1
|
Sami SS, Haboubi HN, Ang Y, Boger P, Bhandari P, de Caestecker J, Griffiths H, Haidry R, Laasch HU, Patel P, Paterson S, Ragunath K, Watson P, Siersema PD, Attwood SE. UK guidelines on oesophageal dilatation in clinical practice. Gut 2018; 67:1000-1023. [PMID: 29478034 PMCID: PMC5969363 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2017] [Revised: 01/03/2018] [Accepted: 01/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
These are updated guidelines which supersede the original version published in 2004. This work has been endorsed by the Clinical Services and Standards Committee of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) under the auspices of the oesophageal section of the BSG. The original guidelines have undergone extensive revision by the 16 members of the Guideline Development Group with representation from individuals across all relevant disciplines, including the Heartburn Cancer UK charity, a nursing representative and a patient representative. The methodological rigour and transparency of the guideline development processes were appraised using the revised Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool.Dilatation of the oesophagus is a relatively high-risk intervention, and is required by an increasing range of disease states. Moreover, there is scarcity of evidence in the literature to guide clinicians on how to safely perform this procedure. These guidelines deal specifically with the dilatation procedure using balloon or bougie devices as a primary treatment strategy for non-malignant narrowing of the oesophagus. The use of stents is outside the remit of this paper; however, for cases of dilatation failure, alternative techniques-including stents-will be listed. The guideline is divided into the following subheadings: (1) patient preparation; (2) the dilatation procedure; (3) aftercare and (4) disease-specific considerations. A systematic literature search was performed. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Develop-ment and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and decide on the strength of recommendations made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarmed S Sami
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Hasan N Haboubi
- Cancer Biomarker Group, Swansea Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Yeng Ang
- Department of GI Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK,Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Philip Boger
- Department of Gastroenterology, Southampton University Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portsmouth University Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - John de Caestecker
- Digestive Diseases Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Helen Griffiths
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wye Valley NHS Trust, Wye Valley, UK
| | - Rehan Haidry
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Hans-Ulrich Laasch
- Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Praful Patel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Southampton University Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Stuart Paterson
- Department of Gastroenterology, NHS Forth Valley, Stirling, UK
| | - Krish Ragunath
- NIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Centre, Queens Medical Centre, Belfast, UK
| | - Peter Watson
- Faculty of Medicine Health and Life Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Castellanos González M, Delgado Martínez C, Pérez-Bedmar Delgado J. Stenosing oesophageal carcinoma diagnosed endoscopically by gastrostomy. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 41:512-3. [PMID: 29735251 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2018.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Revised: 03/26/2018] [Accepted: 04/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
3
|
Gavriel H, Chowdhury AT, Duong C, Spillane J, Sizeland A. Poor functional performance following bidirectional dilatation of severe post radiation oesophageal stricture. Acta Otolaryngol 2015; 135:629-34. [PMID: 25812431 DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2015.1006794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
CONCLUSION Bidirectional oesophageal dilatation for severe chemoradiation-induced oesophageal strictures is efficacious in improving luminal patency but ineffective in relieving functional dysphagia. OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of bidirectional oesophageal dilatation in the severely strictured oesophagus induced by radiation therapy following the treatment of head and neck malignancies. METHODS The study design was a case series in the setting of a tertiary cancer centre. We carried out a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent bidirectional oesophageal dilatation for oesophageal stricture secondary to radiation therapy for head and neck malignancies over a 5-year period. The parameters of the primary tumour, evaluation of preoperative and postoperative oesophageal dysfunction and complications of the procedure were evaluated. RESULTS There were nine episodes of bidirectional oesophageal dilatation among five patients with complete or severe oesophageal obstruction. Mean age was 63 years. The procedure was uneventful in all but one patient who was found to have postoperative mediastinitis, and healed completely. Four patients had persistent dysphagic symptoms despite post dilatation video fluoroscopy failing to reveal any significant narrowing of the oesophageal lumen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haim Gavriel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre , Melbourne , Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gavriel H, Duong C, Spillane J, Sizeland A. Bidirectional esophageal dilatation in pharyngoesophageal stenosis postradiotherapy. Head Neck 2012; 35:733-7. [PMID: 22473569 DOI: 10.1002/hed.22993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/25/2012] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Severely stenosed radiation-induced benign strictures around the level of cricopharyngeus post-radical chemoradiation for head and neck or upper esophageal cancers pose significant management problems. We report our technique of bidirectional assessment and dilatation of pharyngoesophageal strictures in patients with an in situ percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube. The upper gastrointestinal surgeon approached the area of stenosis in a retrograde manner through the PEG tube to guide the otolaryngeal surgeon who performed anterograde dilatation via a rigid laryngoscope. Between 2005 and 2009, bidirectional esophageal dilatation was performed on 5 patients at our institution. Video fluoroscopy confirmed improved patency of stenosed esophagus in all cases and good improvement in swallowing ability in 4 patients. The ability to accurately assess pharyngoesophageal strictures using bidirectional visualization and transillumination is the key modification of our technique. We suggest using bidirectional esophageal dilatation on difficult cases with severe pharyngoesophageal stenoses although extreme care is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haim Gavriel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Esophageal strictures are a common problem in gastroenterological practice. In general, the management of malignant or benign esophageal strictures is different and requires a different treatment approach. In daily clinical practice, stent placement is a commonly used modality for the palliation of incurable malignant strictures causing dysphagia, whereas, if available, intraluminal brachytherapy can be considered in patients with a good performance status. Recurrent dysphagia frequently occurs in malignant cases. In case of tissue in- or overgrowth, a second stent is placed. If stent migration occurs, the stent can be repositioned or a second (preferably partially covered) stent can be placed. Food obstruction of the stent lumen can be resolved by endoscopic cleansing. The cornerstone of the management of benign strictures is still dilation therapy (Savary-Gilliard bougie or balloon). There are a subgroup of strictures that are refractory or recur and an alternative approach is required. In order to prevent stricture recurrence, steroid injections into the stricture followed by dilation can be considered. In case of anastomotic strictures or Schatzki rings, incisional therapy is a safe method in experienced hands. Temporary stent placement is a third option before considering self-bougienage or surgery as a salvage treatment. In this review, the most frequently used endoscopic treatment modalities for malignant and benign stricture management will be discussed based on the available literature, and some practical information for the management in daily clinical practice will be provided.
Collapse
|