Structured reporting of CT or MRI for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: usefulness for clinical planning and interdisciplinary communication

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Recent years have witnessed significant advances in the imaging, molecular profiling, and systemic treatment of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Despite this progress, the early detection, precise classification, and effective management of CCA remain challenging. Owing to recent developments and the significant differences in CCA subtypes, EASL commissioned a panel of experts to draft evidence-based recommendations on the management of extrahepatic CCA, comprising distal and perihilar CCA. Particular attention is given to the need for accurate classification systems, the integration of emerging molecular insights, and practical strategies for diagnosis and treatment that reflect real-world clinical scenarios.

[Increased report completeness and satisfaction with structured neurotological reporting in the interdisciplinary assessment of vertigo]

BACKGROUND

Results of neurotological function diagnostics in the context of interdisciplinary vertigo assessment are usually formulated as free-text reports (FTR). These are often subject to high variability, which may lead to loss of information. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the completeness of structured reports (SR) and referrer satisfaction in the neurotological assessment of vertigo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Neurotological function diagnostics performed as referrals (n = 88) were evaluated retrospectively. On the basis of the available raw data, SRs corresponding to FTRs from clinical routine were created by means of a specific SR template for neurotological function diagnostics. FTRs and SRs were evaluated for completeness and referring physician satisfaction (n = 8) using a visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaire.

RESULTS

Compared to FTRs, SRs showed significantly increased overall completeness (73.7% vs. 51.7%, p < 0.001), especially in terms of patient history (92.5% vs. 66.7%, p < 0.001), description of previous findings (87.5% vs. 38%, p < 0.001), and neurotological (33.5% vs. 26.7%, p < 0.001) and audiometric function diagnostics (58% vs. 32.3%, p < 0.001). In addition, SR showed significantly increased referring physician satisfaction (VAS 8.8 vs. 4.9, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Neurotological SRs enable a significantly increased report completeness with higher referrer satisfaction in the context of interdisciplinary assessment of vertigo. Furthermore, SRs are particularly suitable for scientific data analysis, especially in the context of big data analyses.

Diffusion-weighted imaging as an imaging biomarker for assessing survival of patients with intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma is the most common form of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and is associated with a worse prognosis. This study aimed to assess the role of diffusion-weighted imaging and other imaging features as prognostic markers to predict the survival of patients with intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included patients with pathologically proven IMCC from January 2011 to January 2018. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed various imaging findings and manually estimated the area of diffusion restriction. Patients were grouped according to their restriction area into (group 1) restriction ≥ 1/3 of the tumor and (group 2) restriction < 1/3 of the tumor. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the relationship between various imaging features and patients' survival.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were included in the study. IMCC patients with tumor size ≥ 5 cm had increased intrahepatic- and peritoneal metastases (p = 039 and p = 0.001 for reader 1 and p = 0.048 and p = 0.057 for reader 2). There was no significant relationship between the diffusion restriction area and tumor size, enhancement pattern, vascular involvement, lymph node metastasis, peritoneal- and distant metastasis. The number of deaths was significantly higher in patients with group 2 restriction (63.6% for group 1 vs. 96.6% for group 2; p = 0.001 for reader 1)(68.2% for group 1 vs. 89.7%% for group 2; p = 0.030 for reader 2). Patients with group 2 restriction had shorter 1- and 3-year survival rates and lower median survival time. Multivariable survival analysis showed two independent prognostic factors relating to poor survival outcomes: peritoneal metastasis (p = 0.04 for reader 1 and p = 0.041 for reader 2) and diffusion restriction < 1/3 (p = 0.011 for reader 1 and p = 0.042 for reader 2). Lymph node metastasis and intrahepatic metastasis were associated with shorter survival in the univariate analysis. However, these factors were non-significant in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Restriction diffusion of less than 1/3 and peritoneal metastasis were associated with shorter overall survival of IMCC patients. Other features that might correlate with the outcome are suspicious lymph nodes and multifocal lesions.