Recent Improvements in Racial Disparity in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: How Times Have Changed

Racial Disparities in Liver Transplant for Hepatitis C-Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In the United States, hepatitis C virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma incidence and mortality are highest among minorities. Socioeconomic constraints play a major role in inequitable treatment. We evaluated the association between race/ethnicity and outcomes in a population that overcame treatment barriers.

METHODS

We report a retrospective cohort study of 666 patients across 20 institutions in the United States Hepatocellular Carcinoma Liver Transplantation Consortium from 2015 to 2019 with hepatitis C virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma who completed direct-acting antiviral therapy and underwent liver transplantation. Patients were excluded if they had a prior liver transplantation, hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence, no prior liver-directed therapy, or if race/ethnicity data were unavailable. Patients were stratified by race/ethnicity. Primary outcomes were recurrence-free survival and overall survival, and secondary outcome was major postoperative complication.

RESULTS

Race/ethnicity was not associated with differences in 5-year recurrence-free survival (White 90%, Black 88%, Hispanic 92%, Other 87%; p = 0.85), overall survival (White 85%, Black 84%, Hispanic 84%, Other 93%; p = 0.70), or major postoperative complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Race/ethnicity was not associated with worse oncologic or postoperative outcomes among those who completed direct-acting antiviral therapy and underwent liver transplantation, suggesting that overcoming socioeconomic constraints equalizes outcomes across racial/ethnic groups. Eliminating barriers that prohibit care access among minorities must be a priority.

Disparities in outcomes and access to therapy options in hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) disproportionately impacts racial and ethnic minorities and patients with lower socioeconomic status. These social determinants of health (SDH) lead to disparities in access to care and outcomes. We aim to understand the relationship between SDH and survival and locoregional treatment options in HCC.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database, we evaluated survival and access locoregional treatments including non-transplant surgery, liver transplant (LT), and liver-directed radiation therapy (LDRT) in patients with HCC diagnosed between 2004 and 2017. Variables including clinical stage, age, sex, race, income, rurality, year of diagnosis, facility type (FT), Charlson-Deyo score (CD), and insurance were evaluated. Cox proportional hazards multivariable regression and dominance analyses were used for analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 140 340 patients were included. Worse survival was seen with advanced stage, older age, Black race, rurality, public insurance, treatment at a nonacademic center, and lower income. The top predictors for survival included stage, age, and income. Completion of non-transplant surgery was best predicted by stage, FT, and insurance type, whereas LT was predicted by age, year of diagnosis, and CD score. LDRT utilization was most associated with year of diagnosis, FT, and CD score.

CONCLUSION

For patients with HCC, survival was predicted primarily by stage, age, and income. The primary sociodemographic factors associated with access to surgical treatments, in addition to FT, were insurance and income, highlighting the financial burdens of health care. Work is needed to address disparities in access to care, including improved insurance access, addressing financial inequities and financial toxicities of treatments, and equalizing care opportunities in community centers.

Addressing racial and ethnic disparities in US liver cancer care

HCC, the most common form of primary liver cancer, is the fastest rising cause of cancer-related death in the United States. HCC disproportionately affects racial and ethnic minorities in the United States. A practical framework is needed to organize the complex patient, provider, health system, and societal factors that drive these racial and ethnic disparities. In this narrative review, we adapted and applied the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) Research Framework to the HCC care continuum, as a step toward better understanding and addressing existing HCC-related disparities. We first summarize the literature on HCC-related disparities by race and ethnicity organized by the framework's 5 domains (biological, behavioral, physical/built environment, sociocultural environment, and health care system) and 4 levels (individual, interpersonal, community, and societal) of influence. We then offer strategies to guide future research initiatives toward promotion of health equity in HCC care. Clinicians and researchers may help mitigate further inequities and better address racial and ethnic disparities in HCC care by prioritizing the following in HCC research: (1) increasing racial and ethnic minority representation, (2) collecting and reporting HCC-related data by racial and ethnic subgroups, (3) assessing the patient experience of HCC care by race and ethnicity, and (4) evaluating HCC-specific social determinants of health by race and ethnicity. These 4 priorities will help inform the development of future programs and interventions that are tailored to the unique experiences of each racial and ethnic group.

Diminishing racial disparities in the treatment of colon adenocarcinoma

Background

Prior research has demonstrated racial disparities in the treatment of colon cancer. We sought to determine if treatment disparities persist.

Methods

Patients with colon adenocarcinoma diagnosed from 2012 to 2016 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Associations between race and clinical characteristics were assessed using Chi square tests. The likelihood of receiving treatment based on race was assessed using logistic regression.

Results

Of 18,841 patients, 69.7% were White, 10.2% Black, 8.7% Hispanic and 11.4% Asian. Among patients with early-stage disease (stage I or II), 96.1% of Whites, 94.6% of Blacks, 95.6% of Hispanics and 97.7% of Asians underwent surgery (p = 0.01), while 8.9% of Whites, 9.3% of Blacks, 12.4% of Hispanics and 8.9% of Asians received chemotherapy (p = 0.03). For years 2012 to 2016 collectively, Blacks with early-stage disease were less likely than Whites to undergo any surgery (aOR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.36 - 0.81) and more likely to receive neither surgery nor chemotherapy (aOR = 1.91; 95% CI: 1.25 - 2.93). However, when assessing each year individually, the most recent years revealed no difference in the likelihood of receiving surgery in (aOR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.16 - 1.29 in 2016) or receiving neither surgery nor chemotherapy (aOR = 2.17; 95% CI: 0.70 - 6.70 in 2016).

Conclusion

Racial disparities in the treatment of colon adenocarcinoma have improved in recent years. Health care providers must continue to provide equitable, evidence-based care to ensure that treatment disparities are eliminated.

Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Outcomes Following Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine the impact of social determinants of health (SDoH) on outcomes of patients undergoing resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with HCC in the National Cancer Database who underwent resection from 2009 to 2018 were identified. SDoH associated with length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, and 30-day mortality were analyzed using regression analyses adjusted for confounding variables.

RESULTS

Among 9235 patients, the median age (range) was 65.0 (18-90) years, 72.1% were male, and 57.9% were White. A total of 3% were uninsured, 11.1% had Medicaid, 21% resided in regions with a median household income within the lowest quartile of the US population, and 27.0% resided in regions within the lowest quartile of education level. The odds for having longer LOS were lower among patients with the highest regional education level compared with those with the lowest level [odds ratio (OR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-0.97]. The risk of readmission was lower among patients with Medicare (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.33-0.81), Medicaid (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.31-0.87), or private insurance (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.35-0.88) compared with uninsured patients. Thirty-day overall mortality was less likely among patients with Medicare (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.27-0.75), Medicaid (OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.30-0.93), or private insurance (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.24-0.66), and among patients with high regional income (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.44-0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjusted regression analyses identified SDoH that were associated with HCC outcomes. Increased awareness of how SDoH relate to outcomes may inform strategies that attempt to account for these associations and improve patient outcomes.