Surgical Outcomes for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Child-Pugh Class B: a Retrospective Multicenter Study

Tumor biology characteristics score based on alpha-fetoprotein and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist II as a predictor for recurrence and survival after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Current hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) staging systems lack comprehensive assessment of tumor biologic characteristics. This study aimed to develop and validate a tumor biology characteristics score (TBCS) based on alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist II (PIVKA-II) to predict long-term oncologic outcomes after HCC resection.

METHODS

In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent curative resection for HCC between June 2018 and December 2022 were included. TBCS (range, 2-6 points) was calculated by combining preoperative AFP (<20, 20-199, and ≥200 ng/mL) and PIVKA-II levels (<40, 40-399, and ≥400 mAU/mL). Patients were stratified into low (2 points), medium (3-4 points), and high TBCS groups (5-6 points). The primary outcomes were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 695 patients were analyzed; the low, medium, and high TBCS groups comprised 132 (19.0%), 233 (33.5%), and 330 patients (47.5%), respectively. Notably, 5-year RFS was 30.4%, 14.7%, and 9.7%, whereas 5-year OS was 42.1%, 35.5%, and 23.5% for low, medium, and high TBCS groups, respectively (both P <.001). Multivariate analysis identified TBCS as an independent predictor of both RFS (medium TBCS: hazard ratio [HR], 1.583; 95% CI, 1.219-2.057; P =.001; high TBCS: HR, 1.895; 95% CI, 1.473-2.438; P <.001) and OS (high TBCS: HR, 1.781; 95% CI, 1.353-2.343; P <.001).

CONCLUSION

The novel TBCS combining AFP and PIVKA-II effectively stratified patients with HCC into distinct prognostic groups after curative-intent resection, independently predicting both RFS and OS. This score may help identify high-risk patients for more intense postoperative recurrence surveillance and receipt of adjuvant therapies.

Prognostic performance of MRI LI-RADS version 2018 features and clinical-pathological factors in alpha-fetoprotein-negative hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 features and clinical-pathological factors for predicting the prognosis of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-negative (≤ 20 ng/ml) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, and to compare with other traditional staging systems.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 169 patients with AFP-negative HCC who received preoperative MRI and hepatectomy between January 2015 and August 2020 (derivation dataset:validation dataset = 118:51). A prognostic model was constructed using the risk factors identified via Cox regression analysis. Predictive performance and discrimination capability were evaluated and compared with those of two traditional staging systems.

RESULTS

Six risk factors, namely the LI-RADS category, blood products in mass, microvascular invasion, tumor size, cirrhosis, and albumin-bilirubin grade, were associated with recurrence-free survival. The prognostic model constructed using these factors achieved C-index of 0.705 and 0.674 in the derivation and validation datasets, respectively. Furthermore, the model performed better in predicting patient prognosis than traditional staging systems. The model effectively stratified patients with AFP-negative HCC into high- and low-risk groups with significantly different outcomes (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A prognostic model integrating the LI-RADS category, blood products in mass, microvascular invasion, tumor size, cirrhosis, and albumin-bilirubin grade may serve as a valuable tool for refining risk stratification in patients with AFP-negative HCC.

Resection Versus Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: How to Offer the Best Modality

Liver resection and liver transplantation are the mainstay of treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Patient comorbidities, tumor resectability, and perioperative morbidity and mortality risk, specifically of post-hepatectomy liver failure, are determining factors when deciding between liver resection and liver transplantation in patients who do not have an obvious contraindication to either treatment. Liver resection is preferred in patients without cirrhosis, and it may be a reasonable choice in patient with cirrhosis but preserved liver function and no portal hypertension if the size and function of the future liver remnant are appropriate, especially if organ availability is scarce.

Hepatocellular carcinoma

An update on the management of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is provided in the present article for those interested in the UEMS/EBSQ exam in Surgical Oncology. The most recent publications in HCC, including surveillance, guidelines, and indications for liver resection, liver transplantation, and locoregional or systemic therapies, are summarised. The objective is to yield a set of main points regarding HCC that are required in the core curriculum of hepatobiliary oncological surgery.