Migration of Internal Pancreaticojejunostomy Stents into the Bile Ducts in Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy

Jejunal Perforation Due to Internal Pancreatic Stents Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Case Series and Technical Modification

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex surgical procedure performed to treat various conditions, including pancreatic head cancer and ampullary tumors. Postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPFs) remain one of the most challenging complications of PD, with potentially severe consequences such as abscess formation, bleeding, and even mortality. To mitigate the risk of POPFs, internal pancreatic stents are often employed to promote healing by diverting pancreatic secretions. Although internal stents offer advantages, including the avoidance of external drainage, complications such as stent migration, cholangitis, and liver abscesses have been commonly documented. A jejunal perforation caused by internal pancreatic stents, however, is an extremely rare complication. In this report, we describe three cases of jejunal perforations caused by internal pancreatic stents following PD and present a modified technique to reduce the risk of this complication. Three cases of jejunal perforation following PD were observed. In Case 1, a 69-year-old female developed intra-abdominal abscesses, and computed tomography (CT) revealed a perforation caused by a pancreatic stent, necessitating reoperation. In Case 2, an 83-year-old male exhibited a perforation and hematoma on CT 36 hours after surgery, requiring reoperation. In Case 3, a 66-year-old male presented with an inflammatory response five days post-surgery. CT revealed stent-related perforation, leading to reoperation. All patients fully recovered following surgical intervention. These cases underscore the importance of careful pancreatic stent placement during PD to minimize complications. The likely cause of the jejunal perforations was the perpendicular angle of the stent placement, leading to erosion of the jejunal wall. To address this issue, a modified technique was introduced, involving advancing the stent 5 cm into the jejunal lumen to reduce any direct pressure on the jejunal wall. This adjustment has prevented further cases of perforation, highlighting the critical need for surgical vigilance and technical modifications to enhance patient outcomes following PD.

Endoscopic removal of proximally migrated stents using a double‐balloon enteroscope in patients with bowel reconstruction (with video)

Endoscopic migrated stent removal using a balloon‐assisted enteroscope is technically difficult in patients with bowel reconstruction. We report the treatment outcomes and endoscopic removal methods for migrated stents using a double‐balloon enteroscope (DBE). We retrospectively studied 12 patients with stent migration into the main pancreatic duct (MPD) or bile duct who underwent bowel reconstruction between January 2012 and June 2020. The successful removal rates in the MPD (n = 3) and the bile duct (n = 9) were 66.7% (2/3) and 88.9% (8/9), respectively. The removal techniques included the indirect method (n = 3), the direct method (n = 4), and a combination of indirect and direct methods (n = 3). The removal devices included an extraction balloon catheter (n = 7), basket catheter (n = 5), biopsy forceps (n = 3), and snare (n = 2). Stent removal using a DBE was feasible and useful as the first treatment for patients with bowel reconstruction. The choice of the direct and/or indirect method according to the situation of the migrated stent is important.

Small bowel perforation caused by pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stent migration after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has been widely applied as a standard surgical procedure to treat periampullary diseases. The placement of a pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stent is considered an effective and safe method for preventing pancreatic fistula after PD. Recently, the role of pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stents has been challenged, as gradually increasing complications have been observed. Stent-related small bowel perforation has only occurred in 2 cases as long-term complications but has not been reported to occur within 1 week after surgery.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Here, we report the case of a 71-year-old female patient complaining of painless jaundice who underwent PD with a pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stent for a duodenal papillary adenocarcinoma (T4N1M0). Four days after surgery, she had a sudden rise in temperature, high white blood cell count, significantly elevated C-reactive protein and 400 ml green-brown drainage fluid. Enhanced computed tomography showed hydrops abdominis.

DIAGNOSIS

Small bowel perforation caused by stent migration was considered first.

INTERVENTIONS

An emergency exploratory laparotomy was performed. We located the pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stent, which extended 2 cm from the small bowel, and sutured the jejunum hole after cutting away the protruding part of the stent.

OUTCOMES

The patient recovered smoothly and was discharged on the 7th day after the second surgery. After more than 12 months of follow-up, the patient is doing well and is free of any symptoms related to the procedure.

CONCLUSION

We caution that stent-related complications can occur when perioperative patients suffer from unexplained or sudden changes in vital signs after PD. In addition, the function of the pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stent needs to be reevaluated by future studies.

Propensity score-matched analysis of internal stent vs external stent for pancreatojejunostomy during pancreaticoduodenectomy: Japanese-Korean cooperative project

BACKGROUND

Several studies comparing internal and external stents have been conducted with the aim of reducing pancreatic fistula after PD. There is still no consensus, however, on the appropriate use of pancreatic stents for prevention of pancreatic fistula. This multicenter large cohort study aims to evaluate whether internal or external pancreatic stents are more effective in reduction of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

METHODS

We reviewed 3149 patients (internal stent n = 1,311, external stent n = 1838) who underwent PD at 20 institutions in Japan and Korea between 2007 and 2013. Propensity score matched analysis was used to minimize bias from nonrandomized treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula. This study was registered on the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000032402).

RESULTS

After propensity score matched analysis, clinically relevant pancreatic fistula occurred in more patients in the external stents group (280 patients, 28.7%) than in patients in the internal stents group (126 patients, 12.9%) (OR 2.713 [95% CI, 2.139-3.455]; P < 0.001). In subset analysis of a high-risk group with soft pancreas and no dilatation of the pancreatic duct, clinically relevant pancreatic fistula occurred in 90 patients (18.8%) in internal stents group and 183 patients (35.4%) in external stents group. External stents were significantly associated with increased risk for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (OR 2.366 [95% CI, 1.753-3.209]; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Propensity score matched analysis showed that, regarding clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after PD, internal stents are safer than external stents for pancreaticojejunostomy.

Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes of external and internal pancreatic stents in pancreaticoduodenectomy: randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

To determine the most appropriate pancreatic drainage method, by investigating differences in 12-month clinical outcomes in patients implanted with external and internal pancreatic stents as an extension to a previous study on short-term outcome.

METHODS

This prospective randomized controlled trial enrolled 213 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy between August 2010 and January 2014 (NCT01023594). Of the 185 patients followed-up for 12 months, 97 underwent external and 88 underwent internal stenting. Their long-term clinical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Overall late complication rates were similar in the external and internal stent groups (P = 0.621). The percentage of patients with >50% atrophy of the remnant pancreatic volume after 12 months was similar in both groups (P = 0.580). Factors associated with pancreatic exocrine or endocrine function, including stool elastase level (P = 0.571) and rate of new-onset diabetes (P = 0.179), were also comparable. There were no significant between-group differences in quality of life, as evaluated by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ PAN26 questionnaires.

CONCLUSION

External and internal stents showed comparable long-term, as well as short-term clinical outcomes, including late complication rates, preservation of pancreatic duct diameters, pancreatic volume changes with functional derangements, and quality of life after surgery.

Comparison of patient outcomes with and without stenting tube in pancreaticoduodenectomy

Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of different pancreaticojejunostomy techniques in the treatment of pancreaticoduodenectomy and investigate the applicability of pancreaticojejunostomy without pancreatic duct stenting. Methods From January 2012 to December 2015, 87 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy were randomly assigned to either Group A (duct-to-mucosa anastomosis with pancreatic duct stenting, n = 43) or Group B (pancreas-jejunum end-to-side anastomosis without stenting (n = 44). The operative duration of pancreaticojejunostomy, postoperative hospital stay, and incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two methods. Results The operative duration of pancreaticojejunostomy without use of the pancreatic duct stent was significantly shorter in Group B than in Group A (t = 7.137). The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in Group B than in Group A (t = 2.408). The differences in the incidence of postoperative complications such as pancreatic fistula, abdominal bleeding, abdominal infection and delayed gastric emptying were not significantly different between the two groups (χ²= 0.181, 0.322, 0.603, and 0.001, respectively). Conclusion Pancreaticoduodenectomy without pancreatic duct stenting is safe and reliable and can reduce the operative time and hospital stay. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of postoperative complications.

Successful removal of an internal pancreatic stent that migrated into the bile duct using double-balloon enteroscopy after pancreaticoduodenectomy

PURPOSE

Internal stents used during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) are generally spontaneously passed through the rectum by defecation. However, we encountered six patients with internal stents that migrated into the bile duct after PD. We herein report the outcomes of these six patients and the usefulness of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) for removal of such stents from the bile duct.

METHODS

An internal stent was placed across pancreaticojejunostomy in 416 (68.8%) of 605 consecutive patients undergoing PD between 2005 and 2015. This study evaluated the characteristics and outcomes of the six patients whose internal stent migrated into the bile duct.

RESULTS

Migration of an internal stent into the bile duct was found during follow-up computed tomography (CT) in 6 (1.4%) of 416 patients who had an internal stent placed during PD. Three patients developed stent-induced cholangitis, and two had bile duct stones. Excluding one patient whose internal stent spontaneously slipped out and disappeared from the bile duct, all patients underwent successful removal of a stent from the bile duct by a single instance of biliary intervention involving DBE.

CONCLUSIONS

Removal of a stent from the bile duct using DBE is a feasible and useful procedure that should be considered if an internal stent is detected during follow-up CT after PD.

Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF): A systematic review and analysis of the POPF-related mortality rate in 60,739 patients retrieved from the English literature published between 1990 and 2015

BACKGROUND

Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is one of the most technically demanding operations challenging surgeons, and a postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) can complicate an otherwise uneventful postoperative (PO) course. This review examined the methods and procedures used to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic search of the literature was performed using PubMed (Medline), Embase, Web of science, and the Cochrane databases for studies published between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2015. English language articles involving at least 100 patients undergoing PDs carried out in centers performing at least 10 PDs/y were screened for data regarding the Grade of any POPFs according to the definition of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) and the overall rate of PO mortality related to POPF.

RESULTS

We reviewed 7119 references through the major databases, and an additional 841 studies were identified by cross-checking the bibliographies of the full-text articles retrieved. After excluding 7379 out of 7960 studies, because they did not meet the eligibility criteria, the full texts of 581 articles were examined; 96 studies were excluded at this point, because they concerned partially or totally duplicate data that had already been reported. The remaining 485 articles were screened carefully for POPF-related mortality and POPF Grades as defined by the ISGPF. Of the 485 articles, 208 reported the POPF-related PO mortality rate and 162 the Grades (A, B, and C) of POPFs in 60,739 and 54,232 patients, respectively. The POPF-related mortality rates after pancreatojejunostomy and pancreatogastrostomy were similar but were less (0.5% vs. 1%; P = .014) when an externally draining, trans-anastomotic stent was placed intraoperatively. The incidence of the different Grades of POPF Grade was quite variable, but Grade C POPFs were associated with a PO mortality rate of 25.7% (range 0-100%).

CONCLUSIONS

The POPF-related mortality rate has remained at approximately 1% over the past 25 years. Only externally draining, trans-anastomotic stents decreased the POPF-related mortality rate. However, adequately designed venting drains were never tested in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).