Anterior fracture dislocation of the proximal humerus: Management and treatment results

Proximal humerus fracture dislocations: outcomes of management

PURPOSE

Proximal humerus fracture dislocations are amongst the most severe proximal humerus injuries, presenting a challenging management problem. The aim of this study was to report on long-term outcomes of management of proximal humerus fracture dislocations.

METHODS

Patients with a proximal humerus fracture dislocation managed at a Level 1 trauma centre from January 2010 to December 2018 were included. Patients with isolated tuberosity fracture dislocations or pathological fractures were excluded. Outcome measures were the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), EQ-5D-5L, return to work and radiological outcomes. Complications recorded included further surgery, loss of position/fixation, non-union/malunion and avascular necrosis.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were included with a proximal humerus fracture dislocation in the study period; 48 underwent surgical management and 21 were managed successfully with closed reduction alone. The mean (SD) age of the cohort was 59.7 (±20.4), and 54% were male. Overall patients reported a mean OSS of 39.8 (±10.3), a mean EQ-5D utility score of 0.73 (±0.20), and 78% were able to return to work at a median of 1.2 months. There was a high prevalence of complications in both patients managed operatively or with closed reduction (25% and 38% respectively). In patients undergoing surgical management, 21% required subsequent surgery.

CONCLUSION

Patient reported outcome measures post proximal humerus fracture dislocations do not return to normal population levels. Further, these injuries are associated with a high prevalence of complications. Appropriate patient counselling should be undertaken before embarking on definitive management.

Assessment of surgical management for locked fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus in patients of different ages

Background

Locked fracture-dislocation of the proximal humerus (LFDPH) is a very severe complex injury; neither arthroplasty nor internal plating are fully satisfactory. This study aimed to evaluate different surgical treatments for LFDPH to determine the optimal option for patients of different ages.

Methods

From October 2012 to August 2020, patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or shoulder hemiarthroplasty (HSA) for LFDPH were retrospectively reviewed. At follow-up, radiologic evaluation was performed to evaluate bony union, joint congruence, screw cut-out, avascular necrosis of the humeral head, implant failure, impingement, heterotopic ossification, and tubercular displacement or resorption. Clinical evaluation comprised the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and Constant-Murley and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Additionally, intraoperative and postoperative complications were assessed.

Results

Seventy patients (47 women and 23 men) with final evaluation results qualified for inclusion. Patients were divided into three groups: group A: patients aged under 60 years who underwent ORIF; group B: patients aged ≥60 years who underwent ORIF; and group C: patients who underwent HSA. At a mean follow-up of 42.6 ± 26.2 months, function indicators, namely shoulder flexion, and Constant-Murley and DASH scores, in group A were significantly better than those in groups B and C. Function indicators in group B were slightly but not significantly better compared with group C. Regarding operative time and VAS scores, there were no significant differences between the three groups. Complications occurred in 25%, 30.6%, and 10% of the patients in groups A, B, and C, respectively.

Conclusions

ORIF and HSA for LFDPH provided acceptable but not excellent results. For patients aged <60 years, ORIF might be optimal, whereas, for patients aged ≥60 years, both ORIF and HSA provided similar results. However, ORIF was associated with a higher rate of complications.

Fracture dislocations of the proximal humerus treated with open reduction and internal fixation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The treatment of proximal humerus fracture dislocations can be challenging given the extensive injury to the proximal humeral anatomy and increased risk of devascularization of the humeral head often seen in these injuries. The purpose of this study is to undertake a systematic review of the literature on the functional outcomes, rate of revision, and short- and long-term complications for proximal humerus fracture dislocations treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).

METHODS

The PubMed and OVID Embase databases were queried for literature reporting on proximal humerus fracture dislocations treated with ORIF. Data including study design, patient demographics, functional outcomes, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Twelve studies including 294 patients with Neer type 2-, 3-, or 4-part proximal humerus fracture dislocations met the criteria for inclusion. The mean patient age was 53.4 years (19-89 years) with an average follow-up of 2.9 years (1.15-4.9 years). At the final follow-up, the mean Constant score was 73.2 (52-87.3) and the mean Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand score was 26.6 (17.5-32). Avascular necrosis was observed in 20.0% (0%-82.3%) and nonunion was observed in 3.0% (0%-7.7%) of patients. Conversion to arthroplasty was observed in 10.7% (5%-20%) and a total reoperation was observed in 35.6% (11.8%-89.1%) of patients in studies explicitly reporting these outcomes. In addition to conversion to arthroplasty, common causes of reoperation were revision ORIF (5.2%) and hardware removal (22.2%).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing ORIF for proximal humerus fracture dislocations have reasonable functional outcomes but relatively high avascular necrosis and reoperation rates. This information can be used to counsel patients and set expectations about the potential for further surgeries.

What Factors Are Associated With Poor Shoulder Function and Serious Complications After Internal Fixation of Three-part and Four-part Proximal Humerus Fracture-dislocations?

BACKGROUND

Three-part and four-part fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus are characterized by severe soft tissue disruptions that can compromise the viability of the humeral head. As a result, nonunion and avascular necrosis are more common in these injuries. In such injuries, surgical treatment (internal fixation or arthroplasty) is performed in most patients who are determined to be fit for surgery to potentially restore shoulder function. Although the decision to preserve or replace the humeral head is simple in young patients or those > 65 years, in most other patients, the decision can be complicated, and little is known about which patient-related and injury-related factors may be independently associated with poor shoulder function or complications like avascular necrosis.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What proportion of fractures united after internal fixation of a three-part or four-part fracture-dislocation of the proximal humerus, what is the mean Constant score at a minimum of 2 years after this injury, and what proportion had serious complications (such as loss of fixation, nonunion, reoperation, or avascular necrosis)? (2) After controlling for potential confounding variables, what factors are independently associated with poor shoulder function (defined as a Constant score < 55 out of 100) and occurrence of serious complications such as loss of fixation or reduction resulting in revision surgery, nonunion, or radiographic evidence of avascular necrosis of the humeral head?

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2017, the senior author of this study (ASG) treated 69 patients with three-part or four-part proximal humerus fracture dislocations. During this time, indications for internal fixation in these patients were adequate humeral bone quality as determined by the surgeon on radiographs, adequate bone stock and volume available for fixation in the humeral head as determined on CT images, and the absence of a head split component as assessed on preoperative radiographs and CT images. On this basis, 87% (60 patients) underwent internal fixation with a locked plate and suture fixation of the tuberosities through a deltopectoral approach. Thirteen percent (nine patients) underwent either a hemiarthroplasty or a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Of the 60 patients who underwent internal fixation, four declined to participate in the study and two with brachial plexus palsy were not considered for inclusion. This study focused on the remaining 54 patients who were considered potentially eligible. To be included, a minimum follow-up of 2 years was required; 11% (6 of 54) were lost before that time, and the remaining 48 patients were analyzed at a mean of 48 months ± 17 months in this retrospective study, which drew data from longitudinally maintained institutional databases. Fracture union was assessed by obliteration of fracture lines and the presence of bridging trabecular bone on plain radiographs. Shoulder function was assessed using the Constant score, which is scored from 0 to 100 points, with 0 indicating the most disability and 100 the least disability. The anchor-based minimal clinically important difference for the Constant score is 9.8 points. Twelve patient-related and injury-related factors were analyzed using a multivariate regression model to identify factors that are independently associated with poor results after internal fixation as measured by shoulder function and the occurrence of serious complications. We categorized results as poor if patients had one or more of the following: Constant score < 55 out of 100 at the last follow-up examination (for patients who underwent revision surgery, the Constant score immediately before revision was considered) and loss of fixation or reduction resulting in revision surgery, nonunion, or avascular necrosis of the humeral head. Patients were screened for avascular necrosis at 6 and 12 months after surgery, then annually for another 2 years. Further assessments were made only based on symptoms.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine percent of the fractures united within 18 weeks of surgery (38 of 48), and an additional 13% united by 24 weeks (6 of 48), while 8% did not unite (4 of 48). The mean Constant score at the last follow-up was 68 ± 12. Twenty-one percent (10 of 48) had a Constant score < 55, indicating poor shoulder function. Twenty-one percent (10 of 48) experienced avascular necrosis, and 15% (7 of 48) with either nonunion or avascular necrosis underwent revision shoulder arthroplasty. Two patients who underwent arthroplasty had both nonunion and avascular necrosis. After controlling for potentially confounding variables, we found that being a woman (odds ratio 1.7 [95% confidence interval 1.4 to 2.1]; p = 0.01), four-part fracture dislocations (OR 2.1 [95% CI 1.5 to 2.7]; p < 0.001), absence of a metaphyseal head extension (OR 2.4 [95% CI 1.8 to 3.3]; p < 0.001), absence of active back-bleeding from the humeral head (OR 3.4 [95% CI 2.3 to 5.1]; p < 0.001), height of the head segment < 2 cm (OR 2.3 [95% CI 1.8 to 2.8]; p < 0.001), and absence of capsular attachments to the head fragment (OR 2.2 [95% CI 1.6 to 2.9]; p < 0.001) were independently associated with poor shoulder function and the occurrence of complications such as nonunion and avascular necrosis.

CONCLUSION

Internal fixation of three-part and four-part proximal humerus fracture dislocations resulted in poor shoulder function and complications in a high number of patients, although fracture union was achieved in most patients. A nonunion proportion of 8%, 21% proportion of avascular necrosis, and 15% proportion of patients who underwent revision surgery suggests this is a fairly terrible injury. Being a woman and injury factors such as four-part fracture dislocation, absent metaphyseal head extension and back-bleeding from the head, height of the fractured head segment < 2 cm, and absence of capsular attachments to the head were independently associated with poor function and complications. Our findings can help surgeons decide between internal fixation and arthroplasty for the surgical treatment of these injuries in patients across different age groups and functional demands.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Risk factors for fracture-related infection after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures: A multicenter retrospective study of 496 fractures (TRON group study)

INTRODUCTION

One of the complications of the surgical therapy for proximal humerus fractures is fracture-related infection (FRI). This multicenter study aimed to investigate the incidence of FRI and clarify the risk factors associated with FRI in patients receiving open reduction and internal fixation for proximal humerus fracture.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Among 684 patients diagnosed as having proximal humerus fracture and who were treated by surgical therapy in 13 institutions (named TRON group) from 2015 through 2020, 496 patients (men, n = 134, women, n = 362; mean [SD] age, 68.5 [14.5] years; mean [SD] body mass index [BMI], 23.0 [4.4] kg/m²) were included as subjects. Excluded were 188 patients due to less than 12 month's follow-up, patients who underwent osteosynthesis using neither plate nor nail and those with open fracture. We extracted the following as risk factors of FRI: sex, BMI, smoking status, diabetes, glenohumeral fracture dislocation, fracture classification, approach, implant, waiting period, type of anesthesia, operative time and blood loss during surgery. We conducted logistic regression analysis to investigate the risk factors of FRI using these extracted items as explanatory variables and the presence or absence of FRI as the response variable.

RESULT

FRI occurred after surgery for proximal humerus fracture in 9 of the 496 patients (1.8%). The causative organism was methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in 4 patients, Pseudomonas aeruginosa in one patient and Enterococcus faecalis in one patient. In the other 3 patients, causative organisms were not detected. The univariate analysis showed significant differences for present of glenohumeral fracture dislocation (p = 0.004). Logistic regression analysis showed glenohumeral fracture dislocation to be the significant explanatory factor for FRI (odds ratio 12.3, p = 0.0375).

CONCLUSION

This study revealed an infection rate following open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fracture of 1.8% (9 patients) and that Staphylococcus was the most frequent causative organism. Glenohumeral fracture dislocation is a significant risk for postoperative FRI.

Outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fracture dislocations

INTRODUCTION

Proximal humeral fracture with associated glenohumeral dislocation (PHFD) is a challenging clinical problem. Outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of these injuries have not been widely reported. The purpose of this analysis is to report our experience with ORIF of PHFD.

METHODS

A retrospective review of our 2 institutions' shoulder surgery databases was conducted to identify all PHFDs that were treated with ORIF from 2008 through 2017. Radiographs were reviewed for fracture healing by 12 weeks postoperatively. All reoperations were recorded. Patient-reported outcomes using Simple Shoulder Test (SST) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) scores at a minimum 2-year follow-up were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 20 PHFDs identified: they were 50% male, 55.8 ± 10.3 years old (range 31.3-66.3), and had a body mass index of 29.3 ± 8.2 (15.2-47.8). Seven (35%) patients experienced varus collapse, nonunion, or avascular necrosis and 6 (30%) patients underwent reoperation. Of the 17 patients who did not go on to revision or arthroplasty, 14 (82.3%) had patient-reported outcomes at a mean follow-up of 4.9 ± 2.2 years (2.3-8.8). These patients had an average SST 8.0±4.0 yes responses (0-12) and ASES scores of 71.6 ± 20.4 (20.2-94.9).

CONCLUSION

ORIF of PHFD carries a high rate of reoperation. In patients who achieve healing, functional scores are satisfactory. This information is important for proper patient counseling prior to surgery.

The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II

Background

Globally, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has moved away from the Grammont design to modern prosthesis designs. The purpose of this study was to provide a focused, updated systematic review for each of the most common complications of RSA by limiting each search to publications after 2010. In this part II, the following were examined: (1) instability, (2) humerus/glenoid fracture, (3) acromial/scapular spine fractures (AF/SSF), and (4) problems/miscellaneous.

Methods

Four separate PubMed database searches were performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Overall, 137 studies for instability, 94 for humerus/glenoid fracture, 120 for AF/SSF, and 74 for problems/miscellaneous were included in each review, respectively. Univariate analysis was performed with chi-square and Fisher exact tests.

Results

The Grammont design had a higher instability rate vs. all other designs combined (4.0%, 1.3%; P < .001), and the onlay humerus design had a lower rate than the lateralized glenoid design (0.9%, 2.0%; P = .02). The rate for intraoperative humerus fracture was 1.8%; intraoperative glenoid fracture, 0.3%; postoperative humerus fracture, 1.2%; and postoperative glenoid fracture, 0.1%. The rate of AF/SSF was 2.6% (371/14235). The rate for complex regional pain syndrome was 0.4%; deltoid injury, 0.1%; hematoma, 0.3%; and heterotopic ossification, 0.8%.

Conclusions

Focused systematic reviews of recent literature with a large volume of shoulders demonstrate that using non-Grammont modern prosthesis designs, complications including instability, intraoperative humerus and glenoid fractures, and hematoma are significantly reduced compared with previous studies. As the indications continue to expand for RSA, it is imperative to accurately track the rate and types of complications in order to justify its cost and increased indications.