Contraception for cancer survivors

Contraception use and changes in young women with newly diagnosed breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate contraception use and change among young women with early breast cancer.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial.

SUBJECTS

Patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer age ≤45 years enrolled from 54 US oncology practices.

INTERVENTION

Sites were randomly assigned to the Young Women's Intervention, an educational intervention for young women with newly diagnosed breast cancer and their oncologists addressing issues specific to this population, including contraception, or a contact-time control physical activity intervention. Participants completed surveys in follow-up, including a 3-month survey regarding contraceptive practices before and after diagnosis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes of interest included young women's contraceptive use and methods before breast cancer diagnosis and 3 months after study enrollment. Logistic regression models assessed factors associated with use of less than highly effective contraceptive methods categorized according to World Health Organization effectiveness tiers and changes in contraceptive methods.

RESULTS

Of 312 women included, 258 (83%) reported contraceptive use before breast cancer diagnosis, and 275 (88%) reported contraceptive use after diagnosis. Use of highly effective methods (e.g., vasectomy, non-hormonal intrauterine devices) increased from 39% before diagnosis to 52% after diagnosis. Use of moderately effective methods (e.g., hormonal methods) decreased from 22% before diagnosis to 3% after diagnosis. Use of less effective methods (e.g., condoms, withdrawal) increased from 22% before diagnosis to 34% after diagnosis. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with using less than highly effective contraception after diagnosis included desire for additional children (odds ratio [OR], 6.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.76-10.66) and discussing contraception with a provider (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.12-3.40). After breast cancer diagnosis, 207 patients (66%) reported no change in contraceptive methods. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with contraceptive method change after diagnosis included age <35 years (OR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.57-5.58) and provider discussion (OR, 3.59; 95% CI, 1.91-6.78). There was no association in either analysis with study arm.

CONCLUSION

Although most patients used contraception after breast cancer diagnosis, nearly half reported using less than highly effective contraceptive methods with higher failure rates, highlighting the need for early and improved contraceptive counseling for young women with breast cancer.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01647607.

Male pediatric, adolescent, and young adult reproductive survivorship

As pediatric, adolescent, and young adult cancer survival rates increase, emphasis is placed on reducing late effects, including reproductive complications and potential impact to fertility. Male survivors are at risk of abnormalities in sperm, hormone deficiencies, and sexual dysfunction. This can impact one's progression into puberty and ability to have a biological child and impacts quality of life following treatment. Access to reproductive care is important and requires patient assessment and appropriate referral to reproductive specialists. This review addresses reproductive complications associated with therapy, standard-of-care testing, and therapeutic interventions. The psychologic impact on psychosexual functioning is also addressed.

Dyadic support across contraceptive decision-making among young adult breast cancer survivors and their partners

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to explore the role of dyadic support across the contraceptive decision-making process between young adult breast cancer (YABC) survivors and their partners.

RESEARCH APPROACH

Semi-structured interviews with YABC survivors and their partners.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-five young adult breast cancer survivors and their partners (n = 50). Survivors reported an average age of 36.9 years (SD = 4.30) and the majority self-identified as white (86.2%).

METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH

Thematic analysis approach with dyads as the primary unit of analysis, guided by the dyadic decision-making framework and the Theory of Gender and Power.

RESULTS

Perceived lack of contraceptive options due to a history of hormone-sensitive cancer, perceived infertility, and contraception as a result of cancer treatment (e.g., hysterectomy) contributed to the contraceptive decision context for survivors and their partners. Contraceptive support varied across couples depending on the cancer-specific context, where communication, sharing responsibility, and respecting bodily autonomy revealed as supportive behaviors. Other social influences including survivors' desire to conceive biologically and family planning desires also related to partner supportive behaviors.

INTERPRETATIONS

YABC survivors face specific challenges to contraceptive decision-making where partners can offer supportive behaviors. Health care providers can also support couples by engaging in triadic communication about contraception and family planning.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PSYCHOSOCIAL PROVIDERS OR POLICY

Psychosocial providers can support couples by encouraging them to talk together about contraception and highlighting the importance of triadic communication with a healthcare provider to support shared decision-making and alignment of contraceptive decisions with family planning desires.

The evolving role of the Women's Health Specialist in cancer prevention and survivorship

IMPORTANCE AND OBJECTIVE

This review provides a framework for primary care physicians, internists, family doctors, NP's, PA's, and oncologists caring for women-henceforth referred to as Women's Health Specialists-to identify and screen patients who may be at high risk for inherited cancer syndromes; an intervention referred to as previvorship care. For women who undergo risk-reducing oophorectomy, survivorship care is critical to optimizing quality of life thereafter. In this paper, we review management of the unique survivorship needs and management options for women at risk for or with a cancer diagnosis, highlighting the importance of interdisciplinary care.

METHODS

To review the available previvorship and survivorship management strategies, a Pub Med search was performed using keywords "survivorship," "genetics," "cancer," "menopause," "hormone therapy," "screening" in addition to review of guidelines, position statements and expert, and committee opinions from the American College of OBGYN, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, The North American Menopause Society, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network , and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Women's Health Specialists are in a unique position to identify and screen women who may be at risk for inherited cancer syndromes as well as provide necessary survivorship management following transition from their oncologists' care.

Breast cancer recurrence risk after hormonal contraceptive use in survivors of reproductive age

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk of recurrence with hormonal contraceptive use in breast cancer survivors of reproductive age.

STUDY DESIGN

In this retrospective study, women ages 18-51 years who were diagnosed with primary stage 0-3 breast cancer between 2006-2016 and subsequently entered remission were included. Patients with missing information within the cancer registry or electronic medical record and those with a history of hysterectomy and/or sterilization procedure prior to diagnosis were excluded. Hormonal contraception use was defined as being prescribed an oral contraceptive pill (OCP), patch, vaginal ring, medroxyprogesterone injection, etonogestrel implant, or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (IUD). Women were separated into two groups, hormonal contraceptive users and non-users. Basic descriptive and inferential statistics were used to compare groups as appropriate. The primary outcome reviewed was local or distant breast cancer recurrence. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and pregnancy.

RESULTS

Following exclusions, 1370 women remained in the cohort. Ninety-seven women (7.08 %) received a prescription for a form of hormonal contraception. When comparing groups, hormonal contraceptive users were more likely to be between 18-40 years of age (46.39 % vs. 17.99 % non-users;P < 0.01) and never smokers (68.04 % vs. 38.57 % non-users; P < 0.01). Patients did not differ between groups based on any other demographic or cancer-related characteristic, including tumor hormone receptor expression. Overall, 92 patients (6.72 %) experienced local or distant recurrence during the study period. Recurrence did not differ between groups (6.19 % users vs. 6.76 % non-users; P = 0.83). All-cause mortality and pregnancy rates also did not differ between hormonal contraceptive users and non-users.

CONCLUSION

The study shows no increased risk of recurrence associated with hormonal contraceptive use after breast cancer diagnosis and remission.

Contraceptive needs and fertility intentions of women with breast cancer in Cape Town, South Africa: a qualitative study

Background

No known studies have been undertaken in South Africa exploring the contraceptive and fertility needs and preferences of women of reproductive age (18–49) diagnosed with breast cancer. This study set out to understand the contraceptive needs and fertility intentions of women with breast cancer in Cape Town, South Africa.

Methods

Qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted with 24 women diagnosed with breast cancer and 4 health care providers at a tertiary hospital in Cape Town, South Africa. We explored contraceptive use prior to diagnosis; the impact of breast cancer on future fertility intentions and contraceptive use; understanding of suitable contraceptive methods during and after treatment and women’s fertility related counseling needs during their continuum of care. Data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach.

Results

Since being diagnosed with breast cancer, of those women using a contraceptive method, the non-hormonal intrauterine device (IUD) was the most commonly used method. However, women reported receiving limited information from health care providers about contraceptive use and future fertility planning post treatment when fertility desires might change. Many women reported limited information received from healthcare providers about the impact of cancer treatment on their future fertility. Most women did not receive information around fertility preservation options, and few were familiar with the concept. Providers focus was more on preventing pregnancy during treatment and ensuring a patient was on a non-hormonal contraceptive method. Providers supported a more holistic, multidisciplinary approach to breast cancer patient’s contraceptive and future fertility needs.

Conclusions

Limited contraceptive and future fertility counseling were reported by women despite many women being provided with the IUD. There is a need for improved information and counseling regarding the impact of treatment on contraceptive and fertility options. It is important that cancer care providers provide timely information regarding fertility options and communicate with patients about their fertility concerns prior to treatment and throughout the course of survivorship. The development of evidence-based information tools to enhance patient-provider communication and counseling could address knowledge gaps.

Pregnancy in Breast Cancer Survivors

Safety of pregnancy occurring after breast cancer treatment has been studied largely, but it is still debatable. These studies have generally showed that overall and disease-free survival in breast cancer survivors with subsequent pregnancy is not less than those without future pregnancy . Also, breast cancer survivors treated with chemotherapy , radiation therapy, or both had no increased risk of congenital anomalies, single gene disorders, or chromosomal syndromes in their offspring. However, it appears that the incidence of preterm labor, low birth weight, and fetal anomalies is higher in these cases.These issues as well as safe time interval from breast cancer treatment to pregnancy , safe contraceptive method after breast cancer, counseling about pregnancy in survivors, and how to follow up the patient for breast cancer recurrence during pregnancy are discussed in this chapter.

Pregnancy associated breast cancer

Pregnancy associated breast cancer (PABC) defined as breast cancer occurring during pregnancy or within the first 1-2 years postpartum. Delay in diagnosis is common. Treatment is timed around gestational age. Surgery and chemotherapy are considered safe after the first trimester. Radiation, anti-her-2, and endocrine therapy are delayed until after delivery due to adverse fetal effects. Iatrogenic prematurity likely causes most long-term fetal sequelae. Multi-disciplinary care and social support are critical for patients and families with PABC.

Contraception in cancer survivors - an expert review Part I. Breast and gynaecological cancers

Objective: The efficacy of treatment for many cancers has increased dramatically in recent decades and there are a growing number of cancer survivors who need effective contraception. In this paper, a group of experts from the European Society of Contraception set out to define the most frequent cancers in women and summarise the guidelines, reviews and studies that provide information and guidance on contraception for each cancer. Methods: Epidemiological studies were analysed to determine the frequency of cancers in women of reproductive age. A narrative review was performed for each cancer, collecting data about the treatment of the disease, its impact on fertility, and the efficacy, health risks, possible benefits and contraindications of the contraceptive methods available. The recommendations were then summarised. Results: Owing to a large amount of information, the results are presented in two parts. Part 1 includes contraception after breast and gynaecological cancers. Part 2 summarises the findings and recommendations regarding contraception in women with skin, gastrointestinal, haematological and endocrine cancers.

Should age impact breast cancer management in young women? Fine tuning of treatment guidelines

Despite breast cancer being uncommon in young women, it is still the most frequent cancer diagnosed in women aged 15–39 years, and the leading cause of death in this age group in high-income countries, after accidents and self-injury. The present review summarizes the most recent guidelines and offers an expert perspective on the many challenges associated with treatment of young women with breast cancer. We will especially focus on early breast cancer, exploring the specificities of the diagnostic process, imaging techniques, locoregional and systemic treatments, and the added value of dedicated multidisciplinary teams. Specific differences in adjuvant treatment between premenopausal and postmenopausal women, especially regarding endocrine therapy, will be addressed in detail. Research questions and current gaps in important fields, such as the paucity of age-specific data regarding antihuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (anti-HER2) therapy and gene panels such as OncotypeDX or MAMMAPRINT will be highlighted. A consistent part of this review is dedicated to the issues defining ‘young women’, such as fertility preservation, managing long-term side effects of oncological treatments and genetic counselling, by detailing current strategies and future perspectives.

Fertility and pregnancy in cancer survivors

Cancer survivors are increasing as improvements in cancer diagnosis and treatment translate to improved outcomes. As cancer survivors in their reproductive years contemplate pregnancy, it is important to understand the impact of cancer and its treatment on fertility and pregnancy outcomes. Cancer treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy can affect patients' fertility, and strategies are available to help preserve the future fertility of survivors. The potential impact of previous cancer diagnoses and treatments on pregnancy and maternal and fetal outcomes needs to be assessed and discussed with survivors, with support from materno-fetal medicine specialists and high-risk antenatal services as needed.

Reproductive health and endocrine disruption in women with breast cancer: a pilot study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess whether incorporation of an original reproductive health assessment and algorithm into breast cancer care helps providers appropriately manage patient reproductive health goals and to follow laboratory markers for fertility and correlate these with menstruation.

METHODS

This prospective observational pilot study was set in an urban, public hospital. Newly diagnosed premenopausal breast cancer patients between 18 and 49 years old were recruited for this study prior to chemotherapy initiation. As the intervention, these patients received a reproductive health assessment and care per the study algorithm at 3-month intervals for 24 months. Blood samples were also collected at the same time intervals. The main outcome measures were to assess if the reproductive health management was consistent with patient goals and to track any follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level changes throughout treatment and post-treatment period.

RESULTS

Two patients were pregnant at study initiation. They received obstetric consultations, opted to continue pregnancies, and postpone treatment; both delivered at term without complications. One woman desired future childbearing and received fertility preservation counseling. All women received family planning consultations and received/continued effective contraceptive methods. Seventy-three percent used long-term contraception, 18 % remained abstinent, and 9 % used condoms. During chemotherapy, FSH rose to menopausal levels in 82 % of patients and TSH rose significantly in 9 %. While 82 % of women experienced amenorrhea, 44 % of these women resumed menstruation after chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The assessment and algorithm were useful in managing patients' reproductive health needs. Chemotherapy-induced endocrine disruption impacted reproductive health.

First international consensus guidelines for breast cancer in young women (BCY1)

The 1st International Consensus Conference for Breast Cancer in Young Women (BCY1) took place in November 2012, in Dublin, Ireland organized by the European School of Oncology (ESO). Consensus recommendations for management of breast cancer in young women were developed and areas of research priorities were identified. This manuscript summarizes these international consensus recommendations, which are also endorsed by the European Society of Breast Specialists (EUSOMA).

Pregnancy after cancer: results from a prospective cohort study of cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

Future fertility is an important concern for many cancer survivors. Cancer therapies have been shown to adversely impact reproductive function. However, it is difficult to predict the extent to which reproductive dysfunction will occur. The purpose of this study was to compare measures of ovarian reserve (MOR) and pregnancy rates in young female cancer survivors and similar-aged controls.

PROCEDURES

A prospective cohort study was conducted in a university-hospital setting. Participants were followed annually for a mean 25 months to assess reproductive history, the incidence of pregnancy, and MOR (serum follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, estradiol, inhibin B, anti-mullerian hormone (AMH), antral follicle counts and mean ovarian volume).

RESULTS

Eighty-four female survivors (average age 26, and 14 years post-treatment) and 98 similar-aged controls that were sexually active with men were included. At baseline, 27/84 survivors and 42/98 controls reported a prior pregnancy. Adjusted models showed that anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) were impaired in survivors with a prior pregnancy compared to controls with a prior pregnancy (P < 0.01, P = 0.03). During follow-up in 56 survivors and 74 controls, 19 pregnancies occurred in survivors and 18 in controls. Comparison of MOR between survivors who became pregnant and controls who became pregnant revealed that AMH and AFC were impaired in survivors (P < 0.05). Compared to survivors who did not become pregnant, survivors who did were older (P < 0.01) and more likely to be cohabitating (P < 0.01), but had similar MOR and exposure to alkylators (P = 0.34).

CONCLUSIONS

Survivors achieved pregnancy at a rate similar to controls despite impaired MOR.

Magnetic field interactions of copper-containing intrauterine devices in 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: in vivo study

Objective

An ex vivo study found a copper-containing intrauterine device (IUD) to be safe for women undergoing an MRI examination at a 3.0-T field. No significant artifacts caused by the metallic implant were detected. However, there are still no in vivo data about these concerns. The aim of this study was to evaluate 3.0-T magnetic field interactions of copper-containing IUDs in vivo.

Materials and Methods

Magnetic field interactions and potential adverse events were evaluated in 33 women using a questionnaire-based telephone survey. Two experienced radiologists performed artifact evaluation on MR images of the pelvis.

Results

Eighteen patients were eligible for the survey. One patient reported a dislocation of the IUD after the MR examination. All other patients had no signs of field interactions. No IUD-related artifacts were found.

Conclusion

MRI at 3.0-T is possible for women with copper-containing IUDs. However, consulting a gynecologist to check the correct position of the IUD and exclude complications after an MR examination is highly recommended. High-quality clinical imaging of the female pelvis can be performed without a loss in image quality.

Effects of 17α-ethynylestradiol-induced cholestasis on the pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin in rats: reduced biliary excretion and hepatic metabolism of doxorubicin

1. Since the prevalent hormonal combination therapy with estrogen analogues in cancer patients has frequency and possibility to induce the cholestasis, the frequent combination therapy with 17α-ethynylestradiol (EE, an oral contraceptive) and doxorubicin (an anticancer drug) might be monitored in aspect of efficacy and safety. Doxorubicin is mainly excreted into the bile via P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (Mrp2) in hepatobiliary route and metabolized via cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A subfamily. Also the hepatic Mrp2 (not P-gp) and CYP3A subfamily levels were reduced in EE-induced cholestatic (EEC) rats. Thus, we herein report the pharmacokinetic changes of doxorubicin with respect to the changes in its biliary excretion and hepatic metabolism in EEC rats. 2. The pharmacokinetic study of doxorubicin after intravenous administration of its hydrochloride was conducted along with the investigation of bile flow rate and hepatobiliary excretion of doxorubicin in control and EEC rats. 3. The significantly greater AUC (58.7% increase) of doxorubicin in EEC rats was due to the slower CL (32.9% decrease). The slower CL was due to the reduction of hepatic biliary excretion (67.0% decrease) and hepatic CYP3A subfamily-mediated metabolism (21.9% decrease) of doxorubicin. These results might have broader implications to understand the altered pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacologic effects of doxorubicin via biliary excretion and hepatic metabolism in experimental and clinical estrogen-induced cholestasis.