Ring-like enhancement of focal nodular hyperplasia with hepatobiliary-phase Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: radiological-pathological correlation

Imaging characteristics of hypervascular focal nodular hyperplasia-like lesions in patients with chronic alcoholic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH)-like lesions are hyperplastic formations in patients with micronodular cirrhosis and a history of alcohol abuse. Although pathologically similar to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions, they are benign. As such, it is important to develop methods to distinguish between FNH-like lesions and HCC.

AIM

To evaluate diagnostically differential radiological findings between FNH-like lesions and HCC.

METHODS

We studied pathologically confirmed FNH-like lesions in 13 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis [10 men and 3 women; mean age: 54.5 ± 12.5 (33-72) years] who were negative for hepatitis-B surface antigen and hepatitis-C virus antibody and underwent dynamic computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) and/or gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Seven patients also underwent angiography-assisted CT.

RESULTS

The evaluated lesion features included arterial enhancement pattern, washout appearance (low density compared with that of surrounding liver parenchyma), signal intensity on T1-weighted image (T1WI) and T2-weighted image (T2WI), central scar presence, chemical shift on in- and out-of-phase images, and uptake pattern on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI hepatobiliary phase and SPIO-enhanced MRI. Eleven patients had multiple small lesions (< 1.5 cm). Radiological features of FNH-like lesions included hypervascularity despite small lesions, lack of "corona-like" enhancement in the late phase on CT during hepatic angiography (CTHA), high-intensity on T1WI, slightly high- or iso-intensity on T2WI, no signal decrease in out-of-phase images, and complete SPIO uptake or incomplete/partial uptake of gadoxetic acid. Pathologically, similar to HCC, FNH-like lesions showed many unpaired arteries and sinusoidal capillarization.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the present study showed that FNH-like lesions have unique radiological findings useful for differential diagnosis. Specifically, SPIO- and/or gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and CTHA features might facilitate differential diagnosis of FNH-like lesions and HCC.

Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia during follow-up of patients after cyclophosphamide- or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy: differentiation from liver metastasis

OBJECTIVES

Newly detected hepatic nodules during follow-up of cancer survivors receiving chemotherapy may pose a diagnostic dilemma. We investigated a series of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) diagnosed by either typical MRI features and follow-up or pathology in cancer survivors.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated 38 patients with tumours who developed new hepatic FNH after cyclophosphamide-based (n = 19) and oxaliplatin-based (n = 19) chemotherapies. The main tumour types were breast cancer (n = 18) and colorectal cancer (n = 17). MRI findings, clinical features, and temporal evolution of all target hepatic lesions (n = 63) were reported. In addition, the two chemotherapy drug groups were compared.

RESULTS

The median interval between chemotherapy completion and FNH detection was 30.4 months (12.9, 49.4). Six patients underwent biopsy or surgery, while the remaining patients were diagnosed based on typical MRI features and long-term follow-up. Among the patients, 60.5% (23/38) presented with multiple nodules and 63 target lesions were detected. The median size of target lesions was 11.5 mm (8.4, 15.1). The median follow-up time was 32.5 months (21.2, 48.6), and 15 patients experienced changes in their lesions during the follow-up period (11 increased and 4 decreased). The cyclophosphamide-based treatment group had a younger population, a greater proportion of females, and a shorter time to discovery than the oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy group (all p ≤ 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

FNH may occur in cancer survivors after cyclophosphamide- or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Considering a patient's treatment history and typical MRI findings can help avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary invasive treatment.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

When cancer survivors develop new hepatic nodules during follow-up, clinicians should think of the possibility of focal nodular hyperplasia in addition to liver metastasis, especially if the cancer survivors were previously treated with cyclophosphamide or oxaliplatin.

KEY POINTS

Cancer survivors, after chemotherapy, can develop hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia. Cyclophosphamide and oxaliplatin are two chemotherapeutic agents that predispose to focal nodular hyperplasia development. Focal nodular hyperplasia occurs at shorter intervals in patients treated with cyclophosphamide.

MRI of Peliosis Hepatis: A Case Series Presentation With a 2022 Systematic Literature Update

BACKGROUND

Peliosis hepatis (PH) is a rare benign condition, characterized by hepatic sinusoidal dilatation and blood-filled cystic cavities, often found incidentally, with still challenging diagnosis by imaging due to polymorphic appearance.

PURPOSE

Based on a retrospective analysis of our series (12 patients) and systematic literature review (1990-2022), to organize data about PH and identify features to improve characterization.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective case series and systematic review.

POPULATION

Twelve patients (mean age 48 years, 55% female) with pathology-proven PH and 49 patients (mean age 52 years, 67% female) identified in 33 studies from the literature (1990-2022).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

1,5-T; T1-weighted (T1W), T2-weighted (T2W), diffusion-weighted (DW), contrast-enhanced (CE) T1W imaging.

ASSESSMENT

We compared our series and literature data in terms of demographic (gender/age/ethnicity), clinical characteristics (symptoms/physical examination/liver test), associated conditions (malignancies/infectious/hematologic/genetic or chronic disorders/drugs or toxic exposure) percentage. On magnetic resonance imaging lesion numbers/shape/mean maximum diameter/location/mass effect/signal intensity were compared. PH pathological type/proposed imaging diagnosis/patient follow-up were also considered.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports/Series quality assessment. Intraclass correlation and Cohen's kappa coefficients for levels of inter/intrareader agreement in our experience.

RESULTS

Patients were mainly asymptomatic (92% vs. 70% in our study and literature) with associated conditions (83% vs. 80%). Lesions showed homogeneous T1W-hypointensity (58% vs. 65%) and T2W-hyperintensity (58% vs. 66%). Heterogeneous nonspecific (25% vs. 51%), centrifugal (34% vs. 8%), or rim-like centripetal (25% vs. 23%) patterns of enhancement were most frequent, with hypointensity on the hepatobiliary phase (HBP), without restricted diffusivity. Good inter- and intrareader agreement was observed in our experience. Concerning JBI Checklist, 19 out of 31 case reports met at least 7 out of 8 criteria, whereas 2 case series fulfilled 5 and 6 out of 10 items respectively.

DATA CONCLUSION

A homogeneous, not well-demarcated T1W-hypointense and T2W-hyperintense mass, with heterogeneous nonspecific or rim-like centripetal or centrifugal pattern of enhancement, and hypointensity on HBP, may be helpful for PH diagnosis. Among associated conditions, malignancies and drug exposures were the most frequent.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Liver magnetic resonance imaging: how we do it

Magnetic resonance imaging is used for evaluating focal liver lesions, hepatic vascular diseases, biliary diseases and diffuse liver diseases in children. MRI examinations take a long time, often requiring sedation or anesthesia in smaller children. This makes it essential to understand the concepts and technique necessary to obtain an optimal examination for answering the clinical question while minimizing the need for sedation/anesthesia. We discuss key concepts including appropriate sequence selection, choice of contrast media, dynamic imaging, phases of contrast enhancement and protocol organization.

Magnetic resonance imaging of inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver: a 2021 systematic literature update and series presentation

PURPOSE

Inflammatory pseudotumors of the liver (IPTL) are not exceptional benign lesions with various etiologies, histology, and imaging appearances. The incomplete knowledge of this pathology and the wide polymorphism sometimes resembling malignancy often induce long and expensive diagnostic flow, biopsy and occasionally unnecessary surgery. We propose a systematic revision of MRI literature data (2000-2021) with some narrative inserts and 10 new complete MRI cases, with the aim of organizing the data about IPTL and identifying some typical features able to improve its diagnosis from imaging.

METHODS

We performed a systematic revision of literature from 2000 to 2021 to obtain MRI features, epidemiological, and clinical data of IPTL. The basic online search algorithm on the PubMed database was "(pseudotumor) AND (liver) AND (imaging)." Quality assessment was performed using both scales by Moola for case report studies and by Munn for cross-sectional studies reporting prevalence data. A case-based retrospective study by collecting patients diagnosed with IPTL from three different university hospitals from 2015 to 2021 was done as well. Only cases with MR examinations complete with T1/T2/contrast-enhanced T1/Diffusion-Weighted (W) images and pathology-proven IPTL were selected.

RESULTS

After screening/selection 38 articles were included for a total of 114 patients. In our experience we selected 10 cases for a total of 16 IPTLs; 8 out of 10 patients underwent at least 1 MRI follow-up. Some reproducible and rather typical imaging findings for IPTL were found. The targetoid aspect of IPTL is very frequent in our experience (75% on T1W, 44% on T2W, 81% on contrast-enhanced T1W (at least one phase), 100% on Diffusion-W images) but is also recurrent in the literature (6% on T1W, 31% on T2W, 51% on CE-T1W (at least one phase), 18% on Diffusion-W images, and 67% on hepatobiliary phase). In our experience, Apparent Diffusion Coefficient map values were always equal to or higher than those of the surrounding parenchyma, and at MRI follow-up, nodule/s disappeared at first/second control, in six patients, while in the remaining 2, lesions persisted with tendency to dehydration.

CONCLUSION

A targetoid-like aspect of a focal liver lesion must raise diagnostic suspicion, especially if IgG4-positive plasma is detected. MRI follow-up mainly shows the disappearance of the lesion or its reduction with dehydration.

Diagnostic value of morphological enhancement patterns in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI to distinguish focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenoma

OBJECTIVES

To describe the different morphological enhancement patterns of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI) and to determine their added value in their differential diagnosis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of imaging findings in 185 benign hepatocellular lesions (154 FNH; 31 HCA) in 108 patients who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI was performed by two independent reviewers. Six patterns on HBP were recorded: 1) homogeneous enhancement; 2) peripheral ring-like enhancement with hypointense central core; 3) peripheral ring-like enhancement with hyperintense central core; 4) central core enhancement with hypointense periphery; 5) heterogeneous enhancement; and 6) the absence of enhancement.

RESULTS

Peripheral ring-like enhancement with hypointense central core and peripheral ring-like enhancement with hyperintense central core showed the highest specificity for the diagnosis of FNH (100% and 96.8%, respectively). The absence of enhancement and central core enhancement with hypointense periphery were only present in 0.6% and 1.9% of FHN, respectively. All other patterns were observed with similar frequencies in FNH (22.1% to 26.6%). Six HCA showed contrast uptake on the HBP: homogeneous (6.5%), peripheral ring-like enhancement with hyperintense central core (3.2%) and heterogeneous (9.7%).

CONCLUSION

Both FNH and HCA may demonstrate enhancement in the HBP of Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI, limiting its specificity. A significant improvement in specificity can be achieved by the evaluation of morphological enhancement patterns: Peripheral ring-like enhancement with hypointense or hyperintense central core was highly specific for FNH diagnosis. On the other hand, the absence of HBP enhancement makes the diagnosis of FNH unlikely.

Incidental Liver Findings on Cross-sectional Imaging

Hepatic incidental findings often are seen on cross-sectional imaging examinations of the chest, spine, pelvis, or other nondedicated hepatic imaging. Radiologists are tasked with appropriately triaging, which requires further evaluation, even in the setting of an otherwise limited evaluation. This article reviews common benign entities encountered on ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging, along with their characteristic imaging features. Imaging features that are suspicious for malignancy or suggest the need for further evaluation also are discussed. Two algorithms are proposed to guide radiologists in their recommendations based on patient risk factors, focal hepatic abnormality size, and available imaging features.

HBP-enhancing hepatocellular adenomas and how to discriminate them from FNH in Gd-EOB MRI

BACKGROUND

Recent studies provide evidence that hepatocellular  adenomas  (HCAs) frequently take up gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB) during the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). The purpose of our study was to investigate how to differentiate between Gd-EOB-enhancing HCAs and focal nodular hyperplasias (FNHs). We therefore retrospectively included 40 HCAs classified as HBP Gd-EOB-enhancing lesions from a sample of 100 histopathologically proven HCAs in 65 patients. These enhancing HCAs were matched retrospectively with 28 FNH lesions (standard of reference: surgical resection). Two readers (experienced abdominal radiologists blinded to clinical data) reviewed the images evaluating morphologic features and subjectively scoring Gd-EOB uptake (25-50%, 50-75% and 75-100%) for each lesion. Quantitative lesion-to-liver enhancement was measured in arterial, portal venous (PV), transitional and HBP. Additionally, multivariate regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Subjective scoring of intralesional Gd-EOB uptake showed the highest discriminatory accuracies (AUC: 0.848 (R#1); 0.920 (R#2)-p < 0.001) with significantly higher uptake scores assigned to FNHs (Cut-off: 75%-100%). Typical lobulation and presence of a central scar in FNH achieved an accuracy of 0.750 or higher in at least one reader (lobulation-AUC: 0.809 (R#1); 0.736 (R#2); central scar-AUC: 0.595 (R#1); 0.784 (R#2)). The multivariate regression emphasized the discriminatory power of the Gd-EOB scoring (p = 0.001/OR:22.15 (R#1) and p < 0.001/OR:99.12 (R#2). The lesion-to-liver ratio differed significantly between FNH and HCA in the PV phase and HBP (PV: 132.9 (FNH) and 110.2 (HCA), p = 0.048 and HBP: 110.3 (FNH) and 39.2 (HCA), p < 0.001)), while the difference was not significant in arterial and transitional contrast phases (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Even in HBP-enhancing HCA, characterization of Gd-EOB uptake was found to provide the strongest discriminatory power in differentiating HCA from FNH. Furthermore, a lobulated appearance and a central scar are more frequently seen in FNH than in HCA.

OATP1B3 Expression in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Correlates with Intralesional Gd-EOB-DTPA Uptake and Signal Intensity on Gd-EOB-DTPA-Enhanced MRI

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the predictive value of the OATP1B3 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for the gadolinium ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) uptake and the signal intensity (SI) in the hepatobiliary (HB) phase.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we analyzed 69 liver nodules of 64 patients who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before operation. Based on the SI in the HB phase, the patients were categorized into the hypointense HCC and iso- or hyperintense HCC groups. The OATP1B3 expression was detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and immunohistochemistry. The differences between the expression of OATP1B3 and Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced magnetic resonance imaging between the two groups of hepatocellular carcinoma were compared. The relationship between the OATP1B3 expression and the SI and relative enhancement (RE) was analyzed.

RESULTS

The examined HCC nodules were 59 hypointense HCC and 10 iso- or hyperintense. The relative expressions of OATP1B3, HB-phase signal, and the RE of the HB phase in iso- or hyperintense were significantly higher than those of the hypointense HCC, while the RE of the HB phase increased with an increase in the OATP1B3 expression (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The OATP1B3 expression in HCC can predict the uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA and the SI of the HB phase. We believe that the evaluation of OATP1B3 expression will facilitate the comprehension of imaging performance of HCC in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI.

Spectrum of liver lesions hyperintense on hepatobiliary phase: an approach by clinical setting

Hepatobiliary MRI contrast agents are increasingly being used for liver imaging. In clinical practice, most focal liver lesions do not uptake hepatobiliary contrast agents. Less commonly, hepatic lesions may show variable signal characteristics on hepatobiliary phase. This pictorial essay reviews a broad spectrum of benign and malignant focal hepatic observations that may show hyperintensity on hepatobiliary phase in various clinical settings. In non-cirrhotic patients, focal hepatic observations that show hyperintensity in the hepatobiliary phase are usually benign and typically include focal nodular hyperplasia. In patients with primary or secondary vascular disorders, focal nodular hyperplasia-like lesions arise as a local hyperplastic response to vascular alterations and tend to be iso- or hyperintense in the hepatobiliary phase. In oncologic patients, metastases and cholangiocarcinoma are hypointense lesions in the hepatobiliary phase; however, occasionally they may show a diffuse, central and inhomogeneous hepatobiliary paradoxical uptake with peripheral rim hypointensity. Post-chemotherapy focal nodular hyperplasia-like lesions may be tricky, and their typical hyperintense rim in the hepatobiliary phase is very helpful for the differential diagnosis with metastases. In cirrhotic patients, hepatocellular carcinoma may occasionally appear hyperintense on hepatobiliary phase.

Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI for focal nodular hyperplasia-like lesions in pediatric cancer survivors

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the hepatobiliary enhancement patterns of gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) MRI and the temporal evolution of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH)-like lesions in pediatric cancer survivors.

METHODS

We retrospectively included pediatric cancer survivors who had new liver lesions detected during surveillance imaging and who were diagnosed with FNH-like lesions by Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI without the aid of a hepatobiliary phase. The hepatobiliary enhancement patterns of FNH-like lesions were categorized as homogeneous hyperintense/isointense, heterogeneous hyperintense, and ring-like enhancement. Temporal changes in the FNH-like lesions were evaluated by follow-up Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI. Statistical analyses included one-way analysis of variance and Spearman's rank correlation test.

RESULTS

A total of 132 radiologically diagnosed FNH-like lesions in 18 patients showed the three different hepatobiliary enhancement patterns: homogeneous hyperintense/isointense (n = 65, 49%), heterogeneous hyperintense (n = 24, 18%), and ring-like enhancement (n = 43, 33%). A weak positive correlation was found between the lesion size and the hepatobiliary enhancement pattern (p = 0.015). Follow-up MRI showed alterations in the size and number of 55 FNHs in 8 patients, including stable size (n = 15, 27%), increased size (n = 17, 31%), decreased size (n = 11, 20%), disappearance (n = 12, 22%), and 74 new lesions (5 patients, 63%).

CONCLUSIONS

FNH-like lesions in pediatric cancer survivors showed three different hepatobiliary enhancement patterns and various temporal changes. Recognition of the radiological characteristics of FNH-like lesions may avoid unnecessary invasive procedures and reduce patients/parents' anxiety.

KEY POINTS

• FNH-like lesions in pediatric cancer survivors showed three different hepatobiliary enhancement patterns. The most common was homogeneous hyperintense/isointense, followed by heterogeneous hyperintense, and ring-like enhancement. • FNH-like lesions in pediatric cancer survivors can show various temporal changes during follow-up.

Patterns of enhancement in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI

A variety of patterns of enhancement of liver lesions and liver parenchyma is observed in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. It is becoming increasingly apparent that many lesions may exhibit HBP enhancement. Much of the literature regarding the role of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in characterising liver lesions is dichotomous, focusing on whether lesions are enhancing or non-enhancing in the HBP, rather than examining the patterns of enhancement. We provide a pattern-based description of HBP enhancement of liver parenchyma and of liver lesions. The role of OATP1B3 transporters, hepatocyte function and lesion composition in influencing patterns of HBP hyperintensity are discussed.

Benign Neoplasms, Mass-Like Infections, and Pseudotumors That Mimic Hepatic Malignancy at MRI

A variety of conditions may mimic hepatic malignancy at MRI. These include benign hepatic tumors and tumor-like entities such as focal nodular hyperplasia-like lesions, hepatocellular adenoma, hepatic infections, inflammatory pseudotumor, vascular entities, and in the cirrhotic liver, confluent fibrosis, and hypertrophic pseudomass. These conditions demonstrate MRI features that overlap with hepatic malignancy, and can be challenging for radiologists to diagnose accurately. In this review we discuss the MRI manifestations of various conditions that mimic hepatic malignancy, and highlight features that may allow distinction from malignancy. Level of Evidence 5 Technical Efficacy Stage 3.

Hepatobiliary MR contrast agents are useful to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images can discriminate between benign and malignant liver lesions, but it is unclear if this approach can be used in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS). Thus, we aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of HBP images in patients with BCS.

METHODS

This retrospective study included all patients admitted to our institution with a diagnosis of BCS and focal liver lesions on hepatobiliary contrast agent-enhanced MR imaging (HBCA-MRI) from 2000 to 2019. MR images were reviewed by 2 radiologists blinded to the diagnosis of the lesions. Patient and lesion characteristics were recorded, focusing on HBP imaging features.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients (mean 35 ± 11 years old [13-65]; 21 women [81%] 35 ± 12 years old [13-65]; 5 men [19%] 36 ± 10 years old [19-44]) with 99 benign liver lesions and 12 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) were analyzed. Patients with HCC were significantly older than those with benign lesions (mean 50 ± 10 vs. 33 ± 9 years old, p = 0.003), with higher alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels (3/4 [75%] vs. 1/22 [5%] with AFP >15 ng/ml, p <0.001). Homogeneous hypointense signals were identified on HBP in 14 lesions, including 12/12 (100%) HCCs, and 2/99 (2%) benign lesions (p <0.001). Most benign liver lesions showed either peripheral (n = 52/99 [53%]) or homogeneous hyperintensity (n = 23/99 [23%]) on HBP. Lesions with signal hypointensity on HBP in patients with AFP serum levels >15 ng/ml were all HCCs.

CONCLUSION

Most benign lesions showed homogeneous or peripheral hyperintensity on HBP images while all HCCs were homogeneously hypointense. HBP images are helpful to differentiate between benign lesions and HCCs and outperform other sequences. They should be systematically acquired for the characterization of focal lesions in patients with BCS.

LAY SUMMARY

Hepatobiliary phase imaging is an approach that has recently been shown to discriminate between benign and malignant lesions in the liver. However, it was not known whether this imaging approach could be used effectively in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome. Herein, we have shown that hepatobiliary phase imaging appears to be useful for differentiating between benign and malignant liver lesions in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome.

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma: molecular and genetic background

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays important roles in diagnosis of hepatic lesions because of its superiority in the detectability of small lesions, its differentiation ability, and its utility for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In HCC, expression of organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B3 correlates with the enhancement ratio in the hepatobiliary phase. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, an indirect molecular imaging method, reflects OATP1B3 expression in HCC. OATP1B3 expression gradually decreases from the dysplastic nodule stage to advanced HCC. Decreased expression is a sensitive marker of multistep hepatocarcinogenesis, especially in the early stages. Hypervascular HCCs commonly show hypointensity in the hepatobiliary phase corresponding to a decrease in OATP1B3; however, approximately 10% of HCCs show hyperintensity due to OATP1B3 overexpression. This hyperintense HCC shows less aggressive biological features and has a better prognosis than hypointense HCC. Hyperintense HCC can be classified into a genetic subtype of HCC with a mature hepatocyte-like molecular expression. OATP1B3 expression and the less aggressive nature of hyperintense HCC are regulated by the molecular interaction of β-catenin signaling and hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α, a tumor suppressor factor. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging has the potential to be an imaging biomarker for HCC. KEY POINTS: • The hepatobiliary phase is a sensitive indirect indicator of organic anion transporting polypeptide1B3 (OATP1B3) expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). • The OATP1B3 expression, namely, enhancement in the hepatobiliary phase, decreases from the very early stage of hepatocarcinogenesis, contributing to early diagnosis of HCC. • HCC showing hyperintensity on the hepatobiliary phase is a peculiar genetic subtype of HCC with OATP1B3 overexpression, a less aggressive nature, and mature hepatocyte-like molecular/genetic features.

Differentiation of hypervascular primary hepatic tumors showing hepatobiliary hypointensity on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

To determine the imaging features that help differentiate hypervascular primary hepatic tumors showing hepatobiliary hypointensity on gadoxetic acid MRI.

METHODS

This study comprised 148 patients with pathologically proven hypervascular hepatic tumors who underwent gadoxetic acid MRI. Tumors included 23 atypical focal nodular hyperplasias (FNHs), 11 hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs), 15 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), 25 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICCs), and 74 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). MRIs were analyzed for morphologic features, signal intensity, and enhancement pattern of the tumors to determine the differential features using multivariate logistic regression analysis. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of the MRI features for differentiating the five tumor types upon review by two observers.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis revealed that reverse target sign on hepatobiliary phase in FNHs (p = 0.009), iso or hyperintensity on ADC map in FNHs and HCAs (p = 0.009, < 0.001, respectively), central hypointensity on arterial phase in NETs (p = 0.001), hepatobiliary target sign in ICCs (p = 0.002), the presence of septum and capsule in HCCs (all p < 0.001) were significant independent features of each tumor group over other tumor groups. Diagnostic accuracy for both observers was 98-98.6% for FNHs, 96.6-98% for HCAs, 97.3-98.6% for NETs, 90.5-94.6% for ICCs, and 85.8-93.2% for HCCs.

CONCLUSIONS

Ancillary MRI features established in our study can be helpful in the differentiation of hypervascular and hepatobiliary hypointense primary hepatic tumors on gadoxetic acid MRI.

Focal nodular hyperplasia: a weight-based, intraindividual comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI

PURPOSE

We aimed to qualitatively and quantitatively compare the enhancement pattern of focal nodular hyperplasia after gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoxetate disodium injection in the same patient.

METHODS

1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of 16 patients with 21 focal nodular hyperplasias studied after the injection of both contrast media were evaluated. Both MRI studies were performed in all patients. A qualitative analysis was performed evaluating each lesion in all phases. For quantitative analysis we calculated signal intensity ratio, lesion-to-liver contrast ratio and liver parenchyma signal intensity gain on hepatobiliary phase. Statistical analysis was performed with the Wilcoxon sign-rank test for clustered paired data and the McNemar test for paired frequencies. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

At qualitative analysis no statistically significant differences were evident during any of the contrast-enhanced phases. Signal intensity ratio (P = 0.048), lesion-to-liver contrast ratio (P = 0.032) and liver parenchyma signal intensity gain (P = 0.012) were significantly higher on hepatobiliary phase after gadoxetate disodium injection.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences in the MRI findings of focal nodular hyperplasia after the injection of a weight-based dose of either gadobenate dimeglumine or gadoxetate disodium.

MRI for characterization of benign hepatocellular tumors on hepatobiliary phase: the added value of in-phase imaging and lesion-to-liver visual signal intensity ratio

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the lesion-to-liver visual signal intensity ratio (SIR) before and at the hepatobiliary phase MRI (HBP-MRI) after gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) injection, using several T1-weighted images (T1-WI), for the characterization of benign hepatocellular lesions.

METHODS

Patients with histologically proven focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA), who underwent Gd-BOPTA-enhanced HBP-MRI from 2009 to 2017, were retrospectively identified. The lesion-to-liver SIR was visually assessed by two radiologists on HBP (post-HBP analysis) and compared with that of unenhanced sequences (pre/post-HBP analysis) on T1-WI in-phase (T1-IP), out-of-phase (T1-OP), and fat suppression (T1-FS). Lesions were classified as hyper-, iso-, or hypointense on post-HBP, and as decreasing, stable, or increasing SIR on pre/post-HBP analyses. The performance of the different T1-WI sequences for the diagnostic of FNH was evaluated on post-HBP analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine FNHs and 33 HCAs were analyzed. On post-HBP analysis, FNHs appeared hyper-/isointense in 89.7% of all T1-WI. HCAs appeared hypointense in 93.9%, 63.6%, and 69.7% of T1-IP, T1-OP, and T1-FS, respectively. FNHs exhibited an increasing SIR in 55.2-58.6%, a stable SIR in 44.8-58.6%, and a decreasing SIR in 0%, whereas HCAs exhibited a decreasing SIR in 66.7-93.9%, a stable SIR in 6.1-33.3%, and an increasing SIR in 0% (p < 0.0001). The specificity of T1-IP was significantly higher than that of T1-OP (p = 0.015) and T1-FS (p = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

T1-IP is the most reliable sequence due to misleading tumor/liver signal ratio in the case of fatty liver when using T1-FS or T1-OP. The pre/post-HBP lesion-to-liver SIR is accurate to classify benign hepatocellular lesions and contributes to avoid biopsy.

KEY POINTS

•The T1-weighted images in-phase should be systematically included in the HBP-MRI protocol, as it is the most reliable sequence especially in the case of fatty liver. •The comparison between lesion-to-liver signal intensity ratios on unenhanced and at the hepatobiliary phase sequences is useful to classify benign hepatocellular lesions in three categories without misclassification: FNH (increasing signal intensity ratio), HCA (decreasing signal intensity ration), and indeterminate lesions (stable signal intensity ratio).

Hepatobiliary phase liver MR imaging findings after Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To describe Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MR imaging findings in colon and rectal cancer patients who received Oxaliplatin.

CONCLUSION

Spectrum of hepatobiliary phase imaging findings include diffuse heterogeneous dysfunction, macronodular and micronodular FNH-like lesions, and coexistence of periportal increased liver function with FNH-like lesions. Differentiation of these benign lesions from metastasis is crucial to avoid biopsy in patients with colorectal cancers and may allow better understanding of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome pathophysiology and regenerative response of liver.

Differentiation Between Hepatocellular Carcinoma Showing Hyperintensity on the Hepatobiliary Phase of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI and Focal Nodular Hyperplasia by CT and MRI

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to identify points useful in the imaging differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) showing hyperintensity on the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and FNH-like nodules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled consecutive 51 pathologically diagnosed HCCs that were hyperintense on hepatobiliary phase imaging (47 patients, including 44 with cirrhosis) and 10 FNHs and eight FNH-like nodules (16 patients, including five with cirrhosis). Imaging findings of dynamic CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were assessed by two radiologists and compared between HCC and FNH.

RESULTS

The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was lower in hyperintense HCC than in FNH (p = 0.004). The enhancement patterns of hyperintense HCC and FNH at dynamic CT were significantly different (p < 0.0001), with 95.9% of HCCs and 22.2% of FNHs showing arterial phase enhancement with a washout pattern, and 4.1% of HCCs and 77.8% of FNHs showing arterial phase enhancement without a washout pattern. The frequency of coronalike enhancement was 84.3% in hyperintense HCCs versus 11.1% in FNHs (p < 0.0001). The signal distribution on the hepatobiliary phase was significantly different between hyperintense HCCs and FNHs (p = 0.0002). The frequency of a capsulelike rim was 88.2% versus 22.2%, that of a mosaic appearance was 72.5% versus 11.1%, and that of a central scar was 0% versus 55.6% in hyperintense HCCs versus FNHs (all p < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that ADC ratio (p = 0.03; odds ratio, 0.12) and enhancement pattern at dynamic CT (p = 0.04; odds ratio, 16.21) were the independent factors for differentiation between hyperintense HCC and FNH.

CONCLUSION

For the diagnosis of hyperintense HCC differentiated from FNH and FNH-like nodule, arterial phase enhancement and washout pattern at dynamic CT and decrease of ADC ratio would be important findings.

Optimization of hepatobiliary phase delay time of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for identification of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis of different degrees of severity

AIM

To optimize the hepatobiliary phase delay time (HBP-DT) of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (GED-MRI) for more efficient identification of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurring in different degrees of cirrhosis assessed by Child-Pugh (CP) score.

METHODS

The liver parenchyma signal intensity (LPSI), the liver parenchyma (LP)/HCC signal ratios, and the visibility of HCC at HBP-DT of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 min (i.e., DT-5, DT-10, DT-15, DT-20, and DT-25 ) after injection of Gd-EOB-DTPA were collected and analyzed in 73 patients with cirrhosis of different degrees of severity (including 42 patients suffering from HCC) and 18 healthy adult controls.

RESULTS

The LPSI increased with HBP-DT more significantly in the healthy group than in the cirrhosis group (F = 17.361, P < 0.001). The LP/HCC signal ratios had a significant difference (F = 12.453, P < 0.001) among various HBP-DT points, as well as between CP-A and CP-B/C subgroups (F = 9.761, P < 0.001). The constituent ratios of HCC foci identified as obvious hypointensity (+++), moderate hypointensity (++), and mild hypointensity or isointensity (+/-) kept stable from DT-10 to DT-25: 90.6%, 9.4%, and 0.0% in the CP-A subgroup; 50.0%, 50.0%, and 0.0% in the CP-B subgroup; and 0.0%, 0.0%, and 100.0% in the CP-C subgroup, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The severity of liver cirrhosis has significant negative influence on the HCC visualization by GED-MRI. DT-10 is more efficient and practical than other HBP-DT points to identify most of HCC foci emerging in CP-A cirrhosis, as well as in CP-B cirrhosis; but an HBP-DT of 15 min or longer seems more appropriate than DT-10 for visualization of HCC in patients with CP-C cirrhosis.

Hepatic adenomatosis in liver cirrhosis

Hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) is a benign liver tumor most frequently occurring in women using oral contraception. HCA develops in normal or nearly normal livers and is extremely rare in cirrhosis. The authors present magnetic resonance imaging and histopathologic findings in a 57-year-old man with liver cirrhosis and hepatic adenomatosis. As the differentiation between HCA and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be difficult with imaging, we would like to highlight the importance of ancillary findings such as the presence of iron on MRI, which can be observed in HCA.

Benign Hepatocellular Nodules: Hepatobiliary Phase of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging Based on Molecular Background

Gadoxetic acid is a contrast agent for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with hepatocyte-specific properties and is becoming increasingly important in detection and characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma and benign hepatocellular nodules, including focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH), hepatocellular adenoma (HCA), and dysplastic nodule. In these hepatocellular nodules, a positive correlation between the grade of membranous uptake transporter organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B3 expression and signal intensity in the hepatobiliary (HB) phase has been verified. In addition, it has been clarified that OATP1B3 expression is regulated by activation of β-catenin and/or hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α. On the other hand, recent studies have also revealed some of the background molecular mechanisms of benign hepatocellular nodules. FNH commonly shows iso- or hyperintensity in the HB phase with equal or stronger OATP1B3 expression, with map-like distribution of glutamine synthetase (a target of Wnt/β-catenin signaling) and OATP1B3 expression. NRH shows doughnut-like enhancement with hypointensity in the central portion in the HB phase with OATP1B3 expression. The majority of HCAs show hypointensity in the HB phase, but β-catenin-activated HCA exclusively demonstrates iso- or hyperintensity with increased expression of nuclear β-catenin, glutamine synthetase, and OATP1B3. Dysplastic nodule commonly shows iso- or hyperintensity in the HB phase with similar to increased OATP1B3 expression, but one-third of high-grade dysplastic nodules can be demonstrated as a hypointense nodule with decreased OATP1B3 expression. Knowledge of these background molecular mechanisms of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging is important not only for precise imaging diagnosis but also understanding of the pathogenesis of benign hepatocellular nodules. ^©RSNA, 2016.

Imaging of Hepatic Focal Nodular Hyperplasia: Pictorial Review and Diagnostic Strategy

Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is the second most common benign solid liver lesion after hemangioma, occurring more frequently in young women. The prime differential diagnoses include hepatocellular adenoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and hypervascular metastasis. As the management of FNH is typically conservative, imaging plays a key role in diagnostic pathway, and misdiagnosis may have a major clinical effect. In this article, we describe the ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging features of FNH, underlining the importance of typical radiological features that allow a specific noninvasive diagnosis. We present a large spectrum of a typical imaging findings that FNH may present and discuss the up-to-date diagnostic strategy.

Focal Nodular Hyperplasia and Hepatocellular Adenoma: Accuracy of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging--A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of hepatobiliary (HPB) phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging of the liver in the diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) versus hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) and to identify the rate of (a) reported HCAs that are iso- or hyperintense to liver and (b) reported FNHs that are hypointense to liver on HPB phase MR images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board granted a waiver for this study type, and multiple databases were searched for studies in which researchers distinguished between FNH and HCA with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. Studies to evaluate diagnostic accuracy were included; case reports and series were included to analyze the rate of iso- or hyperintense HCAs on HPB phase MR images. Risk of bias was assessed by using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Sensitivity and specificity were plotted with a forest plot; pooling was not performed because a small number of heterogeneous studies were included. Rate of iso- or hyperintense HCA on HPB phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images was evaluated.

RESULTS

Six studies (309 patients; 164 with HCA, 233 with FNH) were included for diagnostic accuracy assessment. Twelve case series (129 patients; 81 with HCA, 70 with FNH) were included (studies with insufficient 2 × 2 table data for diagnostic accuracy assessment). Sensitivity was high (range, 0.91-1.00; lower margin of the 95% confidence interval: 0.77). Specificity was high (range, 0.87-1.00; lower margin of the 95% confidence interval: 0.54). Specificity was lowest among studies in which molecular subtyping of HCA was performed. Rate of iso-or hyperintensity of HCA on HPB phase MR images was variable (range, 0%-67%) and occurred more frequently in the inflammatory subtype. High risk of bias was identified in the domains of patient selection and reference standard.

CONCLUSION

The reported diagnostic accuracy of HPB phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging in the diagnosis of HCA versus FNH is high; however, studies are few, heterogeneous, and at high risk for bias, indicating that diagnostic accuracy may be overestimated.

Differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenoma: Role of the quantitative analysis of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MRI

PURPOSE

To determine the value of quantitative analysis of the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) in gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to differentiate focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) from hepatocellular adenoma (HCA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight patients bearing 67 lesions (40 FNH; 27 HCA) were retrospectively included in this Institutional Review Board-approved study. The same volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) T1 -weighted sequences were performed before and after contrast injection on a 1.5T MRI, with HBP images acquired with a mean delay of 80 minutes (range 60-120 min). After a visual assessment of lesions enhancement (qualitative HBP analysis), the HBP signal intensity ratio (SIR) and the lesion-to-liver contrast enhancement ratio (LLCER) were calculated for each lesion by two observers (Mann-Whitney test). The sensitivities, specificities (receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve analysis) and interobserver correlation (intraclass coefficient, ICC) of quantitative HBP analysis were determined.

RESULTS

All FNH and 44.4% of HCA appeared hyper- or isointense relative to the adjacent liver on qualitative HBP analysis. The mean SIR (P < 0.01) and LLCER (P < 0.0001) of FNH were significantly higher than that of HCA. The area under the ROC curve for the differentiation of FNH from HCA with LLCER was 0.98 for both observers. With a cutoff value of -0.3%-observer 1 with highest experience- LLCER assessment provided respective sensitivity and specificity values of 100% and 96.2% for the differentiation of FNH from HCA. The ICC was 0.7 for SIR measurements and 0.8 for LLCER measurements.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative LLCER assessment allows an accurate differentiation of FNH from HCA, even in hyper- or isointense HCA on HBP images.

Imaging of benign hepatocellular lesions: current concepts and recent updates

Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) are a variety of solid lesions mostly found in the absence of underlying chronic liver disease in young patients. HCA is no longer to be considered as a unique lesion but as a recollection of different entities sharing common points but most of all separated by different typical morphological aspects. Accurate diagnosis is of clinical importance as the management is most of the time conservative for FNH, whereas HCAs expose patients to hemorrhage and malignant transformation, and may lead to a more invasive treatment, mainly surgical resection. Moreover, the different HCA subtypes expose to different risks of complication. The best imaging techniques for the differentiation between FNH and HCAs and for the subtyping of HCAs are contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as specific combinations of imaging features have been associated with the different lesions. They should be considered as complementary examinations. Atypical or multiple lesions, lesions containing fat or presence of an associated steatosis represent diagnostic challenges. Recently, MR hepatospecific contrast agents have been shown to be useful. Emergent elastography techniques might also be helpful in the near future. Biopsy should always be performed in case of uncertain diagnosis to reach a final diagnosis and avoid unnecessary invasive treatment.

Is gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI limited in tumor characterization for patients with chronic liver disease?

PURPOSE

There are pros and cons to the use of gadoxetic acid in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) workup due to the potential for high false positive diagnosis. This study was conducted to investigate the preoperative diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI protocol including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with emphasis on tumor characterization developed in high risk HCC patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 144 patients (102 men, 42 women; age range 33-74 years) with chronic viral hepatitis or cirrhosis and 183 focal hepatic tumors (size range, 0.4-11.0 cm; mean, 3.2 cm), including 148 HCCs, 13 cholangiocarcinomas, 12 hemangiomas, three hepatocellular adenomas, two focal nodular hyperplasias, and five other tumors. All patients underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI protocol with DWI. MRIs were independently interpreted by three observers for the detection and characterization of hepatic tumors.

RESULTS

Sensitivities for detecting all 183 liver tumors were 98.4%, 97.8%, and 96.2% for each observer, respectively, with a 97.5% for pooled data. Among 183 hepatic tumors, 91.3% (n=167), 87.4% (n=160), and 86.9% (n=159) were correctly characterized according to their reference standard by each observer, respectively. In 13 cholangiocarcinomas, one to three were misinterpreted as HCC, and the remaining tumors were correctly characterized by each observer. The accuracies (Az) of MRI for HCC diagnosis were 0.952 for observer 1, 0.906 for observer 2, and 0.910 for observer 3, with 0.922 for pooled data. There was good inter-observer agreement.

CONCLUSION

The gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI including DWI showed a reasonable performance for tumor characterization with high sensitivity for tumor detection in patients with chronic liver disease, despite concerns of high false positive diagnosis of hypervascular tumors.

Gadoxetic acid enhanced MRI for differentiation of FNH and HCA: a single centre experience

OBJECTIVES

Evaluation of enhancement characteristics of histopathologically confirmed focal nodular hyperplasias (FNHs) and hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients with 115 histopathologically proven lesions (FNHs, n=44; HCAs, n=71) examined with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were retrospectively enrolled (standard of reference: surgical resection, n=53 patients (lesions: FNHs, n=37; HCAs, n=53); biopsy, n=15 (lesions: FNHs, n=7; HCAs, n=18)). Two radiologists evaluated all MR images regarding morphological features as well as the vascular and hepatocyte-specific enhancement in consensus.

RESULTS

For the hepatobiliary phase, relative enhancement of the lesions and lesion to liver enhancement were significantly lower for HCAs (mean, 48.7 (±48.4)%and 49.4 (±33.9) %) compared to FNHs (159.3 (±92.5) %; and 151.7 (±79) %; accuracy of 89%and 90 %, respectively; P<0.001). Visual strong uptake of FNHs vs. hypointensity of HCAs in the hepatobiliary phase resulted in an accuracy of 92 %. This parameter was superior to all other morphological and dynamic vascular criteria alone and in combination (accuracy, 54–85 %).

CONCLUSIONS

For differentiation of FNHs and HCAs by means of MRI, gadoxetic acid uptake in the hepatobiliary phase was found to be superior to all other criteria alone and in combination.

KEY POINTS

EOB-MRI is well suited to differentiate FNHs and hepatocellular adenomas. For this purpose hepatobiliary phase is superior to unenhanced and dynamic imaging. Hepatobiliary phase (peripheral) hyper- or isointensity is typical for FNH. Hepatobiliary phase hypointensity is typical for hepatocellular adenomas. EOB-MRI helps to avoid misinterpretations of benign hepatocellular lesions.

Atypical Findings of Focal Nodular Hyperplasia with Gadoxetic Acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging

We report two cases of focal nodular hyperplasia in patients following gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging confirmed with histopathology. These cases showed an atypical pattern during the delayed-hepatobiliary phase after the injection of gadoxetic acid. One case showed a total defect, and the other showed a peripheral ring-like enhancement without a visible central scar, mimicking hepatocellular carcinoma. The pathologic examination demonstrated that the two lesions were focal nodular hyperplasia.

Imaging benign hepatocellular tumors: atypical forms and diagnostic traps

Management of patients with a benign hepatocellular tumor relies largely on imaging data; the diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) must be made with certainty using MRI, because no other clinical or laboratory data can help diagnosis. It is also essential to identify adenomas to manage them appropriately. The radiological report in these situations is therefore of major importance. However, there are diagnostic traps. The aim of this paper is to present the keys to the diagnosis of benign lesions and to warn of the main diagnostic pitfalls.

Modern imaging evaluation of the liver: emerging MR imaging techniques and indications

Modern MR imaging evaluation of the liver allows for a comprehensive morphologic and functional assessment of the liver parenchyma, hepatic vessels, and biliary tree, thus aiding in the diagnosis of both focal and diffuse liver diseases.

Hyperintense lesions on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced hepatobiliary phase imaging

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to illustrate various focal hepatic lesions that may show hyperintensity on hepatobiliary phase images on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI.

CONCLUSION

Hyperintense lesions on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI include focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) or FNH-like nodules, hepatocellular adenoma, dysplastic nodules, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Understanding the contrast enhancement patterns on hepatobiliary phase images and other imaging findings is important to ensure correct diagnosis.

Liver-specific contrast agents

In the patient with cancer, magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly used as a diagnostic tool for disease detection, lesion characterization, as well as the assessment of treatment response. Although non-contrast T1-weighted and T2-weighted imaging, together with low molecular weight extracellular gadolinium contrast-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging remain the cornerstone for liver assessment, there is increasing recognition of the benefits of liver-specific contrast agents for disease evaluation.