Evaluation of clinical risk factors for osteoporosis and applicability of the FRAX tool in Joinville City, Southern Brazil

Secular trends in hip fractures in adults over 50 years old: a retrospective analysis of hospital admissions to the Brazilian Public Health System from 2004 to 2013

This was a retrospective observational study to determine the secular trends in osteoporosis hip fractures in Brazil from 2004 to 2013. The fracture rates were stable for both sexes, and there was not a secular trend. Fractures were predominant in the South and Southeast Regions. The hip fracture rate was lower in this study than in other studies. These regional differences may be considered in the FRAX Brazil calibration.

PURPOSE

Hip fractures are well-known osteoporotic fractures with high mortality and morbidity. Epidemiological studies in Brazil on hip fractures are scarce, and the great majority have been performed in small populations from a few cities. None of these studies has analyzed the long-term hip fracture secular trends, which are important data for the promotion of public health actions.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study with a secular trend analysis in patients over 50 years old who were admitted to the Brazilian Public Health System from 2004 to 2013. We collected hospitalization data according to the ICD-10 for low-trauma hip fractures. The fracture rate was calculated when the patients were stratified by sex, age, and geographic region, and linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the secular trends.

RESULTS

The hip fracture rate per 100,000 inhabitants was 59.69; the rate was 74.72 in females and 42.95 in males. The fracture rates were higher in the South and Southeast Regions and steadily increased with age, and the average ratio of women-to-men was 1.74. No secular trend was detected in the overall population. Surprisingly, the secular trend only increased in the South region from 2004 to 2013, and the secular trends were stable in the other regions.

CONCLUSION

Although the secular trend was similar to some worldwide studies, the hip fracture rate was lower than that previously observed in regional studies in Brazil. These regional differences may be considered in the FRAX Brazil calibration.

Is diabetes mellitus a risk factor for low bone density: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic review aimed to investigate whether diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for low bone density, as this might be important and necessary for doctors specialized in treating patients with low bone density.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and SciELO were searched for cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies that investigated the effects of diabetes mellitus on bone mineral density till January 2020. Data screening and extraction are done independently, whereas the methodological quality of the studies was assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies that met the eligibility criteria including 24,340 participants were enrolled. The overall quality of the studies had a scale of over 6 points. The overall odds ratio (OR) regarding the risk of diabetes mellitus in low bone density patients was 1.20 [95% confidence interval (CI)0.80-1.79, P = 0.30], and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (OR = 0.69 [0.11, 4.55], P = 0.70). Subgroup analysis revealed that whether females or males, developed or developing countries, T2DM, studies after 2015, and quality over 7 points (all P values > 0.05) showed no significant differences with the risk of low bone density, except type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) (OR = 3.83 [1.64, 8.96], P = 0.002), and studies before 2015 (OR = 1.76 [1.06, 2.92], P = 0.03), and quality below 7 points (OR = 2.27 [1.50, 3.43], P = 0.0001). Funnel plot showed no significant asymmetry.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings revealed no relationship between T2DM and low bone density, and also, the evidence between T1DM and low bone density is inadequate, requiring further analysis of well-designed cohort studies.

INDICATORS OF MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY BY FEMUR FRACTURES IN OLDER PEOPLE: A DECADE-LONG STUDY IN BRAZILIAN HOSPITALS

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the profile of femur fractures in older adults in Brazil between 2008 and 2018.

METHODS

Population-based time series study with data from the Department of Informatics of the Unified Health System (Datasus), including 480,652 hospitalizations, of adults from 60 years and over, with hip fracture (ICD10-S72).

RESULTS

There was an increase of 76.9% in the hospitalization register (mean 5.87%/year) and an average incidence rate of 19.46 fractures for every 10,000 older adults. In total, 68% of hospitalizations were female, 28% from São Paulo. The average length of stay was 8.9 days, being higher in the Northern Region (11.8) and in the Federal District (18.7). Average mortality rate was 5%, being higher in men (5.45%) and over 80 years old. Northeast Region had the lowest mortality rate (3.54%). Southeast Region had the highest rate (5.53%). Total cost of hospitalizations was R$ 1.1 billion, with an average of R$ 100 million/year. Average cost per hospitalization was higher in the Southern Region (R$ 2,491.00).

CONCLUSION

Femoral fracture is an important cause of mortality among older adults, with a higher incidence in women but higher mortality in men, with high cost to the system and regional differences. Level of Evidence II, Economic and decision analyses - developing an economic or decision model.

A brief history of FRAX

This paper reviews the research programme that went into the development of FRAX® and its impact in the 10 years since its release in 2008.

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis is defined on the measurement of bone mineral density though the clinical consequence is fracture. The sensitivity of bone mineral density measurements for fracture prediction is low, leading to the development of FRAX to better calculate the likelihood of fracture and target anti-osteoporosis treatments.

METHODS

The method used in this paper is literature review.

RESULTS

FRAX, developed over an 8-year period, was launched in 2008. Since the launch of FRAX, models have been made available for 64 countries and in 31 languages covering more than 80% of the world population.

CONCLUSION

FRAX provides an advance in fracture risk assessment and a reference technology platform for future improvements in performance characteristics.

The Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

To summarize the existing evidence and evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture as a clinical treatment for osteoporosis. Six English and four Chinese databases were searched from their inception to April 2017. Randomized controlled trials were included, in which warm acupuncture, needling or electroacupuncture were compared with sole Western medicine with osteoporosis. All the data were assessed and extracted by two authors independently. The bias risk assessment recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool was used to assess the quality of the selected studies. This meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.3. Pooled analyses were calculated by standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed by I2 test. Thirty-five studies involving 3014 patients were located. Meta-analysis showed that warm acupuncture could increase the bone mineral density of lumar (SMD [Formula: see text] 0.93, 95% CI [Formula: see text] 0.65, 1.21, [Formula: see text][Formula: see text]0.00001) and femur (MD[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]0.11, 95% CI[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]0.05, 0.16, P[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]0.0002), the level of serum calcium (MD[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]0.18, 95% CI[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]0.13, 0.24, [Formula: see text][Formula: see text]0.00001) and estradiol (SMD[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]0.65, 95% CI[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]0.32, 0.98, P[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]0.0001), relieve pain (MD[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]–1.64, 95% CI[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]–2.69, –0.59, P[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]0.002), decrease the level of serum alkaline phosphatase (MD[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]–7.8, 95% CI[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]–14.17, –0.84, P [Formula: see text] 0.03) compared with sole Western medicine. Electroacupuncture could relieve pain (MD[Formula: see text][Formula: see text] –1.32, 95% CI[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]–2.15, –0.48, P[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]0.002), increase the level of serum calcium (MD[Formula: see text][Formula: see text][Formula: see text]–0.12, 95% CI [Formula: see text] –0.16,-0.09, [Formula: see text][Formula: see text]0.00001) and decrease the level of serum alkaline phosphatase (MD [Formula: see text] –3.63, 95% CI [Formula: see text] –6.60, –0.66, P [Formula: see text] 0.02) compared with sole Western medicine. Needling could relieve pain (MD [Formula: see text] –2.27, 95% CI [Formula: see text] –3.11, –1.43, [Formula: see text][Formula: see text]0.00001) compared with sole Western medicine. This present systematic review indicated that acupuncture could be an effective therapy for treating osteoporosis. Warm acupuncture seemed to more effective than electroacupuncture and needling for osteoporosis in comparison to sole Western medicine.