The early use of PET-CT alters the management of patients with esophageal cancer

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Staging and Follow-Up of Esophageal Cancer

This document provides recommendations regarding the role of imaging in the staging and follow-up of esophageal cancer. For initial clinical staging, locoregional extent and nodal disease are typically assessed with esophagogastroduodenoscopy and esophageal ultrasound. FDG-PET/CT or CT of the chest and abdomen is usually appropriate for use in initial clinical staging as they provide additional information regarding distant nodal and metastatic disease. The detection of metastatic disease is critical in the initial evaluation of patients with esophageal cancer because it will direct patients to a treatment pathway centered on palliative radiation rather than surgery. For imaging during treatment, particularly neoadjuvant chemotherapy, FDG-PET/CT is usually appropriate, because some studies have found that it can provide information regarding primary lesion response, but more importantly it can be used to detect metastases that have developed since the induction of treatment. For patients who have completed treatment, FDG-PET/CT or CT of the chest and abdomen is usually appropriate for evaluating the presence and extent of metastases in patients with no suspected or known recurrence and in those with a suspected or known recurrence. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Mediastinal node staging by positron emission tomography-computed tomography and selective endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration for patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer: Results from a regional centre

AIM

To investigate the impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in the nodal staging of upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer in a tertiary referral centre.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of prospectively recorded data held on all patients with a diagnosis of upper GI cancer made between January 2009 and December 2015. Only those patients who had both a PET-CT and EUS with FNA sampling of a mediastinal node distant from the primary tumour were included. Using a positive EUS-FNA result as the gold standard for lymph node involvement, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) and accuracy of PET-CT in the staging of mediastinal lymph nodes were calculated. The impact on therapeutic strategy of adding EUS-FNA to PET-CT was assessed.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty one patients were included. Sixty nine patients had a diagnosis of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (Thirty one of whom were junctional), forty eight had oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and four had gastric adenocarcinoma. The FNA results were inadequate in eleven cases and the PET-CT findings were indeterminate in two cases, therefore thirteen patients (10.7%) were excluded from further analysis. There was concordance between PET-CT and EUS-FNA findings in seventy one of the remaining one hundred and eight patients (65.7%). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV values of PET-CT were 92.5%, 50%, 52.1% and 91.9% respectively. There was discordance between PET-CT and EUS-FNA findings in thirty seven out of one hundred and eight patients (34.3%). MDT discussion led to a radical treatment pathway in twenty seven of these cases, after the final tumour stage was altered as a direct consequence of the EUS-FNA findings. Of these patients, fourteen (51.9%) experienced clinical remission of a median of nine months (range three to forty two months).

CONCLUSION

EUS-FNA leads to altered staging of upper GI cancer, resulting in more patients receiving radical treatment that would have been the case using PET-CT staging alone.

Role of Pre-therapeutic (18)F-FDG PET/CT in Guiding the Treatment Strategy and Predicting Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to evaluate the role of pre-therapeutic (18)fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET-CT) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in guiding the treatment strategy and predicting the prognosis of esophageal carcinoma, using the survival data of the patients.

METHODS

The present retrospective, cohort study was performed on 40 consecutive patients with esophageal carcinoma (confirmed by endoscopic biopsy), who underwent pre-operative (18)F-FDG PET-CT staging between January 2009 and June 2014. All the patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT and non-contrasted (18)F-FDG PET-CT evaluations. The patients were followed-up over 12 months to assess the changes in therapeutic strategies. Survival analysis was done considering the primary tumor SUVmax, using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method.

RESULTS

In a total of 40 patients, (18)F-FDG PET-CT scan led to changes in disease stage in 26 (65.0%) cases, with upstaging and downstaging reported in 10 (25.0%) and 16 (40.0%) patients, respectively. The management strategy changed from palliative to curative in 10 out of 24 patients and from curative to palliative in 7 out of 16 cases. Based on the (18)F-FDG PET-CT scan alone, the median survival of patients in the palliative group was 4.0 (95% CI 3.0-5.0) months, whereas the median survival in the curative group has not been reached, based on the 12-month follow-up. Selection of treatment strategy on the basis of (18)F-FDG PET/CT alone was significantly associated with the survival outcomes at nine months (P=0.03) and marginally significant at 12 months (P=0.03). On the basis of SUVmax, the relation between survival and SUVmax was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

(18)F-FDG PET/CT scan had a significant impact on stage stratification and subsequently, selection of a stage-specific treatment approach and the overall survival outcome in patients with esophageal carcinoma. However, pre-treatment SUVmax failed to stablish its usefulness in the assessment of patient prognosis and survival outcome.

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography in oesophageal cancer staging: a tailored approach

BACKGROUND

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scanning is used routinely in the staging of oesophageal cancer to identify occult metastases not apparent on CT and changes the management in typically 3-18% patients. The authors aim to re-evaluate its role in the management of oesophageal cancer, investigating whether it is possible to identify a group of patients that will not benefit and can safely be spared from this investigation.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with oesophageal cancer undergoing PET-CT staging between 2010 and 2013 were identified from a specialist modern multidisciplinary team database. Without knowledge of the PET-CT result, patients were stratified into low-risk or high-risk groups according to the likelihood of identifying metastatic disease on PET-CT based on specified criteria routinely available from endoscopy and CT reports. Clinical outcomes in the two groups were investigated.

RESULTS

In 383 undergoing PET-CT, metastatic disease was identified in 52 (13.6%) patients. Eighty-three patients were stratified as low risk and 300 as high risk. None of the low-risk patients went on to have metastatic disease identified on PET-CT. Of the high-risk patients, 17% had metastatic disease identified on PET-CT.

CONCLUSIONS

In one of the largest studies to date investigating the influence of staging PET-CT on management of patients with oesophageal cancer, the authors report a classification based on endoscopy/CT criteria is able to accurately stratify patients according to the risk of having metastatic disease. This could be used to avoid unnecessary PET-CT 22% of patients, saving cost, inconvenience and reducing potential delay to definitive treatment in this group.

Prognostic value of baseline FDG uptake on PET-CT in esophageal carcinoma

AIM: To evaluate the influence of baseline maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) on survival in a cohort of patients, undergoing positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan for esophageal carcinoma.

METHODS: The pre-treatment SUV_max numeric reading was determined in patients with confirmed esophageal or junctional cancer having PET-CT scan during the time period 1^st January 2007 until 31^st July 2012. A minimum follow up of 12 mo was required. Patients were subdivided into quartiles according to SUV_max value and the influence of SUV_max on survival was assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis. The following pre-treatment factors were investigated: patient characteristics, tumor characteristics and planned treatment.

RESULTS: The study population was 271 patients (191 male) with esophageal or junctional carcinoma. The median age was 65 years (range 40-85) and histologic subtype was adenocarcinoma in 197 patients and squamous carcinoma in 74 patients. The treatment intent was radical in 182 and palliative in 89 patients. SUV_max was linked to histologic subtype (P = 0.008), tumor site (P = 0.01) and Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage (P < 0.001). On univariate analysis, prognosis was significantly associated with SUV_max (P = 0.001), T-stage (P < 0.001) and UICC stage (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, only T-stage and UICC stage remained significant.

CONCLUSION: Pretreatment SUV_max was not a useful marker in isolation for determining prognosis of patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Has integrated 18F FDG PET/CT improved staging, reduced early recurrence or increased survival in oesophageal cancer?

BACKGROUND

Survival in oesophageal cancer remains poor with high post-operative recurrence rates. PET/CT was introduced to the Three-Counties Cancer Network (3CCN) in 2006 to detect 'occult' metastatic disease not seen with conventional staging modalities. This study aims to determine whether the introduction of Integrated fluorodeoxyglucose (18F) Positron Emission Tomography (PET/CT) has changed the management, improved survival or reduced the rate of early post-operative recurrence in patients with operable oesophageal cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective review was undertaken of all patients diagnosed with oesophageal cancer in the 3CCN from 2005 to 2009. Early recurrence was defined as proven recurrence locally or at a distant site within one year of resection.

RESULTS

725 patients were identified. 200 (27.6%) patients underwent staging PET/CT. PET/CT altered treatment intent in 19 (9.5%) patients. 128 (17.7%) patients underwent oesophageal resection, 90 (70.3%) of which had a staging PET/CT. No significant difference was noted in post-operative mortality (4.4% Vs 5.3%, p = 0.8) or early recurrence where PET/CT was performed when adjusted for age, sex, stage or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.761, OR 1.136[95% CI 0.499-2.585]). PET/CT had no significant effect on survival (log-rank test; Chi-square 0.710, p = 0.4).

CONCLUSION

PET/CT has improved the accuracy of oesophageal cancer staging avoiding potentially unnecessary surgery. Ultimately however, its use has had no effect on early recurrence or survival rates. Inaccurate identification of occult metastatic disease prior to the introduction of staging PET/CT does not appear to be the primary cause of early recurrence in patients with oesophageal cancer.

Preoperative positron emission tomography/computed tomography predicts advanced lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

We aimed to study whether positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) findings are associated with lymph node staging, as outlined by the 7th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

A series of 76 ESCC patients undergoing esophagectomy were included in this study. The relation between PET/CT findings [maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax)] and pathologic lymph node status (N stage) was studied.

RESULTS

The SUVmax of extra-tumor uptake, but not that of the main tumor, was significantly associated with the N classification. N2/N3 disease was observed in 61.1% of patients with an SUVmax for extra-tumor uptake of >4.9, whereas only 17.2% of patients with an SUVmax of extra-tumor uptake of <4.9 were classified as N2/N3 The number of PET abnormalities (NPAs) was also significantly associated with the N classification. Patients with three or more NPAs had a 65% chance of being classified as N2/N3, whereas patients with one or two NPAs had less than a 20% chance of being classified as N2/N3.

CONCLUSIONS

The SUVmax of extra-tumor uptake and the NPAs were significantly associated with the N classification outlined by the 7th edition of the AJCC TNM staging system. PET/CT does help identify patients with advanced lymph node metastasis (N2/N3 stage) instead of simply indicating nodal involvement.

The "two-week wait" referral pathway allows prompt treatment but does not improve outcome for patients with oesophago-gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

The Two Week Wait Referral Service (2WW) has been implemented as a means of fast-tracking patients with suspected upper gastrointestinal cancers for endoscopy. Whether or not it impacts on the outcome of these patients is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients referred through 2WW with that of patients with oesophago-gastric cancer identified through alternate referral pathways (routine, emergency).

METHODS

The study population was 340 patients with oesophago-gastric carcinoma (gastric 154) diagnosed during the time period 01/2006-12/2007 at University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust. Data were collected prospectively by the MDT co-ordinator and analysed retrospectively.

RESULTS

135 of the 340 patients with oesophago-gastric cancer were diagnosed through the 2WW, 115 patients through routine referral pathways, and 90 patients were admitted on an emergency basis. Patients referred through 2WW had a median referral to 1st treatment time of 47 days (routine 79, emergency 28, p < 0.001 all group comparisons). The number of patients treated with potentially curative intent was 37 of 135 for the 2WW, 42 of 115 for the routine referrals and 10 of 90 for patients admitted as emergencies. The corresponding median survivals for the groups were 239 days (2WW), 405 days (routine) and 121 days (emergency), p < 0.001 (log rank).

CONCLUSIONS

Referral by 2WW resulted in more rapid treatment than routine referral but this did not translate into an improvement in survival. This suggests that the targeting of endoscopy to patients with alarm symptoms is flawed and a less selective approach should be promoted if curable cancers are to be detected.

Does the value of PET-CT extend beyond pretreatment staging? An analysis of survival in surgical patients with esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Studies of positron emission tomography (PET) have focused mainly on tumor staging. The role of PET in predicting survival has received less attention. We sought to assess the relationship of pretreatment maximum standard uptake value (SUV(max)) to survival in surgical patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS

The study consisted of 72 esophagectomy patients (60 with adenocarcinoma) undergoing resection between July 2005 and April 2009. PET combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) was performed at a single center, and SUV(max) was recorded prior to any therapy. Survival was assessed at a median follow-up of 19 months.

RESULTS

The median SUV(max) was 6.25. A receiver operating characteristic curve identified SUV(max) 4.5 to optimally discriminate survival. Patients with low SUV(max) (<4.5) had significantly (p = 0.0003) better survival than those with high SUV(max) (>or=4.5). Stage 3 patients with low SUV(max) had significantly better survival (p = 0.0069) than those with high SUV(max). Likewise, N1 disease patients with low SUV(max) had significantly better survival (p = 0.008) than those with high SUV(max). Multivariate analysis identified SUV(max) to be an independent predictor of survival (p = 0.0021).

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment PET-CT SUV(max) independently predicts survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma undergoing resection. SUV(max) may be a valuable marker of tumor biology that could potentially be exploited for prognostic and therapeutic purposes.