1
|
de Jongh C, van der Veen A, Brosens LAA, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Stoot JHMB, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Distal Versus Total D2-Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Secondary Analysis of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes Including Quality of Life in the Multicenter Randomized LOGICA-Trial. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:1812-1824. [PMID: 37340107 PMCID: PMC10511620 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05683-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Distal gastrectomy (DG) for gastric cancer can cause less morbidity than total gastrectomy (TG), but may compromise radicality. No prospective studies administered neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and few assessed quality of life (QoL). METHODS The multicenter LOGICA-trial randomized laparoscopic versus open D2-gastrectomy for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma (cT1-4aN0-3bM0) in 10 Dutch hospitals. This secondary LOGICA-analysis compared surgical and oncological outcomes after DG versus TG. DG was performed for non-proximal tumors if R0-resection was deemed achievable, TG for other tumors. Postoperative complications, mortality, hospitalization, radicality, nodal yield, 1-year survival, and EORTC-QoL-questionnaires were analyzed using Χ2-/Fisher's exact tests and regression analyses. RESULTS Between 2015 and 2018, 211 patients underwent DG (n = 122) or TG (n = 89), and 75% of patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. DG-patients were older, had more comorbidities, less diffuse type tumors, and lower cT-stage than TG-patients (p < 0.05). DG-patients experienced fewer overall complications (34% versus 57%; p < 0.001), also after correcting for baseline differences, lower anastomotic leakage (3% versus 19%), pneumonia (4% versus 22%), atrial fibrillation (3% versus 14%), and Clavien-Dindo grading compared to TG-patients (p < 0.05), and demonstrated shorter median hospital stay (6 versus 8 days; p < 0.001). QoL was better after DG (statistically significant and clinically relevant) in most 1-year postoperative time points. DG-patients showed 98% R0-resections, and similar 30-/90-day mortality, nodal yield (28 versus 30 nodes; p = 0.490), and 1-year survival after correcting for baseline differences (p = 0.084) compared to TG-patients. CONCLUSIONS If oncologically feasible, DG should be preferred over TG due to less complications, faster postoperative recovery, and better QoL while achieving equivalent oncological effectiveness. Distal D2-gastrectomy for gastric cancer resulted in less complications, shorter hospitalization, quicker recovery and better quality of life compared to total D2-gastrectomy, whereas radicality, nodal yield and survival were similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cas de Jongh
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, G04.228, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen van der Veen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, G04.228, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jan H. M. B. Stoot
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle P. Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, G04.228, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, G04.228, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yamauchi S, Kanda S, Yoshimoto Y, Kubota A, Tsuda K, Yube Y, Kaji S, Oka S, Orita H, Brock MV, Mine S, Fukunaga T. Double stapling technique versus hemi-double stapling technique for esophagojejunostomy with OrVil™ after laparoscopic total gastrectomy: a single-blind, randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-10068-z. [PMID: 37076615 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10068-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The transorally inserted anvil (OrVil™) is frequently selected for esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) because of its versatility. During anastomosis with OrVil™, the double stapling technique (DST) or hemi-double stapling technique (HDST) can be selected by overlapping the linear stapler and the circular stapler. However, no studies have reported the differences between the methods and their clinical significance. METHODS A randomized controlled clinical trial with a parallel assignment and single-blind outcomes assessment analysis was conducted. Patients with gastric cancer eligible for LTG who met the selection criteria were randomized. Preoperative characteristics and perioperative and postoperative outcomes were compared between the DST and HDST. The primary endpoint was an anastomosis-related complication, and the secondary endpoints were perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications, excluding anastomosis-related complications. RESULTS Thirty patients with gastric cancer were eligible and randomized. LTG and esophagojejunostomy were successfully performed in all patients, without conversion to laparotomy. Preoperative characteristics, excluding preoperative chemotherapy, were not significantly different between the two groups. One anastomotic leakage of Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥ IIIa was observed in the DST, although no significant difference was found between the two groups (6.6% vs. 0%, P = 0.30). In the HDST, one case of anastomotic stricture required endoscopic balloon dilation. No significant differences were found in operative time, whereas the anastomosis time was significantly shorter in the HDST than in the DST (47.5 ± 15.8 vs. 38.2 ± 8.8 min, P = 0.028). Except for anastomosis-related complications, postoperative complications (P = 0.282) and postoperative hospital stay for the DST and HDST were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS No superiority was found between the DST and HDST with OrVil™ in esophagojejunostomy of LTG for gastric cancer with respect to postoperative complications, whereas the HDST may be preferable in terms of the simplicity of the surgical technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suguru Yamauchi
- Department of Esophageal and Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan.
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Satoshi Kanda
- Department of Esophageal and Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan
| | - Yutaro Yoshimoto
- Department of Esophageal and Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan
| | - Akira Kubota
- Department of Esophageal and Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan
| | - Kenki Tsuda
- Department of Esophageal and Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan
| | - Yukinori Yube
- Department of Esophageal and Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan
| | - Sanae Kaji
- Department of Esophageal and Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan
| | - Shinichi Oka
- Department of Esophageal and Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan
| | - Hajime Orita
- Department of Esophageal and Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan
| | - Malcolm V Brock
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shinji Mine
- Department of Esophageal and Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan
| | - Tetsu Fukunaga
- Department of Esophageal and Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stoyanova A, Berg AK, Beyer K. A Robotic Completely Intercorporeal Jejunal Pouch Reconstruction after Gastrectomy. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:8600-8608. [PMID: 36421331 PMCID: PMC9689293 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29110678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Robotic surgery is increasingly gaining importance. While initial results suggest an advantage of the robotic over the minimally invasive approach in patients with gastric cancer, definitive proof of its superiority has yet to be provided. There are numerous approaches to recreate a gastric reservoir after a total gastrectomy. However, a major disadvantage of most conventional reconstructions are long term effects such as dumping syndrome, afferent loop syndrome and poor nutrition intake with severe impact on the patient quality of life. The jejunal pouch reconstruction is a beneficial reconstruction, which provides a larger reservoir capacity after gastrectomy and prevents anastomotic stenosis and dumping syndrome. The completely intercorporeal approach with a Pfannenstiel incision instead of an unfavorable midline incision can potentially decrease delayed complications such as incision hernias. With the increased deployment of robotic surgery, a complete intercorporeal reconstruction is now possible without major increase in operating time or further technical weak points. We provide for the first time a detailed technical explanation of the completely intercorporeal robotic jejunal pouch reconstruction after gastrectomy.
Collapse
|
4
|
Sivakumar J, Crosthwaite G. Prophylactic laparoscopic total gastrectomy in a patient with situs inversus totalis. J Surg Case Rep 2021; 2021:rjaa475. [PMID: 34025963 PMCID: PMC8128413 DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjaa475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 10/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A rare case was demonstrated whereby a prophylactic laparoscopic total gastrectomy was performed in a 29-year-old male with a CDH1 gene mutation in the context of rare anatomical anomaly, situs inversus totalis (SIT). This report provides radiological and laparoscopic images detailing the patient's unique anatomy. We also describe the operative approach and technical challenges whilst accounting for the patient's anatomical anomaly. This is the first known case of a laparoscopic total gastrectomy for a CDH1 gene mutation in a patient with SIT. With sufficient pre-operative evaluation and meticulous intra-operative caution, this technically complex operation is safe and feasible in patients with mirror-image anatomy as seen in SIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Sivakumar
- Clinical Institute General Surgery and Gastroenterology, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gary Crosthwaite
- Clinical Institute General Surgery and Gastroenterology, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shen J, Ma X, Yang J, Zhang JP. Digestive tract reconstruction options after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12:21-36. [PMID: 31966911 PMCID: PMC6960078 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i1.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2019] [Revised: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
In addition to the popularity of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG), many reconstructive procedures after LG have been reported. Surgical resection and lymphatic dissection determine long-term survival; however, the election of a reconstruction procedure determines the postoperative quality of life for patients with gastric cancer (GC). Presently, no consensus exists regarding the optimal reconstructive procedure. In this review, the current state of digestive tract reconstruction after LG is reviewed. According to the determining influence of the tumor site on the procedures of surgical resection and reconstruction, we divide these reconstruction procedures into three categories consistent with the resection procedures. We focus on the technical tips of every reconstruction procedure and examine the surgical outcomes (length of surgery and blood loss) and postoperative complications (anastomotic leakage and stricture) to facilitate gastrointestinal surgeons to understand the merits and demerits of every reconstruction procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Shen
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Xiang Ma
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Jing Yang
- Cardiovascular Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Jian-Ping Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang X, Zhu H, Xu D. Cardia cancer surgery: total gastrectomy versus proximal gastrectomy. Panminerva Med 2019; 61:493-495. [PMID: 30657285 DOI: 10.23736/s0031-0808.18.03583-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoqing Wang
- Department of Surgery, Shangqiu First People's Hospital of Henan, Shangqiu, China -
| | - Hongjun Zhu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shangqiu First People's Hospital of Henan, Shangqiu, China
| | - Dongmei Xu
- Department of Surgery, Shangqiu First People's Hospital of Henan, Shangqiu, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kawaguchi Y, Shiraishi K, Akaike H, Ichikawa D. Current status of laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2019; 3:14-23. [PMID: 30697606 PMCID: PMC6345655 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2018] [Revised: 08/12/2018] [Accepted: 08/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In this article, the current state of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) was reviewed, focusing on lymph node dissection and reconstruction. Lymph node dissection in LTG is technically similar to that in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer; however, LTG for advanced gastric cancer requires extended lymph node dissections including splenic hilar lymph nodes. Although a recent randomized controlled trial clearly indicated no survival benefit in prophylactic splenectomy for lymph node dissection at the splenic hilum, some patients may receive prognostic benefit from adequate splenic hilar lymph node dissection. Considering reconstruction, there are two major esophagojejunostomy (EJS) techniques, using a circular stapler (CS) or using a linear stapler (LS). A few studies have shown that the LS method has fewer complications; however, almost all studies have reported that morbidity (such as anastomotic leakage and stricture) is not significantly different for the two methods. As for CS, we grouped various studies addressing complications in LTG into categories according to the insertion procedure of the anvil and the insertion site in the abdominal wall for the CS. We compared the rate of complications, particularly for leakage and stricture. The rate of anastomotic leakage and stricture was the lowest when inserting the CS from the upper left abdomen and was significantly the highest when inserting the CS from the midline umbilical. Scrupulous attention to EJS techniques is required by surgeons with a clear understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of each anastomotic device and approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshihiko Kawaguchi
- First Department of SurgeryFaculty of MedicineUniversity of YamanashiChuoYamanashiJapan
| | - Kensuke Shiraishi
- First Department of SurgeryFaculty of MedicineUniversity of YamanashiChuoYamanashiJapan
| | - Hidenori Akaike
- First Department of SurgeryFaculty of MedicineUniversity of YamanashiChuoYamanashiJapan
| | - Daisuke Ichikawa
- First Department of SurgeryFaculty of MedicineUniversity of YamanashiChuoYamanashiJapan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gertsen EC, Brenkman HJF, Seesing MFJ, Goense L, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Introduction of minimally invasive surgery for distal and total gastrectomy: a population-based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018; 45:403-409. [PMID: 30213716 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive gastrectomy has been introduced in Western populations during the last decade. As minimally invasive distal gastrectomy (MIDG) versus total gastrectomy (MITG) are procedures with a different complexity, outcomes may differ. The aim of this population-based cohort study was to evaluate the safety of MIDG and MITG. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients who underwent potentially curative gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma were included from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (2011-2016). Propensity score matching was applied to create comparable groups of patients receiving open distal gastrectomy (ODG) versus MIDG and open total gastrectomy (OTG) versus MITG, using patient and tumor characteristics. Postoperative outcomes and short-term oncological outcomes were appraised. RESULTS Of the 1970 eligible patients, 1138 underwent distal gastrectomy and 832 underwent total gastrectomy. For distal gastrectomy, 390 ODG were matched to 288 MIDG patients. Although overall postoperative morbidity and mortality were similar, patients who underwent MIDG encountered less intra-abdominal abscesses (4% vs. 1%, p = 0.039) and wound complications (6% vs. 2%, p = 0.021). The median hospital stay was shorter after MIDGs (9 vs. 7 days, p < 0.001). For total gastrectomy, 323 OTG patients were matched to 258 MITG patients. Overall postoperative morbidity, mortality and hospital stay were similar, whereas the anastomotic leakage rate was higher after MITGs (11% vs. 17%, p = 0.030). Short-term oncological outcomes between both groups were equal for distal and total gastrectomy. CONCLUSION Benefits of MIG during the early introduction were demonstrated for distal gastrectomy but not for total gastrectomy. An increased anastomotic leakage rate was encountered for MITG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E C Gertsen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H J F Brenkman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M F J Seesing
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - L Goense
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mizota T, Kurashima Y, Poudel S, Watanabe Y, Shichinohe T, Hirano S. Step-by-step training in basic laparoscopic skills using two-way web conferencing software for remote coaching: A multicenter randomized controlled study. Am J Surg 2018; 216:88-92. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2017] [Revised: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 12/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
10
|
Gong W, Li J. Combat with esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A critical review of the literature. Int J Surg 2017; 47:18-24. [PMID: 28935529 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2017] [Revised: 08/14/2017] [Accepted: 09/10/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage (EJAL) is considered to be one of the most serious complications after total gastrectomy (TG), despite improvements in surgical instruments and technique. The occurrence of EJAL would cause poorer quality of life, prolonged hospital stay, and increased surgery-related costs and mortality. Although there is ever-increasing knowledge about EJAL, the optimal management is controversial. In the present review, we aim to demonstrate the effective management by focus on the possible risk factors, potentially useful preventive strategies, and several kinds of treatments in esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenbin Gong
- School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
| | - Junsheng Li
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhao P, Li Y, Li Z, Jia P, Zhang L, Zhang M. Use of patient safety culture instruments in operating rooms: A systematic literature review. J Evid Based Med 2017; 10:145-151. [PMID: 28471047 DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2016] [Revised: 03/01/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify and qualitatively describe, in a literature review, how the instruments were used to evaluate patient safety culture in the operating rooms of published studies. METHODS Systematic searches of the literature were conducted using the major database including MEDLINE, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, and four Chinese databases including Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Wanfang Data, Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP), and Chinese Journals Full-text Database (CNKI) for studies published up to March 2016. We summarized and analyzed the country scope, the instrument utilized in the study, the year when the instrument was used, and fields of operating rooms. Study populations, study settings, and the time span between baseline and follow-up phase were evaluated according to the study design. RESULTS We identified 1025 references, of which 99 were obtained for full-text assessment; 47 of these studies were deemed relevant and included in the literature review. Most of the studies were from the USA. The most commonly used patient safety culture instrument was Safety Attitude Questionnaire. All identified instruments were used after 2002 and across many fields. Most included studies on patient safety culture were conducted in teaching hospitals or university hospitals. The study population in the cross-sectional studies was much more than that in the before-after studies. The time span between baseline and follow-up phase of before-after studies were almost over three months. CONCLUSION Although patient safety culture is considered important in health care and patient safety, the number of studies in which patient safety culture has been estimated using the instruments in operating rooms, is fairly small.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pujng Zhao
- Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yaqin Li
- West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhi Li
- West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Pengli Jia
- Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Longhao Zhang
- Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Mingming Zhang
- Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Brenkman HJF, Roelen SVS, Steenhagen E, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Postoperative complications and weight loss following jejunostomy tube feeding after total gastrectomy for advanced adenocarcinomas. Chin J Cancer Res 2017; 29:333-340. [PMID: 28947865 PMCID: PMC5592821 DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2017.04.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients undergoing total gastrectomy for cancer are at risk of malnourishment. The aim of this self-controlled study was to examine the effect of jejunostomy tube feeding (JTF) and other factors on postoperative weight and the incidence of jejunostomy-related complications in patients undergoing total gastrectomy for cancer. METHODS All consecutive patients who underwent total gastrectomy for gastric cancer with jejunostomy placement were included from a prospective single-center database (2003-2014). Jejunostomy-related complications and postoperative weight changes were evaluated up to 12 months after surgery. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with weight loss 12 months after gastrectomy. RESULTS Of 113 patients operated in the study period, 65 received JTF after total gastrectomy for a median duration of 18 d [interquartile range (IQR), 10-55 d]. Jejunostomy-related complications occurred in 11 (17%) patients, including skin leakage (n=3) and peritoneal leakage (n=2), luxation (n=3), occlusion (n=2), infection (n=1) and torsion (n=1). In 2 (3%) patients, a reoperation was needed due to jejunostomy-related complications. The mean preoperative weight of patients was 71.8 kg (100%), and remained stable during JTF (73.9 kg, 103%, P=0.331). After JTF was stopped, the mean weight of patients decreased to 64.9 kg (90%) at 12 months after surgery (P<0.001). A high preoperative body mass index (BMI) (≥25 kg/m2) was associated with high postoperative weight loss compared to patients with a low BMI (<25 kg/m2) (16.3% vs. 8.6%, P=0.016). CONCLUSIONS JTF can prevent weight loss in the early postoperative phase. However, this is at the prize of possible complications. As weight loss in the long term is not prevented, routine JTF should be re-evaluated and balanced against the selected use in preoperatively malnourished patients. Special attention should be paid to patients with a high preoperative BMI, who are at risk of more postoperative weight loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hylke J F Brenkman
- Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Stéphanie V S Roelen
- Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Elles Steenhagen
- Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|