Surgical Outcomes of Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer with Proximal Dorsal Jejunal Vein Involvement

Comparison of the different versions of NCCN guidelines for predicting margin-negative resection of pancreatic cancer in patients undergoing upfront surgery

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare the different versions of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for defining resectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in predicting margin-negative (R0) resection, and to assess inter-reader agreement.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 283 patients (mean age, 65.1 years ± 9.4 [SD]; 155 men) who underwent upfront pancreatectomy for PDAC between 2017 and 2019. Two radiologists independently determined the resectability on preoperative CT according to the 2017, 2019, and 2020 NCCN guidelines. The sensitivity and specificity for R0 resection were analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equations. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using kappa statistics.

RESULTS

R0 resection was accomplished in 239 patients (84.5%). The sensitivity and specificity averaged across two readers were, respectively, 76.6% and 29.5% for the 2020 guidelines, 74.1% and 32.9% for the 2019 guidelines, and 72.6% and 34.1% for the 2017 guidelines. Compared with the 2020 guidelines, both 2019 and 2017 guidelines showed significantly lower sensitivity for R0 resection (p ≤ .009). Specificity was significantly higher with the 2017 guidelines (p = .043) than with the 2020 guidelines. Inter-reader agreements for determining the resectability of PDCA were strong (k ≥ 0.83) with all guidelines, being highest with the 2020 guidelines (k = 0.91).

CONCLUSION

The 2020 NCCN guidelines showed significantly higher sensitivity for prediction of R0 resection than the 2017 and 2019 guidelines.

Jejunal vein tributary analysis and intraoperative clamp testing in avoiding congestion after pancreatoduodenectomy

PURPOSE

Although venous drainage of the jejunal loop may be maintained after sacrifice of jejunal vein tributaries during pancreatoduodenectomy, risk of severe jejunal mesenteric congestion following division of these tributaries can be difficult to predict. This study considered how best to predict safety of jejunal vein tributary dissection.

METHODS

Preoperative imaging findings and results of intraoperative clamp tests of jejunal vein tributaries during pancreatoduodenectomy were analyzed in 121 patients with hepatobiliary and pancreatic disease to determine whether this information adequately predicted safety of resecting superior mesenteric vein branches.

RESULTS

Jejunal vein tributaries caudal to the inferior border of the pancreatic uncinate process tended to be fewer when tributaries cranial to this landmark were more numerous. Tributaries cranial to the border drained a relatively wide expanse of jejunal artery territory in the jejunal mesentery. The territory of jejunal tributaries cranial to the inferior border of the pancreas did not vary according to course of the first jejunal vein branch relative to the superior mesenteric artery. One patient among 30 (3%) who underwent intraoperative clamp tests of tributaries cranial to the border showed severe congestion in relation to a venous tributary coursing ventrally to the superior mesenteric artery.

CONCLUSION

Jejunal venous tributaries drained an extensive portion of jejunal arterial territory, but tributaries located cranially to the inferior border of the pancreas could be sacrificed without congestion in nearly all patients. Intraoperative clamp testing of these tributaries can identify patients whose jejunal veins must be preserved to avoid congestion.

Surgical Outcomes of Pancreatectomy with Resection of the Portal Vein and/or Superior Mesenteric Vein and Jejunal Vein for Pancreatic Head Cancer: A Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and survival benefits of portal vein and/or superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) resection with jejunal vein resection (JVR) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Few studies have shown the surgical outcome and survival of pancreatic resection with JVR, and treatment strategies for patients with PDAC suspected of jejunal vein (JV) infiltration remain unclear.

METHODS

In total, 1260 patients who underwent pancreatectomy with PV/ SMV resection between 2013 and 2016 at 50 facilities were included; treatment outcomes were compared between the PV/SMV group (PV/ SMV resection without JVR; n = 824), PV/SMV-J1 V group (PV/SMV resection with first jejunal vein resection; n = 394), and PV/SMV-J2,3 V group (PV/SMV resection with second jejunal vein or later branch resection; n = 42).

RESULTS

Postoperative complications and mortality did not differ between the three groups. The postoperative complication rate associated with PV/ SMV reconstruction was 11.9% in PV/SMV group, 8.6% in PV/SMV-J1 V group, and 7.1% in PV/SMV-J2,3V group; there were no significant differences among the three groups. Overall survival did not differ between PV/SMV and PV/SMV-J1 V groups (median survival; 29.2 vs 30.9 months, P = 0.60). Although PV/SMV-J2,3 V group had significantly shorter survival than PV/SMV group who underwent upfront surgery ( P = 0.05), no significant differences in overall survival of patients who received preoperative therapy. Multivariate survival analysis revealed that adjuvant therapy and R0 resection were independent prognostic factors in all groups.

CONCLUSION

PV/SMV resection with JVR can be safely performed and may provide satisfactory overall survival with the pre-and postoperative adjuvant therapy.

First jejunal vein, jejunal trunk, and pancreatico-duodenectomy: resolving the literature conundrum

A detailed knowledge of the surgical anatomy of tributaries of the superior mesenteric vein, especially proximal jejunal venous anatomy (first jejunal vein and jejunal trunk), is a key prerequisite for performing a safe pancreatico-duodenectomy. However, the available literature on the anatomical course and surgical relevance of these vessels is scarce, the nomenclature across the articles is heterogeneous, and the resulting evidence is confusing to interpret. Standardized terminology and an in-depth review of these vessels with regard to their course, termination, vascular relations, and variations will help the surgeons in planning and performing this complex surgery safely, especially when a venous resection and reconstruction is planned in cases of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. A uniform nomenclature and a unifying classification are proposed in this review for these two tributaries to help resolve the literature conundrum. This standardized terminology and anatomical description will assist the radiologists in reporting pancreatic protocol-computed tomography scans and surgeons in selecting the appropriate steps for the different anatomical orientations of these tributaries for the performance of safe pancreatic surgery. This will also help future researchers communicate in well-defined terms in reference to these tributaries so as to avoid confusion in future studies.

Do jejunal veins matter during pancreaticoduodenectomy?

When planning pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer, the prevalence of anatomical variation of the proximal jejunal vein (PJV), the associated short-term surgical outcomes, and the level of PJV convergence to the superior mesenteric vein must be carefully analyzed from both technical and oncological points of view. The prevalence of the first jejunal trunk (FJT) and PJV located ventral to the superior mesenteric artery is 58%–88% and 13%–37%, respectively. Patients with the FJT had a larger amount of intraoperative bleeding and a higher proportion of patients requiring transfusions compared to those without a common trunk. The risk of transfusion was higher in patients with ventral PJV compared to those with dorsal PJV. Although less frequent, sacrificing the FJT can result in fatal venous congestion of the jejunum. Therefore, a well-planned approach for pancreaticoduodenectomy, based on preoperative evaluation of anatomical variation in the PJV, may help reduce intraoperative bleeding and postoperative morbidity. Additionally, the importance of invasion into the PJVs should be revisited in terms of resectability and oncological clearance.

Anatomical change of SMV branches after the Cattell Braasch maneuver facilitates safe resection around the uncinated process in pancreatoduodenectomy

Background

The aims of the present study were to demonstrate the anatomical change of superior mesenteric vein (SMV) branches and to show how the Cattell Braasch maneuver facilitates a safer ligation of these venous branches during a pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).

Methods

Between January 2010 and December 2019, 97 patients with peripancreatic tumors underwent pancreatectomy. We retrospectively reviewed preoperative triple-phase enhanced computed tomography (CT) images and analyzed variations in SMV branches. Anatomical changes in SMV branches after the Cattell Braasch technique were observed using our operation video and illustrations.

Results

The first jejunal vein (J1v) in 75% of patients ran posterior to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), while the remainder (25%) ran anterior to it. The inferior pancreatoduodenal vein (IPDV) was preoperatively detected in 91% of patients. The IPDV drained into the J1v in 74% of patients and into the SMV in 37%. After the Cattell Braasch maneuver, the J1v which ran posterior to the SMA now was found to lie to the right anterolateral side the SMA and the visualization of both the J1v and the IPDV were much more clearly visualized.

Conclusions

The most frequent venous variation was the IPDV draining into the J1v posterior to the SMA. After the Cattell Braasch maneuver, the IPDV was now located to the right anterolateral anterior aspect of the SMA which facilitates its visualization and should allow a safer ligation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-021-01338-5.

Reconsideration of the Appropriate Dissection Range Based on Japanese Anatomical Classification for Resectable Pancreatic Head Cancer in the Era of Multimodal Treatment

Patients with resectable pancreatic cancer are considered to already have micro-distant metastasis, because most of the recurrence patterns postoperatively are distant metastases. Multimodal treatment dramatically improves prognosis; thus, micro-distant metastasis is considered to be controlled by chemotherapy. The survival benefit of "regional lymph node dissection" for pancreatic head cancer remains unclear. We reviewed the literature that could be helpful in determining the appropriate resection range. Regional lymph nodes with no suspected metastases on preoperative imaging may become areas treated with preoperative and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Many studies have reported that the R0 resection rate is associated with prognosis. Thus, "dissection to achieve R0 resection" is required. The recent development of high-quality computed tomography has made it possible to evaluate the extent of cancer infiltration. Therefore, it is possible to simulate the dissection range to achieve R0 resection preoperatively. However, it is often difficult to distinguish between areas of inflammatory changes and cancer infiltration during resection. Even if the "dissection to achieve R0 resection" range is simulated based on the computed tomography evaluation, it is difficult to identify the range intraoperatively. It is necessary to be aware of anatomical landmarks to determine the appropriate dissection range during surgery.

Predicting overall survival and resection in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX: Development and internal validation of two nomograms

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) are increasingly treated with FOLFIRINOX, resulting in improved survival and resection of tumors that were initially unresectable. It remains unclear, however, which specific patients benefit from FOLFIRINOX. Two nomograms were developed predicting overall survival (OS) and resection at the start of FOLFIRINOX for LAPC.

METHODS

From our multicenter, prospective LAPC registry in 14 Dutch hospitals, LAPC patients starting first-line FOLFIRINOX (April 2015-December 2017) were included. Stepwise backward selection according to the Akaike Information Criterion was used to identify independent baseline predictors for OS and resection. Two prognostic nomograms were generated.

RESULTS

A total of 252 patients were included, with a median OS of 14 months. Thirty-two patients (13%) underwent resection, with a median OS of 23 months. Older age, female sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index ≤1, and CA 19.9 < 274 were independent factors predicting a better OS (c-index: 0.61). WHO ps >1, involvement of the superior mesenteric artery, celiac trunk, and superior mesenteric vein ≥ 270° were independent factors decreasing the probability of resection (c-index: 0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

Two nomograms were developed to predict OS and resection in patients with LAPC before starting treatment with FOLFIRINOX. These nomograms could be beneficial in the shared decision-making process and counseling of these patients.

Precision anatomy for safe approach to pancreatoduodenectomy for both open and minimally invasive procedure: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) has recently gained popularity. Several international meetings focusing on the existing literature on MIPD were held; however, the precise surgical anatomy of the pancreas for the safe use of MIPD has not yet been fully discussed. The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic review of available articles and to show the importance of identifying the anatomical variation in pancreatoduodenectomy.

METHODS

In this review, we described variations in surgical anatomy related to MIPD. A systematic search of PubMed (MEDLINE) was conducted, and the references were identified manually.

RESULTS

The search strategy yielded 272 articles, with 77 retained for analysis. The important anatomy to be considered during MIPD includes the aberrant right hepatic artery, first jejunal vein, first jejunal artery, and dorsal pancreatic artery. Celiac artery stenosis and a circumportal pancreas are also important to recognize.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that only certain anatomical variations are associated directly with perioperative outcomes and that identification of these particular variations is important for safe performance of MIPD.

What Should Guide the Performance of Venous Resection During Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma with Venous Contact?

Complete surgical resection, most often associated with perioperative chemotherapy, is the only way to offer a chance of cure for patients with pancreatic cancer. One of the most important factors in determining survival outcome that can be influenced by the surgeon is the R0 resection. However, the proximity of mesenteric vessels in cephalic pancreatic tumors, especially the mesenterico-portal venous axis, results in an increased risk of vein involvement and/or the presence of malignant cells in the venous bed margin. A concomitant venous resection can be performed to decrease the risk of a positive margin. Given the additional technical difficulty that this implies, many surgeons seek a path between the tumor and the vein, hoping for the absence of tumor infiltration into the perivascular tissue on pathologic analysis, particularly in cases with administration of neoadjuvant therapy. The definition of optimal surgical margin remains a subject of debate, but at least 1 mm is an independent predictor of survival after pancreatic cancer surgical resection. Although preoperative radiologic assessment is essential for accurate planning of a pancreatic resection, intraoperative decision-making with regard to resection of the mesenterico-portal vein in tumors with a venous contact remains unclear and variable. Although venous histologic involvement and perivascular infiltration are not accurately predictable preoperatively, clinicians must examine the existing criteria and normograms to guide their surgical management according to the integration of new imaging techniques, preoperative chemotherapy use, tumor biology and molecular histopathology, and surgical techniques.

En bloc proximal peri-mesenteric clearance for pancreatic head cancer surgery

The superior mesenteric artery (SMA) first approach and meso-pancreas excision (MPE) during pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic head cancer have been suggested for complete local tumor control, less operative blood loss, and early determination of resectability. However, SMA-first approach is merely a mode of approach and the concept of MPE has been challenged due to its anatomical obscurity. Dissection around proximal mesenteric vessels, superior mesenteric vein and SMA, is a critical procedure point for local tumor control as tumor infiltration is frequently observed both at the time of initial diagnosis and recurrence. The meso-pancreas, which encompasses the soft tissue between the uncinated process and SMA, does not include all the aforementioned points of proximal mesenteric areas. Therefore, the authors propose a new terminology named, “en bloc proximal peri-mesenteric clearance (PPMC)”, to describe the removal of all the lymph nodes including soft tissue around proximal mesenteric vessels, especially the SMA, to ensure complete local tumor control of pancreatic head cancer. The SMA-first approach applied either by the mesenteric approach or supra-colic approach can make this procedure more feasible. The extent of the circumferential dissection of the peri-SMA nerve plexus can be adjusted according to the primary disease. PPMC including the removal of all lymph nodes around the proximal SMA may be considered as a standard extent of PD for pancreatic head cancer.

Clinical impact of pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer with resection of the secondary or later branches of the superior mesenteric vein

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of pancreaticoduodenectomy with resection of the second jejunal vein (J2V) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

Among 114 patients with PDAC undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal-superior mesenteric vein resection (PVR), surgical outcomes, and prognoses of 10 patients with resection of J2V or later branches of the superior mesenteric vein (J2VR) were compared to 104 patients with PVR above J2V (standard PVR). The reconstruction methods in the J2VR group were reviewed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the operative time (470 vs 435 min), morbidity (30% vs 27%), presence of portal vein stenosis (10% vs 5%) or thrombosis (10% vs 1%), and induction of adjuvant therapy (80% vs 88%) between the J2VR and standard PVR groups, although blood loss was higher in the J2VR group (1184 vs 494 ml; P = .002). R0 proportion and 2-year survival rates were not significantly worse in the J2VR group compared to the standard PVR group (90 and 88%; 67 and 45%, respectively). At least one branch of the superior mesenteric vein was reconstructed in the J2VR group.

CONCLUSION

Pancreaticoduodenectomy with J2VR for PDAC can be safely performed with a satisfactory overall survival rate.

Vascular Resection for Pancreatic Cancer: 2019 French Recommendations Based on a Literature Review From 2008 to 6-2019

Introduction: Vascular resection remains a subject of debate in the management of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC). These French recommendations were drafted on behalf of the French National Institute of Cancer (INCA-2019).

Material and Methods: A systematic literature search, with PubMed, Medline® (OvidSP), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, was performed for abstracts published in English from January 2008 to June 2019, and identified systematic reviews/metaanalyses, retrospective analyses and case series dedicated to vascular resections in the setting of PDAC. All selected articles were graded for level of evidence and strength of recommendation was given according to the GRADE system.

Results: Neoadjuvant treatment should be performed rather than direct surgery in borderline and locally advanced non-metastatic PDAC with venous and/or arterial infiltration (T4 stage). Patients who respond or those with stable disease and good performance status should undergo surgical exploration to assess resectability because cross-sectional imaging often fails to identify the extent of the remaining viable tumor. Combining vascular resection with pancreatectomy in these cases increases the feasibility of curative resection which is still the only option to improve long-term survival. Venous resection (VR) is recommended if resection is possible in the presence of limited lateral or circumferential involvement but without venous occlusion and in the absence of arterial contact with the celiac axis (CA; cephalic tumors) or the superior mesenteric artery (SMA; all tumor locations) (Grade B). The patients should be in good general condition because mortality and morbidity are higher than following pancreatectomy without VR (Grade B). In case of planned VR, neoadjuvant treatment is recommended since it improves both rate of R0 resections and survival compared to upfront surgery (Grade B). Due to their complexity and specificities, arterial resection (AR; mainly the hepatic artery (HA) or the CA) must be discussed in selected patients, in multidisciplinary team meetings in tertiary referral centers, according to the tumor location and the type of arterial extension. In case of invasion of a short segment of the common HA, resection with arterial reconstruction may be proposed after neoadjuvant therapy. In case of SMA invasion, neoadjuvant therapy may be followed by laparotomy with dissection and biopsy of peri-arterial tissues. A pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with SMA-resection is not recommended if the frozen section examination is positive (Grade C). In case of distal PDAC with invasion of the CA, a distal pancreatectomy with CA-resection without arterial reconstruction may be proposed after neoadjuvant therapy and radiologic embolization of the CA branches (expert opinion).

Conclusion: For PDAC with vascular involvement, neoadjuvant treatment followed by pancreatectomy with venous resection or even arterial resection can be proposed as a curative option in selected patients with selected vascular involvement.