Complex pancreatic surgery: safety and feasibility in the community setting

The Impact of Surgical Volume on Outcomes and Cost in Cleft Repair: A Kids' Inpatient Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

Centralization of specialist services, including cleft service delivery, is occurring worldwide with the aim of improving the outcomes. This study examines the relationship between hospital surgical volume in cleft palate repair and outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the Kids' Inpatient Database was undertaken. Children 3 years or younger undergoing cleft palate repair in 2012 were identified. Hospital volume was categorized by cases per year as low volume (LV; 0-14), intermediate volume (IV; 15-46), or high volume (HV; 47-99); differences in complications, hospital costs, and length of stay (LOS) were determined by hospital volume.

RESULTS

Data for 2389 children were retrieved: 24.9% (n = 595) were LV, 50.1% (n = 1196) were IV, and 25.0% (n = 596) were HV. High-volume centers were more frequently located in the West (71.9%) compared with LV (19.9%) or IV (24.5%) centers (P < 0.001 for hospital region). Median household income was more commonly highest quartile in HV centers compared with IV or LV centers (32.3% vs 21.7% vs 18.1%, P < 0.001). There was no difference in complications between different volume centers (P = 0.74). Compared with HV centers, there was a significant decrease in mean costs for LV centers ($9682 vs $,378, P < 0.001) but no significant difference in cost for IV centers ($9260 vs $9682, P = 0.103). Both IV and LV centers had a significantly greater LOS when compared with HV centers (1.97 vs 2.10 vs 1.74, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite improvement in LOS in HV centers, we did not find a reduction in cost in HV centers. Further research is needed with analysis of outpatient, long-term outcomes to ensure widespread cost-efficiency.

High volume pancreaticoduodenectomy performed at an academic community cancer center

BACKGROUND

We sought to evaluate the post-operative outcomes of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at a high volume academic community cancer center.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy over a 10-year period.

RESULTS

Over 10 years, 213 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Median age was 66y. Most patients had significant comorbidities (median ASA = 3) and were overweight (median BMI = 27). Median operative time and blood loss were 253 min and 500 ml, respectively. 160 (75%) out of 213 patients had a malignant lesion on final pathology. 121 (76%) out of 160 had R0 resection. Median lymph nodes harvested was 13. Overall incidence of DGE was 31% (67/213), with clinically significant DGE in 15% (32/213). Pancreatic leak rate was 18% (37/213), with clinically significant leaks in 10% (21/213). Median length of stay was 8 days. Grade 3/4 morbidity rate was 21% (44/206), and 30-day mortality was 2% (5/213).

CONCLUSIONS

At a high volume academic community cancer center, pancreaticoduodenectomy can be performed with excellent outcomes on par with any academic center or university hospital.

The 13-year experience of performing pancreaticoduodenectomy in a mid-volume municipal hospital

PURPOSE

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex surgery associated with high morbidity, mortality, and cost. Municipal hospitals have their important role in the public health and welfare system. The purpose of this study was to identify the feasibility as well as the cost-effectiveness of performing PD in a mid-volume municipal hospital based on 13 years of experience with PD.

METHODS

From March 2003 to November 2015, 183 patients underwent PD at Seoul Metropolitan Government - Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center.. Retrospectively collected data were analyzed, with a particular focus on complications. Hospital costs were analyzed and compared with a national database, with patients divided into 2 groups on the basis of medical insurance status.

RESULTS

The percentage of medical aid was significantly higher than the average in Korean hospitals. (19.1% vs. 5.8%, P = 0.002). Complications occurred in 88 patients (44.3%). Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) occurred in 113 cases (61.7%), but the clinically relevant POPF was 24.6% (grade B: 23.5% and grade C: 1.1%). The median hospital stay after surgery was 20 days (range, 6-137 days). In-hospital mortality was 3.8% (n = 7), with pulmonary complications being the leading cause. During the study period, improvements were observed in POPF rate, operation time, and hospital stay. The mean total hospital cost was 13,819 United States dollar (USD) per patient, and the mean reimbursement from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) to health care providers was 10,341 USD (74.8%). The patient copayment portion of the NHIS payment was 5%.

CONCLUSION

Performing PD in a mid-volume municipal hospital is feasible, with comparable results and cost-effectiveness.

Improving pancreas surgery over time: Performance factors related to transition of care and patient volume

BACKGROUND

Pancreas surgery has evolved with better diagnostic imaging, changing indications, and improved patient selection. Outside high-volume tertiary centers, the documented effect of evolution in care and volumes are limited. Thus, we aimed to review indications and outcomes in pancreas surgery during the transition from community-based hospital to a university hospital.

METHODS

All pancreatic surgeries performed between 1986 and 2012 within a well-defined Norwegian population were identified from the hospital's database. Indications and postoperative outcomes, including mortality, were investigated.

RESULTS

Of the 219 included patients (54% males; median age, 64 years), 150 (69%) underwent pancreatoduodenectomy; 55 (25%), distal resection; and 5 (2%), enucleation. The annual number of operations increased during the study period (from <10/yr to >20/yr). Most patients (169; 77%) underwent surgery for suspected malignancy. The 30-day mortality decreased significantly over time among patients treated for pancreatic cancer (from 16.1% to 3.5%; p = 0.012). Over time, significant reductions in median hospitalization time (19 versus 12 days; p < 0.001), re-operation rate (37.1% versus 8.4%; p < 0.001), and median ICU stay (3 versus 0 days; p < 0.001) were observed.

CONCLUSION

The transition to university hospital and increase in volume has led to significant improvements in several performance metrics and reduced postoperative mortality. We believe improved perioperative management and focused, multidisciplinary care-bundles to be of importance.

Starting a High-Quality Pancreatic Surgery Program at a Community Hospital

BACKGROUND

Most literature suggests that pancreatic resections should be done by high-volume surgeons at high-volume hospitals to optimize patient outcomes. However, patient preference and insurance requirements may restrict hospital location. After careful planning, a high-volume pancreatic surgeon started performing pancreatectomies at a community hospital.

METHODS

Sixty pancreatectomies were performed at an academic medical center and 28 at a 144-bed community, non-teaching hospital. Sixty-day outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the academic medical center and community hospital with regard to the median age of the patients (66 vs. 61 years), the gender distribution (57 vs. 64 % female), or the median BMI (28 vs. 26 kg/m(2)). There was a significant difference in the American Society of Anesthesiologists class distribution between the academic medical center and community hospital (1; 0 vs. 4 %, 2; 7 vs. 21 %, 3; 88 vs. 75 %, 4; 5 vs. 0 %, p = 0.006). The median length of stay (LOS) for 17 pancreaticoduodenectomy/total pancreatectomy patients at the community hospital was significantly less than for 39 patients at the academic medical center (5 vs. 7 days, p = 0.006). Eleven distal pancreatectomy/splenectomy patients at the community hospital tended to have a shorter median LOS than 21 patients at the academic medical center (4 vs. 5 days, p = 0.25). Accordion ≥ 3 complications (7 vs. 27 %) and readmissions (11 vs. 22 %) tended to be lower at the community hospital than the academic medical center. Greater than 80 % of patients with adenocarcinoma at both hospital settings who were recommended to receive adjuvant therapy started their treatment within 60 days of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

With appropriate planning and careful patient selection, high-quality pancreatic surgery can be performed at a community hospital by a high-volume pancreatic surgeon.

Training and practice of the next generation HPB surgeon: analysis of the 2014 AHPBA residents' and fellows' symposium survey

BACKGROUND

Hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery is a complex subspecialty drawing from varied training pools, and the need for competency is rapidly growing. However, no board certification process or standardized training metrics in HPB surgery exist in the Americas. This study aims to assess the attitudes of current trainees and HPB surgeons regarding the state of training, surgical practice and the HPB surgical job market in the Americas.

STUDY DESIGN

A 20-question survey was distributed to members of Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AHPBA) with a valid e-mail address who attended the 2014 AHPBA. Descriptive statistics were generated for both the aggregate survey responses and by training category.

RESULTS

There were 176 responses with evenly distributed training tracks; surgical oncology (44, 28%), transplant (39, 24.8%) and HPB (38, 24.2%). The remaining tracks were HPB/Complex gastrointestinal (GI) and HPB/minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (29, 16% and 7, 4%). 51.2% of respondents thought a dedicated HPB surgery fellowship would be the best way to train HPB surgeons, and 68.1% felt the optimal training period would be a 2-year clinical fellowship with research opportunities. This corresponded to the 67.5% of the practicing HPB surgeons who said they would prefer to attend an HPB fellowship for 2 years as well. Overall, most respondents indicated their ideal job description was clinical practice with the ability to engage in clinical and/or outcomes research (52.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

This survey has demonstrated that HPB surgery has many training routes and practice patterns in the Americas. It highlights the need for specialized HPB surgical training and career education. This survey shows that there are many ways to train in HPB. A 2-year HPB fellowship was felt to be the best way to train to prepare for a clinically active HPB practice with clinical and outcomes research focus.

Bacteribilia with resistant microorganisms after preoperative biliary drainage--the influence of bacteria on postoperative outcome

BACKGROUND

In pancreatic surgery, preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) leads to bacteribilia. Whether positive bile duct cultures are associated with a higher postoperative morbidity might be related to the resistance of the species isolated from bile.

STUDY

Intraoperative bile duct cultures were collected from all patients who underwent pancreatic surgery. Postoperative morbidity was analyzed according to the species and the resistance found on bile duct cultures.

RESULTS

Fifty-five percent (166/301) of patients had PBD, while 45% (135/301) underwent primary operation. PBD was associated with a positive bile duct culture in 87% (144/166) versus 21% (28/135) in patients without PBD (p = 0.001) and polymicrobial infections in 53% (88/166) versus 6% (8/135) (p = 0.001). Postoperative morbidity was 40% (121/301); mortality was 3% (9/301). PBD was not associated with morbidity and mortality, but resistant species on bile duct cultures lead to significantly more postoperative complications, 54% (25/46) versus 38% (96/255) (p = 0.033), with significantly more antibiotic therapies.

CONCLUSION

PBD is associated with polymicrobial infections with resistant microorganisms, resulting in more postoperative complications. Since PBD cannot always be avoided, surgeons and gastroenterologists must be aware of their institutional surveillance data to identify patients at risk for postoperative complications.