Efficacy of oral supplemental hydration for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in rats

Fluid administration strategies for the prevention of contrast-associated acute kidney injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The known timing of contrast media exposure in patients identified as high-risk for contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) enables the use of strategies to prevent this complication of intravascular contrast media exposure. Although multiple preventive strategies have been proposed, periprocedural fluid administration remains as the primary preventive strategy. This is a critical review of the current evidence evaluating a variety of fluid administration strategies in CA-AKI.

RECENT FINDINGS

Fluid administration strategies to prevent CA-AKI include comparisons of intravenous (i.v.) to no fluid administration, different fluid solutions, duration of fluid administration, oral hydration, left ventricular end diastolic-pressure guided fluid administration and forced diuresis techniques.

SUMMARY

Despite an abundance of fluid administration trials, it is difficult to make definitive recommendations about preventive fluid administration strategies due to low scientific quality of published studies. The literature supports use of i.v. compared with no fluid administration, especially in high-risk patients undergoing intra-arterial contrast media exposure. Use of isotonic saline is recommended over 0.45% saline or isotonic sodium bicarbonate. Logistical considerations support shortened over longer i.v. fluid administration strategies, despite an absence of evidence of equivalent efficacy. Current literature does not support oral hydration for high-risk patients. The use of tailored fluid administration in heart failure patients and forced diuresis with matching fluid administration are promising new fluid administration strategies.

Acute kidney injury in patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: pathophysiologies, risk factors and preventive measures

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been an effective treatment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the common complications after PCI, which seriously affects the living quality and survival time of patients. The approach followed for the patient with AKI after PCI depends on the clinical context and may vary by resource availability. Summary: This review focuses on the pathophysiologies, influencing factors, and preventive measures of AKI in patients with ACS after PCI. The knowledge may better serve the patients and improve their outcomes. Key Messages: Many studies have been carried out for the definition and standard of AKI in the past few years. Etiologies of AKI after PCI included renal damage of contrast medium and atherosclerotic embolism, cardiac insufficiency and surgical factors on renal function. Basic conditions, treatment modalities, and perioperative changes are major risk factors of AKI. Studies have reported that the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy, modulating the volume overload, some pharmaceuticals and blood purification treatment are helpful to prevent the occurrence of AKI.

Is it possible to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy with dexpanthenol?

PURPOSE

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is one of the side effects of diagnostic procedures. Oxidative stress plays an important role in CIN's pathophysiology. Dexpanthenol (Dexp) is a substance with antioxidant efficacy. We investigated the likely protective effects of dexpanthenol for CIN.

METHODS

Twenty-four Sprague-Dawley rats were divided randomly into four groups of 6 rats; control (group 1), Dexp (group 2), CIN (group 3) and Dexp + CIN (group 4). All rats were restricted of water moderately to facilitate of nephrotoxicity. Dexp was administered into the intraperitoneally at a dose of 500 mg/kg for 5 days in groups 2 and 4. The same amount of saline was applied via intraperitoneally to group 1 and 3. In CIN and Dexp + CIN groups, L-NAME (10 mg/kg), tenoxicam (0.5 mg/kg) and sodium amidotrizoate (10 ml/kg) were administered on the 4th day via the tail vein for CIN. All rats were euthanized on the 6th day and samples for biochemical and pathological evaluations were collected.

RESULTS

When the Dexp + CIN group and the CIN group were compared, it was found to be provide a significant decline at the level of acute tubular injury and necrosis in kidney biopsies by dexp. Furthermore Dexp significantly reduced the serum cystatin C (Cys-C) levels, not serum creatinine. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in total oxidant and antioxidant levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Dexpanthenol did not have significant effect on oxidative stress of acute kidney injury on this rat model. However, it has ameliorated serum Cys-C levels and histopathological findings of CIN.