Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Intrahepatic, Perihilar, and Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: a National Population-Based Comparative Cohort Study

Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Intrahepatic and Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinomas

Background/Objectives. Lymph Node Ratio (LNR) is increasingly recognized as an important prognostic factor in various cancer types, with the potential to enhance patient stratification for intrahepatic (ICC) and extrahepatic (ECC) cholangiocarcinoma. The study aimed to assess the impact of LNR on survival in surgically resected patients with ICC and ECC. Methods. This was a retrospective analysis of National Cancer Database (2004-2020) included ICC and ECC (excluding distal bile duct) patients who underwent primary site resection with adequate lymphadenectomy (≥4 LNs excised). Exclusions comprised age < 18 years, distant metastasis, or incomplete key data. LNR was calculated as the ratio of positive LNs to total examined LNs. Survival probabilities were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression. Results. The inclusion criteria were met by 954 patients with ICC and 1607 patients with ECC. In patients with ICC, the median OS time was 62.7 months in LNR0 group, 40.8 months in LNR < 30%, and 25.2 months in LNR ≥ 30% (p < 0.001). In ICC, 3-year OS was 69.3%, 54.6%, and 34% for LNR 0, LNR < 30%, and LNR ≥ 30%, respectively (p < 0.05). When adjusted for age, sex, Charlson-Deyo score, histology, surgical margins, chemo- and radiotherapy using Cox regression, LNR < 30% and LNR ≥ 30% were associated with worse OS in patients with ICC (HR 2.1 (95% CI 1.6-2.7) and HR 2.94 (95% CI 2.3-3.8)) and ECC (HR 2.1 (95% CI 1.8-2.5) and HR 3 (95% CI 2.4-3.7)). Conclusions. It is well-known that LN-negative patients have significantly better survival than LN-positive patients with ICC and ECC. This study strongly demonstrates that survival prognosis can be further stratified based on LNR for ICC and ECC patients and that it is not simply a binary factor.

Cholangiocarcinoma

Management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma relies on a thorough understanding of the tumor's location and proximity to critical vasculobiliary structures. Mid-common bile duct tumors may require hemihepatectomy or pancreatoduodenectomy based on the status of the intraoperative frozen section. Distal common bile tumors are treated with pancreatoduodenectomy. When appropriate, volumetric assessment of the remnant liver should be performed to identify cases requiring preoperative liver augmentation strategies. A similar strategy should be employed for perihilar tumors, which require a right trisegmentectomy with bilioenteric reconstruction to achieve a negative margin. Adjuvant systemic therapy is recommended and increasing usage of neoadjuvant treatment is being incorporated into borderline resectable or regionally advanced cases.

Preoperative prognostic stratification and prediction of long-term outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) frequently receive adjuvant chemotherapy in preoperative and postoperative settings, but prediction of prognostic risk at the time of treatment selection remains challenging.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study enrolled DCC patients who underwent initial pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) between 2009 and 2022. Preoperative clinical parameters were collected, and Cox regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Among 170 patients examined, the median tumor depth was 10 mm, and 37 % of the patients were diagnosed with pT3. Overall, 46 % of patients had lymph node metastasis. The median and 5-year OS was 58.2 months and 50 %, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed tumor size on computed tomography (CT) ≥15 mm and main pancreatic duct (MPD) dilatation (≥3 mm) as independent risk factors for OS among various preoperative parameters; the prognosis was stratified based on these two parameters. Patients with one risk factor had similar outcomes (5-year OS: 39 %) to pStage IIB DCC (pT2N1 or pT3), while those with two risk factors had a prognosis akin to pStage IIIA (pN2), with a high early recurrence rate of 64 % (5-year OS: 8 %). Among non-risk group patients with low carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 levels (<37 U/mL), the prognosis was comparable (5-year OS: 72 %) to those with pStage I DCC.

CONCLUSION

A simple stratification approach was developed to predict long-term postoperative outcomes. To improve poor prognosis, intensive therapy, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, should be considered for patients with two risk factors.

Management of distal cholangiocarcinoma with arterial involvement: Systematic review and case series on the role of neoadjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND

The use of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA) with regional arterial or extensive venous involvement, is not widely accepted and evidence is sparse.

AIM

To synthesise evidence on NAT for dCCA and present the experience of a high-volume tertiary-centre managing dCCA with arterial involvement.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidance to identify all studies reporting outcomes of patients with dCCA who received NAT. All patients from 2017 to 2022 who were referred for NAT for dCCA at our centre were retrospectively collected from a prospectively maintained database. Baseline characteristics, NAT type, progression to surgery and oncological outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included. The definition of "unresectable" locally advanced dCCA was heterogenous. Four studies reported outcomes for 9 patients who received NAT for dCCA with extensive vascular involvement. R0 resection rate ranged between 0 and 100% but without survival benefit in most cases. Remaining studies considered either NAT in resectable dCCA or inclusive with extrahepatic CCA. The presented case series includes 9 patients (median age 67, IQR 56-74 years, male:female 5:4) referred for NAT for borderline resectable or locally advanced disease. Three patients progressed to surgery and 2 were resected. One patient died at 14 months with evidence of recurrence at 6 months and the other died at 51 months following recurrence 6 months post-operatively.

CONCLUSION

Evidence for benefit of NAT is limited. Consensus on criteria for uniform definition of resectability for dCCA is required. We propose using the established National-Comprehensive-Cancer-Network® criteria for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Perihilar and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma after Resection: Clinicopathological Characteristics, Outcomes, and Implications for Addition of Chemoradiotherapy

Background

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate clinicopathological characteristics, patterns of recurrence, survival outcomes, and implications for the addition of chemoradiotherapy for patients with resected perihilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA).

Materials and methods

For the present retrospective study, we identified 38 and 10 patients with resected perihilar and intrahepatic CCA. In perihilar CCA, adjuvant treatment was given as chemotherapy (n = 13) or chemoradiotherapy (n = 10). In intrahepatic CCA, neoadjuvant treatment was given with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE, n = 1) or chemotherapy plus stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT, n = 1), and adjuvant treatment was given to 7 patients with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.

Results

In perihilar CCA, preoperative biliary drainage procedures were performed in 27 out of 30 patients with jaundice. The adjacent liver showed secondary sclerosing cholangitis (n = 5) and fibrosis (n = 19). Locoregional recurrence involved the hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic site and lymph nodes. In intrahepatic CCA, the adjacent liver revealed cirrhosis (n = 1), secondary sclerosing cholangitis (n = 1), and fibrosis (n = 6). The sites of recurrence were in the remnant liver and lymph nodes (n = 6). In perihilar CCA, the median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 30.1 months (95% CI: 22.9-37.4) and 15.1 months (95% CI: 9.74-20.5), respectively. The 2-year and 3-year OS were 60.5% and 44.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed a significant association of no adjuvant treatment with decreased DFS (p = 0.004), HR 4.03 (95% CI: 1.57-10.4). Recurrence showed an unfavorable association with OS (p = 0.056), HR 2.90 (95% CI: 0.98-8.66). In intrahepatic CCA, the median OS and DFS rates were 41.2 months (95% CI: 13.5-68.9) and 10.8 months (95% CI: 1.98-19.6), respectively. The 2-year and 3-year OS were 66.7% and 53.3%, respectively. The patient with multiple intrahepatic CCA lesions and treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and SBRT showed partial pathological necrosis after resection and was disease-free at 3.5 years.

Conclusions

The present study showed the effectiveness of the combination of chemoradiotherapy with resection in improving locoregional disease control and survival in patients with perihilar and intrahepatic CCA.

How to cite this article

Sahai P, Rastogi A, Gupta A, et al. Perihilar and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma after Resection: Clinicopathological Characteristics, Outcomes, and Implications for Addition of Chemoradiotherapy. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2024;14(2):134-144.

Ex vivo liver resection and auto-transplantation and special systemic therapy in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma treatment

This editorial contains comments on the article "Systematic sequential therapy for ex vivo liver resection and autotransplantation: A case report and review of literature" in the recent issue of World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. It points out the actuality and importance of the article and focuses primarily on the role and place of ex vivo liver resection and autotransplantation (ELRAT) and systemic therapy, underlying molecular mechanisms for targeted therapy in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) management. pCCA is a tough malignancy with a high proportion of advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. The only curative option is radical surgery. Surgical excision and reconstruction become extremely complicated and not always could be performed even in localized disease. On the other hand, ELRAT takes its place among surgical options for carefully selected pCCA patients. In advanced disease, systemic therapy becomes a viable option to prolong survival. This editorial describes current possibilities in chemotherapy and reveals underlying mechanisms and projections in targeted therapy with kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy in both palliative and adjuvant settings. Fibroblast grow factor and fibroblast grow factor receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, isocitrate dehydrogenase, and protein kinase cAMP activated catalytic subunit alpha (PRKACA) and beta (PRKACB) pathways have been actively investigated in CCA in last years. Several agents were introduced and approved by the Food and Drug Administration. They all demonstrated meaningful activity in CCA patients with no global change in outcomes. That is why every successfully treated patient counts, especially those with advanced disease. In conclusion, pCCA is still hard to treat due to late diagnosis and extremely complicated surgical options. ELRAT also brings some hope, but it could be performed in very carefully selected patients. Advanced disease requires systemic anticancer treatment, which is supposed to be individualized according to the genetic and molecular features of cancer cells. Targeted therapy in combination with chemo-immunotherapy could be effective in susceptible patients.

Development and validation of a novel preoperative clinical model for predicting lymph node metastasis in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUD

We aimed to develop a novel preoperative nomogram to predict lymph node metastasis (LNM) in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) patients.

METHODS

160 pCCA patients were enrolled at Lihuili Hospital from July 2006 to May 2022. A novel nomogram model was established to predict LNM in pCCA patients based on the independent predictive factors selected by the multivariate logistic regression model. The precision of the nomogram model was evaluated through internal and external validation with calibration curve statistics and the concordance index (C-index). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate and determine the clinical utility of the nomogram.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that age (OR = 0.963, 95% CI: 0.930-0.996, P = 0.030), CA19-9 level (> 559.8 U/mL vs. ≤559.8 U/mL: OR = 3.162, 95% CI: 1.519-6.582, P = 0.002) and tumour diameter (OR = 1.388, 95% CI: 1.083-1.778, P = 0.010) were independent predictive factors of LNM in pCCA patients. The C-index was 0.763 (95% CI: 0.667-0.860) and 0.677 (95% CI: 0.580-0.773) in training cohort and validation cohort, respectively. ROC curve analysis indicated the comparative stability and adequate discriminative ability of nomogram. The sensitivity and specificity were 0.820 and 0.652 in training cohort and 0.704 and 0.649 in validation cohort, respectively. DCA revealed that the nomogram model could augment net benefits in the prediction of LNM in pCCA patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel prediction model is useful for predicting LNM in pCCA patients and showed adequate discriminative ability and high predictive accuracy.

Essential updates 2021/2022: Update in surgical strategy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Resection is the only potential curative treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC); however, complete resection is often technically challenging due to the anatomical location. Various innovative approaches and procedures were invented to circumvent this limitation but the rates of postoperative morbidity (20%-78%) and mortality (2%-15%) are still high. In patients diagnosed with resectable PHC, deliberate and coordinated preoperative workup and optimization of the patient and future liver remnant are crucial. Biliary drainage is recommended to relieve obstructive jaundice and optimize the clinical condition before liver resection. Biliary drainage for PHC can be performed either by endoscopic biliary drainage or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. To date there is no consensus about which method is preferred. The volumetric assessment of the future remnant liver volume and optimization mainly using portal vein embolization is the gold standard in the management of the risk to develop post hepatectomy liver failure. The improvement of systemic chemotherapy has contributed to prolong the survival not only in patients with unresectable PHC but also in patients undergoing curative surgery. In this article, we review the literature and discuss the current surgical treatment of PHC.