Prevalence of Financial Toxicity Among Hispanic Cancer Survivors: A Nationally Representative Pan-Cancer Analysis

Financial Toxicity and Breast Cancer: Why Does It Matter, Who Is at Risk, and How Do We Intervene?

Financial toxicity, or the financial burden patients experience because of medical costs, can lead to negative patient effects including lower quality of life, compromised clinical care, and worse health outcomes. People with cancer and survivors are more likely to have financial toxicity than those without cancer, and patients with breast cancer are uniquely at risk. Patients with breast cancer often require multimodal treatment (surgery, radiation, and/or systemic therapy) and adjuvant hormonal therapy can continue for years after primary treatment. With improved disease outcomes, patients with breast cancer have prolonged survivorship often lasting decades but may carry chronic toxicities from treatment; both ongoing treatment of metastatic disease and long-term surveillance include continued tests, imaging, and medical visits that add to the cumulative burden on patients and their families. Additionally, breast cancer predominately affects women, who are more likely to have dual caregiver responsibilities, and increasingly is diagnosed in younger patients, who may have fertility preservation expenses and are more likely to experience education and/or employment disruption. When faced with high costs, patients may face difficult decisions regarding what sacrifices they are willing to endure to receive care. Interventions designed to reduce financial toxicity are moving out of the pilot phase, and ongoing randomized trials are expected to provide evidence into the effectiveness of financial navigation programs. Further work to address financial toxicity in breast cancer at the patient-provider, institutional, and governmental levels is needed for comprehensively better financial outcomes and quality of life.

Hispanic/Latino Ethnicity Is an Independent Predictor of Worse Survival for Gastric Cancer in a Multicenter Safety-Net Patient Population

BACKGROUND

Various population-based studies have shown Hispanic/Latino ethnicity is a risk factor for worse survival in patients with gastric cancer linked to disparate access to care. We aimed to address whether Hispanic patients treated within safety-net hospital systems continue to experience this survival deficit compared to non-Hispanic patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study comparing survival between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020, within Los Angeles County's safety-net hospital system. Gastric cancer-specific survival was compared between the two cohorts using the Kaplan-Meier estimate and Cox proportional-hazards regression model.

RESULTS

In total, 448 patients who received care from five medical centers were included; 348 (77.7%) patients self-identified as Hispanic and 100 (22.3%) as non-Hispanic. Mean follow-up time was 2.0 years (median 0.91 years, IQR, 0.34-2.5 years). Hispanic patients were found to be diagnosed at a younger age (55.6 vs. 60.7 years, P < 0.01), demonstrate higher state area deprivation index (6.4 vs. 5.0, P < 0.01), and present with metastatic disease (59.8% vs. 45%, P = 0.04). After adjusting social and oncologic variables, Hispanic ethnicity remained an independent risk factor for worse survival [HR 1.56, (95% CI, 1.06-2.28); P = 0.02].

CONCLUSIONS

Hispanic patients treated within a large, multicenter safety-net hospital system experience worse survival compared to non-Hispanic patients. This suggests ethnic disparities exist within safety-net hospital systems, independent of known clinicopathologic factors.

IMPACT

Improving outcomes for Hispanic patients with gastric cancer requires future efforts aimed at defining and addressing these unidentified barriers to care. See related In the Spotlight, p. 12.

Disparities in Stage at Presentation Among Hispanic and Latinx Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the United States

PURPOSE

Hispanic and Latinx people in the United States are the fastest-growing ethnic group. However, previous studies in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) often analyze these diverse communities in aggregate. We aimed to identify differences in NSCLC stage at diagnosis in the US population, focusing on disaggregated Hispanic/Latinx individuals.

METHODS

Data from the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2018 identified patients with primary NSCLC. Individuals were disaggregated by racial and ethnic subgroup and Hispanic country of origin. Ordinal logistic regression adjusting for age, facility type, income, educational attainment, comorbidity index, insurance, and year of diagnosis was used to create adjusted odds ratios (aORs), with higher odds representing diagnosis at later-stage NSCLC.

RESULTS

Of 1,565,159 patients with NSCLC, 46,616 were Hispanic/Latinx (3.0%). When analyzed in the setting of race and ethnicity, Hispanic patients were more likely to be diagnosed with metastatic disease compared with non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients: 47.0% for Hispanic Black, 46.0% Hispanic White, and 44.3% of Hispanic other patients versus 39.1% of non-Hispanic White patients (P < .001 for all). By country of origin, 51.4% of Mexican, 41.7% of Puerto Rican, 44.6% of Cuban, 50.8% of South or Central American, 48.4% of Dominican, and 45.6% of other Hispanic patients were diagnosed with metastatic disease, compared with 39.1% of NHWs. Conversely, 20.2% of Mexican, 26.9% of Puerto Rican, 24.2% of Cuban, 22.5% of South or Central American, 23.7% of Dominican, and 24.5% of other Hispanic patients were diagnosed with stage I disease, compared with 30.0% of NHWs. All Hispanic groups were more likely to present with later-stage NSCLC than NHW patients (greatest odds for Mexican patients, aOR, 1.44; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Hispanic/Latinx patients with non-small-cell lung cancer were more likely to be diagnosed with advanced disease compared with NHWs. Disparities persisted upon disaggregation by both race and country of origin, with over half of Mexican patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis. Disparities among Hispanic/Latinx groups by race and by country of origin highlight the shortcomings of treating these groups as a monolith and underscore the need for disaggregated research and targeted interventions.