Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Versus Transvaginal Posterior Colporrhaphy in Management of Anterior Rectocele

Rectocele with obstructive defecation syndrome: Laparoscopic rectopexy or vaginal repair?

INTRODUCTION

The concomitant presence of a rectocele with obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) is highly probable. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of native tissue vaginal rectocele repair (VRR) and laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) in terms of functional outcome via the medium to long-term ODS score evaluation.

MATERIAL

This was a retrospective cohort study. We identified 30 patients having undergone LVMR for rectocele with defecatory symptoms between January 2015 and December 2021, matched with the same number of patients treated by VRR for the same indication and in the same period. The hypothesis was that both procedures were susceptible to lead to a favorable functional outcome. The main endpoint was ODS score at follow-up. Multivariate analysis was used to assess relationship between ODS score and type of surgery.

RESULTS

Patients' demographics were similar in both groups. However, the preoperative ODS score was significantly higher in the LVMR group (P<0.01). Furthermore, the use of preoperative imaging investigations and diagnosis of an associated rectal intussusception were more frequent in the LVMR group. The mean ODS scores at follow-up (median follow-up 5years) were comparable in the two groups (6.2 for LVMR and 4.43 for VRR). These scores were significantly reduced compared to preoperative values in both groups (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant reduction in ODS scores on medium/long-term follow-up with both surgical techniques. A larger study utilizing randomized comparison of both procedures is needed to confirm our findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Ventral mesh rectopexy. Does a descending perineum impact functional results and quality of life?

PURPOSE

The impact of perineal descent (PD) on functional outcome and quality of life after ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) is unknown. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of PD on the functional outcome and quality of life (QOL) after VMR.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on fifty-five patients who underwent robotic VMR between 2018 and 2021. Pre and postoperative data along with radiological studies were gathered from a prospectively maintained database. The Cleveland Clinic Constipation score (CCCS), the Rome IV criteria and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), were used to measure functional results and QOL.

RESULTS

All 55 patients (mean age 57.8 years) were female. Most patients had radiological findings of severe PD (n = 31) as opposed to mild/moderate PD (n = 24). CCCS significantly improved at 3 months and 1 year post-VMR (mean difference = -4.4 and -5.4 respectively, p < 0.001) with no significant difference between the two groups. The percentage of functional constipation Rome IV criteria only showed an improved outcome at 3 months for severe PD and at 1 year for mild/moderate PD (difference = -58.1% and -54.2% respectively, p < 0.05). Only the SF-36 subscale bodily pain significantly improved in the mild/moderate PD group (mean difference = 16.7, p = 0.002) 3 months post-VMR which subsided after one year (mean difference = 5.5, p = 0.068).

CONCLUSION

Severe PD may impact the functional outcome of constipation without an evident effect on QOL after VMR. The results, however, remain inconclusive and further research is warranted.

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy vs. transperineal mesh repair for obstructed defecation syndrome associated with rectocele: comparison of selectively distributed patients

PURPOSE

Obstructed defecation syndrome represents 50-60% of patients with symptoms of constipation. We aimed to compare the two frequently performed surgical methods, laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy and transperineal mesh repair, for this condition in terms of functional and surgical outcomes.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of 131 female patients who were diagnosed with obstructed defecation syndrome, attributed to rectocele with or without rectal intussusception, enterocele, hysterocele or cystocele, and who underwent either laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy or transperineal mesh repair. Patients were evaluated for surgical outcomes based on the operative time, the length of hospital stay, operative complications, using prospectively designed charts. Functional outcome was assessed by using the Initial Measurement of Patient-Reported Pelvic Floor Complaints Tool.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients diagnosed with complex rectocele underwent laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy, and 80 patients diagnosed with simple rectocele underwent transperineal mesh repair. Mean age was found to be 50.35 ± 13.51 years, and mean parity 2.14 ± 1.47. Obstructed defecation symptoms significantly improved in both study groups, as measured by the Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory, Constipation Severity Instrument and Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms scores. Minor postoperative complications including wound dehiscence (n = 3) and wound infection (n = 2) occurred in the transperineal mesh repair group.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy and transperineal mesh repair are efficient and comparable techniques in terms of improvement in constipation symptoms related to obstructed defecation syndrome. A selective distribution of patients with or without multicompartmental prolapse to one of the treatment arms might be the preferred strategy.