A nationwide analysis of laparoscopy in high-risk colorectal surgery patients

Influence of BMI on robotic rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Obesity presents a significant public health challenge, known to escalate the risk of colorectal cancer twofold. The potential advantages of employing robotic technology in colorectal surgery for obese individuals remain mostly unexplored. A comprehensive search of articles retrieved from Scopus, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library for the duration of January 2014 to March 2024 was performed, without language limitations. Meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The study compared results of robotic rectal cancer resections in obese patients (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) with those in non-obese counterparts. Out of 2410 full-text articles studied, 7 met the inclusion criteria and underwent final analysis. The study included 963 non-obese and 371 obese patients. Operative time produce significant variance in non-obese patients. However, DRM, CRM, HLN, length of hospital stays, conversion rate, and overall complications did not show any statistically significant differences. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer had no clinically significant influence in obese group patients, and postoperative complications are same as in non-obese group except duration of surgery.

Evaluating body mass index's impact on Da Vinci Robotic rectal cancer surgery, a retrospective study

Robotic surgery addresses laparoscopic shortcomings and yields comparable results for low and high body mass index (BMI) patients. However, the impact of BMI on postoperative complications in robotic colorectal surgery remains debated. This study assessed the implications of BMI on short outcomes and postoperative complications, highlighting its unique role in the outcomes. Retrospective analysis of 119 patients who underwent robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer (January 2022 to March 2023). Patients grouped by BMI: normal weight (BMI < 23.9 kg/m2), overweight (BMI ≥ 23.9 kg/m2 and BMI < 27.9 kg/m2), and obese (BMI ≥ 27.9 kg/m2). Investigated BMI's impact on surgical outcomes and postoperative complications. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) in Clavien-Dindo, ASA scores. The obese group had a longer time to flatus (P = 0.002) and a higher re-operation rate than other groups (P = 0.01). The overweight group had a higher anastomotic fistula rate than the obese group. Overall complications showed no significant differences among BMI cohorts (P = 0.0295). There were no significant differences in TNM stages and comorbidities. BMI had no significant impact on overall postoperative complications in robotic surgery for rectal cancer. However, higher BMI correlated with a longer time to flatus and increased re-operation rate.

Fuzzy Logic Preanesthetic Risk Evaluation of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Operations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Pre-operative risk classification of patients undergoing anesthesia is an essential interest and has been the focus of many research and categorizations. On the other hand, the ideal categorization system, based on medical doctors' clinical experience and cooperation with other disciplines, has not been developed yet.

METHODS

In this study, 218 consecutive patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations were included. A novel fuzzy logic evaluation model consisting of 270 rules was constructed. Five major (pulmonary, cardiac, diabetes mellitus and renal or liver disease) and three minor criteria (patients' age, cigarette smoking and body mass index) were chosen to be used during high-risk groups determination.

RESULTS

The verification of the success of risk value decision with the proposed novel fuzzy logic algorithm is the main goal of this study. On the other hand, though not essential aim, a statistical consistency check was also included to have a deeper understanding and evaluation of the graphical results. During the statistical analysis the 0-30%, 30-60% and 60-90% risk ranges were found to be in a very strong positive relationship with complication occurrence. In this study, 172, 31, 15 patients were in 0-30, 30-60 and 60-90% risk ranges, respectively. Complication rates were 7/172 (4.07%) in 0-30% range, 3/31 (9.68%) in 30-60% range; and 2/15 (13.33%) in 60-90% range.

CONCLUSIONS

Fuzzy based risk classification model was successfully used to predict medical results for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations and reliable deductions were reached.

Robotic colon surgery in obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Colon cancer resection can be technically difficult in the obese (OB) population. Robotic surgery is a promising technique but its benefits remain uncertain in OB patients. The aim of this study is to compare OB versus non-obese (NOB) patients undergoing robotic colon surgery, as well as OB patients undergoing robotic versus open or laparoscopic colonic surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Primary outcome measures included length of stay (LOS), surgical site infection (SSI) rate, complications, anastomotic leak and oncological outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of eight studies were included, with five comparing OB and NOB patients undergoing robotic colon surgery included in meta-analysis. A total of 263 OB patients and 400 NOB patients formed the sample for meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between the two groups in operative time, conversion to open, LOS, lymph node yield, anastomotic leak and postoperative ileus. There was a trend towards a significant increase in overall complications and SSI in the OB group (32.3% OB versus 26.8% NOB for complications, 14.2% OB versus 9.9% NOB for SSI). The three included studies comparing surgical techniques were too heterogeneous to undergo meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

Robotic colon surgery is safe in obese patients, but high-quality prospective evidence is lacking. Future studies should report on oncological safety and the cost-effectiveness of adopting the robotic technique in these challenging patients.

Advantages of ligating the rectum with gauze pad band in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis

Purpose

It is difficult to maintain sufficient tension throughout laparoscopic anterior resection with total mesorectal excision, which causes a decline in surgical quality. We used a soft, inexpensive gauze pad band pulling the rectal tube to analyze the effect of surgery.

Methods

A gauze pad band was positioned at the proximal of the tumor, followed by fastening the rectal tube and ligating the rectum. 233 patients undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection for mid to low rectal cancer were enrolled between January 2018 and December 2020. After propensity score matching, 63 cases were selected in gauze pad band group and 126 cases were selected in traditional group. The two groups were compared in preoperative, intraoperative, and pathological characteristics.

Results

Compared to traditional group, the median operation duration (203 min vs. 233 min, p < 0.001) and the median intraoperative bleeding (48 ml vs. 67 ml, p < 0.001) were lesser in gauze pad band group. A higher percentage of one cartridge transection of rectum (36/63 vs. 51/126, p = 0.030), shorter length of cartridges used (6.88 ± 1.27 cm vs. 7.28 ± 1.25 cm, p = 0.040), and longer distal resection margin (2.74 ± 0.76 cm vs. 2.16 + 0.68 cm, p < 0.001) were found in the gauze pad band group. The completeness of total mesorectal excision (61/63 vs. 109/126, p = 0.022), harvested lymph nodes (19 vs. 17, p < 0.001) and positive lymph nodes (1 vs. 0, p = 0.046) were higher in gauze pad band group.

Conclusion

Ligation of the rectum with a gauze pad band allows for a reduction in operative time and intraoperative bleeding while increasing the rate of one cartridge transection. It also protected the quality of total mesorectal excision and membrane anatomy.

Trial registration: Not applicable.

Migration of High Cardiac Risk Patients from Open to Endovascular Procedures is Evident within the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative

BACKGROUND

In this study, pre-operative medical complexity is estimated by the independently validated Vascular Quality Initiative VQI Cardiac Risk Index (CRI). This study aims to identify and correlate trends of CRI for open abdominal aortic aneurysm (OAR) with trends in the CRI for corresponding endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). This assessment of differences in estimated procedural risks will be used to support the theory that, patient migration is an important factor contributing to decreased POMI following open vascular procedures.

METHODS

A retrospective review of VQI data from 2003 to 2020 for all patients undergoing elective aortic repairs (OAR and EVAR) was conducted. The CRI scoring developed for the open repair (oCRI) was applied to both the OAR and EVAR cohorts, with variables specific to EVAR translated from similar open repair factors in the model where feasible. To evaluate for changes across time, patients were grouped into Eras based on year of procedure, subsequently, univariate analysis of post-operative myocardial infarction (POMI) rates and CRI scores were perfomed between each era.

RESULTS

A total of 56,067 elective aortic repairs were identified (83% EVAR, 17% OAR). Within the OAR cohort, the average oCRI estimate was 7.1% with significant decrease across the studied timeframe (8% ± 4.6%→6.9% ± 4.4%, P < 0.001), which corresponded to a significant decrease in observed clinical myocardial infarction (MI) rate (4.1%→1.4%, P < 0.001). Over that same time period, the open CRI was applied to the EVAR cohort, and the average oCRI estimate was 7.2% and showed a significant increase (6.6% ± 2.8%→7.2% ± 4.4%, P < 0.001). Within the EVAR cohort, the eCRI estimate did not show any significant changes over time (average 0.48%), while the actual rate of clinical MI showed a significant decrease (1.1%→0.3%, P = 0.002). Gap analysis was conducted within the EVAR cohort between CRI estimates of procedural risks from an open operation versus an EVAR, which demonstrated that patients within the EVAR cohort would, on an average, has had 6.7% higher risk of POMI had they undergone an open procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Paradigm shifts with regard to patient selection for aortic repair is evident within this large national cohort. Over time, OAR patients had fewer preoperative estimated cardiac comorbidities and there is a corresponding decrease in POMI rates. As high-risk patients migrate from OAR to EVAR, there has been a subsequent increase in EVAR estimated pre-operative risks as the patients become more medically high-risk. Despite increasing complexity, rates of POMI in EVAR significantly decreased, potentially explained by improved operative technique and peri-operative care.

Colorectal resection in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients: experience from a single tertiary center

BACKGROUND

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) and renal replacement therapy (RRT) are important risk factors for post-operative morbidity and mortality but remains poorly reported in colorectal surgery. This study aims to evaluate postoperative outcomes of ESRD patients under RRT undergoing colorectal resection.

METHODS

All ESRD patients under RRT who underwent colorectal resection between 2006 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative outcomes were analysed, such as risk factors of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients were analysed, including 27 emergency and 15 elective surgeries. The most frequent indication was acute colonic ischemia for emergency and malignancy for elective procedures. Laparoscopic approach was used in 12 patients (29%), without difference between elective and emergency groups. Postoperative severe complications rate (including deaths) was 50% (21/42), including 56% (15/27) and 40% (6/15) in emergency and elective groups, respectively (p = .334). Anastomotic leak was observed in 3 of the 23 patients (13%) undergoing digestive anastomosis, (1 in emergency and 2 in elective groups, p = .246). The postoperative mortality rate was 29%, not significantly different between groups. The median hospital stay was 14.5 days (8-42). At univariate analysis, history of cardiac event (p = .028) and open approach (p = .040) were associated with severe complications, and ASA score >3 (p = .043), history of cardiac event (p = .001) and diabetes (p = .030) associated with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Colorectal surgery in ESRD patient exposes to high risk of morbidity and mortality, even in the elective setting, especially in patients with comorbidities like cardiac event and diabetes. Careful patient selection and closed management is required in such fragile patients.

Outcomes of elective left colectomy in renal-transplanted patients: a single-center case-control study (LECoRT study)

PURPOSE

Renal-transplanted patients are reported to have a high anastomotic leakage (AL) rate after colorectal surgery. We aimed to define AL-related morbidity and mortality rates after elective left colectomy in renal-transplanted patients.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected between 2010 and 2015 from patients who underwent elective left colectomy with supra-peritoneal anastomosis in a single French referral hospital. We compared AL rate, and morbidity and mortality rates between renal-transplanted patients and controls.

RESULTS

We identified 120 patients who underwent elective left colectomy during the study period. We retrospectively divided this cohort into 20 (17%) kidney-transplanted recipients (KTR-group) and the remaining 100 patients comprised the control group (C-group). There were no significant differences in sex, age, ASA score, body mass index, history of abdominal surgery and benign/malignant disease ratio between the KTR-group and the C-group. The AL rate was approximately four times higher in the KTR-group versus the C-group (25% vs 7%, p = 0.028). Intra-abdominal septic complications (p = 0.0005) and reoperation rates (p = 0.025) were also higher in the KTR-group. The laparoscopic approach was performed less in the KTR-group (35% versus 93%, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Renal transplantation was identified as a risk factor of AL following elective left colectomy, as well as increased intra-abdominal septic morbidity and higher reoperation rate. Further multicentric studies are required to identify potential independent risk factors of AL after colorectal surgery in these frail populations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The present study was declared on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04495023).

[Palliative Surgery in Colorectal Cancer - Which Factors Should Influence the Choice of the Surgical Procedure?]

BACKGROUND

The surgical procedure for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) in the palliative situation cannot be adequately standardised. The present study was initiated to identify criteria for the decision for resection of the malignancy with or without anastomosis.

PATIENTS/MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a unicentric retrospective analysis, 103 patients after palliative resection with or without anastomosis due to CRC were examined. Using univariate and logistic regression analysis, the influence of a total of 40 factors on postoperative morbidity and mortality was assessed.

RESULTS

In 46 cases, resection with primary anastomosis and in 57 cases a discontinuity resection was performed. Postoperative morbidity was 44.7% and mortality 17.5%. After one-stage resection with anastomosis, nicotine abuse (OR 4.2; p = 0.044), hypalbuminaemia (OR 4.0; p = 0.012), ASA score > 2 (OR 3.7; p = 0.030) and liver remodelling/cirrhosis (OR 3.6; p = 0.031) increased the risk for postoperative complications. Hypalbuminaemia (OR 1.8; p = 0.036), cachexia (OR 1.8; p = 0.043), anaemia (OR 1.5; p = 0.038) and known alcohol abuse (OR 1.9; p = 0.023) were identified as independent risk factors for early postoperative mortality. After discontinuity resection, renal failure (OR 2.1; p = 0.042) and cachexia (OR 1.5; p = 0.045) led to a significant increase in the risk of postoperative morbidity, alcohol abuse (OR 1.8; p = 0.041) in mortality. Hypalbuminaemia (OR 2.8; p = 0.019) and an ASA score > 2 (OR 2.6; p = 0.004) after resection and reconstruction increased the risk of major complications according to Clavien-Dindo, while pre-existing renal failure (OR 1.6; p = 0.023) increased the risk after discontinuity resection. In univariate analysis, an ASA score > 2 (p = 0.038) after simultaneous tumour resection and reconstruction, and urgent surgery in both groups with or without primary anastomosis were additionally identified as significant parameters with a negative influence on mortality (p = 0.010 and p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Palliative resections of colorectal carcinomas have high morbidity and mortality. Especially in cases of pre-existing alcohol abuse and/or urgent indication for surgery, more intensive monitoring should be performed. In the case of anaemia, cachexia, hypalbuminemia and an ASA score > 2, discontinuity resection may be the more appropriate procedure.

Clinical outcome of laparoscopic vs open right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: A propensity score matching analysis of the Japanese National Clinical Database

AIM

The advantages of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy over open surgery for colon cancer in general clinical practice are debated, as evidenced by the continued use of open surgery in a significant proportion of patients worldwide. This study aimed to assess and compare the clinical outcome of laparoscopic and open right hemicolectomy for colon cancer using data from the Japanese National Clinical Database.

METHODS

A total of 72 299 patients who underwent laparoscopic (n = 46 084) and open (n = 26 215) right hemicolectomy for colon cancer between 2014 and 2018 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Short-term outcome was compared between groups using propensity score matching analysis.

RESULTS

The incidence of overall postoperative morbidity ≥ Clavien-Dindo classification grade 3 was significantly higher in the open surgery group than the laparoscopic group (4.7% vs 3.2%, P < .001). The incidence of most individual morbidities, including surgical site infection, anastomotic leakage, and ileus, was higher in the open surgery group. Short-term outcomes, including intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, reoperation rate, 30-day mortality, and in-hospital mortality, were superior in the laparoscopic group, except for operative time. Subgroup analyses showed that the incidence of postoperative morbidity was lower in the laparoscopic group for all prespecified subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy has an advantage over open surgery for colon cancer with respect to short-term outcome.

Impact of laparoscopic approach on the short-term outcomes of elderly patients with colorectal cancer: a nationwide Italian experience

INTRODUCTION

The laparoscopic approach is increasingly adopted in colorectal cancer surgery; however, its role in elderly patients is controversial. We sought to examine the relationship between age and short-term outcomes following laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

Data of patients 65 + years old who underwent laparoscopic surgery for CRC between 2002 and 2014 were retrieved from the administrative National Italian Hospital Discharge Dataset. Patients were divided into three age categories (65-74, 75-84, and 85  +). The impact of age on length of stay, 30-day readmission, in-hospital mortality, and postoperative complications was evaluated.

RESULTS

During the study period, 47,704 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery for CRC. The median postoperative length of stay was 9 days, and 30-day readmission and in-hospital mortality were 4.4% and 0.9%, respectively. Age was found to be an independent risk factor of prolonged length of stay and increased in-hospital mortality. With respect to patients in 65-74 years age category, patients aged 75-84 years and those aged 85 + years had a higher risk of complications (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.36-1.50, and OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.83-2.17, respectively). However, no statistically significant association was found between age and anastomotic leakage or surgical site infection (p = 0.29, and p = 0.58, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CRC who underwent laparoscopic surgery, age was found to be an independent risk factor for prolonged length of stay, in-hospital mortality, and global postoperative complications. These findings should be considered when planning laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients.

A Paradigm Shift in Physician Reimbursement: A Model to Align Reimbursement to Value in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in the United States

BACKGROUND

Despite common beliefs, underuse of laparoscopic colorectal surgery remains an issue. A paradigm shift to increase laparoscopy and align payment with effort is needed, with pressures to improve value.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare reimbursement across surgical approach and payer for common colorectal procedures and to propose a novel way to increase use in the United States.

DATA SOURCES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (Medicare) reimbursement and commercial claims data from 2012 to 2015 were used.

STUDY SELECTION

Reimbursement across payers was mapped for the 10 most common colorectal procedures using the open and laparoscopic approaches.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The reimbursement difference across approaches by payer and potential value proposition from a cost-shifting model increasing reimbursement with corresponding increases in laparoscopic use was measured.

RESULTS

For Medicare, reimbursement was lower laparoscopically than open for the majority. With commercial, laparoscopy was reimbursed less for 3 procedures. When laparoscopic reimbursement was higher, the amount was not substantial. Medicare payments were consistently lower than commercial, with corresponding lower reimbursement for laparoscopy. Increasing reimbursement by 10%, 20%, and 30% resulted in significant cost savings with laparoscopy. Savings were amplified with increasing use, with additional savings over baseline at all levels, except 30% reimbursement/10% increased use.

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by the use of claims data, which could have coding errors and confounding in the case mix across approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Reimbursement for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is comparatively lower than open. Reimbursement can be increased with significant overall cost savings, as the reimbursement/case is still less than total cost savings with laparoscopy compared with open cases. Incentivizing surgeons toward laparoscopy could drive use and improve outcomes, cost, and quality as we shift to value-based payment. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B290. CAMBIOS EN LOS PARADIGMAS DE REEMBOLSOS MÉDICOS: UN MODELO PARA ALINEAR EL REEMBOLSO AL VALOR REAL DE LA CIRUGÍA COLORRECTAL LAPAROSCÓPICA EN LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS: A pesar de las creencias comunes, la subutilización de la cirugía colorrectal laparoscópica sigue siendo un problema. Se necesita un cambio en los paradigmas para aumentar y alinear el rembolso de la laparoscopia aplicando mucho esfuerzo para obtener una mejoría en su valor real.Comparar los reembolsos del abordaje quirúrgico y los de la administración para procedimientos colorrectales comunes y proponer una nueva forma de aumentar su uso en los Estados Unidos.Reembolsos en los Centros de Servicios de Medicare y Medicaid (Medicare) y los datos de reclamos comerciales encontrados de 2012-2015.El reembolso administrativo se mapeó para los diez procedimientos colorrectales más comunes utilizando los enfoques abiertos y laparoscópicos.Diferencias de reembolso entre los enfoques por parte de la administración y la propuesta de valor real de un modelo de cambio de costos que aumentan el reembolso con los aumentos correspondientes si se utiliza la laparoscopía.Para Medicare, el reembolso fue menor para una mayoría por vía laparoscópica que abierta. Comercialmente, la laparoscopia se reembolsó menos por 3 procedimientos. Cuando el reembolso laparoscópico fue mayor, la cantidad no fue sustancial. Los pagos de Medicare fueron consistentemente más bajos que los pagos comerciales, con el correspondiente reembolso más bajo por laparoscopia. El aumento del reembolso en un 10%, 20% y 30% resultó en ahorros de costos significativos con la laparoscopía. Los ahorros se amplificaron con el aumento de la utilización, con ahorros adicionales sobre la línea de base en todos los niveles, excepto el 30% de reembolso / 10% de mayor uso.Uso de datos de reclamos, que podrían tener errores de codificación y confusión en la combinación de casos entre enfoques.El reembolso por la cirugía colorrectal laparoscópica es comparativamente más bajo que el abordaje abierto. El reembolso se puede aumentar con ahorros significativos en los costos generales, ya que el reembolso / caso es aún menor que el ahorro total en los costos de la laparoscopia en comparación con los casos abiertos. Incentivar a los cirujanos hacia la laparoscopía podría impulsar la utilización y mejorar los resultados, el costo y la calidad a medida que se pasa al pago basado en el valor real. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B290. (Traducción-Dr Xavier Delgadillo).

Laparoscopic Surgery Is Safe and Beneficial in True Functional High-Risk Patients with Colorectal Cancer: Utilization of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test

Background: Patients with colorectal cancer deemed to be high-risk may be denied an elective laparoscopic resection due to subjective reasons. A comparison of the 30-day outcomes in true functional high-risk patients who underwent either open or laparoscopic colorectal resection was undertaken. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort of all functional high-risk patients as assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise test between July 2015 and April 2018 were identified. Anaerobic threshold of <11 mL/kg/minute was used as a physiologic indicator to determine a high-risk patient. Adherence to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) was ensured. P values were computed via two-sided Fisher's exact test, and the exact Mann-Whitney U-test. Forest plots for relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were displayed on a log scale. Results: One hundred forty-six patients were identified as high-risk. Outcomes demonstrated a trend to laparoscopic benefit in all Clavien-Dindo grades of postoperative complications, but especially in severe complications of grades 3-4 (3.5% versus 10.2%). Readmissions demonstrated a trend to laparoscopic surgery benefit (7% versus 11.8%), as did mortality (1.7% versus 3.4%). The rate of surgery-site complications was higher after open surgery (42.1% versus 22.4%, P = .0201). Wound infections were observed more frequently after open surgery (12.5% versus 1.72%, P = .0280). The estimated risk of all-grade complications was significantly higher after open anterior rectal resection (63.0% versus 29.6%, P = .0281) and there was significantly shorter stay after laparoscopic right colectomy (5 v. 7 days, P = .0490). Conclusions: Laparoscopic approach for colorectal resections in high-risk patients is safe and beneficial compared to open surgery, especially in patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of the rectum and right colon.

Systematic Review on the Influence of Tissue Oxygenation on Gut Microbiota and Anastomotic Healing

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leak rates have not improved over several decades despite improvements in surgical techniques and patient care. The gut microbiome has been implicated in the development of leaks. The exact mechanisms by which tissue oxygenation affects gut microbial composition and anastomotic healing physiology are unclear. Also, commonly used carbon dioxide (CO₂) is a known vasodilator that improves tissue oxygen tension. We performed a systematic review to determine the influence of hyperoxia, hypoxia, and hypercapnia on the gut microbiome and anastomotic healing.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE to identify studies investigating the effects of hyperoxia, hypoxia, and hypercapnia on anastomotic healing and gut microbiota published between 1998 and 2018. Two reviewers screened the articles for eligibility and quality. Fifty-three articles underwent full text review, and a narrative synthesis was undertaken.

RESULTS

Hyperoxia is associated with better anastomotic healing, increased gastrointestinal oxygen tension, and may reduce gut anaerobes. Hypoxia is associated with poor healing and increased gut anaerobes. However, it is unclear if hypoxia is the most important predictor of anastomotic leaks. Low pressure CO₂ pneumoperitoneum and mild systemic hypercapnia are both associated with increased gastrointestinal oxygen tension and may improve anastomotic healing. We found no studies which investigated the effect of hypercapnia on gut microbiota in the context of anastomotic healing.

CONCLUSIONS

Tissue oxygenation influences gut anastomotic healing, but little evidence exists to demonstrate the influence on the gut microbiome in the context of healing. Further studies are needed to determine if anastomotic microbiome changes with altered tissue oxygenation and if this affects healing and leak rates. If confirmed, altering tissue oxygenation through hyperoxia or hypercapnia could be feasible means of altering the microbiome such that anastomotic leak rates reduce.

Laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer patients taking anti-thrombotic therapy

Background: Several previous studies have shown that laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer is a feasible option. However, its safety and efficacy in patients receiving long-term anti-thrombotic therapy (AT) remain unclear.Material and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 364 patients who underwent elective resection for rectal cancer via a laparoscopic approach between 2007 and 2018 in our institute. Patients were classified according to the long-term use of AT. AT was interrupted perioperatively with or without heparin bridging therapy in all anti-thrombotic users. Clinicopathological factors and surgical outcomes were analyzed between patient groups.Results: Thirty-two patients (9%) receiving AT were older and had lower albumin and hemoglobin levels than those not receiving AT (the non-AT group), and were predominantly male. Estimated blood loss and operative time in the AT group (median: 50 mL and 294 min) did not differ from those in the non-AT group (median: 20 mL and 295 min). There were no intergroup differences in the frequencies of other postoperative complications and oncological outcomes.Conclusions: Our results at the very least can support that laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is a safe and feasible option for patients taking long-term AT discontinued perioperatively.

Optimizing Patient Selection for Laparoscopic and Open Colorectal Cancer Resections: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program–Matched Analysis

The aim of this study was to identify patients undergoing colorectal cancer (CRC) resection who might benefit specifically from either an open or laparoscopic approach. From the NSQIP database (2012–2013), patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy (LC) or open colectomy (OC) for CRC were identified. The two groups were matched and compared in terms of any, medical, and surgical complications. A wide range of patient characteristics were collected and analyzed. Interaction analysis was performed in a multivariable regression model to identify risk factors that may make LC or OC more beneficial in certain subgroups of patients. Overall, OC (n = 6593) was associated with a significantly higher risk of any [odds ratio (OR) 2.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.87–2.20], surgical (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.82–2.16), and medical (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.51–1.94) complications than LC (n = 6593). No subgroup of patients benefited from an open approach. Patients with obesity (BMI > 30) (P = 0.03) and older age (>65 years) (P = 0.01) benefited more than average from a laparoscopic approach. For obese patients, LC was associated with less overall complications (OC vs LC: OR 1.92 obese vs 1.21 nonobese patients). For elderly patients, LC was more preferable regarding the risk of medical complications (OC vs LC OR of 1.91 vs 1.34 for younger patients). No subgroup of CRC patients benefited specifically more from an open colorectal resection. This supports that the laparoscopic technique should be performed whenever feasible. For the obese and elderly patients, the benefits of the laparoscopic approach were more pronounced.

Clinical Research Using the National Inpatient Sample: A Brief Review of Colorectal Studies Utilizing the NIS Database

The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) is the largest collection of longitudinal hospital care data in the United States and is sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The data are collected from state organizations, hospital associations, private organizations, and the federal government. This database has been used in more than 400 disease-focused studies to examine health care utilization, access, charges, quality, and outcomes of care. The database has been maintained since 1988, making it one of the oldest on hospital data. The focus of this review is to explore and discuss the use of NIS database in colorectal surgery research and to formulate a simplified guide of the data captured for future researchers.

Progress in prevention and treatment of anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world, and its morbidity and mortality both rank third among all malignant tumors in China. Rectal cancer accounts for 60%-70% of cases of CRC. With the in-depth study of the pathogenesis of CRC and the mechanism of tumor metastasis, and the improvement of surgical techniques and methods, anal sphincter surgery for middle and low rectal cancer is increasing gradually. Although the quality of life of the patients improves significantly after anal sphincter preservation for rectal cancer, anastomotic leakage is still one of the most common and serious complications. Studies show that the incidence of anastomotic leakage after surgery for low rectal cancer is 3%-21%, and the death rate is up to 3%. Therefore, a comprehensive assessment of patients and analysis of risk factors before operation is of great significant for reducing the potential risk of anastomotic leakage and choosing surgical approach and appropriate preventive measures to prevent and reduce the occurrence of anastomotic leakage. In this paper, we summarize the recent research on anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery in order to help other clinicians reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage in clinical practice.

Outcomes Following Colorectal Resection in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are at increased risk of requiring colorectal resection compared to the general population. Given the need for lifelong immunosuppression and the physiologic impact of years of renal replacement, we hypothesized that colorectal resection may be riskier for this unique population.

METHODS

We investigated the differences in mortality, morbidity, length of stay (LOS), and cost between 2410 KTR and 1,433,437 non-KTR undergoing colorectal resection at both transplant and non-transplant centers using the National Inpatient Sample between 2000 and 2013, adjusting for patient and hospital level factors.

RESULTS

In hospital, mortality was higher for KTR in comparison to non-KTR (11.1 vs 4.3%, p < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] _2.683.59_4.81) as were overall complications (38.5 vs 31.5%, p = 0.001; aOR _1.081.30_1.56). LOS was significantly longer (10 vs 7 days, p < 0.001; ratio _1.421.53_1.65) and cost was significantly greater ($23,056 vs $14,139, p < 0.001; ratio _1.421.54_1.63) for KTR compared to non-KTR. While LOS was longer for KTR undergoing resection at transplant centers compared to non-transplant centers (aOR 1.68 vs 1.53, p = 0.03), there were no statistically significant differences in mortality, overall morbidity, or cost by center type.

CONCLUSIONS

KTR have higher mortality, higher incidence of overall complications, longer LOS, and higher cost than non-KTR following colorectal resection, regardless of center type. Physicians should consider these elevated risks when planning for surgery in the KTR population and counsel patients accordingly.

Is There Any Reason Not to Perform Standard Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision?

The curative treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer is currently based on chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision (TME). Laparoscopy has developed considerably because of obvious clinical benefits such as reduced pain and shorter hospital stay. Recently, several prospective randomized clinical trials with long-term follow-up have showed that laparoscopy is noninferior to laparotomy with the same oncologic outcomes in terms of survival and local control rate. However, laparoscopic TME remains a challenging procedure requiring a high level of expertise and a long learning curve to ensure an adequate and safe resection. The only relative contraindication of laparoscopic rectal surgery is T4 rectal cancer extended beyond the plane of TME. In this situation, it is reasonable to consider an open resection to avoid an uncomplete resection. In obese and elderly patients, laparoscopic TME also provides the same benefits as in nonobese and younger patients but may be more difficult to achieve. This review summarizes current knowledge on the place of laparoscopic TME in the treatment of rectal cancer.

Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite proven safety and efficacy, rates of minimally invasive approaches for colon cancer remain low in the USA. Given the known benefits, investigating the root causes of underutilization and methods to increase laparoscopy is warranted. Our goal was to develop a predictive model of factors impacting use of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.

METHODS

The Premier Hospital Database was reviewed for elective colorectal resections for colon cancer (2009-2014). Patients were identified by ICD-9-CM diagnosis code and then stratified into open or laparoscopic approaches by ICD-9-CM procedure codes. An adjusted multivariate logistic regression model identified variables predictive of use of laparoscopy for colon cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 24,245 patients were included-12,523 (52 %) laparoscopic and 11,722 (48 %) open. General surgeons performed the majority of all procedures (77.99 % open, 71.60 % laparoscopic). Overall use of laparoscopy increased from 48.94 to 52.03 % over the study period (p < 0.0001). Patients with private insurance were more likely to have laparoscopy compared with Medicare patients (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.089, 95 % CI [1.004, 1.181], p = 0.0388). Higher volume of surgeons (OR 3.518, 95 % CI [2.796, 4.428], p < 0.0001) and larger hospitals by bed size were more likely to approach colon cancer laparoscopically. Colorectal surgeons were 32 % more likely to approach a case laparoscopically than general surgeons (OR 1.315, 95 % CI [1.222, 1.415], p < 0.0001). Teaching hospitals, hospitals in the Midwest, and hospitals with less than 500 beds were less likely to use laparoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

There are patient, provider, and hospital characteristics that can be identified preoperatively to predict who will undergo surgery for colon cancer using laparoscopy. However, additional patients may be eligible for laparoscopy based on patient-level characteristics. These results have implications for regionalization and increasing teaching of MIS. Recognizing and addressing these variables with training and recruiting could increase use of minimally invasive approaches, with the associated clinical and financial benefits.

Morbid Obesity is Associated with Increased Mortality, Surgical Complications, and Incremental Health Care Utilization in the Peri-Operative Period of Colorectal Cancer Surgery

BACKGROUND

Morbid obesity (Basic Mass Index ≥ 40 kg/m(2)) leads to increased long-term mortality after colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. Little is known about its effects on peri-operative CRC surgery outcomes.

METHODS

85,300 discharges for CRC surgery were identified using the redesigned 2012 National Inpatient Sample. Outcomes of interest were mortality, healthcare charges, and surgical outcomes in morbidly obese patients which were compared to those in nonobese patients.

RESULTS

There were 4385 (5.14%) morbidly obese patients who underwent CRC surgery during the study period. Morbid obesity was associated with younger age, females, and African Americans in our study (p < 0.05). Morbidly obese patients had higher prevalence of CRC peri-operative co-morbidities, surgical complications, and conversions from laparoscopic to open surgery. On multivariate analysis, morbid obesity led to an increased CRC surgery peri-operative mortality (OR 1.85, 95 % CI 1.15, 2.97). Mortality remained significant even after adjusting for surgical complications (OR 1.79, 95 % CI 1.12, 2.88). Morbidly obese patients undergoing CRC also had a prolonged length of hospitalization (1.22 day, 95 % CI 0.67, 1.78), a $15,582 increase in total hospital charges (95 % CI 8419, 22,745), and increased disposition to short-term rehabilitation facilities (OR 2.25, 95 % CI 1.79, 2.84).

CONCLUSION

Analysis of national level data demonstrates that morbidly obese patients have an increased CRC surgery peri-operative mortality with higher prevalence of co-morbidities, surgical complications, and more health care resource utilization. Future research efforts should concentrate on ameliorating these outcomes in morbidly obese patients.

Conversion during laparoscopic colorectal resections: a complication or a drawback? A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes

PURPOSE

Several studies compared the outcomes of laparoscopically completed colorectal resections (LCR) to those requiring conversion to open surgery (COS). However, a comparative analysis between COS patients and patients undergoing planned open surgery (POS) would be useful to clarify if the conversion can be considered a simple drawback or a complication, being cause of additional postoperative morbidity. The aim of this study is to perform a meta-analysis of current evidences comparing postoperative outcomes of COS patients to POS patients.

METHODS

A systematic search of Medline, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Scopus was performed to identify studies reporting short-term outcomes of COS and POS patients. Primary outcomes were 30-day overall morbidity and length of postoperative hospital stay. Data were analyzed with fixed-effect modeling, and sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

Twenty studies involving 30,656 patients undergoing POS and 1935 COS patients were selected. The mean conversion rate was 0.17. Similar 30-day overall morbidity and length of postoperative hospital stay were found in COS and POS patients. Wound infection (OR 1.43, 95 % CI 1.12 to 1.83, p < 0.01) was higher in the COS group. Other results were robust. Outcomes were comparable for patients undergoing resection for different natures of the disease (benign vs. malignant) and at different sites (colon vs. rectum).

CONCLUSION

Conversions from laparoscopic to open procedure during colorectal resection are not associated with a poorer postoperative outcome compared to patients undergoing planned open surgery, except for a higher risk of wound infection.

The influence of body mass index on clinical short-term outcomes in robotic colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

Robotic surgery has been developed to address the technical limitations of laparoscopic surgery and might result in similar outcomes for patients with low and high body mass index (BMI).

METHODS

Demographic, peri-operative data and surrogate oncologic markers for colorectal cancer of patients that underwent robotic colorectal procedures were collected in a prospective database and analyzed.

RESULTS

103 consecutive patients (36 normal-weight, 33 overweight, 34 obese) underwent robotic colorectal surgery from 11/2011 to 05/2012. While operating room (OR) time was longer for the obese patients (123.4 vs 137.9 and 154.7 min), results for estimated blood loss (104.2 vs 153 and 155.9 mL), conversions (2.8 vs 6.1 and 5.9%), complications (19.4 vs 21.2 and 32.4%), re-admissions (11.1 vs 112.1 and 20.6) and mortality (0% for all) were comparable. BMI did not affect the surrogate markers in patients with malignancies.

CONCLUSIONS

Data demonstrates that patient BMI does not have a significant impact on short-term clinical outcomes during robotic colorectal surgery. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for diverticulitis in overweight patients

AIM

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been introduced as a new technique for the treatment of various colorectal diseases. Recurrent or complicated diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon is a frequent indication for minimally invasive sigmoid colectomy. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of obesity on the outcome of SILS sigmoid colectomy.

METHODS

From September 2009 to October 2014, data from 377 patients who had intended SILS sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis at our institution were collected in a prospective database. The patients were categorized in the following subgroups: group 1 (normal weight, body mass index (BMI) < 25 kg/m(2)), group 2 (overweight, BMI 25-29.9 kg/m(2)), group 3 (obesity, BMI 30-34.9 kg/m(2)), and group 4 (morbid obesity, BMI > 35 kg/m(2)).

RESULTS

The groups were equivalent for sex, age, status of diverticulitis, the presence of acute inflammation in the specimen, and the percentage of teaching operations, but the percentage of patients with accompanying diseases was significantly more frequent in groups 2, 3, and 4 (p = 0.04, 0.008, and 0.018, respectively). As compared to group 1, the conversion rate was significantly increased in groups 2 and 4 (2.3 vs. 9.3% (p = 0.013) and 2.3 vs. 12.5% (p = 0.017), respectively). The duration of surgery, hospitalization, and morbidity did not differ between the four groups.

CONCLUSION

Up to a body mass index of 35 kg/m(2), increased body weight does not significantly reduce the feasibility and outcome of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for diverticulitis.

Risk Factors of Postoperative Myocardial Infarction after Colorectal Surgeries

There are limited data regarding the specific risk factors of postoperative myocardial infarction (MI) in patients undergoing colorectal resectional surgery. We sought to identify risk factors of acute MI after colorectal resection operations. The National Inpatient Sample database was used to identify patients who had postoperative MI after colorectal resection operations between 2002 and 2010. Statistical analysis was performed to identify factors predictive of postoperative MI. We sampled a total of 2,513,124 patients undergoing colorectal resection, of whom 38,317 (1.5%) sustained a postoperative MI. Patients with postoperative MI had associated 28.5 per cent in-hospital mortality. Risk factors identified include ( P < 0.01): history of congestive heart failure (odds ratio [OR], 8.18), chronic renal failure (OR, 3.86), age 70 years or older (OR, 3.68), peripheral vascular disorders (OR, 2.93), fluid and electrolyte disorders (OR, 2.69), emergency admission (OR, 2.56), preoperative weight loss (OR, 2.49), cardiac valvular disease (OR, 2.46), chronic lung disease (OR, 1.75), deficiency anemia (OR, 1.22), colorectal cancer (OR, 1.77), and hypertension (OR, 1.14). Postoperative MI occurs in less than 2 per cent of colorectal resections. However, patients sustaining postoperative MI are over six times more likely to die. Congestive heart failure and chronic renal failure are the strongest predictors of postoperative MI.

Factors associated with conversion from laparoscopic to open colectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database

AIM

Conversion rates from laparoscopic to open colectomy and associated factors are traditionally reported in clinical trials or reviews of outcomes from experienced institutions. Indications and selection criteria for laparoscopic colectomy may be more narrowly defined in these circumstances. With the increased adoption of laparoscopy, conversion rates using national data need to be closely examined. The purpose of this study was to use data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) to identify factors associated with conversion of laparoscopic to open colectomy at a national scale in the United States.

METHOD

The ACS-NSQIP Participant Use Data Files for 2006-2011 were used to identify patients who had undergone laparoscopic colectomy. Converted cases were identified using open colectomy as the primary procedure and laparoscopic colectomy as 'other procedure'. Preoperative variables were identified and statistics were calculated using sas version 9.3. Logistic regression was used to model the multivariate relationship between patient variables and conversion status.

RESULTS

Laparoscopy was successfully performed in 41 585 patients, of whom 2508 (5.8%) required conversion to an open procedure. On univariate analysis the following factors were significant: age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, presence of diabetes, smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ascites, stroke, weight loss and chemotherapy (P < 0.05). The following factors remained significant on multivariate analysis: age, BMI, ASA class, smoking, ascites and weight loss.

CONCLUSION

Multiple significant factors for conversion from laparoscopic to open colectomy were identified. A novel finding was the increased risk of conversion for underweight patients. As laparoscopic colectomy is become increasingly utilized, factors predictive of conversion to open procedures should be sought via large national cohorts.

Robotic general surgery: current practice, evidence, and perspective

BACKGROUND

Robotic technology commenced to be adopted for the field of general surgery in the 1990s. Since then, the da Vinci surgical system (Intuitive Surgical Inc, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) has remained by far the most commonly used system in this domain. The da Vinci surgical system is a master-slave machine that offers three-dimensional vision, articulated instruments with seven degrees of freedom, and additional software features such as motion scaling and tremor filtration. The specific design allows hand-eye alignment with intuitive control of the minimally invasive instruments. As such, robotic surgery appears technologically superior when compared with laparoscopy by overcoming some of the technical limitations that are imposed on the surgeon by the conventional approach.

PURPOSE

This article reviews the current literature and the perspective of robotic general surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

While robotics has been applied to a wide range of general surgery procedures, its precise role in this field remains a subject of further research. Until now, only limited clinical evidence that could establish the use of robotics as the gold standard for procedures of general surgery has been created. While surgical robotics is still in its infancy with multiple novel systems currently under development and clinical trials in progress, the opportunities for this technology appear endless, and robotics should have a lasting impact to the field of general surgery.

Risk factors of postoperative upper gastrointestinal bleeding following colorectal resections

There is limited data regarding the risk factors of postoperative upper GI bleeding (UGIB) in patients undergoing colorectal resection. We sought to identify risk factors of UGIB after colorectal resection. The NIS database was used to evaluate all patients who had colorectal resection complicated by UGIB between 2002 and 2010. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression was performed to quantify the association of preoperative variables with postoperative UGIB. We sampled a total of 2,514,228 patients undergoing colorectal resection, of which, 12,925 (0.5%) suffered a postoperative UGIB. The mortality of patients who had UGIB was significantly greater than patients without UGIB (14.9 vs. 4.7%; OR, 3.57; CI, 3.40-3.75; P < 0.01). Patients suffering from UGIB had an associated 14.9% inhospital mortality. History of chronic peptic ulcer disease (6.75; CI, 5.75-7.91; P < 0.01) and emergency admission (OR, 4.27; CI, 4.09-4.45; P < 0.01) are associated with UGIB. Duodenal ulcer as the source of bleeding is a mortality predictors of patients (OR, 1.71; CI, 1.49-1.97; P < 0.01). Postoperative UGIB occurs in less than 1 % of colorectal resections. However, patients suffering from postoperative UGIB are over three times more likely to die. Chronic peptic ulcer disease and emergency admission are respectively the strongest predictors of postoperative UGIB.

Laparoscopic emergency surgery for diverticular disease that failed medical treatment: a valuable option? Results of a retrospective comparative cohort study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery has become the standard of treatment for elective management of diverticular disease. However, its use in the acute setting remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery with open surgery in the acute management of complicated diverticular disease that failed initial medical treatment.

SETTINGS

This is a single-center comparative retrospective cohort study.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing surgery for complicated diverticular disease after an attempt at medical treatment from 2000 to 2011 were selected.

INTERVENTION

Laparoscopic versus open surgery was compared.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes were overall 30-day morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, time to resume diet, and need for a permanent stoma.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients were identified by using medical records: 24 laparoscopic surgery and 18 open surgery. Baseline demographics, ASA classification, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scores, Hinchey classification, and Charlson Comorbidity Index did not differ between groups. The mean operative time was 36 minutes longer (p = 0.05) and blood loss was 460 mL less (p < 0.001) for laparoscopic surgery. Two patients (8.3%) in the laparoscopic surgery group required conversion to open surgery. There was no mortality. Overall morbidity was lower favoring laparoscopic surgery (16.7% vs 55.6%; p = 0.01). Two patients in the laparoscopic surgery group experienced an anastomotic leak compared with none in the open surgery group. Mean time to resume diet (3 vs 6.5 days; p < 0.01) and length of stay (5 vs 8 days; p = 0.04) were shorter for the laparoscopic surgery group. Rate of permanent stoma at last follow-up (median, 332 days) did not differ significantly between groups.

LIMITATIONS

This study is limited by selection bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery for patients in whom medical treatment for complicated diverticular disease failed is associated with favorable outcomes, including a reduced rate of morbidity and a shorter length of stay. When applied to selected patients, this approach appears to be a safe procedure with a low rate of conversion.

Laparoscopic versus open repair of parastomal hernias: an ACS-NSQIP analysis of short-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Parastomal hernia (PSH) is a frequent complication following the creation of a stoma. While a significant number of cases require operative management, data comparing short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open repair of parastomal hernias are limited.

METHODS

The ACS-NSQIP was retrospectively reviewed from 2005 to 2011 for all PSH cases that underwent open or laparoscopic repair. Patients characteristics, operative details, and outcomes were listed for both procedure types. Selected end points were compared on multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 2,167 identified parastomal hernia cases, only 222 (10.24 %) were treated laparoscopically. The open and laparoscopic groups were similar with respect to mean patient age (63 vs. 63 years; p = 1) and gender distribution as the majority of patients were females (56.8 %). However, open repair was more likely to be performed in patients with a higher ASA class (III and IV) (p < 0.001). Also, the open approach was more likely to be used emergently (8.64 vs. 3.60 %; p = 0.01) and for recurrent hernias (6.99 vs. 3.15 %; p < 0.05). After adjusting for all potential confounders including age, gender, ASA, emergency designation of the operation, hernia type, and wound class, laparoscopy was associated with shorter operative time (137.5 vs. 153.4 min; p < 0.05), shorter length of hospital stay by 3.32 days (p < 0.001), lower risk of overall morbidity (OR = 0.42; p < 0.001), and a lower risk of surgical site infections (OR = 0.35; p < 0.01) compared to open repair. Mortality rates were similar in the laparoscopic and open groups (0.45 vs. 1.59 %, respectively; p = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair is safe and appears to be associated with better short-term outcomes compared to open repair in selected cases. Large prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm those results and to assess long-term recurrence rates.

Pitfalls of laparoscopic colorectal surgery and how to avoid them

SUMMARY Laparoscopic surgery is commonly used for colorectal diseases. Recently, laparoscopy for colorectal carcinoma has increased in use, especially by colorectal surgeons. Laparoscopy is associated with potential pitfalls that pose challenges to the surgeon and team. The identification and management of these pitfalls may not directly parallel those during an open approach. As such, it is essential for the surgeon to have a good working knowledge of how to avoid potential problems and how to best manage them when they do occur. This review highlights common pitfalls of laparoscopic colorectal surgery, as well as offering practical approaches to their management. Technical, patient and surgeon factors are all discussed.