1
|
Varlas VN, Bălescu I, Varlas RG, Adnan AA, Filipescu AG, Bacalbașa N, Suciu N. Complete Abdominal Evisceration After Open Hysterectomy: A Case Report and Evidence-Based Review. J Clin Med 2025; 14:262. [PMID: 39797345 PMCID: PMC11721390 DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2024] [Revised: 12/09/2024] [Accepted: 12/28/2024] [Indexed: 01/13/2025] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Despite its low incidence, complete postoperative abdominal evisceration represents a complication requiring an urgent solution. We aimed to present a rare case of an abdominal evisceration of the omentum and small-bowel loops after a total abdominal hysterectomy and review the literature regarding this condition's diagnosis and therapeutic management. Case report: On the sixth postoperative day for a uterine fibroid, a 68-year-old patient presented with an abdominal evisceration of the omentum and small bowel that occurred two hours before. An emergency laparotomy was performed to correct the evisceration and restore the integrity of the abdominal wall structure. The literature review was carried out in the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases using the terms "abdominal wall dehiscence", "abdominal evisceration", "open abdomen", "burst abdomen", "abdominal fascial dehiscence", "abdominal dehiscence post-hysterectomy", and "hysterectomy complications" by identifying all-time articles published in English. Results: Seven studies were included in this electronic search. The early diagnosis of abdominal evisceration, the identification of risk factors and comorbidities, followed by the choice of surgical technique, and postoperative follow-up were parts of the standard algorithm for managing this life-threatening case. Conclusions: Abdominal evisceration, as a surgical emergency, requires the diagnosis and treatment of this complication alongside the identification of the risk factors that can lead to its occurrence, as well as careful postoperative monitoring adapted to each case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentin Nicolae Varlas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Filantropia Clinical Hospital, 011132 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Irina Bălescu
- Department of Surgery, Ponderas Academic Hospital, 021188 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Roxana Georgiana Varlas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Al-Aloul Adnan
- Ramnicu Sarat Municipal Hospital, 125300 Buzau, Romania;
- Faculty of Nursing, Bioterra University, 013724 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alexandru George Filipescu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Elias Emergency University Hospital, 011461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Nicolae Bacalbașa
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Nicolae Suciu
- Fetal Medicine Excellence Research Center, Alessandrescu-Rusescu National Institute for Mother and Child Health, 020395 Bucharest, Romania;
- Division of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alessandrescu-Rusescu National Institute for Mother and Child Health, Polizu Clinical Hospital, 020395 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Petrovskiy AN, Polovinkin VV, Sukhinin AA. [CT imaging in the treatment of ventral hernias]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2025:86-95. [PMID: 40296425 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202505186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/30/2025]
Abstract
Ventral hernias are one of the most common problems in abdominal surgery. At the same time, clinical diagnosis of abdominal hernia is a straightforward issue amenable to surgical treatment in the absence of severe comorbidities. However, long-term follow-up revealed disappointing results regarding complication rates and incidence of postoperative recurrences. In this context, preoperative planning with control of comorbidities and complete visualization of hernia and its anatomical relationships with abdominal organs is important. Computed tomography (CT) offers the best opportunity to determine dimensions and location of hernial defect(s), diastasis recti and/or associated muscle atrophy, as well as loss of domain. This information is valuable to select the best surgical technique (open or minimally invasive), location and fixation of mesh, possible need for various separation techniques, botulinum toxin, preoperative pneumoperitoneum or reduction interventions on abdominal organs. Nevertheless, this issue remains peripheral to active surgical discussions focusing on intervention techniques, postoperative management, etc., since there is currently no clear communication between radiologists and surgeons in this area of surgery. This review is devoted to the role of CT in the treatment of ventral hernias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A N Petrovskiy
- Research Institute - Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1, Krasnodar, Russia
| | - V V Polovinkin
- Research Institute - Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1, Krasnodar, Russia
- Kuban State Medical University, Krasnodar, Russia
| | - A A Sukhinin
- Kuban State Medical University, Krasnodar, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Polychronidis G, Rahbari NN, Bruckner T, Sander A, Sommer F, Usta S, Hermann J, Albers MB, Sargut M, Knebel P, Klotz R. Continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy: CONTINT: a randomized controlled trial [NCT00544583]. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18:51. [PMID: 37848901 PMCID: PMC10583371 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00517-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-level evidence regarding the technique of abdominal wall closure for patients undergoing emergency midline laparotomy is sparse. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two commonly applied abdominal wall closure strategies after primary emergency midline laparotomy. METHODS/DESIGN CONTINT was a multi-center pragmatic open-label exploratory randomized controlled parallel trial. Two different abdominal wall closure strategies in patients undergoing primary midline laparotomy for an emergency surgical intervention with a suspected septic focus in the abdominal cavity were compared: the continuous, all-layer suture and the interrupted suture technique. The primary composite endpoint was burst abdomen within 30 days after surgery or incisional hernia within 12 months. As reliable data on this composite primary endpoint were not available for patients undergoing emergency surgery, it was planned to initially recruit 80 patients and conduct an interim analysis after these had completed the 12 months follow-up. RESULTS From August 31, 2009, to June 28, 2012, 124 patients were randomized of whom 119 underwent surgery and were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principal. The primary composite endpoint did not differ between the continuous suture (C: 27.1%) and the interrupted suture group (I: 30.0%). None of the individual components of the primary endpoint (reoperation due to burst abdomen after 30 days (C: 13.5%, I: 15.1%) and reoperation due to incisional hernia (C: 3.0%, I:11.1%)) differed between groups. Time needed for fascial closure was longer in the interrupted suture group (C: 12.8 ± 4.5 min, I: 17.4 ± 6.1 min). BMI was associated with burst abdomen during the first 30 days with an OR of 1.17 (95% CI 1.04-1.32). CONCLUSION This RCT showed no difference between continuous suture with slowly absorbable suture versus interrupted rapidly absorbable sutures after primary emergency midline laparotomy in rates of postoperative burst abdomen and incisional hernia after one year. However, the trial was stopped after the interim analysis due to futility as there was no chance to show superiority of one suture technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Polychronidis
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nuh N Rahbari
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Thomas Bruckner
- Institute of Medical Biometry (IMBI), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anja Sander
- Institute of Medical Biometry (IMBI), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Sommer
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Augsburg University Medical Center, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Selami Usta
- Department for General and Visceral Surgery, St. Josefs-Hospital, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Janssen Hermann
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Düren Hospital, Düren, Germany
| | - Max Benjamin Albers
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Mine Sargut
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Phillip Knebel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rosa Klotz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal adhesion formation is common after abdominal surgery and results in severe complications. Tissue hypoxia is one of the main drivers of peritoneal adhesions. Thus, we determined the clinical role of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 signaling in peritoneal adhesions and investigated whether the biguanide antidiabetic drug metformin shows HIF-inhibitory effects and could be repurposed to prevent adhesion formation. STUDY DESIGN As part of the ReLap study (DRKS00013001), adhesive tissue from patients undergoing relaparotomy was harvested and graded using the adhesion grade score. HIF-1 signaling activity within tissue biopsies was determined and correlated with adhesion severity. The effect of metformin on HIF-1 activity was analyzed by quantification of HIF target gene expression and HIF-1 protein stabilization in human mesothelial cells and murine fibroblast under normoxia and hypoxia. Mice were treated with vehicle or metformin 3 days before and until 7 days after induction of peritoneal adhesions; alternatively, metformin treatment was discontinued 48 hours before induction of peritoneal adhesions. RESULTS HIF-1 signaling activity correlated with adhesion severity in patient biopsies. Metformin significantly mitigated HIF-1 activity in vitro and in vivo. Oral treatment with metformin markedly prevented adhesion formation in mice even when the treatment was discontinued 48 hours before surgery. Although metformin treatment did not alter macrophage polarization, metformin reduced proinflammatory leucocyte infiltration and attenuated hypoxia-induced profibrogenic expression patterns and myofibroblast activation. CONCLUSIONS Metformin mitigates adhesion formation by inhibiting HIF-1-dependent (myo)fibroblast activation, conferring an antiadhesive microenvironment after abdominal surgery. Repurposing the clinically approved drug metformin might be useful to prevent or treat postoperative adhesions.
Collapse
|
5
|
Schollemann F, Kunczik J, Dohmeier H, Pereira CB, Follmann A, Czaplik M. Infection Probability Index: Implementation of an Automated Chronic Wound Infection Marker. J Clin Med 2021; 11:jcm11010169. [PMID: 35011910 PMCID: PMC8745914 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11010169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The number of people suffering from chronic wounds is increasing due to demographic changes and the global epidemics of obesity and diabetes. Innovative imaging techniques within the field of chronic wound diagnostics are required to improve wound care by predicting and detecting wound infections to accelerate the application of treatments. For this reason, the infection probability index (IPI) is introduced as a novel infection marker based on thermal wound imaging. To improve usability, the IPI was implemented to automate scoring. Visual and thermal image pairs of 60 wounds were acquired to test the implemented algorithms on clinical data. The proposed process consists of (1) determining various parameters of the IPI based on medical hypotheses, (2) acquiring data, (3) extracting camera distortions using camera calibration, and (4) preprocessing and (5) automating segmentation of the wound to calculate (6) the IPI. Wound segmentation is reviewed by user input, whereas the segmented area can be refined manually. Furthermore, in addition to proof of concept, IPIs’ correlation with C-reactive protein (CRP) levels as a clinical infection marker was evaluated. Based on average CRP levels, the patients were clustered into two groups, on the basis of the separation value of an averaged CRP level of 100. We calculated the IPIs of the 60 wound images based on automated wound segmentation. Average runtime was less than a minute. In the group with lower average CRP, a correlation between IPI and CRP was evident.
Collapse
|
6
|
Arora A, Jha AK, Kumar M. Letter to the Editor: Standard of Care and Outcomes of Primary Laparotomy Versus Laparotomy in Patients with Prior Open Abdominal Surgery (ReLap Study; DRKS00013001). J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:1350-1351. [PMID: 33728591 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-04977-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Arora
- Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, 801507, India.
| | - Ashesh Kumar Jha
- Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, 801507, India
| | - Manoj Kumar
- Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, 801507, India
| |
Collapse
|