Does the value of PET-CT extend beyond pretreatment staging? An analysis of survival in surgical patients with esophageal cancer

The prognostic value of pretreatment [18F]FDG PET/CT parameters in esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the prognostic implications of pretreatment [18F]FDG-PET metrics in esophageal cancer patients through a meta-analysis of the existing literature.

METHODS

We carefully searched electronic databases, including PubMed and Embase, from inception to April 1, 2024, to identify studies describing the prognostic value of pretreatment PET metrics for advanced esophageal cancer. Clinical endpoints examined were overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS)/disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS were taken directly from the original reports.

RESULTS

Forty-seven publications, including 5504 patients, were included in our analysis. OS and PFS were analyzed in 31 and nine studies, respectively, and DFS/RFS was analyzed in 16 studies. The comprehensive pooled analysis revealed significant associations between metabolic parameters derived from positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and clinical outcomes. Expressly, the pooled HR indicated that patients with higher SUVmax were significantly associated with poor PFS (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.12, p = 0.011) and poor RFS/DFS (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02-1.18, p = 0.019). Patients with higher SUVmean were significantly associated with poorer OS (HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.01-1.14, p = 0.025). High MTV was significantly associated with inferior OS (HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00-1.05, p = 0.049). High TLG was significantly associated with poorer RFS/DFS (HR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.11-3.68, p = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

This study unveiled pretreatment FDG-derived parameters as valuable prognostic indicators in assessing esophageal cancer outcomes. Specifically, SUVmax is associated with PFS and RFS/DFS. SUVmean and MTV were correlated with OS, and TLG was only associated with RFS/DFS.

KEY POINTS

Question Inconsistent findings on the prognostic value of pretreatment [18F]FDG PET parameters in esophageal cancer require comprehensive analysis to clarify their role in outcome prediction. Findings Higher pretreatment [18F]FDG-PET metrics (SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, TLG) are associated with poor survival outcomes, emphasizing their potential value in enhancing prognostic assessments for esophageal cancer. Clinical relevance This study highlights the prognostic significance of pretreatment [18F]FDG-PET metrics in esophageal cancer, providing valuable insights for patient outcome prediction and potentially guiding personalized treatment strategies.

Prognostic Significance of FDG PET/CT in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Era of the 8th AJCC/UICC Staging System

Introduction

Recently, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) staging system was updated for its 8th edition. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) is a useful imaging tool to diagnose and predict prognoses for esophageal cancer. However, there was no previous study to explore the role of FDG PET/CT in the staging system based on the 8th edition. The prognostic value of FDG PET/CT was investigated in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) considering the new 8th AJCC/UICC staging system.

Methods

Subjects were 721 patients with esophageal SqCC undergoing pretherapeutic FDG PET/CT. Clinico-pathological variables and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor were included in survival analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare hazard ratios according to pathological stage and SUVmax. A new staging classification including FDG uptake was proposed.

Results

In multivariate survival analysis, pathological stage and SUVmax of the primary tumor were selected as independent prognostic factors for overall survival in both the 7th and 8th editions. The proposed new staging system showed better discrimination for overall survival between stage I and II than did the conventional staging system (hazard ratios: 2.250 vs. 1.341).

Conclusions

The FDG uptake of the primary tumor was found to be an independent prognostic factor along with pathological stage based on both 7th and 8th AJCC/UICC staging systems in patients with esophageal SqCC. The suggested new staging system including SUVmax was better for predicting prognoses than the conventional staging system.

Prognostic Significance of FDG PET/CT in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Era of the 8th AJCC/UICC Staging System

INTRODUCTION

Recently, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) staging system was updated for its 8th edition. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) is a useful imaging tool to diagnose and predict prognoses for esophageal cancer. However, there was no previous study to explore the role of FDG PET/CT in the staging system based on the 8th edition. The prognostic value of FDG PET/CT was investigated in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) considering the new 8th AJCC/UICC staging system.

METHODS

Subjects were 721 patients with esophageal SqCC undergoing pretherapeutic FDG PET/CT. Clinico-pathological variables and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor were included in survival analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare hazard ratios according to pathological stage and SUVmax. A new staging classification including FDG uptake was proposed.

RESULTS

In multivariate survival analysis, pathological stage and SUVmax of the primary tumor were selected as independent prognostic factors for overall survival in both the 7th and 8th editions. The proposed new staging system showed better discrimination for overall survival between stage I and II than did the conventional staging system (hazard ratios: 2.250 vs. 1.341).

CONCLUSIONS

The FDG uptake of the primary tumor was found to be an independent prognostic factor along with pathological stage based on both 7th and 8th AJCC/UICC staging systems in patients with esophageal SqCC. The suggested new staging system including SUVmax was better for predicting prognoses than the conventional staging system.

Can the Efficacy of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in Clinical Oncology Be Enhanced by Screening Biomolecular Profiles?

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a functional imaging modality widely used in clinical oncology. Over the years the sensitivity and specificity of PET has improved with the advent of specific radiotracers, increased technical accuracy of PET scanners and incremental experience of Radiologists. However, significant limitations exist—most notably false positives and false negatives. Additionally, the accuracy of PET varies between cancer types and in some cancers, is no longer considered a standard imaging modality. This review considers the relative influence of macroscopic tumour features such as size and morphology on 2-Deoxy-2-[¹⁸F]fluoroglucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) uptake by tumours which, though well described in the literature, lacks a comprehensive assessment of biomolecular features which may influence [¹⁸F]FDG uptake. The review aims to discuss the potential influence of individual molecular markers of glucose transport, glycolysis, hypoxia and angiogenesis in addition to the relationships between these key cellular processes and their influence on [¹⁸F]FDG uptake. Finally, the potential role for biomolecular profiling of individual tumours to predict positivity on PET imaging is discussed to enhance accuracy and clinical utility.

Clinical significance of SUVmax on preoperative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients who underwent R0-esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

The standardized uptake value (SUV) is a marker of tumor glucose metabolism, detected using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and may reflect tumor aggressiveness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of maximum SUV (SUVmax) of primary esophageal cancer (EC) lesions. A total of 86 patients with EC who underwent pre-treatment FDG-PET and R0-resection were included in our study. The mean patient age was 65 years, and 87% were men. Histologically, cancers included squamous cell carcinomas, adenocarcinomas, and other tumors in 72, 3, and 11 patients, respectively. Preoperative chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy was performed in 4 and 37 patients, respectively. Measured patient outcomes included the correlation between the SUVmax of the primary EC lesion and clinicopathological factors in patients who did not undergo preoperative treatment (n = 45), and the investigation of relapse-free survival (RFS) according to SUVmax and the relationship between SUVmax and recurrence sites in all patients (n=86). The mean SUVmax was 8.9 ± 4.6, and SUVmax values significantly correlated with tumor invasion depth and stage. The 5-year RFS for the enrolled patients was 57%, and the RFS of patients with SUVmax < 7.0 was better than that of patients with SUVmax ≥ 7.0, with a marginal difference (p = 0.0892). Lymph node recurrences were significantly more common in patients with SUVmax ≥ 7.0, compared to patients with SUVmax < 7.0. Therefore, the SUVmax value of the primary EC lesion before preoperative treatment may be predictive of RFS and lymph node recurrence.

Correlation of pretreatment 18F-FDG uptake with clinicopathological factors and prognosis in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Objectives

The aim of this study is to determine the correlation of pretreatment fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake with clinicopathological factors and its prognostic value in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Patients and methods

A cohort of 162 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL who had undergone pretreatment PET/computed tomography was retrospectively reviewed. The relationship of pretreatment maximum standard uptake value (SUV_max) with clinical factors, molecular markers, and efficacy was evaluated. The value of SUV_max in predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival was analyzed.

Results

In all, 72.9% of the patients received R-CHOP treatment; the rest received CHOP chemotherapy. The median follow-up duration was 30 months (range, 4–124 months). The median SUV_max was 12.2 (range, 1.7–42.7). SUV_max between groups differed significantly with respect to each of International Prognostic Index (IPI) factors, except for age and performance status. High SUV_max was associated with high Ki-67 and Glut-3 protein expression, but not with Glut-1. Complete remission rate differed significantly between the low (SUV_max≤9.0) and the high SUV_max (SUV_max>9.0) groups (91.7 vs. 61.1%, P=0.000). Patients with low SUV_max showed favorable survival (3-year PFS: 92.2 vs. 63.6%, P=0.000; 3-year overall survival: 95.5 vs. 78.3%, P=0.003). On multivariate analyses, SUV_max predicted PFS independent of revised-IPI (SUV_max: P=0.011, hazard ratio 4.784; revised-IPI: P=0.004, hazard ratio 2.551).

Conclusion

Pretreatment SUV_max was associated with clinicopathological factors, efficacy, and survival outcome. A novel prognostic model on the basis of IPI score/pretreatment SUV_max might be useful for risk stratification of patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL Video abstract: http://links.lww.com/NMC/A55.

Metabolic tumor volume provides complementary prognostic information to EUS staging in esophageal and junctional cancer

To determine the correlation between 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) derived esophageal tumor parameters [maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV)] and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) derived tumor parameters (T stage, N stage) and their prognostic implications. 150 consecutive patients with cancer of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction underwent staging PET-CT and staging EUS. PET-CT derived SUVmax and MTV of the primary tumor was recorded. EUS evaluated T and N stage. Relationships between parameters were investigated using the Mann-Whitney U tests, survival analysis performed using Kaplan-Meier and independent prognostic factors determined using Cox regression multivariate analysis. A significant difference in MTV was noted between EUS T1/T2 tumors (median 6.7 cm3) and EUS T3/T4 tumors (median 35.7 cm3; P < 0.0001). An MTV of <23.4 cm3 (P = 0.0001), SUVmax < 4.1 (P = 0014), EUS T stage (P < 0.0001), EUS N stage (P < 0.0001), and clinical stage (P < 0.0001) were all significantly associated with survival, with MTV <23.4 cm3 (P = 0.004), EUS T stage (P = 0.01), and EUS N stage (P = 0.01) significant in multivariate analysis. MTV, a volumetric parameter of PET-CT, has more prognostic importance than SUVmax and provides valuable prognostic information in esophageal and junctional cancer, along with EUS T and N stage. MTV provides complementary information to EUS and should be included in the staging of esophageal and junctional cancer.

Prognostic value of baseline FDG uptake on PET-CT in esophageal carcinoma

AIM: To evaluate the influence of baseline maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) on survival in a cohort of patients, undergoing positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan for esophageal carcinoma.

METHODS: The pre-treatment SUV_max numeric reading was determined in patients with confirmed esophageal or junctional cancer having PET-CT scan during the time period 1^st January 2007 until 31^st July 2012. A minimum follow up of 12 mo was required. Patients were subdivided into quartiles according to SUV_max value and the influence of SUV_max on survival was assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis. The following pre-treatment factors were investigated: patient characteristics, tumor characteristics and planned treatment.

RESULTS: The study population was 271 patients (191 male) with esophageal or junctional carcinoma. The median age was 65 years (range 40-85) and histologic subtype was adenocarcinoma in 197 patients and squamous carcinoma in 74 patients. The treatment intent was radical in 182 and palliative in 89 patients. SUV_max was linked to histologic subtype (P = 0.008), tumor site (P = 0.01) and Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage (P < 0.001). On univariate analysis, prognosis was significantly associated with SUV_max (P = 0.001), T-stage (P < 0.001) and UICC stage (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, only T-stage and UICC stage remained significant.

CONCLUSION: Pretreatment SUV_max was not a useful marker in isolation for determining prognosis of patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Relationship between (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in primary lesions and clinicopathological characteristics of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients

The aim of this study, was to investigate the relationship between ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) uptake in primary tumors and the clinicopathological characteristics of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients. Patients with histopathologically diagnosed ESCC who had received a pre-therapeutic ¹⁸F-FDG positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan were enrolled in the study. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and the length of the primary tumor were measured by PET-CT. The clinical tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage was determined mainly by PET-CT images according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, 2002. A significant difference was observed in SUVmax between the length and T stage of the primary tumor (P=0.000 and P=0.017, respectively), but not in the grade of tumor differentiation (P=0.383), clinical stage (P=0.583), N staging (P=0.387), M staging (P=0.886), patient age (P= 0.752) or gender (P=0.233). There was a significant positive correlation between the SUVmax and the length of the tumor (r=0.456, P=0.000) and the depth of invasion of the primary tumor (r=0.257, P=0.006). After controlling for length, no statistically significant correlation was found between T stage and SUVmax (r=0.074, P=0.537). In conclusion, these findings suggest that tumor length influences FDG uptake in ESCC tumors, and that the T stage of the primary tumor is not significantly correlated with the SUVmax after controlling for length. However, we did not find a significant correlation between the SUVmax and primary tumor differentiation and clinical stage. These data provide important information for the management of ESCC.

Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors

Recently, PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST) have been proposed as a new standardized method to assess chemotherapeutic response metabolically and quantitatively. The aim of this study was to evaluate therapeutic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer, comparing PERCIST with the currently widely used response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST).

METHODS

Fifty-one patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, adriamycin, and cisplatin), followed by surgery were studied. Chemotherapeutic lesion responses were evaluated using (18)F-FDG PET and CT according to the RECIST and PERCIST methods. The PET/CT scans were obtained before chemotherapy and about 2 wk after completion of chemotherapy. Associations were statistically analyzed between survival (overall and disease-free survival) and clinicopathologic results (histology [well-, moderately, and poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma], lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, clinical stage, pathologic stage, resection level, reduction rate of tumor diameter, reduction rate of tumor uptake, chemotherapeutic responses in RECIST and PERCIST, and pathologic response).

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in response classification between RECIST and PERCIST (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P < 0.0001). Univariate analysis showed that lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, resection level, pathologic stage, and PERCIST were significant factors associated with disease-free or overall survival in this study. Although multivariate analysis demonstrated that venous invasion (disease-free survival: hazard ratio [HR] = 4.519, P = 0.002; overall survival: HR = 5.591, P = 0.003) and resection level (disease-free survival: HR = 11.078, P = 0.001) were the significant predictors, PERCIST was also significant in noninvasive therapy response assessment before surgery (disease-free survival: HR = 4.060, P = 0.025; overall survival: HR = 8.953, P = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

RECIST based on the anatomic size reduction rate did not demonstrate the correlation between therapeutic responses and prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, PERCIST was found to be the strongest independent predictor of outcomes. Given the significance of noninvasive radiologic imaging in formulating clinical treatment strategies, PERCIST might be considered more suitable for evaluation of chemotherapeutic response to esophageal cancer than RECIST.

Accuracy of PET-CT in predicting survival in patients with esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Positron emission tomography (PET) is an integral part of tumor staging for patients with esophageal cancer. Recent studies suggest a role for PET scan in predicting survival in these patients, but this relationship is unclear in the setting of neoadjuvant therapy. We examined pretreatment maximum standard uptake value (SUV(max)) of the primary tumor in patients treated with and without neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

All patients undergoing esophagectomy with a preoperative PET scan over a nine-year period (2001-2010) were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Positron emission tomography data were obtained from computers housing the original PET scans. Overall survival was correlated with SUV(max) of the primary tumor.

RESULTS

A total of 191 patients were identified, and 103 patients met inclusion criteria. Eighty-two had an adenocarcinoma (80%), and 21 (20%) had a squamous cell carcinoma. Fifty-seven (55%) patients received neoadjuvant therapy. In the surgery alone group, a SUV(max) of > 5.0 in the primary tumor was associated with poor prognosis [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.32; p = 0.007], but this factor did not retain its significance on multivariate analysis (HR 0.65; p = 0.43). Pretreatment SUV(max) in patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy was not significant in predicting overall survival (p = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

This study does not support the use of SUV(max) on pretreatment PET scans as a prognostic tool for patients with esophageal cancer, especially in those who have received neoadjuvant therapy. Lymph node status is a more accurate predictor of outcome, and efforts to improve pretreatment staging should focus on this factor.

The impact of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography positive lymph nodes on postoperative recurrence and survival in resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Induction therapy is not always beneficial for all patients. Therefore, it is important to identify the patients with a high rate of recurrence. The occurrence of lymph node metastases (LNMs) strongly influences the postoperative survival in patients with esophageal cancer. We investigated the usefulness of an LN evaluation by initial (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in prediction of postoperative recurrence for patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

A total of 76 ESCC patients who did not undergo induction therapy, but who did receive a curative resection were divided into PET-node (PET-N) positive (n = 26) and negative (n = 50) groups according to the presence or absence of FDG uptake in LNs. The PET-N status was compared with the size and the number of LNMs, as well as with the survival and failure patterns.

RESULTS

PET positive LNs involved a significantly larger size of metastatic nests than PET negative LNs (P = 0.002). The PET-N negative group showed a higher proportion of patients with 2 or fewer LNMs (92.0%), a higher 5-year relapse-free survival (75.1%) and a higher overall survival (70.0%), and a lower postoperative recurrence (24.0%) than the 15.4, 29.6, 30.3, and 69.2% values in the PET-N positive group, respectively, (P < 0.005). Multivariate analyses identified the PET-N status to be the most significant preoperative risk factor for postoperative recurrence (P = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

The preoperative PET-N status in patients with resectable ESCC was significantly associated with the size and the number of LNMs and was therefore found to reliably identify the high-risk population for postoperative recurrence.

Outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer staged with [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET): can postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET predict the utility of resection?

PURPOSE

To determine whether [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) can delineate patients with esophageal cancer who may not benefit from esophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed records of 163 patients with histologically confirmed stage I to IVA esophageal cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy with or without resection with curative intent. All patients received surgical evaluation. Initial and postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET scans and prognostic/treatment variables were analyzed. FDG-PET complete response (PET-CR) after chemoradiotherapy was defined as standardized uptake value ≤ 3.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight patients received trimodality therapy and 75 received chemoradiotherapy. Surgery was deferred primarily due to medical inoperability or unresectable/metastatic disease after chemoradiotherapy. A total of 105 patients were evaluable for postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET response. Thirty-one percent achieved a PET-CR. PET-CR predicted for improved outcomes for chemoradiotherapy (2-year overall survival, 71% v 11%, P < .01; 2-year freedom from local failure [LFF], 75% v 28%, P < .01), but not trimodality therapy. On multivariate analysis of patients treated with chemoradiotherapy, PET-CR is the strongest independent prognostic variable (survival hazard ratio [HR], 9.82, P < .01; LFF HR, 14.13, P < .01). PET-CR predicted for improved outcomes regardless of histology, although patients with adenocarcinoma achieved a PET-CR less often.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with trimodality therapy found no benefit with PET-CR, likely because FDG-PET residual disease was resected. Definitive chemoradiotherapy patients achieving PET-CR had excellent outcomes equivalent to trimodality therapy despite poorer baseline characteristics. Patients who achieve a PET-CR may not benefit from added resection given their excellent outcomes without resection. These results should be validated in a prospective trial of FDG-PET-directed therapy for esophageal cancer.