Minimizing the acquisition phase in coronary CT angiography using the second generation 320-row CT

Contrast Enhancement Boost Technique at Aortic Computed Tomography Angiography: Added Value for the Evaluation of Type II Endoleaks After Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Delayed-phase acquisition of the computed tomography (CT) angiography is important for the evaluation of type II endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair because the endoleak cavity area is associated with aneurysm sac expansion. Contrast enhancement boost (CE-boost) is a postprocessing technique for increasing the degree of contrast enhancement on contrast-enhanced CT. We aimed to investigate the usefulness of the CE-boost technique for the visualization of type II endoleaks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 28 patients with type II endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair who underwent triphasic contrast-enhanced CT. Objective (CT number, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio) and subjective quality analyses using a four-point scale (1, poor; 4, excellent) were performed for the conventional early- and delayed-phase images as well as CE-boost delayed-phase images.

RESULTS

The CE-boost delayed-phase images yielded a significantly higher CT number (134.5 ± 41.7 HU), signal-to-noise ratio (23.4 ± 10.5), and contrast-to-noise ratio (15.3 ± 8.4) and showed a significantly larger endoleak area (145.0 ± 134.8 mm²) than did the conventional early-phase (95.6 ± 53.2 HU, 7.3 ± 4.7, 4.0 ± 4.2, and 56.2 ± 99.3 mm², respectively) and delayed-phase (110.5 ± 33.3 HU, 8.2 ± 2.7, 4.9 ± 2.0, and 124.8 ± 131.9 mm², respectively) images (p < 0.01). The endoleak visibility score was highest for the CE-boost delayed-phase images (2.0 ± 1.0, 3.0 ± 0.6, and 3.4 ± 0.7 for conventional early-phase, delayed-phase, and delayed-phase CE-boost images, respectively; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The CE-boost technique facilitates clear visualization of type II endoleak cavities.

Diagnostic Phase of Calcium Scoring Scan Applied as the Center of Acquisition Window of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Improves Image Quality in Minimal Acquisition Window Scan (Target CTA Mode) Using the Second Generation 320-Row CT

Objective. To compare the image quality of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) acquired under two conditions: 75% fixed as the acquisition window center (Group 75%) and the diagnostic phase for calcium scoring scan as the center (CS; Group CS). Methods. 320-row cardiac CT with a minimal acquisition window (scanned using “Target CTA” mode) was performed on 81 patients. In Group 75% (n = 40), CS was obtained and reconstructed at 75% and the center of the CCTA acquisition window was set at 75%. In Group CS (n = 41), CS was obtained at 75% and the diagnostic phase showing minimal artifacts was applied as the center of the CCTA acquisition window. Image quality was evaluated using a four-point scale (4-excellent) and the mean scores were compared between groups. Results. The CCTA scan diagnostic phase occurred significantly earlier in CS (75.7 ± 3.2% vs. 73.6 ± 4.5% for Groups 75% and CS, resp., p = 0.013). The mean Group CS image quality score (3.58 ± 0.63) was also higher than that for Group 75% (3.19 ± 0.66, p < 0.0001). Conclusions. The image quality of CCTA in Target CTA mode was significantly better when the center of acquisition window is adjusted using CS.