Biomechanical evaluation of metacarpal fracture fixation: application of a 90° internal fixation model

Advances in the Treatment of Hand and Wrist Injuries in the Elite Athlete

Caring for hand and wrist injuries in the elite athlete brings distinct challenges, with case-by-case decisions regarding surgical intervention and return-to-play. Metacarpal fractures, thumb ulnar collateral ligament tears, and scaphoid fractures are common upper-extremity injuries in the elite athlete that can be detrimental to playing time and future participation. Treatment should therefore endure the demand of accelerated rehabilitation and return-to-activity without compromising long-term outcomes. Fortunately, the literature has supported emerging management options that support goals specific to the athlete. This review examined the advances in surgical and perioperative treatment of metacarpal fractures, thumb ulnar collateral ligament injuries, and scaphoid fractures in the elite athlete.

Biomechanical analysis of plate versus K-wire fixation for metacarpal shaft fractures with wedge-shaped bone defects

BACKGROUND

Metacarpal shaft fracture is a common type of hand fracture. Numerous studies have explored fixing transverse fractures in the midshaft of the metacarpal bone. However, this section of the metacarpal bone is often susceptible to high-energy injury, resulting in comminuted fracture or bone loss. In such cases, wedge-shaped bone defects can develop in the metacarpal shaft, increasing the difficulty of performing fracture fixation. Notably, the research on this type of fracture fixation is limited. This study compared the abilities of four fixation methods to fix metacarpal shaft fractures with wedge-shaped bone defects.

METHODS

In total, 28 artificial metacarpal bones were used. To create wedge-shaped bone defects, an electric saw was used to create metacarpal shaft fractures at the midshaft of each bone. The artificial metacarpal bones were then divided into four groups for fixation. The bones in the first group were fixed with a dorsal locked plate (DP group), those in the second group were fixed with a volar locked plate (VP group), and those in the third group were fixed by combining dorsal and volar locked plates (DP + VP group), and those in the fourth group were fixed with two K-wires (2 K group). Cantilever bending tests were conducted using a material testing machine to measure yielding force and stiffness. The four groups' fixation capabilities were then assessed through analysis of variance and Tukey's test.

RESULTS

The DP + VP group (164.1±44.0 N) achieved a significantly higher yielding force relative to the 2 K group (50.7 ± 8.9 N); the DP group (13.6 ± 3.0 N) and VP group (12.3 ± 1.0 N) did not differ significantly in terms of yielding force, with both achieving lower yielding forces relative to the DP + VP group and 2 K group. The DP + VP group (19.8±6.3 N/mm) achieved the highest level of stiffness, and the other three groups did not differ significantly in terms of stiffness (2 K group, 5.4 ± 1.1 N/mm; DP group, 4.0 ± 0.9 N/mm; VP group, 3.9 ± 1.9 N/mm).

CONCLUSIONS

The fixation method involving the combined use of dorsal and volar locked plates (DP + VP group) resulted in optimal outcomes with respect to fixing metacarpal shaft fractures with volar wedge bone defects.

Ideal Length and Diameter for Intramedullary Screw Fixation of Metacarpal Fractures: A Biomechanical Study

Purpose

This biomechanical study evaluated the effect of intramedullary screw diameter and length relative to 3-point bending force and torsional force when used to stabilize metacarpal shaft fractures.

Methods

Transverse osteotomies were made in the proximal metacarpal shaft in 36 middle finger metacarpal fourth-generation composite Sawbones. To compare screw diameters, antegrade intramedullary screws of 30-mm length were placed in 6 metacarpals, which included 4.7-mm Acutrak 2, Standard Acutrak 2 (4.0 mm), and Mini-Acutrak 2 (3.5 mm) screws. To compare screw lengths, metacarpals were fixated with Standard Acutrak 2 screws of 26, 30, or 34 mm in length, with screw tips bypassing the osteotomy by 6, 10, or 14 mm, respectively. A 6 degrees of freedom robot was used for torsional and 3-point bending testing.

Results

Increasing screw diameter demonstrated significant differences in both 3-point bending and torsional strengths. Maximum torsional loads were 69 Ncm (4.7-mm Acutrak 2), 45 Ncm (Standard Acutrak 2), and 27 Ncm (Mini-Acutrak 2) (P < .05). Loads to failure in the 3-point bending tests were 916 N (4.7-mm Acutrak 2), 713 N (Standard Acutrak 2), and 284 N (Mini-Acutrak 2) (P < .05). Differing screw lengths demonstrated significant differences with maximum torsional loads when comparing the 26-mm screws (22 Ncm) with 30- and 34-mm screws (45 and 55 Ncm, respectively) (P < .05). The 3-point dorsal bending strengths were significantly different between the 26-mm screws (320 N) and 30- and 34-mm screws (713 N and 702 N, respectively) (P < .05).

Conclusions

The results demonstrated significantly higher torsional strength and resistance to 3-point bending with larger intramedullary screw diameters. Further, when selecting the intramedullary screw length, the screw tip should pass at least 10 mm beyond the fracture.

Clinical Relevance

This study provided biomechanical evidence to guide surgeons in selecting intramedullary screw diameter and length for treating metacarpal fractures.

Comparison of the fixation ability of headless compression screws and locking plate for metacarpal shaft transverse fracture

Metacarpal shaft fractures are common hand fractures. Although bone plates possess strong fixation ability, they have several limitations. The use of headless compression screws for fracture repair has been reported, but their fixation ability has not been understood clearly.This study aimed to compare the fixation ability of locked plate with that of headless compression screw for metacarpal fracture repair.A total of 14 artificial metacarpal bones (Sawbones, Vashon, WA, USA) were subjected to transverse metacarpal shaft fractures and divided into 2 groups. The first group of bones was fixed using locked plates (LP group), whereas the second group was fixed using headless compression screws (HC group). A material testing machine was used to perform cantilever bending tests, whereby maximum fracture force and stiffness were measured. The fixation methods were compared by conducting a Mann-Whitney U test.The maximum fracture force of the HC group (285.6 ± 57.3 N, median + interquartile range) was significantly higher than that of the LP group (227.8 ± 37.5 N; P < .05). The median of the HC group was 25.4% greater. However, no significant difference in stiffness (P > .05) was observed between the HC (65.2 ± 24.6 N/mm) and LP (61.7 ± 19.7 N/mm) groups.Headless compression screws exhibited greater fixability than did locked plates, particularly in its resistance to maximum fracture force.

Effect of a figure-of-eight cerclage wire with two Kirschner wires on fixation strength for transverse metacarpal shaft fractures: an in vitro study with artificial bone

BACKGROUND

Metacarpal shaft fractures are a common type of hand fracture. Despite providing strong fixation strength, plate fixation has numerous shortcomings. Concerning internal fixation with Kirschner wires (K-wires), although this approach is frequently used to treat metacarpal shaft fractures, the lack of functional stability may result in fixation failure.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of figure-of-eight cerclage wire on fixation for transverse metacarpal shaft fractures using two K-wires.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used a saw blade to create transverse metacarpal shaft fractures in 14 fourth-generation artificial third metacarpal bones (Sawbones, Vashon, WA, USA), which were assigned to groups undergoing fixation with two K-wires (KP) or with two K-wires and figure-of-eight cerclage wire (KP&F8). All specimens were subjected to material testing, specifically cantilever bending tests. The maximum fracture force and stiffness of the two fixation types were determined on the basis of the force-displacement data. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare between-group differences in maximum fracture force and stiffness.

RESULTS

The maximum fracture force of the KP group (median ± interquartile range = 97.30 ± 29.70 N) was significantly lower than that of the KP&F8 group (153.2 ± 69.50 N, p < 0.05; Figure 5a), with the median of the KP&F8 group exceeding that of the KP group by 57.5%. Similarly, stiffness was significantly lower in the KP group (18.14 ± 9.84 N/mm) than in the KP&F8 group (38.25 ± 23.49 N/mm; p < 0.05; Figure 5b), with the median of the KP&F8 group exceeding that of the KP group by 110.9%.

CONCLUSION

The incorporation of a figure-of-eight cerclage wire increased the maximum fracture force and stiffness by 57.5 and 110.9%, respectively, compared with those achieved in standard two K-wire fixation. Therefore, hand surgeons are advised to consider the proposed approach to increase fixation strength.

Effect of Bicortical Interfragmentary Screw Size on the Fixation of Metacarpal Shaft Fractures: A 3-Dimensional-Printed Biomechanical Study

Purpose

Spiral metacarpal fractures fixed with 2 non-lagged, interfragmentary cortical screws were tested to failure. The effect of screw size (1.2 mm, 1.5 mm, 2.0 mm, and 2.3 mm) on construct strength was tested in 3-point bending.

Methods

Three-dimensional-printed metacarpal test models were reproduced from computed tomography scans to reduce the confounding variables of bone density and anatomy, often encountered when using cadavers.

Results

No significant difference was found between the screw sizes, and the peak failure force was similar. Drill bit fracture and deformation during the insertion of the smallest screw (1.2 mm) as well as model failure during the insertion of the largest screw (2.3 mm) were found in some cases.

Conclusions

Screws of 1.5 mm and 2.0 mm in diameter were of sufficient strength and did not have the issues encountered with smaller or larger screws. Concerns from previous authors regarding intraoperative fracture were consistent with the pre-testing failure of some 2.3-mm models.

Clinical Relevance

Screws of 1.5 mm or 2 mm appear adequate for the fixation of spiral fracture patterns in metacarpal shafts using bicortical non-lagged technique with a low risk of fixation complications.

Metacarpal shaft fixation: a biomechanical comparison of dorsal plating, lag screws, and headless compression screws

Background

Metacarpal shaft fractures are common and can be treated nonoperatively. Shortening, angulation, and rotational deformity are indications for surgical treatment. Various forms of treatment with advantages and disadvantages have been documented. The purpose of the study was to determine the stability of fracture fixation with intramedullary headless compression screws in two types of metacarpal shaft fractures and compare them to other common forms of rigid fixation: dorsal plating and lag screw fixation. It was hypothesized that headless compression screws would demonstrate a biomechanical stronger construct.

Methods

Five matched paired hands (age 60.9 ± 4.6 years), utilizing non-thumb metacarpals, were used for comparative fixation in two fracture types created by an osteotomy. In transverse diaphyseal fractures, fixation by headless compression screws (n = 7) and plating (n = 8) were compared. In long oblique diaphyseal fractures, headless compression screws (n = 8) were compared with plating (n = 8) and lag screws (n = 7). Testing was performed using an MTS frame producing an apex dorsal, three point bending force. Peak load to failure and stiffness were calculated from the load-displacement curve generated.

Results

For transverse fractures, headless compression screws had a significantly higher stiffness and peak load to failure, means 249.4 N/mm and 584.8 N, than plates, means 129.02 N/mm and 303.9 N (both p < 0.001). For long oblique fractures, stiffness and peak load to failure for headless compression screws were means 209 N/mm and 758.4 N, for plates 258.7 N/mm and 518.5 N, and for lag screws 172.18 N/mm and 234.11 N. There was significance in peak load to failure for headless compression screws vs plates (p = 0.023), headless compression screws vs lag screws (p < 0.001), and plates vs lag screws (p = 0.009). There was no significant difference in stiffness between groups.

Conclusion

Intramedullary fixation of diaphyseal metacarpal fractures with a headless compression screw provides excellent biomechanical stability. Coupled with lower risks for adverse effects, headless compression screws may be a preferable option for those requiring rapid return to sport or work.

Level of evidence

Basic Science Study, Biomechanics.

Effect of oblique headless compression screw fixation for metacarpal shaft fracture: a biomechanical in vitro study

Background

Metacarpal shaft fracture is a common fracture in hand trauma injuries. Surgical intervention is indicated when fractures are unstable or involve considerable displacement. Current fixation options include Kirschner wire, bone plates, and intramedullary headless screws. Common complications include joint stiffness, tendon irritation, implant loosening, and cartilage damage.

Objective

We propose a modified fixation approach using headless compression screws to treat transverse or short-oblique metacarpal shaft fracture.

Materials and methods

We used a saw blade to model transverse metacarpal neck fractures in 28 fresh porcine metacarpals, which were then treated with the following four fixation methods: (1) locked plate with five locked bicortical screws (LP group), (2) regular plate with five bicortical screws (RP group), (3) two Kirschner wires (K group), and (4) a headless compression screw (HC group). In the HC group, we proposed a novel fixation model in which the screw trajectory was oblique to the long axis of the metacarpal bone. The entry point of the screw was in the dorsum of the metacarpal neck, and the exit point was in the volar cortex of the supracondylar region; thus, the screw did not damage the articular cartilage. The specimens were tested using a modified three-point bending test on a material testing system. The maximum fracture forces and stiffness values of the four fixation types were determined by observing the force–displacement curves. Finally, the Kruskal–Wallis test was adopted to process the data, and the exact Wilcoxon rank sum test with Bonferroni adjustment was performed to conduct paired comparisons among the groups.

Results

The maximum fracture forces (median ± interquartile range [IQR]) of the LP, RP, HC, and K groups were 173.0 ± 81.0, 156.0 ± 117.9, 60.4 ± 21.0, and 51.8 ± 60.7 N, respectively. In addition, the stiffness values (median ± IQR) of the LP, HC, RP, and K groups were 29.6 ± 3.0, 23.1 ± 5.2, 22.6 ± 2.8, and 14.7 ± 5.6 N/mm, respectively.

Conclusion

Headless compression screw fixation provides fixation strength similar to locked and regular plates for the fixation of metacarpal shaft fractures. The headless screw was inserted obliquely to the long axis of the metacarpal bone. The entry point of the screw was in the dorsum of the metacarpal neck, and the exit point was in the volar cortex of the supracondylar region; therefore the articular cartilage iatrogenic injury can be avoidable. This modified fixation method may prevent tendon irritation and joint cartilage violation caused by plating and intramedullary headless screw fixation.

Intramedullary screw fixation for metacarpal shaft fractures: a biomechanical human cadaver study

Intramedullary cannulated compression screws have been introduced for the fixation of unstable metacarpal fractures. In the present study, this technique was compared with dorsal compression plating to evaluate its biomechanical performance in stabilizing metacarpal shaft fractures. In a first set of experiments, the biomechanical characteristics of the screws were analysed in an artificial bone model. In subsequent experiments, midshaft osteotomies were performed in human cadaver metacarpals, followed by plating or intramedullary screw osteosynthesis. The metacarpals were tested to failure in cantilever bending, following a stepwise increasing cyclic loading protocol. We found a significantly lower load at failure and a significantly lower number of cycles to failure in the intramedullary screw group, but both methods offered sufficient stability under these loads. With reference to published loads on the metacarpals during use of the hand, we conclude that intramedullary osteosynthesis yields sufficient strength and stiffness for early active motion. A difference in its fixation stability is noted compared with plate fixation, which may not be clinically relevant.

Headless Screw Fixation of Metacarpal Neck Fractures: A Mechanical Comparative Analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical properties of metacarpal neck fracture fixation by headless compression screw (HCS) with that of Kirschner wire (KW) cross-pinning and locking plate (LP) fixation.

METHODS

A metacarpal neck fracture was created in 30 fourth-generation composite Sawbones metacarpal models. A volar-based wedge was removed using a custom jig to simulate a typical apex dorsal fracture, unstable in flexion. The models were divided into 3 equal groups based on the method of fixation: retrograde cross-pinning with two 1.2-mm KWs, 2.0-mm dorsal T-plate with six 2.0-mm locking screws (LP), and a 3.0-mm retrograde HCS. Models were fixed at the proximal end, mounted in a material testing machine, and loaded through a cable tensioned over the metacarpal head, simulating grip loading. Cyclic loading from 0 to 40 N was performed, followed by loading to failure. Load, displacement, and failure mode were recorded.

RESULTS

Stiffness of the HCS (7.3 ± 0.7 N/m) was significantly greater than the KW (5.8 ± 0.5 N/m) but significantly less than the LP (9.5 ± 1.9 N/m). With cyclic loading to 40 N, the LP exhibited significantly less displacement (0.2 ± 1.3 mm) compared with the HCS (2.5 ± 2.3 mm) and KW (2.8 ± 1.0 mm). Load to failure for the HCS (215.5 ±3 9.0 N) was lower than that of the KW (279.7 ± 100.3 N) and of the LP (267.9 ± 44.1 N), but these differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The HCS provided mechanical fracture fixation properties comparable with KW fixation. The LP construct allowed significantly less displacement and had the highest strength of the 3 fixation methods.

A Biomechanical Analysis of 2 Constructs for Metacarpal Spiral Fracture Fixation in a Cadaver Model: 2 Large Screws Versus 3 Small Screws

PURPOSE

Surgeons confronted with a long spiral metacarpal fracture may choose to fix it solely with lagged screws. A biomechanical analysis of a metacarpal spiral fracture model was performed to determine whether 3 1.5-mm screws or 2 2.0-mm screws provided more stability during bending and torsional loading.

METHODS

Second and third metacarpals were harvested from 12 matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric hands and spiral fractures were created. One specimen from each matched pair was fixed with 2 2.0-mm lagged screws whereas the other was fixed with 3 1.5-mm lagged screws. Nine pairs underwent combined cyclic cantilever bending and axial compressive loading followed by loading to failure. Nine additional pairs were subjected to cyclic external rotation while under a constant axial compressive load and were subsequently externally rotated to failure under a constant axial compressive load. Paired t tests were used to compare cyclic creep, stiffness, displacement, rotation, and peak load levels.

RESULTS

Average failure torque for all specimens was 7.2 ± 1.7 Nm. In cyclic torsional testing, the group with 2 screws exhibited significantly less rotational creep than the one with 3 screws. A single specimen in the group with 2 screws failed before cyclic bending tests were completed. No other significant differences were found between test groups during torsional or bending tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Both constructs were biomechanically similar except that the construct with 2 screws displayed significantly less loosening during torsional cyclic loading, although the difference was small and may not be clinically meaningful.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Because we found no obvious biomechanical advantage to using 3 1.5-mm lagged screws to fix long spiral metacarpal fractures, the time efficiency and decreased implant costs of using 2-2.0 mm lagged screws may be preferred.

Metacarpal fractures in the athlete

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe current evaluation and treatment of metacarpal fractures in athletes RECENT FINDINGS: Biomechanical and clinical studies involving lower-profile, locking, shorter length, and double-row or separate-dual plate configurations, as well as intramedullary screw fixation, have demonstrated the potential benefits of internal fixation with promising results. Treatment should be customized to the specific athlete and injury, and is often successful without surgery, or with percutaneous pin fixation. Internal fixation of metacarpal fractures has improved with new hardware and new techniques, and may expedite return to play, although further clinical studies are needed.