Right-sided upper abdomen single-incision laparoscopic gastric banding

Preliminary experience of single-incision laparoscopic placement of adjustable gastric band in adolescents: Safe and feasible

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery seems particularly suited to adolescents in view of the cosmetic improvements it provides. This study reports on our first experience of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for adjustable gastric banding (SILS-AGB) using a single-trocar approach and evaluates its safety and efficacy as compared with conventional four-trocar laparoscopy.

METHODS

The data of adolescent patients who underwent SILS-AGB or conventional laparoscopy for adjustable gastric banding (CL-AGB) between 2014 and 2019 in our center were reviewed. Pre- and postoperative data on weight- and obesity-associated comorbidities were used to assess the efficacy of the surgical intervention. Perioperative and postoperative data on the duration of surgery, use of analgesics, hospital stay, and complications were compared between the SILS and CL groups along with an assessment of scar quality.

RESULTS

Overall, 12 patients, with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 43.3 kg/m-² (37.0-55.5) at surgery were included in the SILS-AGB group and compared with 14 patients who underwent classic laparoscopy (CL-AGB group) and had an initial BMI of 39.5 kg/m-² (32.0-49.8). Median surgery time was 82 min (55-140) in the CL-AGB group and 106 min (75-159) in the SILS-AGB group (p = 0.04). Postoperative recovery was better in the SILS-AGB group with a mean duration of level-3 intravenous analgesia of 1.8 ± 0.4 days (vs. 2.4 ± 0.6 days, p = 0.02) and a median duration of hospitalization of 2 days (2-3) versus 3 days (2-5) (p = 0.0005). Mid-term follow-up showed equivalent efficacy in terms of weight loss, with a mean BMI at 12 months of 38.5 ± 6.0 kg m-1kg m-1² in both groups, and resolution of hyperinsulinism (92.3 % before surgery vs. 48 % at 6 months).

CONCLUSION

SILS for AGB placement appears to be as safe and effective as CL despite a slightly longer operative time. SILS was associated with faster recovery and better cosmetic results with a single scar.

It is time for a better clip applier - 3 mm, percutaneous, non-crushing and locking

INTRODUCTION

Since the advent of laparoscopy there have been attempts to minimize abdominal wall incisions. For this purpose smaller instruments have been produced. Our aim was to develop the first 3 mm percutaneous clip applier and to make it better than the standard clips of today.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The ClipTip clip is made of Nitinol and has a crocodile shaped jaws, which when apposed effectively seal vessels. The shaft operates as a retractable needle permitting percutaneous insertion. Closing, reopening and reclosing is possible. The physical properties of the device were compared to three commercially available clip appliers. Surgeries were performed on porcine animals by experienced surgeons.

RESULTS

In comparison to available clips, the superiority of the ClipTip is a combination of wide effective length alongside the ability to withstand strong forces. In live animal studies the Cliptip was inserted into the peritoneal cavity without any injuries. Vessels were ligated successfully and no clip dislodgement or leakage occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed the next generation clip applier with better properties. Advantages include its length, the needleoscopic caliber, non-crushing effect, locking mechanism and wide aperture. The device has performed safely and effectively in pre-clinical tests. Further studies are planned in humans.

Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is an effective and popular bariatric surgery for weight loss in obese patients that traditionally involves up to 5 incisions. Recently, a more minimally invasive single-incision technique has been developed. In this retrospective study, we compare conventional and single-incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding with regard to weight loss and complication rates in a cohort of demographically similar patients.

METHODS

From February 2009 to February 2010, 59 patients underwent laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding by one surgeon at an outpatient surgery center. All patients were compared by age, sex, preoperative body mass index, 30-day complication rates, and excess weight loss. Thirty-seven operations were performed by a conventional, 5-incision technique, whereas 22 patients underwent the single-incision technique. The success of these techniques was determined by comparing complication rates and average percentage excess weight loss at 6-month follow-up intervals.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent conventional laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding had a mean age of 41.2 years and preoperative body mass index of 48.2 kg/m(2) compared with 43.9 years and 40.3 kg/m(2), respectively, for the single-incision patients. The mean operative time in the single-incision group was longer than that in the conventional group: 47.1 minutes versus 37.4 minutes (P = .0027). The overall percentage excess weight loss was not statistically different between the 2 groups for each follow-up period. There were no complications or deaths in either group.

CONCLUSION

Although patients undergoing bariatric surgery may choose the single-incision technique for cosmetic purposes, this retrospective review comparing single-incision and conventional laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding shows longer operative times with equivalent weight loss and morbidity.

Single and multiple incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a matched comparison

BACKGROUND

Single incision laparoscopic bariatric surgery has developed over the last few years, with single incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (SILS-AGB) being performed most commonly. However, there are no randomised controlled trials and few matched studies comparing SILS-AGB to conventional laparoscopic multi-port multiport adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). Our aim was to study any differences in outcome and analgesic requirements between two matched groups of gastric band patients (SILS-AGB and LAGB).

METHODS

Between June 2009 and September 2010, 111 patients underwent SILS-AGB and 99 patients underwent LAGB performed by a single surgeon (AGP). Patients were matched for age, sex, weight, BMI and co-morbidities. Forty six SILS-AGB and LAGB patients were included for analysis. Their outcomes were compared for operating times, conversions, analgesia requirements, morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

Patients characteristics between the SILS-AGB and LAGB groups were similar with no differences in their median age (44 vs 47 years), sex (m:f; 7:39 vs 4:42), body mass index (43.1 vs 44.4 kg/m(2)) or co morbidities respectively. In the SILS-AGB group the median operating time (70 min) was not significantly longer than in LAGB group (61.5 min, p = 0.07). However, SILS-AGB patients used less opiates (p < 0.01) than the LAGB patients. There was no difference in morbidity, mortality or readmission rates.

CONCLUSION

SILS-AGB is a safe and feasible option and is comparable with LAGB. Post operative demand for analgesia was significantly less in the SILS-AGB group. Further comparisons of post operative pain and long term outcomes are required; however preliminary results are promising.

Single-access laparoscopic adjustable gastric band removal: technique and initial experience

BACKGROUND

Single-access laparoscopy (SAL) has gained significant interest in recent years. Potential benefits, beyond cosmetic outcomes, could be reduction of abdominal trauma, decreased risk of incisional hernia and diminished postoperative pain. Technique and initial experience in patients submitted to laparoscopic adjustable gastric band removal (LAGBR) through SAL is reported here.

METHODS

Between December 2009 and March 2012, 14 patients (9 females, 5 males) underwent LAGBR through SAL. Indications for operation were band intolerance (11), pouch dilatation (2) and insufficient weight loss (1). The mean age was 40.3 ± 9.1 years (range 26-57), and the mean interval time between LAGB placement and removal was 94.7 ± 41.9 months (range 37-157). The mean weight and the mean body mass index at the time of LAGBR were 89.3 ± 17.6 kg (range 65-119) and 30.6 ± 4.5 kg/m(2) (range 25.3-36.7), respectively. Technically, the previous port site scar was used as the single-access site to the abdominal cavity. An 11-mm reusable trocar was adopted for a 10-mm regular scope, besides curved reusable instruments.

RESULTS

No patients required conversion to open surgery and none necessitated additional trocars. The mean laparoscopic time was 24.6 ± 7.9 min (range 13-37), and the mean final scar length was 3.6 ± 0.3 cm (range 3-4). Two patients experienced early postoperative complications. The mean hospital stay was 1.3 ± 1.1 days (range 1-5). The mean follow-up time was of 18 ± 9.8 months (range 3-30), and there were no late complications.

CONCLUSIONS

LAGBR can be safely performed through SAL. Thanks to this technique, the laparoscopic working triangulation is established as well as the ergonomic positions of the surgeon. Due the use of only reusable material, the cost of this SAL remains similar to multiport laparoscopy.

Single-incision laparoscopic bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery has been established as the best option of treatment for morbid obesity. In recent years single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has emerged as another modality of carrying out the bariatric procedures. While SILS represents an advance, its application in morbid obesity at present is limited. In this article, we review the technique and results of SILS in bariatric surgery.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched and totally 11 series reporting SILS in bariatric surgery were identified and analyzed. The case reports were excluded. Since 2008, 114 morbidly obese patients receiving SILS bariatric surgeries were reported.

RESULTS

The procedures performed included SILS gastric banding, sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass. No mortality was reported in the literatures. Sixteen patients (14.05%) needed an additional incision for a liver retractor, a trocar or for conversion. Only one complication of wound infection was reported in these series. All the surgeons reported that the patients were highly satisfied with the scar.

CONCLUSION

Because of abundant visceral and subcutaneous fat and multiple comorbidities in morbid obesity, it is more challenging for surgeons to perform the procedures with SILS. It is clear that extensive development of new instruments and technical aspects of these procedures as well as randomized studies to compare them with traditional laparoscopy are essential before these procedures can be utilized in day-to-day clinical practice.

Single incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: 111 cases

BACKGROUND

As single incision surgery increases in popularity, the feasibility of offering this approach in bariatric surgery is further progression of this surgical technique. With the technical challenges that both operating on the morbidly obese patient and single incision surgery present, we describe our initial experience undertaking 111 single-incision gastric band insertions.

METHODS

From June 2009 to October 2010, 111 obese patients underwent single-incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding through a single transverse incision using a multichannel single port and a pars flaccida technique. Prospective data collection was undertaken, including visual analog scores.

RESULTS

In this initial series, the median operative time was 65 minutes (range 34-165). There was 1 conversion to a 5-port laparoscopic technique (.9%), and an additional port was placed in 7 patients (6%). Male patients were more likely to require an additional port (P < .05). The single-incision size ranged from 26 to 45 mm (median 35). At 23 hours postoperatively, the median pain score was 2.5 on a 0-10 visual analog score. On multivariate analysis, pain was found to increase with operation time (P < .001). The median length of stay was 24 hours (range 5.5-48). There was no mortality and minimal morbidity, with 1 wound infection necessitating band removal.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding can be performed safely with minimal morbidity and mortality in the morbidly obese patient, and our technique has a high rate of success. The benefits compared with the traditional laparoscopic approach and long-term outcomes are yet to be established. However, if the intra-abdominal operative time is >60 minutes, one should consider the placement of an additional port, especially in male patients.