Reduced Laparoscopic Intra-abdominal Pressure During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Its Effect on Post-operative Pain: a Double-Blinded Randomised Control Trial

Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum with intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for enhanced recovery after surgery: A prospective randomised controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs represent a shift in perioperative care, combining evidence-based interventions to reduce surgical stress to expedite recovery. ERAS requires cohesive team efforts to facilitate early discharge and reduce hospital stays. Anaesthesia and pneumoperitoneum management within ERAS play crucial roles in influencing postoperative outcomes. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is widely acknowledged as the foremost approach for managing symptomatic gallstone disease due to its minimally invasive nature and favourable recovery. It has been demonstrated that increased abdominal pressures with prolonged CO2 exposure produce changes in cardio-vascular and pulmonary dynamics, which can be minimized by insufflating at minimum pressure required for adequate exposure, as advocated by European endoscopic guidelines. Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective alpha-2 adrenoreceptor agonist, has gained attention in anaesthesia armamentarium due to its sedative, analgesic, sympatholytic, and opioid-sparing properties. For multimodal opioid sparing postoperative pain management it's advantageous.

AIM

To evaluate combined effect of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum and intra-operative dexmedetomidine infusion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for ERAS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

160 patients of American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score 1 and 2, undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized into low pressure pneumoperitoneum (10-12 mmHg) and standard pressure pneumoperitoneum (13-15 mmHg) groups. Each group is subdivided into, no Dexmedetomidine (ND) and with Dexmedetomidine (WD) infusion (0.7 mcg/kg/hr) intra-operatively. Thus, 40 patients in each of the 4 study arms. Perioperative variables were collected and analysed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Low pressure pneumoperitoneum with intra-operative Dexmedetomidine infusion (0.7 mcg/kg/hr) resulted in stable hemodynamics, reduced post-operative pain, no requirement of additional analgesics and early discharge. Thus, synergistic impact of these interventions significantly improved postoperative outcomes when used as part of ERAS protocols.

The Impact of Intraoperative CO 2 Pneumoperitoneum Pressure in Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Pneumoperitoneum is widely used in gastrointestinal surgery, particularly for laparoscopic or robotic procedures, with suggested advantages associated with low pressure. While existing data predominantly focuses on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the assessment of intra-abdominal pressures in other gastrointestinal surgeries remains unexplored.

METHODS

This study conducted an electronic literature search for randomized control trials comparing low-pressure pneumoperitoneum to standard or high-pressure counterparts.

RESULTS

Out of 26 articles meeting inclusion criteria, encompassing 2077 patients, 15 demonstrated positive associations with low-pressure pneumoperitoneum. No significant difference in postoperative pain was found in the remaining papers. Methodological variations, diverse outcome reporting, and a prevalent high risk of bias precluded meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights substantial outcome variability, urging cautious interpretation of aggregated results. Despite positive associations in specific cases, insufficient evidence was found to support the superiority of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum. The study recommends future research employing validated patient-reported outcome measures and standardized reporting to help guide the development of evidence-based guidelines and optimize patient care in abdominal surgeries.

Effect of multimedia education on anxiety and pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a Solomon four-group randomized controlled trial

Preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain pose significant challenges in surgical settings, often leading to various physical and psychological complications. This study aimed to assess the impact of multimedia education on anxiety levels and pain among candidates undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In a clinical trial employing Solomon's four-group design, 80 candidates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled. They were selected through convenience sampling and randomly allocated to four groups: intervention group with pre-test (E1), intervention group without pre-test (E2), control group with pre-test (C1), and control group without pre-test (C2). Multimedia education was administered to the intervention groups. Data were collected using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for anxiety assessment and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain measurement, then analyzed using SPSS-22 software. Preoperative state anxiety levels in groups E1 and E2 were significantly lower compared to C1 and C2 (38.6 ± 7.32, 38.1 ± 8.83, 46.3 ± 11.57, and 45.8 ± 9.57, respectively; p = 0.006). However, there was no significant difference in state anxiety levels 24 h post-surgery nor in trait anxiety levels before and 24 h after surgery. Moreover, there was no significant difference in mean pain scores 24 h post-surgery among the groups. The findings indicate that multimedia education can effectively reduce preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing surgery. However, it did not significantly impact anxiety and pain levels post-surgery. Multimedia education may be considered as a supplementary approach to standard preoperative care protocols.

The effect of ultrasound-guided drug injection at Neiguan point on the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

This study explores the feasibility and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided acupoint injection at Neiguan acupoint to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

A total of 60 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the General Surgery Department of Zhejiang Hospital from February 2021 to August 2021 were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly divided into the injection group (n = 30) and the control group (n = 30). The patients in the injection group received ultrasound-guided injections of tropisetron at bilateral Neiguan acupoints, while those in the control group received intravenous injections of tropisetron. The incidence of PONV within 24 hours after surgery, the need for "rescue" treatment, the incidence of puncture complications, and patients' satisfaction with PONV management were evaluated.

RESULT

Neiguan point can be accurately located by ultrasound guidance. Compared with the control group, the incidence of PONV was significantly decreased in the Injection group within 0 to 6 hours after surgery, and the vomiting rate was decreased within 6 to 12 hours after surgery (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided drug injection at Neiguan to prevent PONV has the characteristics of visualization and accuracy, which is easy to promote and use, and the effect is satisfactory.

The Impact of Acupuncture on Pain Intensity, Nausea, and Vomiting for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Meta-analysis Study

BACKGROUND

Acupuncture may have some potential in pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and this meta-analysis aims to explore the impact of acupuncture on pain intensity, nausea and vomiting for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, Cochrane library databases, CNKI, VIP, and Wangfang were systematically searched, and we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of acupuncture on pain control for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

RESULTS

Five RCTs and 366 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control intervention for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, acupuncture was associated with significantly reduced pain scores at 6 hours [mean difference (MD)=-0.86; 95% CI=-1.37 to -0.34; P =0.001, 2 RCTs) and pain scores at 8 to 10 hours (MD=-0.71; 95% CI=-1.13 to -0.28; P =0.001, 2 RCTs), decreased incidence of nausea (odds ratio=0.10; 95% CI=0.03-0.34; P =0.0003, 3 RCTs), and vomiting (odds ratio=0.11; 95% CI=0.01-0.85; P =0.03, 3 RCTs), but demonstrated no obvious impact on pain scores at 12 to 24 hours (MD=-0.38; 95% CI=-1.02 to 0.27; P =0.25, 2 RCTs).

CONCLUSIONS

Acupuncture may be effective to reduce pain intensity, nausea, and vomiting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

The Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Sugammadex and Neostigmine in Reversing Neuromuscular Blockade Inpatients with Obesity Undergoing Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

Background and Objectives: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is practiced worldwide. Sugammadex was proven to have multiple benefits in reversing neuromuscular blockade (NMB) for patients with obesity undergoing MBS, but its effects on complications of various systems are not clear and concrete. Materials and Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted as per the PRISMA guidelines and registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42023491171). A systematic search was conducted in multiple databases for studies comparing sugammadex with neostigmine in MBS. Continuous data are reported as mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Dichotomous data are reported as relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs. A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to evaluate the reliability of the conclusions. Results: Nine studies with 633 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with those from the neostigmine group, patients from the sugammadex group were characterized by a significantly shorter recovery time from the administration of the study drug to a train-of-four (TOF) ratio of ≥90% (MD [95% CI]: -15.40 [-26.64; -4.15]; I2 = 96.6%; p = 0.0073; n = 380; random effects model), a lower risk of postoperative residual curarization (PORC) (RR [95% CI]: 0.18 [0.09; 0.38]; p < 0.0001; I2 = 27.9%; n = 344; common effect model), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (RR [95% CI]: 0.67 [0.48; 0.93]; p = 0.0164; I2 = 0%; n = 335; common effect model), and cardiovascular complications (RR [95% CI]: 0.48 [0.26; 0.88]; p = 0.0186; I2 = 14.7%; n = 178; common effect model). TSA confirmed the conclusions regarding the recovery time and PORC risk. Conclusions: In conclusion, our systemic review and meta-analysis with TSA revealed that sugammadex provided a faster and more reliable choice to reverse NMB in patients with obesity undergoing MBS, with a lower risk of PORC. Sugammadex reduced the risk of cardiovascular complications and postoperative nausea and vomiting. However, the conclusions were not confirmed, and, so, further studies may be necessary.

Comparison of low-pressure and standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with cardiopulmonary comorbidities: a double blinded randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The benefits of low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LPLC) in patients with cardiopulmonary comorbidities remain unclear. This study aimed to explore the feasibility and pulmonary effects of LPLC in patients with cardiopulmonary comorbidities.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, parallel, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients included patients with cardiac or pulmonary comorbidities, who were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo LPLC (10 mmHg) or standard-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) (14 mmHg). The primary outcome was postoperative partial pressure of carbon dioxide (CO2). Surgical safety variables, patient recovery, pulmonary function parameters, and surgeon comfort were also compared between groups.

RESULTS

This study enrolled 144 participants, with 124 participants extracted for the final analysis (62 in LPLC and 62 in SPLC group, respectively). The median postoperative PaCO2 was similar in the LPLC (43.3 mmHg) and SPLC (43.0 mmHg) groups (p = 0.988). Pulmonary parameters including postoperative pH, PaCO2, HCO3, and lactate levels were similar between the two groups. Postoperative base excess was significantly higher in the LPLC group (- 0.6 mmol/L [- 6.9 ~ 7.5] vs. -1.9 mmol/L [- 6.6 ~ 5.4]; p = 0.031). There was no between-group difference regarding intraabdominal operative time, rate of intraoperative bile spillage, blood loss, surgeon comfort during surgery, and conversion rate. Moreover, postoperative major complication rates, the median time to the first flatus, postoperative hospital stay, or mean postoperative visual analog scale score for pain were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no reduction of partial pressure of CO2 with LPLC compared with SPLC for patients with cardiopulmonary comorbidities. LPLC with a pneumoperitoneum pressure of 10 mmHg may be safe and feasible for these patients when performed by experienced surgeons, although it does not improve pulmonary parameters.

REGISTRATION

The trial is retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04670952) on December 17, 2020.

The Effect of Breathing and Coughing Exercises and Oxygen Therapy on Shoulder Pain and Analgesic Consumption After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of breathing and coughing exercises and oxygen therapy on shoulder pain and analgesic consumption after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

DESIGN

A randomized controlled intervention study.

METHODS

The sample included 105 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the general surgery clinic of a tertiary center. Breathing and coughing exercises were applied to groups 1 and 2 of the intervention group, from the fourth hour after surgery. In addition, 2 liters per minute O2 treatment was applied to group 2 during the first hour after surgery, while the control group did not recieve the interventions.

FINDINGS

After surgery, a statistically significant difference was found in favor of the intervention groups in pain levels at the 12th hour (P < .05). There was a negative and statistically significant difference between pain levels and SpO2 values in all groups (P < .05). Non-opioids were consumed in lower amounts in the intervention groups (P > .05), while opioids were consumed only in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Breathing and coughing exercises and oxygen therapy after laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduced shoulder pain and the amount of analgesic consumption.

Low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in minimally invasive colorectal surgery: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (LPP) in minimally invasive colorectal surgery.

METHODS

A PRISMA-compliant systematic review/meta-analysis was conducted, searching PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and clinicaltrials.gov for randomized-controlled trials assessing outcomes of LPP vs standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum (SPP) in colorectal surgery. Efficacy outcomes [pain score in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), pain score postoperative day 1 (POD1), operative time, and hospital stay] and safety outcomes (blood loss and postoperative complications) were analyzed. Risk of bias2 tool assessed bias risk. The certainty of evidence was graded using GRADE.

RESULTS

Four studies included 537 patients (male 59.8%). LPP was undertaken in 280 (52.1%) patients and associated with lower pain scores in PACU [weighted mean difference: -1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.65 to -0.47, P = 0.004, I 2  = 0%] and POD1 (weighted mean difference: -0.49, 95% CI: -0.91 to -0.07, P = 0.024, I 2  = 0%). Meta-regression showed that age [standard error (SE): 0.036, P < 0.001], male sex (SE: 0.006, P < 0.001), and operative time (SE: 0.002, P = 0.027) were significantly associated with increased complications with LPP. In addition, 5.9%-14.5% of surgeons using LLP requested pressure increases to equal the SPP group. The grade of evidence was high for pain score in PACU and on POD1 postoperative complications and major complications, and blood loss, moderate for operative time, low for intraoperative complications, and very low for length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

LPP was associated with lower pain scores in PACU and on POD1 with similar operative times, length of stay, and safety profile compared with SPP in colorectal surgery. Although LPP was not associated with increased complications, older patients, males, patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, and those with longer operative times may be at risk of increased complications.

The evaluation of feasibility of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy using intraoperative instillation of bupivacaine: a retrospective observational study

Purpose

This study aimed to compare outcomes of opioid patients-controlled anesthesia (PCA) and intraoperative local anesthesia in terms of postoperative pain, lab results, patient surveys, and discharge scores to evaluate the feasibility of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Methods

Patients who underwent LC for acute cholecystitis were assigned to the outpatient surgery (OPS) group or inpatient surgery (IPS) group according to the surgeon. In the OPS group, a mixture of bupivacaine and epinephrine was injected into trocar sites and sprayed on the surgical dissection field. Oral opioid and analgesics were given twice a day. In the IPS group, patients received opioid PCA. Numeric rating scale (NRS) for walking, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), CRP, self-assessed survey on general physical condition and discharge, and discharge score of ambulatory surgery were assessed postoperatively.

Results

NRS was significantly lower in the OPS group. There were no significant differences in ESR and CRP between the groups. Self-assessed survey on general conditions and the possibility of discharge were significantly better in the OPS group. The discharge scores at 3, 6, and 9 hours were significantly higher in the OPS group.

Conclusion

Intraoperative instillation of bupivacaine at port sites and dissection fields had a better effect on short-term postoperative pain, patient surveys, and discharge criteria of ambulatory surgery than opioid PCA.

Low Pressure versus Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The creation of pneumoperitoneum using higher pressure is believed to be associated with increased postoperative abdominal pain.

AIM

This study aimed to compare postoperative abdominal pain following low pressure laparoscopic appendectomy and standard pressure laparoscopic appendectomy.

METHODS

This was a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of 54 patients aged between 18 and 56 years with clinical and/or radiologic diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups: low pressure laparoscopic appendectomy (n = 26) and standard pressure laparoscopic appendectomy (n = 28). The intra-abdominal pressure was kept in either low pressure (9 mm Hg) or standard pressure (13 mm Hg). Abdominal and shoulder pain scores were assessed using the visual analog scale at 6 hours and 3 days post procedure. Postoperative analgesia requirement, duration of surgery, complications, and hospital stay were recorded.

RESULTS

Both groups match for the demographic parameters. Three patients required conversion from low to standard pressure. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of abdominal pain (P = 0.86) and shoulder pain (P = 0.33), duration of surgery (P = 0.51), complications (P = 0.17), and length of hospital stay (P = 0.83).

CONCLUSION

The use of low pressure pneumoperitoneum did not reduce the incidence of abdominal pain in patients who had laparoscopic appendectomy. Patients with acute appendicitis can be treated with either low or normal pressure pneumoperitoneum depending on the experience of the surgeon.

Penehyclidine for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery Under Combined Intravenous and Inhalation Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Purpose

We designed this study to investigate the effect of intravenous use of penehyclidine on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after gynecological laparoscopic surgery.

Patients and Methods

Ninety-two Women Patients (Aged ≥ 18) Scheduled for Elective Gynecologic Laparoscopy Were Enrolled in the Current Study. Patients Were Equally Randomized Assigned Into Penehyclidine group (PHC group: received a bolus of penehyclidine 10 μg/kg during the induction of anesthesia, then followed by a continuous infusion of 10 μg/kg penehyclidine at a fixed rate of 2.0 mL/h in postoperative intravenous analgesia pump over 48h, 0.5 mg upper limit respectively) or Control group (received 0.9% saline in replace of penehyclidine at the same time points). The primary outcome measure was the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the postanesthesia care unit and ward area. Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores and general comfort questionnaire (GCQ) scores were assessed on postoperative day (POD) 1, 2.

Results

Patients between two groups had comparable baseline characteristics. Compared with the Control group, the incidence and severity of PONV, postoperative nausea (PON), and postoperative vomiting (POV) were significantly lower in the PHC group at 2h (PONV: P = 0.002, P = 0.004, respectively; PON: P = 0.018, P = 0.038, respectively; POV: P = 0.011, P = 0.072, respectively), 24h (PONV: P = 0.003, P = 0.001, respectively; PON: P = 0.010, P = 0.032, respectively; POV: P = 0.006, P = 0.044, respectively), and 48h (PONV: P = 0.003, P = 0.002, respectively; PON: P = 0.007, P = 0.019, respectively; POV: P = 0.002, P = 0.013, respectively) after surgery. The QoR-15 and GCQ scores of the PHC group were significantly higher than those of the Control group at POD 1, 2 (P < 0.001; P < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that perioperative intravenous application of penehyclidine can effectively prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting in gynecological laparoscopic surgery patients and improve postoperative recovery.

Comparison of the analgesic effect of dezocine and esketamine in combination with sufentanil respectively after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Sufentanil in combination with dezocine or esketamine is often used for postoperative analgesia. However, there is a lack of clinical evidence of efficacy. This study compares the analgesic effects of esketamine and dezocine combined with sufentanil for relieving pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC).

METHODS

A total of 58 patients were randomly assigned to the esketamine group (ES group) and dezocine group (DE group). In the ES group, 1.5 mg/kg esketamine was used. In the DE group, 0.3 mg/kg dezocine was used. Primary outcome measures were Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score at 4 h, 8 h, 24 h and 48 h after surgery. The second outcome measures were Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in the serum 10 minutes before anesthesia induction, and at 24 h and 48 h after surgery.

RESULTS

The VAS scores at 4 h, 8 h, 24 h and 48 h after the surgery in the ES group vs DE group were 2.70 vs 3.50(P=0.013),2.35 vs 3.15(P=0.004),1.69 vs 2.58(P=0.002), and 1.50 vs 2.26(P=0.002), respectively. The serum IL-6 concentrations 10 minutes before anesthesia induction, and at 24 h and 48 h after surgery in the ES group and DE group were 34.39 and 34.12(P=0.901),112.33 and 129.60(P=0.014), and 89.69 and 108.46(P<0.001), respectively. The CRP levels in serum 10 minutes before anesthesia induction, and at 24 h and 48 h after the surgery in the ES group and DE group were 5.99 and 5.86(P=0.639), 28.80 and 35.37(P<0.001), and 23.17 and 30.11(P<0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

For postoperative pain after LC, 1.5mg/kg esketamine provided better analgesia and reduced inflammation levels than 0.3mg/kg dezocine.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered in the China Clinical Research Information Center in 31/05/2023 : https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/home (Registration number: ChiCTR2300072011).

Low-Pressure Pneumoperitoneum During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Safety and Feasibility Analysis

PURPOSE

Laparoscopy is advised under the lowest possible intra-peritoneal pressure. The aim of this study is to analyze the safety/feasibility of low pneumoperitoneum pressure (LPP) during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All primary LSGs who completed a 3-month follow-up were included. Re-do operations and LSGs performed with concomitant procedures were excluded. All LSGs were performed by the senior author. Upon trocar insertions, pressure was set to 10 mmHg, and the procedure was started. The pressure was increased step-wise, according to the senior author's assessment of the quality of exposure. Doing so, three pressure groups were formed: groups 1 (10 mmHg), 2 (11-13 mmHg), and 3 (14 mmHg). All data was retrieved from our database. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA/Tukey's HSD test/Chi-square test. P values < 0.05 were regarded as significant.

RESULTS

Between February 2018 and October 2022, 708 consecutive/primary LSGs were studied. No mortality/conversion/thromboembolic event was observed. Groups 1, 2, and 3 comprised 376 (53.1%), 243 (34.3%), and 89 (12.6%) patients, respectively. Demographics, initial weight, duration of surgery, history for abdominoplasty, drain output, length of stay, and %total weight loss were evenly distributed among groups. Among 16 bleeding episodes, 14 occurred in the LPP group (p = 0.019). Including the only leak and stenosis, 8/9 of Clavien-Dindo 3b + 4 complications were observed in the LPP group (p = 0.092).

CONCLUSIONS

LSG with LPP is feasible in about half of the patients. However, almost all potentially life-threatening complications occurred in the LPP group where a significantly higher rate of bleeding was observed. Our findings suggest caution for routinely using LPP during LSG.

Use of sugammadex is associated with reduced incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting in adult patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a post-hoc analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common but troublesome complication in patients who undergo laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS). Whether sugammadex use is related to the persistent decrease in the occurrence of PONV during postoperative inpatient hospitalization, which is critical for the rehabilitation of patients after LBS, remains unknown.

METHODS

The study was based on a randomized controlled trial conducted in an accredited bariatric centre. A total of 205 patients who underwent LBS were included in the analysis. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression model were used to identify the significant variables related to PONV. Then propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were employed to compare outcomes between the sugammadex and neostigmine groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV within 48 h after LBS. The secondary endpoints included the severity of PONV, time to first flatus, need for rescue antiemetic therapy, and water intake.

RESULTS

The incidence of PONV was 43.4% (89/205) within the first 48 h after LBS. In multivariable analysis, sugammadex use (OR 0.03, 95% CI 0.01-0.09, P < 0.001) was an independent protective factor of PONV. After IPTW adjustment, sugammadex use was associated with lower incidence of PONV (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.48-0.61, P < 0.001), postoperative nausea (PON) (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67-0.88, P < 0.001), and postoperative vomiting (POV) (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.53-0.68, P < 0.001) within postoperative 48 h. The severity of PON as well as the incidence and severity of POV within the first 24 h were also lower in the sugammadex group (all P < 0.05). Reduced need for rescue antiemetic therapy within the first 24 h, increased water intake for both periods, and earlier first passage of flatus were observed in the sugammadex group (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with neostigmine, sugammadex can reduce the incidence and severity of PONV, increase postoperative water intake, and shorten the time to first flatus in bariatric patients during postoperative inpatient hospitalization, which may play a pivotal role in enhanced recovery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100052418, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=134893 , date of registration: October 25, 2021).

Low intra-abdominal pressure in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Guidelines do not provide clear recommendations with regard to the use of low intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) during laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the influence of low versus standard IAP during laparoscopic surgery on the key-outcomes in perioperative medicine as defined by the StEP-COMPAC consensus group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials comparing low IAP (<10 mmHg) with standard IAP (10 mmHg or higher) during laparoscopic surgery without time, language, or blinding restrictions. According to the PRISMA guidelines, two review authors independently identified trials and extracted data. Risk ratio (RR), and mean difference (MD), with 95% CIs were calculated using random-effects models with RevMan5. Main outcomes were based on StEP-COMPAC recommendations, and included postoperative complications, postoperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) scores, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Eighty-five studies in a wide range of laparoscopic procedures (7349 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. The available evidence indicates that the use of low IAP (<10 mmHg) leads to a lower incidence of mild (Clavien-Dindo grade 1-2) postoperative complications (RR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.53-0.86), lower pain scores (MD=-0.68, 95% CI: -0.82 to 0.54) and PONV incidence (RR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.51-0.88), and a reduced length of hospital stay (MD=-0.29, 95% CI: -0.46 to 0.11). Low IAP did not increase the risk of intraoperative complications (RR=1.15, 95% CI: 0.77-1.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the established safety and the reduced incidence of mild postoperative complications, lower pain scores, reduced incidence of PONV, and shorter length of stay, the available evidence supports a moderate to strong recommendation (1a level of evidence) in favor of low IAP during laparoscopic surgery.

Penehyclidine hydrochloride for treating postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common and distressing complication of laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS). Penehyclidine hydrochloride has been reported to be effective in preventing PONV. Considering the potential preventive effects of penehyclidine against PONV, we hypothesized that intravenous infusion of penehyclidine may alleviate PONV within the first 48 h in patients scheduled for LBS.

METHODS

Patients who underwent LBS were randomly assigned (1:2) to receive saline (Control group, n = 113) or a single intravenous dose of penehyclidine 0.5 mg (PHC group, n = 221). The primary outcome was incidence of PONV within the first 48 h postoperatively. Secondary endpoints included severity of PONV, need for rescue antiemetic therapy, volume of water intake, and time to first flatus.

RESULTS

PONV occurred in 159 (48%) patients within the first 48 h postoperatively, including 51% in the Control group and 46% in the PHC group. There was no significant difference in the incidence or severity of PONV between the two groups (P > 0.05). Within the first 24 h and 24-48 h, no significant difference was found in incidence or severity of PONV, postoperative nausea, postoperative vomiting, need for rescue antiemetic therapy, or volume of water intake (P > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that penehyclidine was significantly associated with a prolonged time to first flatus (median onset time: 22 h vs. 21 h, P = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Penehyclidine did not decrease incidence and severity of PONV in patients undergoing LBS. However, a single intravenous dose of penehyclidine (0.5 mg) was associated with a slightly prolonged time to first flatus.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100052418, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=134893 , date of registration: 25/10/2021).

The effectiveness of extremely low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on pain reduction after robot-assisted cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

The robot-assisted cholecystectomy could provide a sufficient surgical field with the extremely low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (ELPP; 4 mmHg) by the robot arm lifting the abdominal wall upward. This study aimed to investigate the effect of ELPP on the postoperative outcomes in benign gallbladder disease.

METHODS

A retrospective study was designed to compare the postoperative pain in addition with operation time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and complication of three types of cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease: 75 ELPP single site robot-assisted cholecystectomy (SSRC), 114 standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum (SPP) SSRC and 110 SPP conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC).

RESULTS

There was no difference in whole operation time between ELPP SSRC and SPP SSRC group (p = 0.159). Postoperative pain score was significantly less in ELPP SSRC group as compared to SPP SSRC or SPP CLC group at 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively (p = 0.004, p = 0.004, and p = 0.013 respectively). The incidence of shoulder pain was also significantly lower in ELPP SSRC group (p < 0.001). The rate of postoperative complication and length of stay were not different among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that ELPP technique using robot is feasible without increasing postoperative complications in the process of cholecystectomy and the use of the ELPP can reduce postoperative pain and shoulder pain compared to the use of the SPP.

Low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

It has been previously demonstrated that the rise of intra-abdominal pressures and prolonged exposure to such pressures can produce changes in the cardiovascular and pulmonary dynamic which, though potentially well tolerated in the majority of healthy patients with adequate cardiopulmonary reserve, may be less well tolerated when cardiopulmonary reserve is poor. Nevertheless, theoretically lowering intra-abdominal pressure could reduce the impact of pneumoperitoneum on the blood circulation of intra-abdominal organs as well as cardiopulmonary function. However, the evidence remains weak, and as such, the debate remains unresolved. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to demonstrate the current knowledge around the effect of pneumoperitoneum at different pressures levels during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis were reported according to the recommendations of the 2020 updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions.

RESULTS

This systematic review and meta-analysis included 44 randomized controlled trials that compared different pressures of pneumoperitoneum in the setting of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Length of hospital, conversion rate, and complications rate were not significantly different, whereas statistically significant differences were observed in post-operative pain and analgesic consumption. According to the GRADE criteria, overall quality of evidence was high for intra-operative bile spillage (critical outcome), overall complications (critical outcome), shoulder pain (critical outcome), and overall post-operative pain (critical outcome). Overall quality of evidence was moderate for conversion to open surgery (critical outcome), post-operative pain at 1 day (critical outcome), post-operative pain at 3 days (important outcome), and bleeding (critical outcome). Overall quality of evidence was low for operative time (important outcome), length of hospital stay (important outcome), post-operative pain at 12 h (critical outcome), and was very low for post-operative pain at 1 h (critical outcome), post-operative pain at 4 h (critical outcome), post-operative pain at 8 h (critical outcome), and post-operative pain at 2 days (critical outcome).

CONCLUSIONS

This review allowed us to draw conclusive results from the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum with an adequate quality of evidence.

Comparative Study of Dezocine and Ketorolac Tromethamine in Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Purpose

This study aimed to observe the application value of dezocine and ketorolac tromethamine in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Methods

A total of 154 patients who underwent LC surgery in our hospital and received PCIA after surgery from September 2020 to September 2021 were selected, they were divided into group A (n = 77) and group B (n = 77). Group A was given dezocine and group B was given ketorolac tromethamine. The analgesia, sedation, comfort, and adverse reactions of the two groups were closely observed at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after surgery.

Results

At 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after surgery, the visual analog scale scores in group B were lower than those in group A (P &lt; 0.05). At 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after surgery, the Ramsay scores in group B were higher than those in group A (P &lt; 0.05). At 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after surgery, there was no significant difference in Bruggrmann comfort scale scores between the two groups (P &gt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P &gt; 0.05).

Conclusion

Both dezocine and ketorolac tromethamine have high clinical application value in patients who underwent LC surgery and received PCIA, with higher patient comfort and fewer adverse reactions. But compared with dezocine, ketorolac tromethamine can achieve better sedative and analgesic effects, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

Review of Outcomes of Low Verses Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopy changes cardiorespiratory physiology and contributes to post-op pain. We studied outcomes before and after implementing low-pressure pneumoperitoneum QI project.

METHODS

Forty-two patients were insufflated at standard pressures (15 mmHg) while 41 were insufflated using low (8-12 mmHg) during laparoscopic procedures. These variables were obtained from the patient chart: pain scores, intravenous morphine milligram equivalents (MME), peak inspiratory pressures (PIP), end-tidal CO₂ (EtCO₂), surgery duration, and patient demographics. The study was conducted after IRB approval.

RESULTS

Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum is feasible and the surgeon can increase to 10-12 mmHg as needed. The mean post-op IV MME was significantly decreased in the low-pressure group (11.75 ± 10.41) compared to the standard pressure group (17.36 ± 18.1) (t-test, P = .047). Mean peak inspiratory pressures during insufflation were significantly higher for procedures conducted at standard pressure (31.40 ± 4.82) compared to the 8 mmHg (24.68 ± 4.19) and 12 mmHg (27.33± 3.85) low pressure groups (one-way ANOVA, P < .0001). During insufflation, there was a significant increase in the average EtCO₂ in the standard pressure group (42.07 ± 5.60) compared to the 8 mmHg low pressure group (37.59 ± 5.05) (ANOVA, P = .0096). Constant flow insufflation was more likely to be performed at low pressure than demand mode (58% v. 33%).

CONCLUSION

Low pressure pneumoperitoneum decreases PIP pressure and CO2 absorption evidenced by lower ETCO2 intra-operatively. Patients have significant improvement in postoperative pain evidenced by decreased narcotics needed. Low pressure pneumoperitoneum using a constant flow insufflator is safe and results in improved patient outcomes.

Deep Neuromuscular Blockade Combined with Low Pneumoperitoneum Pressure for Nociceptive Recovery After Major Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

Patients undergoing major laparoscopic surgery often experience significant pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Deep neuromuscular block (NMB) improves surgical conditions and facilitates the application of low intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), which may be beneficial for these patients. This study is designed to determine the effects of deep NMB combined with low IAP, as compared to moderate NMB combined with standard IAP, on patients' nociceptive recovery after major laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.

Study Design and Methods

This single-center randomized controlled trial will include 220 patients scheduled for major laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery (lasts for ≥ 90 minutes). Patients will be randomly assigned, with a 1:1 ratio, into a deep NMB + low IAP group (train of four = 0, post-tetanic count = 1-3, IAP = 8 mmHg) and a moderate NMB + standard IAP group (train of four = 1-3, IAP = 12 mmHg). If the surgical workspace is inadequate, the surgeons can request a step increase of 1 mmHg in IAP during 3-min intervals. The upper limit of IAP will be set at 15 mmHg. Postoperative recovery will be assessed using the postoperative quality recovery scale (PQRS). The primary outcome of this trial is the PQRS nociceptive recovery (including pain and PONV) at postoperative day (POD) 1. The secondary outcomes include recovery in other PQRS domains at POD 1, and recovery in all PQRS domains in a post-anesthesia care unit, at POD 3 in the surgical wards, at hospital discharge, and at postoperative 30 days. For the sample size estimation, 110 patients in each group (220 in total) would be needed to detect an absolute increase rate of 20% in the PQRS nociceptive domain in the deep NMB + low IAP group at POD 1.

Discussion

This study investigates the effects of deep NMB combined with low IAP on postoperative PQRS nociceptive recovery in patients undergoing major laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. We expect that this deep NMB + low IAP strategy would improve postoperative pain and PONV following major laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.