Prevention of post-operative leak following laparoscopic Heller myotomy

Mucosal injury during laparoscopic Heller cardiomyotomy: risk factors and impact on surgical outcomes

PURPOSE

To investigate the risk factors and outcomes of mucosal perforation (MP) during laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) in patients with achalasia.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent LHM for achalasia at a single facility.

RESULTS

Among 412 patients who underwent LHM for achalasia, MP was identified in 52 (12.6%). Old age, long disease duration, low albumin level, an esophageal transverse diameter  > 6 cm, and a sigmoid-shaped esophagus were found to be independent predictors of MP. These factors were assigned a pre-operative score to predict the perforation risk. MP had a significant impact on intra and post-operative outcomes. Gastric side perforation was associated with a higher incidence of reflux symptoms, whereas esophageal-side perforation had a higher incidence of residual dysphagia.

CONCLUSIONS

Many risk factors for MP have been identified. Correctable parameters like low serum albumin should be resolved prior to surgery, while uncorrectable parameters like old age and a sigmoid-shaped esophagus should be managed by experienced surgeons in high-volume centers. Implementing these recommendations will help decrease the incidence and consequences of this serious complication.

Laparoscopic Esocardiomyotomy-Risk Factors and Implications of Intraoperative Mucosal Perforation

BACKGROUND

Mucosal perforation during laparoscopic esocardiomyotomy is quite frequent, and its consequences cannot always be neglected. The purpose of the study is to investigate the risk factors for intraoperative mucosal perforation and its implications on the postoperative outcomes and the functional results three months postoperatively.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified the patients with laparoscopic esocardiomyotomy performed at Sf. Maria Hospital Bucharest, in the period between January 2017-January 2022 and collected the data (preoperative-clinic, manometric and imaging, intra-and postoperative). To identify the risk factors for mucosal perforations, we used logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

We included 60 patients; intraoperative mucosal perforation occurred in 8.33% of patients. The risk factors were: the presence of tertiary contractions (OR = 14.00, 95%CI = [1.23, 158.84], p = 0.033206), the number of propagated waves ≤6 (OR = 14.50), 95%CI = [1.18, 153.33], p < 0.05), the length of esophageal myotomy (OR = 1.74, 95%CI = [1.04, 2.89] p < 0.05), the length of esocardiomyotomy (OR = 1.74, 95%CI = [1.04, 2.89] p < 0.05), and a protective factor-the intraoperative upper endoscopy (OR = 0.037, 95%CI = [0.003, 0.382] p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying risk factors for this adverse intraoperative event may decrease the incidence and make this surgery safer. Although mucosal perforation resulted in prolonged hospital stays, it did not lead to significant differences in functional outcomes.

Intraoperative Esophagogastroduodenoscopy During Heller Myotomy: Evaluating Guidelines

BACKGROUND

National guidelines suggest routine intraoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) during laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) to assess for mucosal perforation and myotomy adequacy, but the utility of this is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of intraoperative EGD on outcomes after LHM.

METHODS

Patients who underwent LHM in a single center were retrospectively identified. Outcomes were compared between patients who did and did not undergo intraoperative EGD.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were reviewed: 46 (75%) underwent intraoperative EGD and 15 (25%) did not. Mucosal perforations occurred in 2 (4%) of the EGD group and 3 (20%) of the non-EGD group (p = 0.06). All perforations, regardless of EGD use, were recognized laparoscopically. There were no postoperative leaks. Failed myotomy occurred in 5 (11%) who underwent EGD and 1 (7%) who did not (p = 0.64).

CONCLUSIONS

Because EGD does not appear to improve outcomes after LHM, we emphasize its selective, rather than routine, use.

Identification of risk factors for mucosal injury during laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia

BACKGROUND

Mucosal injury during myotomy is the most frequent complication seen with the Heller-Dor procedure for achalasia. The present study aimed to examine risk factors for such mucosal injury during this procedure.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent the laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure for achalasia at a single facility. Variables for evaluation included patient characteristics, preoperative pathophysiological findings, and surgeon's operative experience. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors. We also examined surgical outcomes and the degree of patient satisfaction in relation to intraoperative mucosal injury.

RESULTS

Four hundred thirty-five patients satisfied study criteria. Intraoperative mucosal injury occurred in 67 patients (15.4%). In univariate analysis, mucosal injury was significantly associated with the patient age ≥60 years, disease history ≥10 years, prior history of cardiac diseases, preoperative esophageal transverse diameter ≥80 mm, and surgeon's operative experience with fewer than five cases. In multivariate analysis involving these factors, the following variables were identified as risk factors: age ≥60 years, esophageal transverse diameter ≥80 mm, and surgeon's operative experience with fewer than five cases. The mucosal injury group had significant extension of the operative time and increased blood loss. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of reflux esophagitis or the degree of symptom alleviation postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

The fragile esophagus caused by advanced patient age and/or dilatation were risk factor for mucosal injury during laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure. And novice surgeon was also identified as an isolated risk factor for mucosal injury.

National outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy: operative complications and risk factors for adverse events

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) has supplanted an open approach due to decreased operative morbidity. Our goal was to quantify the incidence of peri-operative complications and identify risk factors for adverse outcomes in LHM.

METHODS

All LHM were queried from 2005 to 2011 from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Adverse outcomes were identified, and univariate and stepwise logistic regression (MVR) was then performed to quantify association.

RESULTS

There were 1,237 LHM in the study period. Patient averages were: age 51.9 ± 16.8 years, BMI 27.3 ± 6.6 kg/m(2), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) 0.2 ± 0.6. 15.3 % had >10 % body mass loss in the preoperative 6 months. During surgery, 10.2 % underwent concomitant EGD, and mean operative time was 141.6 ± 63.4 min. There were 7(0.06 %) wound complications, 22(1.8 %) general complications, and 30(2.4 %) major complications. Average length of stay (LOS) was 2.8 ± 5.5 days. The rate of readmission and reoperation were 3.1 and 2.3 %, respectively, and there were 4(0.03 %) deaths. General and major complications were associated with alcohol use, pack-years of smoking, weight loss, history of stroke, radiation therapy, and longer operative times (p < 0.05); however, these factors did not remain significant on MVR (p > 0.05). Operative time was found to be significantly longer by 35.3 min for inpatients, 43.1 min in functionally dependent patients, 50.0 min in preoperative septic patients, and 17.2 min with concomitant EGD (p < 0.01 for all). LOS was found to be longer by 1.9 days for inpatients, 1.8 days in ASA category ≥3, and 1.2 days per one point increase in CCI (p < 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSION

LHM is being performed nationally with a low incidence of operative complications and mortality. General and major complications following LHM are associated with patient alcohol use, pack-years of smoking, weight loss, history of stroke, radiation therapy, and longer operative times. Additionally, independent predictors of longer operative time and LOS were identified.

Are contrast swallows necessary immediately postlaparoscopic Heller cardiomyotomy?

Laparoscopic cardiomyotomy is an effective treatment for achalasia. Intraoperative leak tests are carried out to exclude mucosal perforations, additionally some surgeon perform postoperative contrast swallows. The aim of the study was to identify whether postoperative contrast swallows were necessary in all patients who undergo laparoscopic cardiomyotomy. All patients who underwent a laparoscopic cardiomyotomy at a single center between 2004 and 2011 were identified. Median age was 55 (18 to 79), median body mass index 26 (17 to 37), and median length of stay was 1 day (1 to 4). A total of 54% of patients had previous pneumatic dilatations. One intraoperative mucosal perforation was identified and repaired. No leaks were seen on the postoperative swallow; however, 1 patient was readmitted with a contained leak, 8 days after surgery. Postoperative contrast swallow did not have any clinical impact. We suggest that they are only indicated if there is a clinical concern and that laparoscopic cardiomyotomy can be safely carried out as a day case procedure.

Major complications of pneumatic dilation and Heller myotomy for achalasia: single-center experience and systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

Pneumatic dilation (PD) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) can be definitive therapies for achalasia; recent data suggest comparable efficacy. However, risk must also be considered. We reviewed the major complication rate of PD and LHM in a high-volume center and reviewed the corresponding literature.

METHODS

We reviewed 12 years of our institution's achalasia treatment experience. During this interval, a consistent technique of PD was used utilizing Rigiflex dilators. Medical records were reviewed for post-procedure complications. We administered a telephone survey and examined medical records to assess efficacy of treatment. We also performed a systematic review of the literature for comparable clinical data and examined 80 reports encompassing 12,494 LHM and PD procedures.

RESULTS

At our center, 463 achalasia patients underwent 567 PD or LHM procedures. In all, 78% of the PDs used a 30-mm Rigiflex dilator. In all, 157/184 (85%) patients underwent 1 or 2 PD without any subsequent treatment. There were seven clinically significant perforations; one from PD and six from LHM. There were no resultant deaths from these perforations; two deaths occurred within 30 days of LHM from unrelated causes. Complications and deaths post-PD were significantly fewer than those post-LHM (P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal perforation from PD at our high-volume center was less common than often reported and lower than that associated with LHM. We conclude that, in the hands of experienced operators using conservative technique, PD has fewer major complications and deaths than LHM.

Surgical treatment for achalasia: when should it be performed, and for which patients?

Achalasia is a rare motor disorder of the esophagus, characterized by the absence of peristalsis and impaired swallow-induced relaxation. In the past decade, evidence has been accumulated suggesting that achalasia may be an immune-mediated inflammatory disorder. With the advent of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) has slowly shifted the treatment of achalasia toward the greater use of surgical therapy. The goal of both surgical and nonsurgical treatment is to eliminate the outflow obstruction afforded by a nonrelaxing sphincter, relieving dysphagia and maintaining a barrier against gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Endoscopic botulinum toxin injection (EBTI) is safe, easy to perform, inexpensive, and effective in aged patients, and it is especially effective when the lower esophageal pressure is hypertonic. This therapeutic option is reserved for patients too ill to undergo any surgical procedure. Pneumatic dilation (PD) has been shown to be an effective and inexpensive treatment with few adverse effects. The long-term success rate of PD seems to drop progressively over time. Heller myotomy (HM) has shown the best clinical efficacy in achalasia as a first-line treatment. Multiple endoscopic treatments are associated with poorer outcomes after HM. EBTI also makes LHM more difficult and results in a worse surgical outcome. The inferior symptomatic outcomes after thoracoscopic HM may be caused by the difficulty in extending an adequate myotomy onto the stomach from the chest and the inability to create a fundoplication. LHM with Dor's fundoplication (LHM + Dor) is effective and is safer procedure for avoiding GER, dysphagia, mucosal perforation, and a pseudodiverticulum. LHM + Dor is also effective in the presence of sigmoid achalasia, but the clinical result is not as good as nonsigmoid achalasia. A few patients need esophagectomy for surgical failure of HM. However, considering the risk of esophagectomy, LHM + Dor is the first treatment option for patients with achalasia regardless of the degree of esophageal dilatation. This procedure is therefore considered to be an effective and safe treatment for patients of any age or with any condition.

A single institution's experience with more than 500 laparoscopic Heller myotomies for achalasia

BACKGROUND

Long-term symptom relief and patient satisfaction after Heller myotomy are being reported. Herein, we report the largest experience of laparoscopic Heller myotomy for the treatment of achalasia.

STUDY DESIGN

Since 1992, 505 patients have been prospectively followed after laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Until 2004, concomitant fundoplication was undertaken for a patulous hiatus, a large hiatal hernia, or to buttress the repair of an esophagotomy, then concomitant fundoplication became routinely applied. More recently, laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) Heller myotomy has been performed when possible to improve cosmesis. Before and after myotomy, patients scored their symptoms.

RESULTS

Before myotomy, 60% of patients underwent endoscopic therapy; of these patients, 27% had Botox (Allergan) therapy alone, 52% underwent dilation therapy alone, and 21% had both. Esophagotomy occurred in 7% of patients. Concomitant diverticulectomy was undertaken in 7%, fundoplication was performed in 59%, and LESS Heller myotomy was done in 12%. Median length of stay was 1 day. With mean follow-up at 31 months, the severity of all symptoms improved significantly. After myotomy, 95% experienced symptoms less than once per week, 86% believed their outcome is satisfying or better, and 92% would undergo myotomy again, if necessary. Symptoms after myotomy are similar with or without fundoplication and regardless of the laparoscopic approach used.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy safely and durably relieves symptoms of dysphagia. Confinement is short and satisfaction is very high. Relief of esophageal obstruction is paramount; the approach used or the application of a fundoplication has a lesser impact. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy, preferably with anterior fundoplication using a single site laparoscopic approach, is strongly encouraged for patients with symptomatic achalasia and is efficacious even after failures of dilation and/or Botox therapy.

Multiple preoperative endoscopic interventions are associated with worse outcomes after laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia

BACKGROUND

The effect of preoperative pneumatic dilation or botulinum toxin injection on outcomes after laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) for achalasia is unclear. We compared outcomes in patients with and without multiple preoperative endoscopic interventions.

METHODS

This cohort study categorized achalasia patients undergoing first-time LHM by the number of preoperative endoscopic interventions: zero or one intervention vs. two or more interventions. Outcomes of interest included surgical failure (defined as the need for re-intervention), gastrointestinal symptoms, and health-related quality of life. Logistic regression modeling was performed to determine the independent effect of multiple preoperative endoscopic interventions on the likelihood of surgical failure.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-four patients were included; 88 (66%) had zero to one preoperative intervention, and 46 (34%) had multiple (more than one) interventions. The incidence of surgical failure was 7% in the zero to one intervention group and 28% in the more than one intervention group (p < 0.01). Greater improvements in gastrointestinal symptoms and health-related quality of life were seen in the zero to one intervention group. On logistic regression modeling, the likelihood of surgical failure was significantly higher in the more than one intervention group (odds ratio = 5.1, 95% confidence interval 1.6-15.8, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple endoscopic treatments are associated with poorer outcomes and should be limited to achalasia patients who fail surgical therapy.