, and joints, as well as its relationship to neurovascular structures and the presence of skip lesions. Advanced techniques such as dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and perfusion MRI help characterize the tumor environment and assess treatment response. Osteosarcoma comprises a range of subtypes with differing clinical and imaging characteristics, some of which are particularly distinctive, such as in the case of telangiectatic osteosarcoma. Knowledge of these variants can guide radiologists in the differential diagnosis, which includes both central and surface forms, ranging from highly aggressive to more indolent types. In this review, we present a wide range of representative cases from our hospital case series to illustrate both typical and atypical imaging presentations. Finally, we discuss recent advancements and challenges in applying artificial intelligence approaches to the imaging of osteosarcoma.

Decoding Radiomics: A Step-by-Step Guide to Machine Learning Workflow in Hand-Crafted and Deep Learning Radiomics Studies

Although radiomics research has experienced rapid growth in recent years, with numerous studies dedicated to the automated extraction of diagnostic and prognostic information from various imaging modalities, such as CT, PET, and MRI, only a small fraction of these findings has successfully transitioned into clinical practice. This gap is primarily due to the significant methodological challenges involved in radiomics research, which emphasize the need for a rigorous evaluation of study quality. While many technical aspects may lie outside the expertise of most radiologists, having a foundational knowledge is essential for evaluating the quality of radiomics workflows and contributing, together with data scientists, to the development of models with a real-world clinical impact. This review is designed for the new generation of radiologists, who may not have specialized training in machine learning or radiomics, but will inevitably play a role in this evolving field. The paper has two primary objectives: first, to provide a clear, systematic guide to radiomics study pipeline, including study design, image preprocessing, feature selection, model training and validation, and performance evaluation. Furthermore, given the critical importance of evaluating the robustness of radiomics studies, this review offers a step-by-step guide to the application of the METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS, 2024)-a newly proposed tool for assessing the quality of radiomics studies. This roadmap aims to support researchers and reviewers alike, regardless of their machine learning expertise, in utilizing this tool for effective study evaluation.

Impact of AI on radiology: a EuroAIM/EuSoMII 2024 survey among members of the European Society of Radiology

In order to assess the perceptions and expectations of the radiology staff about artificial intelligence (AI), we conducted an online survey among ESR members (January-March 2024). It was designed considering that conducted in 2018, updated according to recent advancements and emerging topics, consisting of seven questions regarding demographics and professional background and 28 AI questions. Of 28,000 members contacted, 572 (2%) completed the survey. AI impact was predominantly expected on breast and oncologic imaging, primarily involving CT, mammography, and MRI, and in the detection of abnormalities in asymptomatic subjects. About half of responders did not foresee an impact of AI on job opportunities. For 273/572 respondents (48%), AI-only reports would not be accepted by patients; and 242/572 respondents (42%) think that the use of AI systems will not change the relationship between the radiological team and the patient. According to 255/572 respondents (45%), radiologists will take responsibility for any AI output that may influence clinical decision-making. Of 572 respondents, 274 (48%) are currently using AI, 153 (27%) are not, and 145 (25%) are planning to do so. In conclusion, ESR members declare familiarity with AI technologies, as well as recognition of their potential benefits and challenges. Compared to the 2018 survey, the perception of AI's impact on job opportunities is in general slightly less optimistic (more positive from AI users/researchers), while the radiologist's responsibility for AI outputs is confirmed. The use of large language models is declared not only limited to research, highlighting the need for education in AI and its regulations. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study critically evaluates the current impact of AI on radiology, revealing significant usage patterns and clinical implications, thereby guiding future integration strategies to enhance efficiency and patient care in clinical radiology. KEY POINTS: The survey examines ESR member's views about the impact of AI on radiology practice. AI use is relevant in CT and MRI, with varying impacts on job roles. AI tools enhance clinical efficiency but require radiologist oversight for patient acceptance.

Radiologists' perceptions on AI integration: An in-depth survey study

PURPOSE

To assess the perceptions and attitudes of radiologists toward the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical practice.

METHODS

A survey was conducted among members of the SIRM Lombardy. Radiologists' attitudes were assessed comprehensively, covering satisfaction with AI-based tools, propensity for innovation, and optimism for the future. The questionnaire consisted of two sections: the first gathered demographic and professional information using categorical responses, while the second evaluated radiologists' attitudes toward AI through Likert-type responses ranging from 1 to 5 (with 1 representing extremely negative attitudes, 3 indicating a neutral stance, and 5 reflecting extremely positive attitudes). Questionnaire refinement involved an iterative process with expert panels and a pilot phase to enhance consistency and eliminate redundancy. Exploratory data analysis employed descriptive statistics and visual assessment of Likert plots, supported by non-parametric tests for subgroup comparisons for a thorough analysis of specific emerging patterns.

RESULTS

The survey yielded 232 valid responses. The findings reveal a generally optimistic outlook on AI adoption, especially among young radiologist (<30) and seasoned professionals (>60, p<0.01). However, while 36.2 % (84 out 232) of subjects reported daily use of AI-based tools, only a third considered their contribution decisive (30 %, 25 out of 84). AI literacy varied, with a notable proportion feeling inadequately informed (36 %, 84 out of 232), particularly among younger radiologists (46 %, p < 0.01). Positive attitudes towards the potential of AI to improve detection, characterization of anomalies and reduce workload (positive answers > 80 %) and were consistent across subgroups. Radiologists' opinions were more skeptical about the role of AI in enhancing decision-making processes, including the choice of further investigation, and in personalized medicine in general. Overall, respondents recognized AI's significant impact on the radiology profession, viewing it as an opportunity (61 %, 141 out of 232) rather than a threat (18 %, 42 out of 232), with a majority expressing belief in AI's relevance to future radiologists' career choices (60 %, 139 out of 232). However, there were some concerns, particularly among breast radiologists (20 of 232 responders), regarding the potential impact of AI on the profession. Eighty-four percent of the respondents consider the final assessment by the radiologist still to be essential.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate an overall positive attitude towards the adoption of AI in radiology, though this is moderated by concerns regarding training and practical efficacy. Addressing AI literacy gaps, especially among younger radiologists, is essential. Furthermore, proactively adapting to technological advancements is crucial to fully leverage AI's potential benefits. Despite the generally positive outlook among radiologists, there remains significant work to be done to enhance the integration and widespread use of AI tools in clinical practice.

Translating radiological research into practice-from discovery to clinical impact

At the European Society of Radiology (ESR), we strive to provide evidence for radiological practices that improve patient outcomes and have a societal impact. Successful translation of radiological research into clinical practice requires multiple factors including tailored methodology, a multidisciplinary approach aiming beyond technical validation, and a focus on unmet clinical needs. Low levels of evidence are a threat to radiology, resulting in low visibility and credibility. Here, we provide the background and rationale for the thematic series Translating radiological research into practice-from discovery to clinical impact, inviting authors to describe their processes of achieving clinically impactful radiological research. We describe the challenges unique to radiological research. Additionally, a survey was sent to non-radiological clinical societies. The majority of respondents (6/11) were in the field of gastrointestinal/abdominal medicine. The implementation of CT/MRI techniques for disease characterisation, detection and staging of cancer, and treatment planning and radiological interventions were mentioned as the most important radiological developments in the past years. The perception was that patients are substantially unaware of the impact of these developments. Unmet clinical needs were mostly early diagnosis and staging of cancer, microstructural/functional assessment of tissues and organs, and implant assessment. All but one respondent considered radiology important for research in their discipline, but five indicated that radiology is currently not involved in their research. Radiology research holds the potential for being transformative to medical practice. It is our responsibility to take the lead in studies including radiology and strive towards the highest levels of evidence.Critical relevance statement For radiological research to make a clinical and societal impact, radiologists should take the lead in radiological studies, go beyond the assessment of technical feasibility and diagnostic accuracy, and-in a multidisciplinary approach-address clinical unmet needs.Key points• Multiple factors are essential for radiological research to make a clinical and societal impact.• Radiological research needs to go beyond diagnostic accuracy and address unmet clinical needs.• Radiologists should take the lead in radiological studies with a multidisciplinary approach.

Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer Screening: The Future Is Now

Lung cancer has one of the worst morbidity and fatality rates of any malignant tumour. Most lung cancers are discovered in the middle and late stages of the disease, when treatment choices are limited, and patients' survival rate is low. The aim of lung cancer screening is the identification of lung malignancies in the early stage of the disease, when more options for effective treatments are available, to improve the patients' outcomes. The desire to improve the efficacy and efficiency of clinical care continues to drive multiple innovations into practice for better patient management, and in this context, artificial intelligence (AI) plays a key role. AI may have a role in each process of the lung cancer screening workflow. First, in the acquisition of low-dose computed tomography for screening programs, AI-based reconstruction allows a further dose reduction, while still maintaining an optimal image quality. AI can help the personalization of screening programs through risk stratification based on the collection and analysis of a huge amount of imaging and clinical data. A computer-aided detection (CAD) system provides automatic detection of potential lung nodules with high sensitivity, working as a concurrent or second reader and reducing the time needed for image interpretation. Once a nodule has been detected, it should be characterized as benign or malignant. Two AI-based approaches are available to perform this task: the first one is represented by automatic segmentation with a consequent assessment of the lesion size, volume, and densitometric features; the second consists of segmentation first, followed by radiomic features extraction to characterize the whole abnormalities providing the so-called "virtual biopsy". This narrative review aims to provide an overview of all possible AI applications in lung cancer screening.

Risk Assessment and Cholangiocarcinoma: Diagnostic Management and Artificial Intelligence

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common primary liver tumor, with a median survival of only 13 months. Surgical resection remains the only curative therapy; however, at first detection, only one-third of patients are at an early enough stage for this approach to be effective, thus rendering early diagnosis as an efficient approach to improving survival. Therefore, the identification of higher-risk patients, whose risk is correlated with genetic and pre-cancerous conditions, and the employment of non-invasive-screening modalities would be appropriate. For several at-risk patients, such as those suffering from primary sclerosing cholangitis or fibropolycystic liver disease, the use of periodic (6-12 months) imaging of the liver by ultrasound (US), magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)/cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), or computed tomography (CT) in association with serum CA19-9 measurement has been proposed. For liver cirrhosis patients, it has been proposed that at-risk iCCA patients are monitored in a similar fashion to at-risk HCC patients. The possibility of using Artificial Intelligence models to evaluate higher-risk patients could favor the diagnosis of these entities, although more data are needed to support the practical utility of these applications in the field of screening. For these reasons, it would be appropriate to develop screening programs in the research protocols setting. In fact, the success of these programs reauires patient compliance and multidisciplinary cooperation.