Ring injuries of the finger: long-term follow-up

Avoiding Ring Avulsion Injuries With Silicone Rings: A Biomechanical Study

PURPOSE

Finger avulsion injuries account for 5% of upper extremity injuries requiring evaluation in an emergency room. They are devastating injuries that require microvascular reconstruction or amputation. As public awareness rises, there is a growing market for silicone rings, with limited data on their ability to prevent ring avulsion injuries.

METHODS

Five cadaver forearms were attached to a custom fixture, allowing for ring avulsion simulations. Specifically designed silicone or metal rings of varying sizes (#4-#11) were assigned to one of five fingers on each forearm, based on fit. The contralateral corresponding finger was tested using a ring of the same size in the other material. A preload of 2 N was applied to each ring, and ultimate failure force was determined by applying an upward force at a loading rate of 500 mm/sec until failure. Additionally, a fifth cadaver forearm was used to determine the ultimate failure force of silicone rings in a clenched fist position.

RESULTS

The average ultimate failure force for silicone rings of all sizes was 53.0 N, compared to 495.2 N for metal rings of all sizes. The average ultimate failure force of silicone rings in the clenched fist position was increased across rings of all sizes, with an average of 99.9 N. There were no degloving injuries in the silicone ring avulsion group.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomechanically, silicone rings have a significantly lower failure force than metal rings and may help prevent ring avulsion injuries.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The use of silicone rings should be encouraged in professions where ring avulsion injuries are more likely, such as heavy labor.

Practical Tips to Improve Efficiency and Success in Upper Limb Replantation

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After reading this article, participant should be able to: 1. Describe the technique of replantation for very distal amputation of the digit and salvage procedures for venous drainage. 2. Perform single-digit replantation after viewing the videos. 3. Recognize appropriate cases for joint salvage techniques in periarticular amputation at each joint of the digit and wrist. 4. Outline the methods of flexor and extensor tendon reconstruction in an avulsed amputation of the digit or thumb. 5. Understand the order of digital replantation and transpositional replantation for a restoration of pinch or grip in multiple-digit amputation.

SUMMARY

This article provides practical tips and caveats for the latest replantation surgical techniques for digit, hand, and upper extremity amputation. Four videos, clinical photographs, and drawings highlight important points of operative technique and outcomes of replantation.

Transplantation of a Free Vascularized Joint Flap from the Second Toe for the Acute Reconstruction of Defects in the Thumb and other Fingers

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate a novel surgical method for the acute reconstruction of defects in the thumb and other fingers by transplanting a free vascularized joint flap from the second toe and to determine its clinical curative effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A free vascularized joint flap from the second toe was transplanted to reconstruct a complete defect of the thumb and other fingers accompanied by the loss of the proximal finger in 10 patients. Of these patients, three had their thumbs reconstructed with a free vascularized joint flap from the second toe and with the proximal interphalangeal joint flap, one had a thumb reconstructed with a free vascularized joint flap from the second toe, and six had their finger defects reconstructed with the proximal interphalangeal joint flap. The toes of the metatarsophalangeal joint were amputated at the foot donor site. All patients underwent one-stage emergency surgery.

RESULTS

The composite tissue flaps, replanted thumbs, and fingers survived well in all 10 cases. Follow-up visits were conducted for 6-28 months, with an average of 9 months of follow-up. The transplanted bone joints healed over a period of 6-16 weeks. Bone nonunions and refractures did not occur, and the walking function of the foot donor site was not visibly affected.

CONCLUSION

A free vascularized joint flap from the second toe can be transplanted to repair defects in the thumb and other fingers. This technique can be applied to recover the appearance and function of fingers.

Single ray amputation in traumatic injury of the hand: review of literature

Background and aim of the work: Ring avulsion are relatively common hand lesions and are associated with significant disability, especially in hand-workers. The treatment choice is still debatable. We sought to conduct a detailed systematic review in attempt to collate evidence on functional, cosmetic and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following ray amputation for the management of traumatic hand injury and ring avulsion injury. Methods: Using the PubMed database we made a systematic search for articles regarding single ray amputation after traumatic hand lesion. Nine articles met our including criteria and were analysed. Results: Most of the included studies suggest that for those worse cases ray amputation still represent a good option. Indeed ray resection can eliminate the gap, remove a cumbersome or painful digit and guarantes better cosmesis but reduces grip and pinch strength (from 15% to 30%) and decreased palm width. Conclusions: Different surgical techniques are available, almost all of them results in a loss of strength but ensure good both functional and cosmetic results. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Ring Avulsion Injuries: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Ring avulsion injuries can range from soft tissue injury to complete amputation. Grading systems have been developed to guide treatment, but there is controversy with high-grade injuries. Traditionally, advanced ring injuries have been treated with completion amputation, but there is evidence that severe ring injuries can be salvaged. The purpose of this systematic review was to pool the current published data on ring injuries.

METHODS

A systematic review of the English literature published from 1980 to 2015 in PubMed and MEDLINE databases was conducted to identify patients who underwent treatment for ring avulsion injuries.

RESULTS

Twenty studies of ring avulsion injuries met the inclusion criteria. There were a total of 572 patients reported with ring avulsion injuries. The Urbaniak class breakdown was class I (54 patients), class II (204 patients), and class III (314 patients). The average total arc of motion (TAM) for patients with a class I injury was 201.25 (n = 40). The average 2-point discrimination was 5.6 (n = 10). The average TAM for patients with a class II injury undergoing microsurgical revascularization was 187.0 (n = 114), and the average 2-point discrimination was 8.3 (n = 40). The average TAM for patients with a class III injury undergoing microsurgical revascularization was 168.2 (n = 170), and the average 2-point discrimination was 10.5 (n = 97).

CONCLUSIONS

Ring avulsion injuries are commonly classified with the Urbaniak class system. Outcomes are superior for class I and II injuries, and there are select class III injuries that can be treated with replantation. Shared decision making with patients is imperative to determine whether replantation is appropriate.