Advance Care Planning Prior to Death in Older Adults with Hip Fracture

Advanced Care Planning for the Orthopaedic Patient

➢ Advanced care planning most commonly refers to the act of planning and preparing for decisions with regard to end-of-life care and/or serious illness based on a patient's personal values, life goals, and preferences.➢ Over time, advanced care planning and its formalization through advanced directives have demonstrated substantial benefits to patients, their families and caregivers, and the larger health-care system.➢ Despite these benefits, advanced care planning and advanced directives remain underutilized.➢ Orthopaedic surgeons interact with patients during sentinel events, such as fragility hip fractures, that indicate a decline in the overall health trajectory.➢ Orthopaedic surgeons must familiarize themselves with the concepts and medicolegal aspects of advanced care planning so that care can be optimized for patients during sentinel health events.

Strategies to improve end-of-life decision-making and palliative care following hip fracture in frail older adults: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Although surgery is the gold standard following a hip fracture, the potential for rehabilitation and survival rates are low in frail older patients. Some patients may derive more benefit from palliative care. The objectives of this review were to identify the available strategies to improve end-of-life decision-making and palliative care for frail patients with hip fractures and to synthetise their level of support.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of the scientific and grey literature, searching seven databases and websites of associations. We included all study designs, expert opinion articles and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Data were synthetised according to the Approach to Patient with Limited Life Expectancy and Hip Fracture framework. The number of research items and their level of evidence were tabulated for each of the recommended strategies.

RESULTS

Of the 10 591 items identified, 34 were eligible. The majority of included articles were original research studies (n = 15). Half of the articles and CPGs focused on intervention categories (55%) such as goals of care discussion and comfort care, followed by factors to consider in the end-of-life decision-making process (25%) and prognosis assessments (20%), mainly through the estimation of life expectancy. The level of evidence for these strategies remains low, given the limited number of prospective studies supporting them.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review highlighted that end-of-life care in frail older patients with a hip fracture remains understudied. The strategies identified could be prioritised for future research to improve the well-being of the target population while promoting sustainable resource management.

Impact of Chronic Conditions, Healthcare Utilization, and Demographics on Advance Care Planning

Context: Unraveling the intricacies of what factors influence advance care planning (ACP) is an ongoing research challenge. Research shows much ACP is crisis-based and takes place at the end of life. Complicating this late-stage approach may be demographic differences based on race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Objective: We examined the relationship between demographic factors, chronic health conditions, and healthcare utilization in predicting who was most likely to engage in ACP activities, including designating a durable power of attorney for healthcare (DPOAHC), having a living will, and discussing wishes with family or others. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis using 2018 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) exit data provided by a proxy for the deceased participant that matched the 2016 survey participant data (N = 884). Generalized linear mixed models were used for the analysis. Results: The number of chronic health conditions and healthcare utilization were not associated with ACP activities, but several of the demographic variables showed strong associations. Participants who were female, white, older, and from a higher socioeconomic status were more likely to have engaged in ACP. Conclusion: People continue to defer ACP discussions and documentation end of life or when facing medical crises. More needs to be done to reach out to younger adults, racial minorities, and those with lower socioeconomic status to encourage them to engage in ACP.

Qualitative Evaluation of a Novel Educational Tool to Communicate Individualized Hip Fracture Prognostic Information to Patients and Surrogates: My Hip Fracture (My-HF)

INTRODUCTION

Mortality and morbidity are high for older adults after hip fracture (HF), but patients and surrogate decision makers (SDMs) are typically unaware of the poor prognosis. We developed a novel educational tool, My Hip Fracture (My-HF), to provide patients and SDMs of patients hospitalized with acute HF individualized estimates of their post-HF prognosis. We conducted initial usability testing of My-HF in a sample of patients with HF and SDMs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

My-HF provides information about: 1) anatomy and risk factors for HF; 2) Hip fracture treatment received; 3) individualized predicted risk of adverse events and 4) anticipated discharge trajectory. We conducted a qualitative usability study using a convenience sample of hospitalized, post-operative patients with acute HF or SDMs of patients who lacked decision-making capacity. We used semi-structured interviews to obtain feedback. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes and concepts.

RESULTS

We conducted interviews with 8 patients and 9 SDMs (mean age of interviewees 70.1 years, 41% female). My-HF was generally well received. Thematic analysis identified legibility and visual appeal, comprehension, numeracy, utility and reflection as prominent themes. Most respondents found My-HF to be useful in improving their understanding of HF and as a potential mechanism for sharing information with other care team members (including family and professionals). Suggestions for improvement of legibility, presentation of the individualized prognosis information and content were identified.

DISCUSSION

Patients and SDMs are generally accepting of My-HF and found it useful for communicating individualized prognostic information. Feedback identified areas for improvement for future iterations of the tool.

CONCLUSION

My-HF presents a means of addressing the gap in understanding of prognosis post-HF as a part of patient-centered care. Further evaluation will be needed to assess the impact of My-HF on patient and SDM reported outcomes as we transition from a paper to smart-phone enabled web application.

A 2-min cognitive screener for predicting 1-year functional recovery and survival in older adults after hip fracture repair

BACKGROUND

Implementing cognitive assessment in older people admitted to hospital with hip fracture - lying in bed, experiencing pain - is challenging. We investigated the value of a quick and easy-to-administer 10-point cognitive screener (10-CS) in predicting 1-year functional recovery and survival after hip surgery.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study comprising 304 older patients (mean age=80.3±9.1 years; women=72%) with hip fracture consecutively admitted to a specialized academic medical center that supports secondary hospitals in Sao Paulo Metropolitan Area, Brazil. The 10-CS, a 2-minute bedside tool including temporal orientation, verbal fluency, and three-word recall, classified patients as having normal cognition, possible cognitive impairment, or probable cognitive impairment on admission. Outcomes were time-to-recovery activities of daily living (ADLs; Katz index) and mobility (New Mobility Score), and survival during 1-year after hip surgery. Hazard models, considering death as a competing risk, were used to associate the 10-CS categories with outcomes after adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical measures.

RESULTS

On admission, 144 (47%) patients had probable cognitive impairment. Compared to those cognitively normal, patients with probable cognitive impairment presented less postsurgical recovery of ADLs (77% vs. 40%; adjusted sub-hazard ratio [HR]=0.44; 95%CI=0.32-0.62) and mobility (50% vs. 30%; adjusted sub-HR=0.52; 95%CI=0.34-0.79), and higher risk of death (15% vs. 40%; adjusted HR=2.08; 95%CI=1.03-4.20) over 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The 10-CS is a strong predictor of functional recovery and survival after hip fracture repair. Cognitive assessment using quick and easy-to-administer screening tools like 10-CS can help clinicians make better decisions and offer tailored care for older patients admitted with hip fracture.

Advance care planning in Dutch primary care: a pre/post-implementation study

BACKGROUND

Despite known advantages of advance care planning (ACP) and a positive attitude towards ACP by older people living in the community and general practitioners (GPs), such conversations are not yet commonplace in GP practices.

AIM

To implement ACP as part of routine care in general practice and thereby increasing the number of ACP conversations and advance directives; to investigate characteristics of older people with and without an ACP conversation.

METHODS

(1) A pre-evaluation and post-evaluation study using questionnaire data from people aged 75 years or older living in the community. (2) A prospective study using data provided by healthcare professionals (people they started an ACP conversation with).

RESULTS

After implementation of ACP, significantly more people had spoken to their GP about hospitalisations, intensive care admission and treatment preferences in certain circumstances, compared with before. Advance directives were drawn up more often. People who had an ACP conversation were older, have had a cerebrovascular accident, had a clear idea about future health problems, had a preference to start ACP before they were ill, already had an ACP conversation at pre-measurement and indicated at pre-measurement that their GP knows their preferences.

CONCLUSION

Results in number of ACP conversations and advance drectives were modest but positive. ACP was implemented as routine care. GPs select people with whom they have a conversation. This can be an efficient use of time, but there is a risk that certain groups may be underserved (for example, patients with multimorbidity or patients with less health skills).

A Qualitative Exploration of Seriously Ill Patients' Experiences of Goals of Care Discussions in Australian Hospital Settings

BACKGROUND

Goals of care (GOC) is a communication and decision-making process that occurs between a clinician and a patient (or surrogate decision-maker) during an episode of care to facilitate a plan of care that is consistent with the patient's preferences and values. Little is known about patients' experiences of these discussions.

OBJECTIVE

This study explored patients' perspectives of the GOC discussion in the hospital setting.

DESIGN

An explorative qualitative design was used within a social constructionist framework.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients were recruited from six Australian hospitals across two states. Eligible patients had had a GOC discussion and they were identified by the senior nurse or their doctor for informed consent and interview.

APPROACH

Semi-structured individual or dyadic interviews (with the carer/family member present) were conducted at the bedside or at the patient's home (for recently discharged patients). Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed for themes.

KEY RESULTS

Thirty-eight patient interviews were completed. The key themes identified were (1) values and expectations, and (2) communication (sub-themes: (i) facilitators of the conversation, (ii) barriers to the conversation, and (iii) influence of the environment). Most patients viewed the conversation as necessary and valued having their preferences heard. Effective communication strategies and a safe, private setting were facilitators of the GOC discussion. Deficits in any of these key elements functioned as a barrier to the process.

CONCLUSIONS

Effective communication, and patients' values and expectations set the stage for goals of care discussions; however, the environment plays a significant role. Communication skills training and education designed to equip clinicians to negotiate GOC interactions effectively are essential. These interventions must also be accompanied by systemic changes including building a culture supportive of GOC, clear policies and guidelines, and champions who facilitate uptake of GOC discussions.