Dual-time point positron emission tomography findings of benign mediastinal lymph nodes in a tuberculosis-endemic region

Updates on 18F-FDG-PET/CT as a clinical tool for tuberculosis evaluation and therapeutic monitoring

Tuberculosis (TB) is currently the world's leading cause of infectious mortality. The complex immune response of the human body to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) results in a wide array of clinical manifestations, thus the clinical and radiological diagnosis can be challenging. ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET) scan with/without computed tomography (CT) component images the whole body and provides a metabolic map of the infection, enabling clinicians to assess the disease burden. ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT scan is particularly useful in detecting the disease in previously unknown sites, and allows the most appropriate site of biopsy to be selected. ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT is also very valuable in assessing early disease response to therapy, and plays an important role in cases where conventional microbiological methods are unavailable and for monitoring response to therapy in cases of multidrug-resistant TB or extrapulmonary TB. ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT cannot reliably differentiate active TB lesion from malignant lesions and false positives can also be due to other infective or inflammatory conditions. ¹⁸F-FDG PET is also unable to distinguish tuberculous lymphadenitis from metastatic lymph node involvement. The lack of specificity is a limitation for ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in TB management.

Dual-time point 18F-FDG-PET and PET/CT for Differentiating Benign From Malignant Musculoskeletal Lesions: Opportunities and Limitations

In this review, we summarize the false-positive and false-negative results of standard ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in characterizing musculoskeletal lesions and discussed the added value and limitations of dual-time point imaging (DTPI) and delayed imaging in differentiating malignant from benign musculoskeletal lesions, based on review of the peer-reviewed literature. The quantitative and semiquantitative parameters adopted for DTPI are standardized uptake value (mainly maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax]) and retention index (RI), calculated as RI (%) = 100% × (SUV [maxD-Delayed] - SUV [maxE-Early])/SUV [maxE-Early], although the criteria and cutoff for diagnosing malignancy in studies have varied considerably. Also, there has been considerable heterogeneity in protocol (time point of delayed imaging), interpretation, and results in dual-time point (DTP) ¹⁸F-FDG-PET for differentiating malignant from benign musculoskeletal lesions in various research studies. The specificity of DTPI is a function of many factors such as the nature of the musculoskeletal lesion or malignancy in question, the prevalence of false-positive etiologies in the patient population, and the cutoff values (either SUVmax or RI) employed to define a malignancy. Despite the apparent conflicting reports on the performance, there have been certain common points of agreement regarding DTPI: (1) DTP PET increases the sensitivity of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT due to continued clearance of background activity and increasing ¹⁸F-FDG accumulation in malignant lesions, when the same diagnostic criteria (as in the initial standard single-time point imaging) are used. Increased sensitivity for lesion detection can be viewed as a strong point of DTP and delayed-time point imaging. (2) The causes for false positives (such as active infectious or inflammatory lesions and locally aggressive benign tumors) and false negatives (eg, low-grade sarcomas) are the major hurdles accounting for reduced diagnostic value of the technique, with overlap of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake patterns between benign and malignant musculoskeletal lesions on DTPI. (3) DTPI, however, could still be potentially useful in increasing the confidence of interpretation such as differentiating malignancy from sites of inactive or chronic inflammation, post-treatment viable residue vs necrosis, and certain other benign lesions. (4) Consideration of diagnostic CT component of PET/CT and the patient's clinical picture can lead to increase in specificity of interpretation in a given case scenario. Further systematic research, adoption of uniform protocol, and interpretation criterion could evolve the specific indications and interpretation criteria of DTPI for improved diagnostic accuracy in musculoskeletal lesions and its clinical applications.

Primary Pulmonary Artery Sarcoma on Dual-Time Point FDG PET/CT Imaging

A 59-year-old man presented cough, chest pain, and shortness of breath for 2 weeks and fever for 4 days. A contrast chest CT revealed a large right pulmonary artery filling defect, suggestive of pulmonary embolism that failed to respond to anticoagulation therapy. FDG PET/CT was performed to evaluate possible malignancy, which revealed intense activity in the right main pulmonary artery without any extrathoracic abnormality. The ratio of the SUVmax of this lesion to the liver was significantly increased in the delayed PET images. The pathological examination demonstrated primary pulmonary artery sarcoma.

Imaging in extrapulmonary tuberculosis

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global public health problem, with 1.5 million deaths annually worldwide. One in five cases of TB present as extrapulmonary TB (EPTB), posing major diagnostic and management challenges. Mycobacterium tuberculosis adapts to a quiescent physiological state and is notable for its complex interaction with the host, producing poorly understood disease states ranging from latent infection to active clinical disease. New tools in the diagnostic armamentarium are urgently required for the rapid diagnosis of TB and monitoring of TB treatments, and to gain new insights into pathogenesis. The typical and atypical imaging features of EPTB are reviewed herein, and the roles of several imaging modalities for the diagnosis and management of EPTB are discussed.

Latent tuberculosis infection--Revisiting and revising concepts

Host- and pathogen-specific factors interplay with the environment in a complex fashion to determine the outcome of infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), resulting in one of three possible outcomes: cure, latency or active disease. Although much remains unknown about its pathophysiology, latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) defined by immunologic evidence of Mtb infection is a continuum between self-cure and asymptomatic, yet active tuberculosis (TB) disease. Strain virulence, intensity of exposure to the index case, size of the bacterial inoculum, and host factors such as age and co-morbidities, each contribute to where one settles on the continuum. Currently, the diagnosis of LTBI is based on reactive tuberculin skin testing (TST) and/or a positive interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA). Neither diagnostic test reflects the activity of the infectious focus or the risk of progression to active TB. This is a critical shortcoming, as accurate and efficient detection of those with LTBI at higher risk of progression to TB disease would allow for provision of targeted preventive therapy to those most likely to benefit. Host biomarkers may prove of value in stratifying risk of development of TB. New guidelines are required for interpretation of discordance between TST and IGRA, which may be due in part to a lack of stability (that is reproducibility) of IGRA or TST results or to a delay in conversion of IGRA to positivity compared to TST. In this review, the authors elaborate on the definition, diagnosis, pathophysiology and natural history of LTBI, as well as promising methods for better stratifying risk of progression to TB. The review is centered on the human host and the clinical and epidemiologic features of LTBI that are relevant to the development of new and improved diagnostic tools.

Serial changes of FDG uptake and diagnosis of suspected lung malignancy: a lesion-based analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study prospectively evaluates the serial change of FDG uptake and its diagnostic value in malignant versus benign lung lesions in patients with suspected lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with suspected lung malignancy underwent whole-body FDG PET/CT at 1, 2, and 3 hours after an IV injection of F-FDG. The SUVs of FDG in lung nodules and hilar/mediastinal nodes at each time point were correlated with biopsy/surgical pathologic findings.

RESULTS

There were a total of 45 malignant lesions and 80 benign lesions from 43 patients with pathologic diagnosis that were included for analysis. The SUVmax had an average of 25.5% increase in all tumor-positive lesions from 1 to 2 hours (vs 1.6% decrease in all tumor-negative lesions, P < 0.0001) and an average of 39.1% increase from 1 to 3 hours (vs 4.5% increase in all tumor-negative lesions, P < 0.0001). The receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the 2-hour and 3-hour SUVmax had similar area under the curve and outperformed the SUVmax on the 1-hour initial imaging or retention index (RI). The optimal cutoff values to differentiate malignancy from benign lesions were 3.24 for 1-hour SUVmax, 3.67 for 2-hour SUVmax, and 4.21 for 3-hour SUVmax, with 11.6% for 1- to 2-hour RI and 23.9% for 1- to 3-hour RI. The 3-hour delayed SUVmax of 4.21 provided the best overall performance (accuracy of 88.8%). The analysis of the lesion-to-background ratio revealed that delayed imaging improved the image quality significantly, leading to much easier detection of either malignant or benign lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple time point FDG PET/CT imaging moderately improves the diagnostic accuracy of lung cancer and significantly improves the image quality.

When should we recommend use of dual time-point and delayed time-point imaging techniques in FDG PET?

FDG PET and PET/CT are now widely used in oncological imaging for tumor characterization, staging, restaging, and response evaluation. However, numerous benign etiologies may cause increased FDG uptake indistinguishable from that of malignancy. Multiple studies have shown that dual time-point imaging (DTPI) of FDG PET may be helpful in differentiating malignancy from benign processes. However, exceptions exist, and some studies have demonstrated significant overlap of FDG uptake patterns between benign and malignant lesions on delayed time-point images. In this review, we summarize our experience and opinions on the value of DTPI and delayed time-point imaging in oncology, with a review of the relevant literature. We believe that the major value of DTPI and delayed time-point imaging is the increased sensitivity due to continued clearance of background activity and continued FDG accumulation in malignant lesions, if the same diagnostic criteria (as in the initial standard single time-point imaging) are used. The specificity of DTPI and delayed time-point imaging depends on multiple factors, including the prevalence of malignancies, the patient population, and the cut-off values (either SUV or retention index) used to define a malignancy. Thus, DTPI and delayed time-point imaging would be more useful if performed for evaluation of lesions in regions with significant background activity clearance over time (such as the liver, the spleen, the mediastinum), and if used in the evaluation of the extent of tumor involvement rather than in the characterization of the nature of any specific lesion. Acute infectious and non-infectious inflammatory lesions remain as the major culprit for diminished diagnostic performance of these approaches (especially in tuberculosis-endemic regions). Tumor heterogeneity may also contribute to inconsistent performance of DTPI. The authors believe that selective use of DTPI and delayed time-point imaging will improve diagnostic accuracy and interpretation confidence in FDG PET imaging.

Dual-time-point FDG PET/CT: Is It Useful for Lymph Node Staging in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer?

PURPOSE

Dual-time-point (DTP) FDG PET/CT has been shown to be useful for lymph node (LN) staging in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the LN staging ability of DTP FDG PET/CT in the predominant area of pulmonary tuberculosis.

METHODS

Sixty-nine NSCLC patients underwent DTP PET/CT. Regions of interest were placed on each LN of each station, and the maximum SUVs were measured. Three variables were obtained: (1) the SUV on the early scan (SUVearly), (2) the SUV on the delayed scan (SUVdelayed), and (3) the retention index of the SUV (RI). Each patient had one final LN stage and three other LN stages according to the cutoff values of SUVearly, SUVdelayed, and RI.

RESULTS

In the LN-based analysis, the area under the ROC curve of SUVdelayed (0.884) was significantly larger (P < 0.01) than those of SUVearly (0.868) and RI (0.717). Among the three variables, SUVdelayed was more accurate (P < 0.01) for detecting the mediastinal LN metastasis than SUVearly and RI. In the patient-based analysis, SUVdelayed had correctly determined LN stages in 55 of 69 patients (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy = 88.7 %, 50.0 %, and 79.7 %), whereas SUVearly and RI correctly determined LN stages in 53 and 52 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, comparing the diagnostic efficacy of SUVearly, SUVdelayed, and RI for LN staging in patients with NSCLC, SUVdelayed was the most accurate variable for LN staging. DTP PET/CT could provide improved diagnostic accuracy for the LN staging of NSCLC.