1
|
Ghosh NK, R R, Singh A, Malage S, Sharma S, Kumar A, Singh RK, Behari A, Kumar A, Saxena R. Surgery for symptomatic hepatic hemangioma: Resection vs. enucleation, an experience over two decades. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2023; 27:258-263. [PMID: 37127398 PMCID: PMC10472124 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.22-130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS/AIMS Hemangiomas are the most common benign liver lesions; however, they are usually asymptomatic and seldom require surgery. Enucleation and resection are the most commonly performed surgical procedures for symptomatic lesions. This study aims to compare the outcomes of these two surgical techniques. METHODS A retrospective analysis of symptomatic hepatic hemangiomas (HH) operated upon between 2000 and 2021. Patients were categorized into the enucleation and resection groups. Demographic profile, intraoperative bleeding, and morbidity (Clavien-Dindo Grade) were compared. Independent t-test and chi-square tests were used for continuous and categorical variables respectively. p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS Sixteen symptomatic HH patients aged 30 to 66 years underwent surgery (enucleation = 8, resection = 8) and majority were females (n = 10 [62.5%]). Fifteen patients presented with abdominal pain, and one patient had an interval increase in the size of the lesion from 9 to 12 cm. The size of hemangiomas varied from 6 to 23 cm. The median blood loss (enucleation: 350 vs. resection: 600 mL), operative time (enucleation: 5.8 vs. resection: 7.5 hours), and postoperative hospital stay (enucleation: 6.5 vs. resection: 11 days) were greater in the resection group (statistically insignificant). In the resection group, morbidity was significantly higher (62.6% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.05), including one mortality. All patients remained asymptomatic during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Enucleation was simpler with less morbidity as compared to resection in our series. However, considering the small number of patients, further studies are needed with comparable groups to confirm the superiority of enucleation over resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nalini Kanta Ghosh
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Rahul R
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Ashish Singh
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Somanath Malage
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Supriya Sharma
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Ashok Kumar
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Rajneesh Kumar Singh
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Anu Behari
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Ashok Kumar
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Rajan Saxena
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kumar P, Tiwary SK, Shukla P, Verma A, Khanna AK. Liver Resection for Giant Hepatic Cavernous Hemangioma. Middle East J Dig Dis 2021; 13:268-272. [PMID: 36606225 PMCID: PMC9489461 DOI: 10.34172/mejdd.2021.235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver hemangiomas are common. Giant liver hemangiomas are rare and symptomatic patients require treatment. Surgery is the curative procedure. Other options such as intra-arterial embolization may be used to decrease the volume and bleeding of these lesions. Three cases of giant liver hemangioma were treated with liver resection, one with left lateral hepatectomy and two with right lateral hepatectomy. All patients had made an uneventful recovery with no recurrence at 3-year follow-up. Most hemangiomas are small, asymptomatic, and do not require any treatment. Liver resection is a safe and effective treatment for giant hemangiomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puneet Kumar
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences,Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
,Corresponding Author: Puneet Kumar, MD Department of Surgery,Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India Tel: + 91 941 5304896 Fax: + 91 542 2367568
| | - Satyendra K Tiwary
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences,Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
| | - Priyesh Shukla
- Department of Surgery,Govt. Medical College, Azamgarh, India
| | - Ashish Verma
- Department of Radiodiagnosis,Institute of Medical Sciences,Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
| | - A K Khanna
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences,Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shimizu S, Mizumoto M, Okumura T, Li Y, Baba K, Murakami M, Ishida T, Nakamura M, Hiroshima Y, Iizumi T, Saito T, Numajiri H, Nakai K, Hata M, Sakurai H. Proton beam therapy for a giant hepatic hemangioma: A case report and literature review. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 27:152-156. [PMID: 33665385 PMCID: PMC7902997 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Hepatic hemangiomas are benign tumors with a favorable prognosis, but giant hepatic hemangiomas can cause abdominal symptoms and are indicated for treatment. Most cases are treated with surgery, but radiotherapy has also been used. However, to date, there have been no reports of proton beam therapy for a hepatic hemangioma. Case presentation A 46-year-old woman had a tumor of 80 × 80 mm in the left medial lobe of the liver, which was diagnosed as a giant hemangioma based on the contrast pattern. Therapy was required for a giant hepatic hemangioma with symptoms, but the patient refused blood transfusion due to religious reasons, which made surgical resection difficult. Therefore, she was referred to our hospital for proton beam therapy. At her first visit, liver function was Child-Pugh A (5 points) and there was no elevation of tumor markers. Proton beam therapy of 28.6 Gy (RBE) given in 13 fractions was performed without interruption. The only observed acute radiation toxicity was Grade 1 dermatitis. One year after proton beam therapy, the hemangioma had significantly decreased, and a complete response has been maintained for 15 years based on ultrasound and MRI. Conclusion This case is the first reported use of proton beam therapy for a hepatic hemangioma. The outcome suggests that this treatment may be effective for a giant liver hemangioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shosei Shimizu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Masashi Mizumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Okumura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Yinuo Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Keiichirou Baba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Motohiro Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Toshiki Ishida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Yuichi Hiroshima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Takashi Iizumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Takashi Saito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Haruko Numajiri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Kei Nakai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Masaharu Hata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Leon M, Chavez L, Surani S. Hepatic hemangioma: What internists need to know. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:11-20. [PMID: 31933511 PMCID: PMC6952297 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i1.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2019] [Revised: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 12/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatic hemangioma (HH) is the most common benign liver tumor and it is usually found incidentally during radiological studies. This tumor arises from a vascular malformation; however, the pathophysiology has not been clearly elucidated. Symptoms usually correlate with the size and location of the tumor. Less commonly the presence of a large HH may cause life-threatening conditions. The diagnosis can be established by the identification of HH hallmarks in several imaging studies. In patients that present with abdominal symptoms other etiologies should be excluded first before attributing HH as the cause. In asymptomatic patient's treatment is not required and follow up is usually reserved for HH of more than 5 cm. Symptomatic patients can be managed surgically or with other non-surgical modalities such as transcatheter arterial embolization or radiofrequency ablation. Enucleation surgery has shown to have fewer complications as compared to hepatectomy or other surgical techniques. Progression of the tumor is seen in less than 40%. Hormone stimulation may play a role in HH growth; however, there are no contraindications for hormonal therapy in patients with HH due to the lack of concrete evidence. When clinicians encounter this condition, they should discern between observation and surgical or non-surgical management based on the clinical presentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Leon
- Centro Medico ABC, Ciudad de Mexico, CDMX 01120, Mexico
| | - Luis Chavez
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX 79905, United States
| | - Salim Surani
- Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi, TX 78405, United States
| |
Collapse
|